ENSO impacts on litter stocks and water holding capacity in secondary forests in eastern Amazonia

Abstract

Among the impacts of climate change, there is the intensification of phenomena such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) responsible for El Niño and La Niña. However, understanding their effects on the functional processes of forests is limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of ENSO on litter stock and water holding capacity (WHC) in a successional forest in eastern Amazonia. Evaluations occurred in periods with the most rainfall in El Niño (2019) and least in La Niña (2021) years. Twelve permanent plots were used to sample litter. ENSO effects were evident for WHC, higher during El Niño. However, this influence was not clear for litter, as only in the rainy season effects were found. There was a positive correlation of WHC with precipitation and humidity, while litter stocks were negatively correlated with temperature and wind speed. Although the subject of this study requires long-term assessments, preliminary results suggests that, depending on the intensity of ENSO, forest functional processes can be strongly impacted and altered. The conclusion reinforces warnings by the scientific community about the impacts of climate change on the maintenance of litter stocks, decomposition and, consequently, the biogeochemical cycle and essential ecosystem services for the maintenance of Amazonia biodiversity. The need to develop long-term research to understand the effects of climatic change on litter stocks and water holding capacity is highlighted, especially in Amazonia.

Keywords

Seasonality / Climate change / Succession ecosystem / Biogeochemical cycle / Amazonia biodiversity

References

[1]	Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gon?alves JL, Sparovek G (2013) K?ppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
[2]	Antala M, Juszczak R, van der Tol C, Rastogi A (2022) Impact of climate change-induced alterations in peatland vegetation phenology and composition on carbon balance. Sci Total Environ 827:154294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154294
[3]	Barros TC, Elias F, Romano LL, Ferreira J (2020) Natural recovery of plant species diversity in secondary forests in Eastern Amazonia: contributions to passive forest restoration. Rev Bras Bot 43:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-020-00585-9
[4]	Blow FE (1955) Quantity and hydrologic characteristics of litter upland oak forest in Eastern Tennessee. J For 53:190–195
[5]	Brando P, Macedo M, Silvério D, Rattis L, Paolucci L, Alencar A, Coe M, Amorim C (2020) Amazon wildfires: scenes from a foreseeable disaster. Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 268:151609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151609
[6]	Bufacchi P, Bizzo WA, Buckeridge MS, Franco-Jacome DL, Grandis A, Cambler AB, Filho GCK (2020) Thermal degradation of leaves from the Amazon rainforest litter considering non-structural, structural carbohydrates and lignin composition. Bioresour Technol Rep 11:100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100490
[7]	Caldeira MVW, de GodinhoMoreira TOFL, Campanharo LF, Castro KC, Mendon?a A, Trazzi PA (2019) Litter as an ecological indicator of forest restoration processes in a dense Ombrophylous lowland forest. Floresta e Ambient 26:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.041118
[8]	Cox PM, Betts RA, Collins M, Harris PP, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2004) Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theor Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0049-4
[9]	Cuevas E, Medina E (1986) Nutrient dynamics within amazonian forest ecosystems—I. Nutrient flux in fine litter fall and efficiency of nutrient utilization. Oecologia 68:466–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036756
[10]	de Moura YM, Galv?o LS, Hilker T, Wu J, Saleska S, do Amaral CH, Nelson BW, Lopes AP, Wiedeman KK, Prohaska N, de Oliveira RC, Machado CB, Arag?o LEOC (2017) Spectral analysis of amazon canopy phenology during the dry season using a tower hyperspectral camera and modis observations. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 131:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.006
[11]	de Tenório ARM, da Gra?a JJC, Góes JEM, Mendez JR, Gama JRNF, da Silva PRO, das Chagas PSM, da Silva RNP, Americo RR, Pereira WLM (1999) Mapeamento dos solos da esta??o de piscicultura de Castanhal. FCAP, Belém
[12]	Dong X, Li F, Lin Z, Harrison SP, Chen Y, Kug JS (2021) Climate influence on the 2019 fires in Amazonia. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148718
[13]	dos Santos Jr HB, Araújo EAA, de Rodrigues JIM, Martins WBR, Rangel-Vasconcelos LGT, de Oliveira FA (2021) Fitossociologia e propriedades físicas da liteira em um ecossistema sucessional alterado pela agricultura itinerante na Amaz?nia oriental. Sci Plena 17:1–16. https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2021.060202
[14]	Espinoza JC, Marengo JA, Schongart J, Jimenez JC (2022) The new historical flood of 2021 in the Amazon river compared to major floods of the 21st century: atmospheric features in the context of the intensification of floods. Weather Clim Extrem 35(11):100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100406
[15]	Garcia MN, Ferreira MJ, Ivanov V, dos Santos VAHF, Ceron JV, Guedes AV, Saleska SR, Oliveira RS (2021) Importance of hydraulic strategy trade-offs in structuring response of canopy trees to extreme drought in central Amazon. Oecologia 197:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04924-9
[16]	Heinimann A, Mertz O, Frolking S, Christensen AE, Hurni K, Sedano F, Chini LP, Sahajpal R, Hansen M, Hurtt G (2017) A global view of shifting cultivation: Recent, current, and future extent. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184479
[17]	INMET Instituo Nacional de Meteorologia (2021) Tabela de dados das esta??es. https://tempo.inmet.gov.br/TabelaEstacoes/A202. Accessed 5 Aug 2021
[18]	Innangi M, Menta C, Pinto S (2018) Integrating chemical, biological and soil fauna variables during beech leaf litter decay: a partial least squares approach for a comprehensive view of the decomposition process. Appl Soil Ecol 130:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.05.023
[19]	INPE Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (2021) Monitoramento dos focos de fogo ativo por países. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/queimadas/situacao-atual/estatisticas/estatisticas_paises/. Accessed 5 Aug 2021
[20]	Kimmins JP (1987) Forest ecology. Macmillan Publishing Company, London
[21]	Leal Filho W, Setti AFF, Azeiteiro UM, Lokupitiya E, Donkor FK, Etim NN, Matandirotya N, Olooto FM, Sharifi A, Nagy GJ, Djeki I (2022) An overview of the interactions between food production and climate change. Sci Total Environ 838:156438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156438
[22]	Lopes AP, Nelson BW, Wu J, de Alencastro Gra?a PML, Tavares JV, Prohaska N, Martins GA, Saleska SR (2016) Leaf flush drives dry season green-up of the Central Amazon. Remote Sens Environ 182:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.009
[23]	Martins WBR, Vale RL, Ferreira GC, Andrade VMS, Dionísio LFS, Rodrigues RP, Oliveira F, de Souza GMP (2018) Litterfall, litter stock and water holding capacity in post-mining forest restoration ecosystems, Eastern Amazon. Rev Bras Ciências Agrárias Brazilian J Agric Sci 13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v13i3a5546
[24]	Moon K, Duff TJ, Tolhurst KG (2019) Sub-canopy forest winds: understanding wind profiles for fire behaviour simulation. Fire Saf J 105:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.02.005
[25]	Morais TMO, Berenguer E, Barlow J, Fran?a F, Lennox GD, Malhi Y, Rossi LC, de Seixas MMM, Ferreira J (2021) Leaf-litter production in human-modified Amazonian forests following the El Ni?o-mediated drought and fires of 2015–2016. For Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119441
[26]	Moura MM, dos Santos AR, Pezzopane JEM, Alexandre RS, da Silva SF, Pimentel SM, de Andrade MSS, Silva FGR, Branco ERF, Moreira TR, da Silva RG, de Carvalho GR (2019) Relation of El Ni?o and La Ni?a phenomena to precipitation, evapotranspiration and temperature in the Amazon basin. Sci Total Environ 651:1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.242
[27]	Numata I, Khand K, Kjaersgaard J, Cochrane MA, Silva SS (2021) Forest evapotranspiration dynamics over a fragmented forest landscape under drought in southwestern Amazonia. Agric for Meteorol 306:108446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108446
[28]	Patharkar OR, Walker JC (2019) Connections between abscission, dehiscence, pathogen defense, drought tolerance, and senescence. Plant Sci 284:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.03.016
[29]	Queiroz MG, da Silva TGF, Zolnier S, de Souza CAA, de Souza LSB, Neto AJS, de Araújo GGL, Ferreira WPM (2019) Seasonal patterns of deposition litterfall in a seasonal dry tropical forest. Agric for Meteorol 279:107712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107712
[30]	R Development Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing v. 4. 2. 3
[31]	Rani V, Sreelekshmi S, Preethy CM, BijoyNandan S (2016) Phenology and litterfall dynamics structuring ecosystem productivity in a tropical mangrove stand on South West coast of India. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8:400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.02.008
[32]	Roe S, Streck C, Obersteiner M, Frank S, Griscom B, Drouet L, Fricko O, Gusti M, Harris N, Hasegawa T, Hausfather Z, Havlík P, House J, Nabuurs GJ, Popp A, Sánchez MJS, Sanderman J, Smith P, Stehfest E, Lawrence D (2019) Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat Clim Chang 9:817–828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9
[33]	Rosalem LMP, Wendland EC, Anache JAA (2019) Understanding the water dynamics on a tropical forest litter using a new device for interception measurement. Ecohydrology 12:e2058. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2058
[34]	Santos AFA, Carneiro ACP, Martinez DT, Caldeira SF (2017) Capacidade de reten??o hídrica do estoque de serapilheira de eucalipto. Floresta e Ambient 24:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.030315
[35]	Sim?es S, Gon?alves AL, Jones TH, Sousa JP, Canhoto C (2022) Air temperature more than drought duration affects litter decomposition under flow intermittency. Sci Total Environ 829:154666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154666
[36]	Taiz L, Zeiger E, M?ller IM, Murphy A (2017) Fisiologia e Desenvolvimento Vegetal, 6th edn. Artmed, Porto
[37]	Townsend A, Asner G, Cleveland C (2008) The biogeochemical heterogeneity of tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 23:424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.009
[38]	Xiao Q, McPherson EG (2016) Surface water storage capacity of twenty tree species in Davis, California. J Environ Qual 45:188–198. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.02.0092
[39]	Zhang KR, Zhu Q, LiuWang JXM, Zhou XL, Li MX (2019) Spatial and temporal variations of N2O emissions from global forest and grassland ecosystems. Agric for Meteorol 266–267:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.011