Effect of thinning intensity on tree growth and temporal variation of seed and cone production in a Pinus koraiensis plantation

Abstract

Thinning of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) is used to facilitate timber and cone production. The present study in Northeast China investigated the effects of thinning intensity on individual tree growth, temporal variation in cone yield, and seed quality in Korean pine plantation. In 2005, five thinning intensity levels (none, extreme, heavy, moderate and light) were set in 15 permanent plots in a 32-year-old Korean pine plantation at Mengjiagang Forest Farm, Jiamusi City, Heilongjiang Province. We recorded tree growth and seed cone production from 2013 to 2016, i.e., from 8 to 11 years after thinning. Except for height growth, thinning increased tree growth (diameter at breast height and crown size) and improved cone yield. The extreme thinning treatment (to 300 trees per hectare) resulted in the largest tree diameter, tree volume, crown size and 4-year cone production per tree. The highest cone yield per tree in the mast year (2014) was observed when stands were thinned to 500 trees per hectare (heavy thinning). Although the best cone and seed quality and the largest cone and seed mass per tree were recorded in the heavily thinned stand, no significant differences were found between heavy and moderate thinning stands (750 trees per hectare). At the stand level, the moderately thinned stand had the highest basal area, stock volume and seed cone production per stand. Our results suggest that thinning to 750 trees per hectare will improve timber and cone productivity in 40-year-old P. koraiensis stands.

Keywords

Korean pine / Thinning intensity / Seed yield / Tree growth / Temporal variation in cone yield

References

[1] Arista M, Talavera S. Density effect on the fruit-set, seed crop viability and seedling vigour of Abies pinsapo. Ann Bot, 1996, 77(2): 187-192.

[2] Ayari A, Khouja ML. Ecophysiological variables influencing Aleppo pine seed and cone production: a review. Tree Physiol, 2014, 34(4): 426-437.

[3] Ayari A, Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Tome M, Tome J, Garchi S, Henchi B. Stand, tree and crown variables affecting cone crop and seed yield of Aleppo pine forests in different bioclimatic regions of Tunisia. Forest Syst, 2012, 21(1): 128-140.

[4] Bae SW, Hwang J, Lee ST, Kim HS, Jeong JM. Changes in soil temperature, moisture content, light availability and diameter growth after thinning in Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) plantation. J Korean For Soc, 2010, 99(3): 397-403.

[5] Bladon KD, Silins U, Landhausser SM, Messier C, Lieffers VJ. Carbon isotope discrimination and water stress in trembling aspen following variable retention harvesting. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27(7): 1065-1071.

[6] Brix H (1993) Fertilization and thinning effect on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: a synthesis of project results. FRDA Report, 196. Forestry Canada and B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, p 64

[7] Calama R, Montero G. Cone and seed production from stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in Central Range (Spain). Eur J Forest Res, 2007, 126(1): 23-35.

[8] Choi J, Lee B, Lee D, Choi I. Growth monitoring of Korean white pine (Pinus koraiensis) plantation by thinning intensity. J Korean For Soc, 2014, 103(3): 422-430.

[9] Climent J, Prada M, Calama R, Chambel RM, Ron DS, Alia R. To grow or to seed: ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae). Am J Bot, 2008, 95(7): 833-842.

[10] Crone EE, Mcintire EJB, Brodie J. What defines mast seeding? Spatio-temporal patterns of cone production by whitebark pine. J Ecol, 2011, 99(2): 438-444.

[11] Daniel TW, Helms JA, Baker FS. Principles of silviculture, 1979, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Corporation 521

[12] FAO. William MC. Seeds, fruits, and cones. Non-wood forest products from conifers, 1998, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 72 87

[13] Farris MA, Mitton JB. Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in Ponderosa pine. Evolution, 1984, 38(5): 1151-1154.

[14] González-Ochoa AI, López-Serrano FR, de las Heras J. Does post-fire forest management increase tree growth and cone production in Pinus halepensis. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 188(1–3): 235-247.

[15] Goubitz S, Nathan R, Roitemberg R, Shmida A, Ne’eman G. Canopy seed bank structure in relation to: fire, tree size and density. Plant Ecol, 2004, 173(2): 191-201.

[16] Harrington CA, Reukema DL. Initial shock and long-term stand development following thinning in a Douglas-fir plantation. For Sci, 1983, 29(1): 33-46.

[17] Holland EP, James A. Assessing the efficacy of population-level models of mast seeding. Theor Ecol, 2015, 8(1): 121-132.

[18] Horner GJ, Baker PJ, Nally RM, Cunningham SC, Thomson JR, Hamilton F. Forest structure, habitat and carbon benefits from thinning floodplain forests: managing early stand density makes a difference. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259(3): 286-293.

[19] Hou C, Wei ZG, Zhang LJ. Effects of different thinning intensity on seed production stands of Pinus koraiensis in Mengjiagang Forest Farm. Chin For Sci Technol, 2014, 20(1): 41-46. (in Chinese)

[20] Hummel S. Height, diameter and crown dimensions of Cordia alliodora associated with tree density. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 127(1–3): 31-40.

[21] Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR, Dong LH. Optimal management of Korean pine plantations in multifunctional forestry. J For Res, 2017, 28(5): 1027-1037.

[22] Karlsson C. Seed production of Pinus sylvestris after release cutting. Can J For Res, 2000, 30(6): 982-989.

[23] Kelly D. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol, 1994, 9(12): 465-470.

[24] Knowe SA, Hibbs DE. Stand structure and dynamics of young red alder as affected by planting density. For Ecol Manag, 1996, 82(1–3): 69-85.

[25] Kon H, Noda T. Experimental investigation on weather cues for mast seeding of Fagus crenata. Ecol Res, 2007, 22(5): 802-806.

[26] Krannitz PG, Duralia TE. Cone and seed production in Pinus ponderosa: a review. West N Am Nat, 2004, 64(2): 208-218.

[27] Latham P, Tappeiner J. Response of old-growth conifers to reduction in stand density in western Oregon forests. Tree Physiol, 2002, 22(2–3): 137-146.

[28] Li YZ, Turnblom EC, Briggs DG. Effects of density control and fertilization on growth and yield of young Douglas-fir plantations in the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res, 2007, 37(2): 449-461.

[29] Madrigal J, Martínez E, Hernando C, Gujarro M, Díez C, Vega JA, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Fonturbel T, Cuiñas P, Alonso M, Beloso MC. Respuesta a corto plazo del regenerado post-incendio de Pinus pinaster Ait. a clareos mecanizadosintensos. Silva Lusit, 2004, 12(1): 1-14. (in Portuguese)

[30] Mäkinen H, Isomäki A. Thinning intensity and growth of Scots pine stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 201(2–3): 311-325.

[31] Mencuccini M, Piussi P, Sulli AZ. Thirty years of seed production in a subalpine Norway spruce forest: patterns of temporal and spatial variation. For Ecol Manag, 1995, 76(1–3): 109-125.

[32] Moradi S, Limaei SM, Lohmander P, Khanmohammadi M. Quantitative and financial evaluation of non-timber forest products (case study: Zemkan basin forests, West of Iran). J For Res, 2017, 28(2): 371-379.

[33] Moreno-Fernández D, Cañellas I, Calama R, Gordo J, Sánchez-González M. Thinning increases cone production of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stands in the Northern Plateau (Spain). Ann For Sci, 2013, 70(8): 761-768.

[34] Moya D, Espelta JM, Verkaik I, López-Serrano F, Heras JDL. Tree density and site quality influence on Pinus halepensis Mill. reproductive characteristics after large fires. Ann For Sci, 2007, 64(6): 649-656.

[35] Moya D, Heras JDL, López-Serrano F, Leone V. Optimal intensity and age of management in young Aleppo pine stands for post-fire resilience. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255(8–9): 3270-3280.

[36] Navarro FB, Jiménez MN, Cañadas EM, Gallego E, Terrón L, Ripoll MA. Effects of different intensities of overstory thinning on tree growth and understory plant-species productivity in a semi-arid Pinus halepensis Mill. afforestation. For Syst, 2010, 3(3): 410-417.

[37] Ne’eman G, Izhaki I. Stability of pre- and post-fire spatial structure of pine trees in Aleppo pine forest. Ecography, 2006, 21(5): 535-542.

[38] Ordonez JL, Retana J, Espelta JM. Effects of tree size, crown damage, and tree location on post-fire survival and cone production of Pinus nigra trees. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 206(1–3): 109-117.

[39] Powers MD, Pregitzer KS, Palik BJ, Webster CR. Wood δ¹³C, δ¹⁸O and radial growth responses of residual red pine to variable retention harvesting. Tree Physiol, 2010, 30(3): 326-334.

[40] Reukema DL. Seed production of Douglas-fir increased by thinning. PNW Old Ser Res Note, 1961, 210: 1-5.

[41] Ruano I, Rodríguez-García E, Bravo F. Effects of precommercial thinning on growth and reproduction in post-fire regeneration of Pinus halepensis Mill. Ann For Sci, 2013, 70(4): 357-366.

[42] Shen HL. Korean pine as a nut production species in China present situation and future development. Acta Hortic, 2003, 620: 187-191.

[43] Sheng HC, Man XL, Cai TJ, Liu YC. Seed setting pattern and sustainable management of Pinus koraiensis forests in Liangshui nature reserve. J Northeast For Univ, 2010, 38(12): 4-6. (in Chinese)

[44] Shmida A, Lev-Yadun S, Goubitz S, Ne’eman G. Sexual allocation and gender segregation in Pinus halepensis, P. brutia and P. pinea. Leiden, 2000, Leiden: Backhuys Publisher 91 104

[45] Stephenson AG. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1981, 12(1): 253-279.

[46] Sucoff E, Hong SG. Effects of thinning on needle water potential in red pine. For Sci, 1974, 20(1): 25-29.

[47] Sutton A, Staniforth RJ, Tardif J. Reproductive ecology and allometry of red pine (Pinus resinosa) at the northwestern limit of its distribution range in Manitoba Canada. Can J Bot, 2002, 80(5): 482-493.

[48] Tapias R, Gil L, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Pardos JA. Canopy seed banks in Mediterranean pines of south-eastern Spain: a comparison between Pinus halepensis Mill., P. pinaster Ait., P. nigra Arn. and P. pinea L. J Ecol, 2001, 89(4): 629-638.

[49] Teskey RO, Bongarten BC, Cregg BM, Dougherty PM, Hennessey TC. Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol, 1987, 3(1): 41-61.

[50] Tong QJ, Zhang SY, Thompson M. Evaluation of growth response, stand value and financial for precommercially thinned jack pine stands in Northwestern Ontario. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 209(3): 225-235.

[51] Trabaud L, Michels C, Grosman J. Recovery of burnt Pinus halepensis Mill. forests. II. Pine reconstruction after wildfire. For Ecol Manag, 1985, 13(3–4): 167-179.

[52] Valinger E, Elfving B, Morling T. Twelve-year growth response of Scots pine to thinning and nitrogen fertilisation. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 134(1–3): 45-53.

[53] Wang LP. Effects of different thinning intensity on environment variables of Pinus koraiensis plantation forest. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2016, 3: 19-22. (in Chinese)

[54] Woodruff DR, Bond BJ, Ritchie GA, Scott W. Effects of stand density on the growth of young Douglas-fir trees. Can J Forest Res, 2002, 32(3): 420-427.

[55] Wu J. The study on fruiting regularities and cone production effect factor in Korean pine. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2015, 6: 66-67. (in Chinese)

[56] Yang HL, Wang X, Tao YZ, Gu Y. Study on the tree volume table compilation of Korean pine in Liaoning province. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2007, 2: 61-62. (in Chinese)

[57] Zhang JW, Oliver WW, Ritchie MW. Effect of stand densities on stand dynamics in white fir (Abies concolor) forests northeast California, USA. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 244(1–3): 50-59.

[58] Zhang Z, Zhang HG, Yang CP, Zhang L, Du J, Jiang Y. Clonal variations in nutritional components of Pinus koreansis seeds collected from seed orchards in Northeastern China. J For Res, 2016, 27(2): 295-311.