Effects of site preparation methods on soil physical properties and outplanting success of coniferous seedlings in boreal forests

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of patch scarification and mounding on the physical properties of the root layer and the success of tree planting in various types of forests. This study was conducted on 12 forest sites in taiga forests of the European part of Russia. A total of 54 plots were set up to assess seedling survival; root collar diameter, height, and heigh increment were measured for 240 seedlings to assess growth. In the rooting layer, 240 soil samples were taken to determine physical properties. The study showed that soil treatment methods had no effect on bulk density and total porosity in Cladina sites. However, reduced soil moisture was noted, particularly in mounds, resulting in increased aeration. In Myrtillus sites, there were increased bulk density, reduced soil moisture, and total porosity in the mounds. Mounding treatment in Polytrichum sites resulted in reduced soil moisture and increased aeration porosity. In the Myrtillus and Polytrichum sites, patch scarification had no effects on physical properties. In Polytrichum sites, survival rates, heights, and heigh increments of bareroot Norway spruce seedlings in mounds were higher than in patches; however, the same did not apply to diameter. In Cladina and Myrtillus sites, there was no difference in growth for bareroot and containerised seedlings with different soil treatments. Growing conditions and soil types should be considered when applying different soil treatment methods to ensure high survival rates and successful seedling growth.

Keywords

Boreal forests / Mechanical site preparation / Patch scarification / Mounding / Soil properties / Containerised seedlings / Bareroot seedlings

References

[1]	Babich NA, Sungurov RV, Sungurova NR (2006) Forest crops in the northern taiga subzone: monograph. Solombal'skaya tipografiya, Arkhangelsk, p 144
[2]	Bartenev IM (2013) On the question of creation of forest cultures by PMCR planting. For Eng J 2:123–130
[3]	Burton P, Bedford L, Goldstein M, Osberg M (2000) Effects of disk trench orientation and planting spot position on the ten-year performance of lodgepole pine. New for 20(1):23–44
[4]	Cardoso JC, Burton PJ, Elkin CM (2020) A disturbance ecology perspective on silvicultural site preparation. Forests 11(12):1278
[5]	Celma S, Blate K, Lazdi?a D, Dūmi?? K, Neimane S, ?tāls TA, ?tikāne K (2019) Effect of soil preparation method on root development of P. sylvestris and P. abies saplings in commercial forest stands. New for 50:283–290
[6]	de Chantal M, Leinonen K, Ilvesniemi H, Westman CJ (2003) Combined effects of site preparation, soil properties, and sowing date on the establishment of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies from seeds. Can J for Res 33(5):931–945
[7]	Debkov NM (2021) Experience in the creation of forest plantations using container seedlings. Russ for J 5:192–200
[8]	Duan J, Abduwali D (2021) Basic theory and methods of afforestation. Intechopen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96164
[9]	Dumins K, Lazdina D (2018) Forest regeneration quality—factors affecting first year survival of planted trees. Res Rural Dev 1:53–58
[10]	Dymov AA, Lapteva EM (2006) Changes in podzolic soils on bilayered deposits under the influence of felling. Russ J for Sci 3:42–49
[11]	Gladinov AN, Konovalova EV, Sodboeva SCh (2021) Results of a comparative analysis of the use of Scots pine seedlings with open and closed root system under artificial forest recovery in the conditions of Western Transbaikalie. Adv Curr Nat Sci 11:7–12
[12]	H?ggstr?m B, Domevscik M, ?hlund J, Nordin A (2021) Survival and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings in north Sweden: effects of planting position and arginine phosphate addition. Scand J for Res 36(6):423–433
[13]	Hallsby G, ?rlander GA (2004) Comparison of mounding and inverting to establish Norway spruce on podzolic soils in Sweden. Forestry 77(2):107–117
[14]	Hattori D, Tanaka K, Irino KO, Kendawang JJ, Ninomiya I, Sakurai K (2013) Effects of soil compaction on the growth and mortality of planted dipterocarp seedlings in a logged-over tropical rainforest in Sarawak Malaysia. For Ecol Manag 310:770–776
[15]	Hébert SS, Serneels L, Tolia A, Craessaerts K, Derks C, Filippov MA, Müller U, De Strooper B (2006) Regulated intramembrane proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein and regulation of expression of putative target genes. EMBO Rep 7(7):739–745
[16]	Holmstr?m E, G?lnander H, Petersson M (2019) Within-site variation in seedling survival in Norway spruce plantations. Forests 10(2):181
[17]	Ilintsev A, Bogdanov A, Nakvasina E, Amosova I, Koptev S, Tretyakov S (2020) The natural recovery of disturbed soil, plant cover and trees after clear-cutting in the Boreal Forests. Russia Iforest 13:531–540
[18]	IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. In: World Soil Resources Reports no. 106, FAO, Rome, Italy, p 181
[19]	J??rats A, Tullus A (2018) The effect of planting stock and soil scarification on forest regeneration. For Stud 69(1):75–85
[20]	Karpechko AYu (2008) Changes in density and root mass in soils under the influence of harvesting machines in spruce forests of Southern Karelia. Russ J for Sci 5:66–70
[21]	Kikeeva AV, Novichonok EV, Kharitonov VA, Kryshen’ AM, (2022) Features of the root system development in Picea Abies (L.) H. Karst. seedlings planted under shelterwood in a moist bilberry spruce forest depending on soil preparation methods. Trans KarRC RAS 3:28–41
[22]	Knapp BO, Wang GG, Walker JL (2008) Relating the survival and growth of planted longleaf pine seedlings to microsite conditions altered by site preparation treatments. For Ecol Manag 255(11):3768–3777
[23]	Ko?uli? O, Procházka J, Tuf IH, Michalko R (2021) Intensive site preparation for reforestation wastes multi-trophic biodiversity potential in commercial oak woodlands. J Environ Manage 300:113741
[24]	Kozlowski TT (1985) Soil aeration, flooding and tree growth. J of Arboric 11:85–96
[25]	L?f M, Dey DC, Navarro RM, Jacobs DF (2012) Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration. New for 43:825–848
[26]	Luoranen J, Viiri H (2016) Deep planting decreases risk of drought damage and increases growth of Norway spruce container seedlings. New for 47:701–714
[27]	Mc Carthy R, Rytter L, Hjelm K (2017) Effects of soil preparation methods and plant types on the establishment of poplars on forest land. Ann for Sci 74:47
[28]	Merzlenko MD, Babich NA (2002) Theory and practice of growing pine and spruce in crops. Publishing House Arhang.gos.tekhn. un–ta, Arkhangelsk, p 220
[29]	Mochalov BA (2014) Soil cultivation and selection planting site attached to pine artificial stands creation from containerized seedlings. Russ for J 4:9–18
[30]	Mochalov BA, Senkov AO (2007) Growth of bare-root and containerized pine seedlings in cultures of taiga zone. Russ for J 4:145–147
[31]	Morozov AE, Baturin SV (2020) Efficiency of forest recovery on continuous felling after application of complexes multi-operation forestry machines in the conditions of Bead forestry of the Perm region. For Russ Econ 2(73):50–57
[32]	Nilsson U, Luoranen J, Kolstr?m T, ?rlander G, Puttonen P (2010) Reforestation with planting in northern Europe. Scand J for Res 25(4):283–294
[33]	Nilsson O, Hjelm K, Nilsson U (2019) Early growth of planted Norway spruce and Scots pine after site preparation in Sweden. Scand J for Res 34:678–688
[34]	Novichonok EV, Galibina NA, Kharitonov VA, Kikeeva AV, Nikerova KM, Sofronova IN, Rumyantsev AS (2020) Effect of site preparation under shelterwood on Norway spruce seedlings. Scand J for Res 35(8):523–531
[35]	Nzokou P, Cregg BM (2010) Morphology and foliar chemistry of containerized Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. Seedlings as affected by water availability and nutrition. Ann for Sci 67:602
[36]	Osman KT (2013) Forest soils: properties and management. Springer, Switzerland, p 217
[37]	Page-Dumroese DS, Harvey AE, Jurgensen MF, Amaranthus MP (1998) Impacts of soil compaction and tree stump removal on soil properties and outplanted seedlings in northern Idaho, USA. Can J Forest Res 78:29–34
[38]	Pall R, Mohsenin NN (1980) A soil air pycnometer for determination of porosity and particle density. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 23:735–741
[39]	Parshevnikov AL (1966) On soils on the eluvia of red-colored marl. Eurasian Soil Sci 5:28–34
[40]	Perumal M, Wasli ME, Ying HS, Lat J, Sani H (2015) Soil morphological and physicochemical properties at reforestation sites after enrichment planting of shorea macrophylla in sampadi forest reserve, sarawak. Malays Borneo J Resour Sci Technol 5(2):28–43
[41]	Saksa T, Heiskanen J, Miina J, Tuomola J, Kolstrom T (2005) Multilevel modelling of height growth in young Norway spruce plantations in southern Finland. Silva Fenn 39(1):143–153
[42]	Shein EV (2005) Course of soil physics. MSU Publ, Moscow, p 432
[43]	Sikstr?m U, Hjelm K, Holt Hanssen K, Saksa T, Wallertz K (2020) Influence of mechanical site preparation on regeneration success of planted conifers in clearcuts Fennoscandia—a review. Silva Fenn 54(2):1–35
[44]	Sklyarov GA, Sharova AS (1970) The soils of the North European forests. Nauka, Moscow, p 268
[45]	Sokolov AI (2006) Reforestation in the clearcuts of the North-West of Russia. KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, p 215
[46]	Sukachev VN (1964) Fundamentals of forest biogeocenology. Nauka, Moskow, p 571
[47]	Sutton RF (1993) Mounding site preparation: a review of European and North American experience. New for 7(2):151–192
[48]	Tsyribko VB (2016) Determination of the optimal parameters of soil agrophysical properties and assessment of the current status based on them. Soil Sci Agrochem 1:36–44
[49]	Varfolomeev LA, Sungurov RV (2007) Soil ecology of forest crops in the North. Arkhangelsk, p 291
[50]	Zhigunov AV, Shevchuk SV (2006) Forest cultures of pine and spruce from planting material grown by combined method. Russ for J 6:13–19
[51]	Zhigunov AV (2000) Theory and practice of containerized planting material growing. St.-Petersburg, p 294