Temporal changes in mixing effects on litter decay and nitrogen release in a boreal riparian forest in northeastern China

Simin Wang1, Bo Liu2, Rui Li1, Xiaoxin Sun3,4, Rong Mao1,2()

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 1. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-023-01662-x
Original Paper

Temporal changes in mixing effects on litter decay and nitrogen release in a boreal riparian forest in northeastern China

  • Simin Wang1, Bo Liu2, Rui Li1, Xiaoxin Sun3,4, Rong Mao1,2()
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In riparian forests, litter decay provides essential energy and nutrients for both terrestrial and fluvial ecosystems. Litter mixing effects (LMEs) are crucial in regulating litter decay and nutrient dynamics, yet how LMEs change over time is unclear in riparian forests. In this study, leaf litter of three common species (Alnus sibirica Fisch. ex Turcz, Betula platyphylla Sukaczev, and Betula fruticosa Pall.) were mixed in an equal mass ratio and LMEs were measured for mass and nitrogen (N) remaining in whole litter mixtures over a 3-year period in a boreal riparian forest, northeastern China. LMEs were also assessed for component litter mass and N remaining by separating litter mixtures by species. During the decay of litter mixtures, antagonistic effects on mass and N remaining were dominant after one and two years of decay, whereas only additive effects were observed after three years. LMEs correlated negatively with functional diversity after the first and two years of decay but disappeared after three years. When sorting litter mixtures by species, non-additive LMEs on mass and N remaining decreased over incubation time. Moreover, non-additive LMEs were more frequent for litter of both B. platyphylla and B. fruticosa with lower N concentration than for A. sibirica litter with higher N concentration. These results indicate that incubation time is a key determinant of litter mixing effects during decay and highlight that late-stage litter mixture decay may be predicted from single litter decay dynamics in boreal riparian forests.

Keywords

Biodiversity / Litter quality / Litter mixtures / Synergistic effects / Functional diversity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Simin Wang, Bo Liu, Rui Li, Xiaoxin Sun, Rong Mao. Temporal changes in mixing effects on litter decay and nitrogen release in a boreal riparian forest in northeastern China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, 35(1): 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01662-x

References

[1]
Alonso A, López-Rojo N, Pérez J, Boyero L (2022) Functional consequences of alder and oak loss in stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol 67:1618–1630. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13965
[2]
Bonanomi G, Capodilupo M, Incerti G, Mazzoleni S (2014) Nitrogen transfer in litter mixture enhances decomposition rate, temperature sensitivity, and C quality changes. Plant Soil 381:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2119-4
[3]
Canessa R, van den Brink L, Berdugo MB, H?ttenschwiler S, Rios RS, Salda?a A, Tielb?rger K, Bader MY (2022) Trait functional diversity explains mixture effects on litter decomposition at the arid end of a climate gradient. J Ecol 110:2219–2231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13946
[4]
García-Palacios P, Shaw EA, Wall DH, H?ttenschwiler S (2017) Contrasting mass-ratio vs. niche complementarity effects on litter C and N loss during decomposition along a regional climatic gradient. J Ecol 105:968–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12730
[5]
Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, H?ttenschwiler S (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010
[6]
Gra?a MAS, B?rlocher F, Gessner MO (2005) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–60
[7]
H?ttenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932
[8]
Hiltbrunner E, Aerts R, Bühlmann T, Huss-Danell K, Magnusson B, Myrold DD, Reed SC, Sigurdsson BD, K?rner C (2014) Ecological consequences of the expansion of N2-fixing plants in cold biomes. Oecologia 176:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2991-x
[9]
Kominoski J, Marczak LB, Richardson JS (2011) Riparian forest composition affects stream litter decomposition despite similar microbial and invertebrate communities. Ecology 92:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0028.1
[10]
Kou L, Jiang L, H?ttenschwiler S, Zhang MM, Niu SL, Fu XL, Dai XQ, Yan H, Li SG, Wang HM (2020) Diversity-decomposition relationships in forests worldwide. eLife 9:e55813. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55813
[11]
Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1
[12]
Lecerf A, Marie G, Kominoski JS, LeRoy CJ, Bernadet C, Swan CM (2011) Incubation time, functional litter diversity, and habitat characteristics predict litter-mixing effects on decomposition. Ecology 92:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0315.1
[13]
Liu J, Liu XY, Song QN, Compson ZG, LeRoy CJ, Luan FG, Wang H, Hu YL, Yang QP (2020) Synergistic effects: a common theme in mixed-species litter decomposition. New Phytol 227:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16556
[14]
Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0179.1
[15]
M?ller J (2009) Gravimetric determination of acid detergent fiber and lignin in feed: interlaboratory study. J AOAC Int 92:74–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/92.1.74
[16]
Mortensen LH, Cruz-Paredes C, Schmidt O, R?nn R, Vesterg?rd M (2019) Ash application enhances decomposition of recalcitrant organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 135:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.021
[17]
Njoroge DM, Chen SC, Zuo J, Dossa GGO, Cornelissen JHC (2022) Soil fauna accelerate litter mixture decomposition globally, especially in dry environments. J Ecol 110:659–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13829
[18]
Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9439-0
[19]
R Development Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
[20]
Riis T, Kelly-Quinn M, Aguiar FC, Manolaki P, Bruno D, Bejarano MD, Clerici N, Fernandes MR, Franco JC, Pettit N, Portela AP, Tammeorg O, Tammeorg P, Rodríguez-González PM, Dufour S (2020) Global overview of ecosystem services provided by riparian vegetation. Bioscience 70:501–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa041
[21]
Santonja M, Milcu A, Fromin N, Rancon A, Shihan A, Fernandez C, Baldy V, H?ttenschwiler S (2019) Temporal shifts in plant diversity effects on carbon and nitrogen dynamics during litter decomposition in a Mediterranean shrubland exposed to reduced precipitation. Ecosystems 22:939–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0315-4
[22]
Singhal V, Roy T, Singh C, Ghosh J (2021) Effect of incubation time, litter diversity and species richness on decomposition dynamics of tree species from western Himalayas. CATENA 203:105281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105281
[23]
Swan CM, Sparkman A (2023) The role of functional and phylogenetic diversity in riparian tree vegetation on leaf litter breakdown in rivers. Oikos 2023:e09361. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.09361
[24]
Wallenstein MD, Haddix ML, Ayres E, Steltzer H, Magrini-Bair KA, Paul EA (2013) Litter chemistry changes more rapidly when decomposed at home but converges during decomposition-transformation. Soil Biol Biochem 57:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.027
[25]
Wang H, Liu SR, Wang JX, You YM, Yang YJ, Shi ZM, Huang XM, Zheng L, Li ZY, Ming AG, Lu LH, Cai DX (2018) Mixed-species plantation with Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis hystrix accelerates C loss in recalcitrant coniferous litter but slows C loss in labile broadleaf litter in southern China. Forest Ecol Manag 422:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.024
[26]
Wang LF, Zhou Y, Chen YM, Xu ZF, Zhang J, Liu Y, Joly F (2022) Litter diversity accelerates labile carbon but slows recalcitrant carbon decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 168:108632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108632
[27]
Wu PP, Jiang LX, Zhang Y, Tu QH, Mao R (2022) Manganese addition accelerates litter decomposition and alters litter mixing effects in the late stage in subtropical plantations of southern China. Plant Soil 481:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05652-6
[28]
Xu ZF, Zhu JX, Wu FZ, Liu Y, Tan B, Yang WQ (2016) Effects of litter quality and climate change along an elevational gradient on litter decomposition of subalpine forests, Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. J For Res 27:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0180-3
[29]
Zhang DQ, Hui DF, Luo YQ, Zhou GY (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtn002
[30]
Zhang XX, Wang BY, Liu ZW (2019) Impacts of plant secondary metabolites from conifer litter on the decomposition of Populus purdomii litter. J For Res 30:2237–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0766-7
[31]
Zhang XH, Wang L, Jiang W, Mao R (2020) Functional identity and functional diversity co-regulate litter mixture decomposition and nitrogen release in boreal riparian forest ponds. Biogeochemistry 151:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00716-0
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/