Spotting ignition of larch (Larix gmelinii) fuel bed by different firebrands

Abstract

Spot fire increase the difficulty of fire-fighting and threaten public safety, and therefore it is important to study ignition probabilities of fuel bed by different firebrands, in order to understand ignition mechanisms and analyze the formation of spot fires. This will provide an important basis for further study to improve the fire-fighting efficiency and reduce casualties. In this study, the ignition probabilities of larch (Larix gmelinii) fuel beds with different moisture levels and packing ratios by diffreent firebrands, including cones and twigs of different sizes, was investigated. Ignition experiments were conducted at different wind speeds generated by fans. The results show that, regardless of moisture content and packing ratio, ignition probability is zero when there is no wind. Both moisture content and wind speed significantly influence ignition probability, while packing ratio has almost no effect. The maximum moisture content at which firebrand ignition occurred was 50%, and ignition probability increased with wind speed and decreased with moisture content. Cones have the highest ignition probability, followed by large twigs and by small twigs. Ignition probability is also affected by firebrand shapes and sizes that determine their potential heat and contact area to the fuel bed. Two empirical models were established to link ignition probability with fuel properties and wind speed. This study will help clarify the mechanism of spot ignition and reduce corresponding losses.

Keywords

Firebrands / Wind speed / Moisture content / Packing ratio / Logistic model / Larix gmelinii

References

[1] Aghajani H, Fallah A, Emadian SF. Modelling and analyzing the surface fire behaviour in Hyrcanian forest of Iran. J For Sci, 2014, 60(9): 353-362.

[2] Albini FA, Alexander ME, Cruz MG. A mathematical model for predicting the maximum potential spotting distance from a crown fire. Int J Wildland Fire, 2012, 21: 609-627.

[3] Bianchi LO, Defosse GE. Ignition probability of fine dead surface fuels in native Patagonia forests of Argentina. For Syst, 2014, 23: 129-138.

[4] Bunting SC, Wright HA. Ignition capabilities of non-flaming firebrands. J For, 1974, 72: 646-649.

[5] Chuvieco E, González I, Verdú F, Aguado I, Yebra M. Prediction of fire occurrence from live 8 fuel moisture content measurements in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Int J Wildland Fire, 2009, 18: 430-441.

[6] Ellis PFM. Fuel bed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringbark’ for intense spotting. Int J Wildland Fire, 2011, 20: 897-907.

[7] Ellis PEM. The likelihood of ignition of dry-eucalypt forest litter by firebrands. Int J Wildland Fire, 2015, 24: 225-235.

[8] Francesco C, Guillermo R, Vittorio V, Romano B. Multiscale modeling of transient flows from fire and ventilation in long tunnels. Comput Fluids, 2011, 51(1): 16-29.

[9] Ganteaume A, Corinne LM, Mercedes G, Carmen H, Marielle J, Teresa F, Pedro PG, José AV. Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. Int J Wildland Fire, 2009, 18: 951-969.

[10] Ganteaume A, Guijarro M, Jappiot M, Hernando C, Lampin-Maillet C, Pedro Pérez-Gorostiaga José AV. Laboratory characterization of firebrands involved in spot fires. Ann For Sc, 2011, 68: 531-541.

[11] Garcia CV, Woodard PM, Titus SJ, Adamowicz WL, Lee BS. A logit model for predicting the daily occurrence of human caused forest-fires. Int J Wildland Fire, 1995, 5: 101-111.

[12] Hadden RM, Scott S, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC. Ignition of combustible fuel 13 beds by hot particles: an experimental and theoretical study. Fire Technol, 2011, 47: 341-355.

[13] Hoffheins FM. Fire hazard tests with cigarettes. J Franklin Inst, 1933, 216: 777-778.

[14] Koo E, Pagni PJ, Weise DR, Woycheese JP. Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires. Int J Wildland Fire, 2010, 19: 818-843.

[15] Li YZ, Zhang SH, Liu H. Variation in density and strength of wood of korean pine and larch from northeast of china and the lumber stress grading. Sci Silvae Sin, 1986, 22: 380-392. (in Chinese)

[16] Luke RH, Mcarthur AG, Brown AG, Mcarthur AG, Hillis WE. Bushfires in australia. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1978, 22: 354-358.

[17] Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC. On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire Mater, 2006, 30: 77-87.

[18] Manzello SL, Maranghides A, Mell WE, Cleary TG, Yang JC. Firebrand production from burning vegetation. For Ecol Manage, 2006, 234: S119.

[19] Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC. Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires. Int J Wildland Fire, 2006, 15: 427-431.

[20] Manzello SL, Maranghidesa A, Mella WE. Firebrand generation from burning vegetation. Int J Wildland Fire, 2007, 16: 458-462.

[21] Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Maranghides A, Mell W, Yang JC. Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuel beds. Fire Saf J, 2008, 43: 226-233.

[22] Manzello SL, Park SH, Cleary TG. Investigation on the ability of glowing firebrands deposited within crevices to ignite common building materials. Fire Saf J, 2009, 44: 894-900.

[23] Masinda MM, Sun L, Wang GY, Hu TX. Moisture content thresholds for ignition and rate of fire spread for various dead fuels in northeast forest ecosystems of China. J For Res, 2020

[24] Matvienko OV, Kasymov DP, Filkov AI, Daneyko OI, Gorbatov DA. Simulation of fuel bed ignition by wildland firebrands. Int J Wildland Fire, 2018, 27: 550-561.

[25] Morandini F, Silvani X, Dupuy JL, Susset A. Fire spread across a sloping fuel bed: flame dynamics and heat transfers. Combust Flame, 2018, 190: 158-170.

[26] Oliveira LA, Lopes AG, Baliga BR, Almeida M, Viegas DX. Numerical prediction of size, mass, temperature and trajectory of cylindrical wind-driven firebrands. Int J Wildland Fire, 2014, 23: 698-708.

[27] Pablo A, Alexis C, Candido GM, Guillermo R. Influence of atrium roof geometries on the numerical predictions of fire tests under natural ventilation conditions. Energy Build, 2013, 65: 382-390.

[28] Plucinski MP, Anderson WR. Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful 19 point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. Int J Wildland Fire, 2008, 17: 628-637.

[29] Sale PD, Hoffheins FM. Cigarettes and cigars, fire hazard tests. NFPA Q., 1928, 21: 237-246.

[30] Sardoy N, Consalvi JL, Porterie B, Fernandez-Pello AC. Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees. Combust Flame, 2007, 150: 151-169.

[31] Satho K, Zhong YL, Yang KT. Report of national research of national research institute of fire and disaster, 2003, Japan: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[32] Sun P, Zhang Y, Sun L, Hu HH, Guo FT, Wang GY, Zhang H. Influence of fuel moisture content, packing ratio and wind velocity on the ignition probability of fuel beds composed of mongolian oak leaves via cigarette butts. Forests, 2018, 9: 507.

[33] Tao Z, Bathras B, Kwon B, Biallas B, Yang R. Effect of firebrand size and geometry on heating from a smoldering pile under wind. Fire Saf J, 2020

[34] Tarifa CS, Notario PP, Moreno FG(1965) On the flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 10, 1021–1037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(65)80244-2

[35] Viegas DX, Almeida M, Raposo J, Oliveira R, Viegas CX. Ignition of mediterranean fuel beds by several types of firebrands. Fire Technol, 2012, 50: 61-77.

[36] Wang SP (2016) Experimental and Theoretical Study on Spotting Ignition. Doctor’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China. (in Chinese)