Effects of thinning on the understory light environment of different stands and the photosynthetic performance and growth of the reforestation species Phoebe bournei

Abstract

Light levels determine regeneration in stands and a key concern is how to regulate the light environment of different stand types to the requirements of the understory. In this study, we selected three stands typical in south China (a Cryptomeria japonica plantation, a Quercus acutissima plantation, and a mixed stand of both) and three thinning intensities to determine the best understory light environment for 3-year-old Phoebe bournei seedlings. The canopy structure, understory light environment, and photosynthesis and growth indicators were assessed following thinning. Thinning improved canopy structure and understory light availability of each stand; species composition was the reason for differences in the understory light environment. Under the same thinning intensity, the mixed stand had the greatest light radiation and most balanced spectral composition. P. bournei photosynthesis and growth were closely related to the light environment; all three stands required heavy thinning to create an effective and sustained understory light environment. In a suitable understory light environment, the efficiency of light interception, absorption, and use by seedlings was enhanced, resulting in a higher carbon assimilation the main limiting factor was stomatal conductance. As a shade-avoidance signal, red/far-red radiation is a critical factor driving changes in photosynthesis and growth of P. bournei seedlings, and a reduction increased light absorption and use capacity and height: diameter ratios. The growth advantage transformed from diameter to height, enabling seedlings to access more light. Our findings suggest that the regeneration of shade-tolerant species such as P. bournei could be enhanced if a targeted approach to thinning based on stand type was adopted.

Keywords

Thinning / Understory light environment / Phoebe bournei / Photosynthetic performance / Growth performance

References

[1]	Aiba SI, Hanya G, Tsujino R, Takyu M, Seino T, Kimura K, Kitayama K (2007) Comparative study of additive basal area of conifers in forest ecosystems along elevational gradients. Ecol Res 22(3):439–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0338-3
[2]	An J, Wei XL, Huo HH (2022) Transcriptome analysis reveals the accelerated expression of genes related to photosynthesis and chlorophyll biosynthesis contribution to shade-tolerant in Phoebe bournei. BMC Plant Biol 22(1):268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03657-y
[3]	Annigh?fer P (2018) Stress relief through gap creation? Growth response of a shade tolerant species (Fagus sylvatica L.) to a changed light environment. For Ecol Manag 415–416:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.027
[4]	Asanok L, Marod D, Duengkae P, Pranmongkol U, Kurokawa H, Aiba M, Katabuchi M, Nakashizuka T (2013) Relationships between functional traits and the ability of forest tree species to reestablish in secondary forest and enrichment plantations in the uplands of northern Thailand. For Ecol Manag 296:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.029
[5]	Beaudet M, Messier C (2002) Variation in canopy openness and light transmission following selection cutting in northern hardwood stands: an assessment based on hemispherical photographs. Agric For Meteorol 110(3):217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00289-1
[6]	Beaudet M, Harvey BD, Messier C, Coates KD, Poulin J, Kneeshaw DD, Brais S, Bergeron Y (2011) Managing understory light conditions in boreal mixedwoods through variation in the intensity and spatial pattern of harvest: a modelling approach. For Ecol Manag 261(1):84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.033
[7]	Chelle M, Evers JB, Combes D, Varlet-Grancher C, Vos J, Andrieu B (2007) Simulation of the three-dimensional distribution of the red:far-red ratio within crop canopies. New Phytol 176(1):223–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02161.x
[8]	Cogliastro A, Paquette A (2012) Thinning effect on light regime and growth of underplanted red oak and black cherry in post-agricultural forests of south-eastern Canada. New For 43(5–6):941–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9329-5
[9]	Dahlgren JP, Eriksson O, Bolmgren K, Strindell M, Ehrlén J (2006) Specific leaf area as a superior predictor of changes in field layer abundance during forest succession. J Veg Sci 17(5):577–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02481.x
[10]	Daryaei A, Sohrabi H, Puerta-Pi?ero C (2019) How does light availability affect the aboveground biomass allocation and leaf morphology of saplings in temperate mixed deciduous forests? New for 50(3):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9666-0
[11]	De Kauwe MG, Lin YS, Wright IJ, Medlyn BE, Crous KY, Ellsworth DS, Maire V, Prentice IC, Atkin OK, Rogers A, Niinemets ü, Serbin SP, Meir P, Uddling J, Togashi HF, Tarvainen L, Weerasinghe LK, Evans BJ, Ishida FY, Domingues TF (2016) A test of the ‘one-point method’ for estimating maximum carboxylation capacity from field-measured, light-saturated photosynthesis. New Phytol 210(3):1130–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13815
[12]	Demotes-Mainard S, Péron T, Corot A, Bertheloot J, Le Gourrierec J, Pelleschi-Travier S, Crespel L, Morel P, Huché-Thélier L, Boumaza R, Vian A, Guérin V, Leduc N, Sakr S (2016) Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture. Environ Exp Bot 121:4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.010
[13]	Dumais D, Larouche C, Raymond P, Bédard S, Lambert MC (2018) Survival and growth dynamics of red spruce seedlings planted under different forest cover densities and types. New For 50(4):573–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9680-2
[14]	Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1993) Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Oecologia 96(2):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317729
[15]	Emerson R, Chalmers R, Cederstrand C (1957) Some factors influencing the long-wave limit of photosynthesis. PNAS 43(1):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.43.1.133
[16]	Finazzi G, Johnson GN (2016) Cyclic electron flow: facts and hypotheses. Photosynth Res 129(3):227–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-016-0306-2
[17]	Forrester DI (2017) Ecological and physiological processes in mixed versus monospecific stands. In: Pretzsch H, Forrester DI, Bauhus J (eds) Mixed-species forests. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–115
[18]	Forrester DI, Ammer C, Annigh?fer PJ, Barbeito I, Bielak K, Bravo-Oviedo A, Coll L, Río MD, Dr?ssler L, Heym M, Hurt V, L?f M, Ouden JD, Pach M, Pereira MG, Plaga BNE, Ponette Q, Skrzyszewski J, Sterba H, Svoboda M, Zlatanov TM, Pretzsch H (2018) Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe. J Ecol 106(2):746–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12803
[19]	Fraser DP, Hayes S, Franklin KA (2016) Photoreceptor crosstalk in shade avoidance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 33:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.03.008
[20]	Ge YJ, He XY, Wang JF, Jiang B, Ye RH, Lin XC (2014) Physiological and biochemical responses of Phoebe bournei seedlings to water stress and recovery. Acta Physiol Plant 36(5):1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1502-3
[21]	Giertych MJ, Karolewski P, Oleksyn J (2015) Carbon allocation in seedlings of deciduous tree species depends on their shade tolerance. Acta Physiol Plant 37(10):216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1965-x
[22]	Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M, Messier C (2010) Shade tolerance, canopy gaps and mechanisms of coexistence of forest trees. Oikos 119(3):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17441.x
[23]	Gustafsson M, Gustafsson L, Alloysius D, Falck J, Yap S, Karlsson A, Ilstedt U (2016) Tree traits and canopy closure data from an experiment with 34 planted species native to Sabah, Borneo. Data Brief 6:466–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.12.048
[24]	He PC, Wright IJ, Zhu SD, Onoda Y, Liu H, Li RH, Liu XR, Hua L, Oyanoghafo OO, Ye Q (2019) Leaf mechanical strength and photosynthetic capacity vary independently across 57 subtropical forest species with contrasting light requirements. New Phytol 223(2):607–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15803
[25]	Ishii HT, Tanabe SI, Hiura T (2004) Exploring the relationships among canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. For Sci 50(3):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/50.3.342
[26]	Kennedy S, Black K, O’Reilly C, Ní Dhubháin á (2007) The impact of shade on morphology, growth and biomass allocation in Picea sitchensis, Larix × eurolepis and Thuja plicata. New for 33(2):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9019-2
[27]	Kohyama T, Hotta M (1990) Significance of allometry in tropical saplings. Funct Ecol 4(4):515–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389319
[28]	Li Y, Krober W, Bruelheide H, Hardtle W, von Oheimb G (2017) Crown and leaf traits as predictors of subtropical tree sapling growth rates. J Plant Ecol 10(1):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw041
[29]	Li XN, Wang YH, Yang ZH, Liu T, Mu CC (2022) Photosynthesis adaption in Korean pine to gap size and position within Populus davidiana forests in Xiaoxing’anling. China J For Res 33(5):1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01439-0
[30]	Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11(5):591–603. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
[31]	Lochhead KD, Comeau PG (2012) Relationships between forest structure, understory light and regeneration in complex Douglas-fir dominated stands in south-eastern British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 284:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.029
[32]	Matsuo T, Martinez-Ramos M, Bongers F, van der Sande MT, Poorter L (2021) Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession. J Ecol 109(8):2871–2884. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13680
[33]	Midgley JJ, Parker R, Laurie H, Seydack A (2002) Competition among canopy trees in indigenous forests: an analysis of the ‘additive basal area’ phenomenon. Austral Ecol 27(3):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2002.01177.x
[34]	Niinemets U (2010) A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res 25(4):693–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4
[35]	Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hiura T, Hirose T (2006) Leaf anatomy and light acclimation in woody seedlings after gap formation in a cool-temperate deciduous forest. Oecologia 149(4):571–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0485-1
[36]	Orman O, Wrzesinski P, Dobrowolska D, Szewczyk J (2021) Regeneration growth and crown architecture of European beech and silver fir depend on gap characteristics and light gradient in the mixed montane old-growth stands. For Ecol Manag 482:118866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118866
[37]	Peterson RB, Oja V, Laisk A (2001) Chlorophyll fluorescence at 680 and 730 nm and leaf photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 70(2):185–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017952500015
[38]	Poorter L, Bongers F (2006) Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87(7):1733–1743. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1733:Ltagpo]2.0.Co;2
[39]	Pretzsch H (2014) Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manag 327:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027
[40]	Riikonen J (2021) Applications of different light spectra in growing forest tree seedlings. Forests 12(9):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091194
[41]	Roeber VM, Bajaj I, Rohde M, Schmulling T, Cortleven A (2021) Light acts as a stressor and influences abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Plant Cell Environ 44(3):645–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13948
[42]	Rosati A, Paoletti A, Caporali S, Perri E (2013) The role of tree architecture in super high density olive orchards. Sci Hortic 161:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.06.044
[43]	Santos VAHF, Ferreira MJ (2020) Are photosynthetic leaf traits related to the first-year growth of tropical tree seedlings? A light-induced plasticity test in a secondary forest enrichment planting. For Ecol Manag 460:117900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117900
[44]	Santos V, Nelson BW, Rodrigues J, Garcia MN, Ceron JVB, Ferreira MJ (2019) Fluorescence parameters among leaf photosynthesis-related traits are the best proxies for CO2 assimilation in Central Amazon trees. Braz J Bot 42(2):239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-019-00533-2
[45]	Santos VAHF, Modolo GS, Ferreira MJ (2020) How do silvicultural treatments alter the microclimate in a Central Amazon secondary forest? A focus on light changes. J Environ Manag 254:109816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109816
[46]	Schwartz G, Ferreira MS, Lopes JC (2015) Silvicultural intensification and agroforestry systems in secondary tropical forests: a review. Amaz J Agric Environ Sci 58(3):319–326. https://doi.org/10.4322/rca.1830
[47]	Sendall KM, Reich PB, Lusk CH (2018) Size-related shifts in carbon gain and growth responses to light differ among rainforest evergreens of contrasting shade tolerance. Oecologia 187(3):609–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4125-3
[48]	Silveira LCI, Brasileiro BP, Kist V, Weber H, Daros E, Peternelli LA, Barbosa MHP (2015) Selection strategy in families of energy cane based on biomass production and quality traits. Euphytica 204(2):443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1364-9
[49]	Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V (2010) Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820 nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1797:122–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.04.365
[50]	Tsimilli-Michael M, Strasser RJ (2008) In vivo assessment of stress impact on plant’s vitality: applications in detecting and evaluating the beneficial role of mycorrhization on host plants. In: Varma A (ed) Mycorrhiza. Springer, Berlin, pp 679–703
[51]	Wang HY, Wu F, Li M, Liang DQ, Ding GJ (2021a) Heteroblastic foliage affects the accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates and biomass in Pinus massoniana (Lamb.) seedlings. Forests 12(12):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121686
[52]	Wang X, Wei XL, Wu GY, Chen SQ (2021b) Ammonium application mitigates the effects of elevated carbon dioxide on the carbon/nitrogen balance of Phoebe bournei seedlings. Tree Physiol 41(9):1658–1668. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpab026
[53]	Wei HX, Chen X, Chen GS, Zhao HT (2019) Foliar nutrient and carbohydrate in Aralia elata can be modified by understory light quality in forests with different structures at Northeast China. Ann For Res 62(2):125–137. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2019.1395
[54]	Wiener EM (2010) Ecological research and the management of young successional forests: a case study on the reintroduction of native tree species on a Terra Firme site in northeastern Peru. J Sustain Forest 29(6–8):571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811003739098
[55]	Zha MQ, Han YZ, Cheng XR (2022) Mixing planting proportions in a plantation affects functional traits and biomass allocation of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei seedlings. J For Res 33(6):1793–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01464-7
[56]	Zhang Q, Chen YJ, Song LY, Liu N, Sun LL, Peng CL (2012) Utilization of lightflecks by seedlings of five dominant tree species of different subtropical forest successional stages under low-light growth conditions. Tree Physiol 32(5):545–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps043
[57]	Zhang T, Dong XB, Guan HW, Meng Y, Ruan JF, Wang ZY (2018a) Effect of thinning on the spatial structure of a Larix gmelinii Rupr. secondary forest in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Forests 9(11):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9110720
[58]	Zhang T, Yan QL, Wang J, Zhu JJ (2018b) Restoring temperate secondary forests by promoting sprout regeneration: effects of gap size and within-gap position on the photosynthesis and growth of stump sprouts with contrasting shade tolerance. For Ecol Manag 429:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.025
[59]	Zhang TJ, Zheng J, Yu ZC, Gu XQ, Tian XS, Peng CL, Chow WS (2018c) Variations in photoprotective potential along gradients of leaf development and plant succession in subtropical forests under contrasting irradiances. Environ Exp Bot 154:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.07.016
[60]	Zhen SY, Bugbee B (2020) Far-red photons have equivalent efficiency to traditional photosynthetic photons: implications for redefining photosynthetically active radiation. Plant Cell Environ 43(5):1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13730
[61]	Zhen SY, Haidekker M, van Iersel MW (2019) Far-red light enhances photochemical efficiency in a wavelength-dependent manner. Physiol Plant 167(1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12834
[62]	Zhen SY, van Iersel MW, Bugbee B (2022) Photosynthesis in sun and shade: the surprising importance of far-red photons. New Phytol 236(2):538–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18375