Peat properties of a tropical forest reserve adjacent to a fire-break canal

Dayang Nur Sakinah Musa1,2, Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir1(), Xinyan Huang4, Luqman Chuah Abdullah1, Mohamad Syazaruddin Md Said1, Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman3

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 29. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-023-01679-2

Peat properties of a tropical forest reserve adjacent to a fire-break canal

  • Dayang Nur Sakinah Musa1,2, Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir1(), Xinyan Huang4, Luqman Chuah Abdullah1, Mohamad Syazaruddin Md Said1, Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Tropical peat comprises decomposed dead plant material and acts like a sponge to absorb water, making it fully saturated. However, drought periods dry it readily and increases its vulnerability to fire. Peat fires emit greenhouse gases and particles contributing to haze, and prevention by constructing fire-break canals to reduce fire spread into forest reserves is crucial. This paper aims to determine peat physical and chemical properties near a fire-break canal at different fire frequency areas. Peat sampling was conducted at two forest reserves in Malaysia which represent low fire frequency and high fire frequency areas. The results show that peat properties were not affected by the construction of a fire-break canal, however lignin and cellulose content increased significantly from the distance of the canal in both areas. The study concluded that fire frequency did not significantly influence peat properties except for porosity. The higher fibre content in the high frequency area did not influence moisture content nor the ability to regain moisture. Thus, fire frequency might contribute differently to changes in physical and chemical properties, hence management efforts to construct fire- break canals and restoration efforts should protect peatlands from further degradation. These findings will benefit future management and planning for forest reserves.

Keywords

Peat fire / Peat properties / Fire-break canals / Forest reserves

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dayang Nur Sakinah Musa, Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir, Xinyan Huang, Luqman Chuah Abdullah, Mohamad Syazaruddin Md Said, Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman. Peat properties of a tropical forest reserve adjacent to a fire-break canal. Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, 35(1): 29 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01679-2

References

[1]
Afdeni S, Sutikno S, Handayani YL (2016) Analisis Indeks Kekeringan Meteorologis Lahan Gambut Di Pulau Bengkalis. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa JOM Bidang Teknik dan Sains 4(2):1–10
[2]
Agus F, Hairiah K, Mulyani A (2011) Measuring carbon stock in peat soils: practical guidelines. Bogor, Indonesia: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia regional program, indonesian centre for agricultural land resources research and development. p 60.
[3]
Basintal A, Matunjau C, Freddie KTK, Jaini M, Angampun G, Malim P, Harim W (2007) ‘Klias forest reserve conservation plan.’ Sabah Forestry Department.
[4]
Bor?vka L, Donátová H, Něme?ek K (2002) Spatial distribution and correlation of soil properties in a field: a case study. Plant Soil Environ 48:425–432. https://doi.org/10.17221/4391-pse
[5]
Che Azmi NA, Mohd Apandi N, Ahmad AS (2021) Carbon emissions from the peat fire problem—a review. Environ Sci Pollut R 28:16948–16961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12886-x
[6]
Darusman T, Murdiyarso D, Impron I, Chaniago IA, Lestari DP (2022) Carbon dynamics in rewetted tropical peat swamp forests. Climate 10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10030035
[7]
Davies GM, Gray A, Rein G, Legg CJ (2013) Peat consumption and carbon loss due to smouldering wildfire in a temperate peatland. For Ecol Manag 308:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.051
[8]
Dlapa P, Bodí MB, Mataix-Solera J, Cerdà A, Doerr SH (2013) FT-IR spectroscopy reveals that ash water repellency is highly dependent on ash chemical composition. CATENA 108:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.011
[9]
Duchaufour P (1982) Hydromorphic soils. ‘Pedology’. Springer, Dordrecht, p 335 doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6003-2_12.
[10]
Gabriel M, Toader C, Faul F, Ro?kopf N, Grundling P, Huyssteen C, Grundling AT, Zeitz J (2018) Physical and hydrological properties of peat as proxies for degradation of south African peatlands: implications for conservation and restoration. Mires Peat 21:1–21. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2018.OMB.336
[11]
Girkin NT, Vane CH, Cooper HV, Moss-Hayes V, Craigon J, Turner BL, Ostle N, Sj?gersten S (2019) Spatial variability of organic matter properties determines methane fluxes in a tropical forested peatland. Biogeochemistry 142:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0531-1
[12]
Granath G, Moore PA, Lukenbach MC, Waddington JM (2016) Mitigating wildfire carbon loss in managed northern peatlands through restoration. Sci Rep UK 6(1):28498. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28498
[13]
Hamada Y, Tsuji N, Kojima Y, Qirom M, Sulaiman A, Firmanto, Jagau Y, Irawan D, Naito R, Nirmala Sari E (2016) ‘Guidebook for estimating carbon emissions from tropical peatlands in Indonesia.’ Indonesia-Japan Project for Development of REDD+ Implementation Mechanism. https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/indonesia/015/materials/c8h0vm0000c2fxdl-att/materials_01.pdf
[14]
Handayani EP, Maswar M (2019) Soil physicochemical properties in oil palm plantations impacted to peatland fire. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 336(1):012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/336/1/012021
[15]
Huang X, Rein G, Chen H (2015) Computational smoldering combustion: predicting the roles of moisture and inert contents in peat wildfires. P Combust Inst 35(3):2673–2681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.048
[16]
Iglovikov A, Motorin A (2019) Composition of organic matter in peat soils of the northern trans-Urals depending on groundwater level. E3S Web Conf 135:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913501004
[17]
Junedi H, Kurniawan Mastur A, Ar DA (2021) Study of the critical limits of the ground water for peatland fire prevention. In The 3rd green development international conference (GDIC 2020). Atlantis Press, pp 461–465.
[18]
Kettridge N, Humphrey RE, Smith JE, Lukenbach MC, Devito KJ, Petrone RM, Waddington JM (2014) Burned and unburned peat water repellency: Implications for peatland evaporation following wildfire. J Hydrol 513:335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.019
[19]
K?n?nen M, Jauhiainen J, Laiho R, Kusin K, Vasander H (2015) Physical and chemical properties of tropical peat under stabilised land uses. Mires Peat 16(8):1–13
[20]
Leng LY, Ahmed OH, Jalloh MB (2019) Brief review on climate change and tropical peatlands. Geosci Front 10(2):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.12.018
[21]
McMorrow JM, Evans MG, Cutler ME (2003) The effect of moisture content and humification on the hyperspectral reflectance of peat. In: Proc. Remote Sensing and Photogrammetric Society (RSPSoc) Conference, Nottingham, CDROM. Nottingham: RSPSoc, pp 10–12.
[22]
Munawi MK (2014) Integrated management plan for north selangor peat swamp forest 2014–2023. Selangor State Forestry Department.
[23]
Nelson K, Thompson D, Hopkinson C, Petrone R, Chasmer L (2021) Peatland-fire interactions: a review of wildland fire feedback and interactions in Canadian boreal peatlands. Sci Total Environ 769:145212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145212
[24]
Noble A, Palmer SM, Glaves DJ, Crowle A, Holden J (2017) Impacts of peat bulk density, ash deposition and rainwater chemistry on establishment of peatland mosses. Plant Soil 419:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3325-7
[25]
Perdana LR, Ratnasari NG, Ramadhan ML, Palamba P, Nasruddin NYS (2018) Hydrophilic and hydrophobic characteristics of dry peat. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 105(1):012083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012083
[26]
Rein G (2009) Smouldering combustion phenomena in science and technology. Int Rev Chem Eng 1:3–18
[27]
Rein G, Huang X (2021) Smouldering wildfires in peatlands, forests and the arctic: challenges and perspectives. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 24:100296
[28]
Rein G (2013) Smouldering fires and natural fuels. Fire phenomena and the Earth system: an interdisciplinary guide to fire science. CM Belcher (ed). John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, pp 15–33
[29]
Santoso MA, Cui W, Amin HMF, Christensen EG, Nugroho YS, Rein G (2021) Laboratory study on the suppression of smouldering peat wildfires: effects of flow rate and wetting agent. Int J Wildland Fire 30(5):378–390. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20117
[30]
SFD (2017) Annual Report 2017. Sabah Forestry Department. http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/docs/ar/ar2017.pdf.
[31]
SFD (2019) Annual Report 2019. Sabah Forestry Department. http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/docs/ar/SFD.AR2019.pdf.
[32]
SFD (2020) Annual Report 2020. Sabah Forestry Department. http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/docs/ar/SFD.AR2018.pdf.
[33]
Sinclair AL, Graham LL, Putra EI, Saharjo BH, Applegate G, Grover SP, Cochran MA (2020) Effects of distance from canal and degradation history on peat bulk density in a degraded tropical peatland. Sci Total Environ 699:134199
[34]
Sutikno S, Nasrul B, Gunawan H, Jayadi R, Saputra E, Yamamoto K (2019) The effectiveness of canal blocking for hydrological restoration in tropical peatland. MATEC Web Conf 276:06003. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20192760
[35]
Szajdak LW, Jezierski A, Wegner K, Meysner T, Szczepanski M (2020) Influence of drainage on peat organic matter: and Transformation. Molecules 25(11):2587
[36]
Tata HL, Pradjadinata S (2016) Native species for degraded peat swamp forest rehabilitation. J Trop Silvic 7(3):S80–S82. https://doi.org/10.29244/j-siltrop.7.3.s80-s82
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/