Spatial variability of soil microbial indices in common alder COMMON ALDER (Alnus glutinosa) stands using a geostatistical approach in northern Iran

Abstract

Microbial indices and their spatial patterns are strongly affected by environmental factors. Spatial variability of soil properties is one of the most important causes of variability in soil microbial indices. This research was conducted in the Caspian forest to assess spatial variabilities and frequency distributions of microbial properties. Ninety soil samples were taken using a grid sampling design 40 × 40 m. Microbial indices, organic carbon, nitrogen and pH were determined. Soil variable distributions showed that microbial indices had abnormal distributions. Logarithmic transformation produced normal distribution. Spatial continuity using geostatistical (variogram) was studied and maps obtained by point kriging. The variograms revealed the presence of spatial autocorrelation. The results indicate that spatial dependence of soil microbial indices was affected by non-intrinsic factors and forest management procedures. The maps show that soil microbial indices and soil properties have spatial variability. The spatial pattern of microbial indices was correlated to organic carbon and nitrogen.

Keywords

Variograms / Soil microbial indices / Spatial distribution / Natural forest / Iran

References

[1] Alef K, Nannipieri P. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry, 1995, London: Academic Press.

[2] Anderson TH. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2003, 98(5): 285-293.

[3] Anderson TH, Domsch KH. Application of eco-physiological quotients on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem, 1990, 22(2): 251-255.

[4] Blouina M, Hodsonb ME, Delgadoc EA, Bakerd G, Brussaarde L, Buttf KR, Daig J, Dendoovenh L, Peresi G, Tondohj JE, Cluzeauk D, Brunl J. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Sci, 2013, 64(4): 161-182.

[5] Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. PAGE AL. Nitrogen total. Methods of soil analysis, 1982 Part 2.2 Madison: Soil Science Society of America 595 624

[6] Forugi Far H, Jafarzadeh AA, TorabiGolsefidi H, AliAsgarzad N. The impact of landform units on distribution and spatial variability of soil biological indices in Tabriz Plain. J Water Soil, 2011, 21(4): 1-18.

[7] Gartzia-Bengoetxea N, Kandelerb E, Martínez de Arano I, Arias-Gonzáleza A. Soil microbial functional activity is governed by a combination of tree species composition and soil properties in temperate forests. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 100(11): 57-64.

[8] Gazanshahi J. Soil and plant analysis, 2006, Norman: Homa Press.

[9] Gholami Sh, Sayad E, Gebbers R, Schirrmann M, Joschko M, Timmerd J. Spatial analysis of riparian forest soil macrofauna and its relation to abiotic soil properties. Pedobiologia, 2016, 59(3): 27-36.

[10] Godwin RJ, Miller PCH. A review of the technologies for mapping within-field variability. Biosys, 2003, 84(4): 393-407.

[11] Islam KR, Weil RR. Soil quality indicator properties in mid-Atlantic soils as influenced by conservation management. J Soil Water Conserv, 2000, 55(1): 69-78.

[12] Jenkinson DS, Powison DS. The effects of biotical treatments on metabolism in soil—V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biocliem, 1976, 8: 109-130.

[13] Khosravi Y, Abasi A. Spatial analysis of environmental data with geostatistics, 2016, Zanjan: Zanjan press.

[14] Kooch Y, Hosseini SM, Zaccone C, Jalilvand H, Hojjati SM. Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by afforestation: the Darab Kola forest (north of Iran) case study. J Environ Monit, 2012, 14(9): 2438-2446.

[15] Kooch Y, MollaeiDarabi S, Hosseini SM. The effects of pits and mounds following wind throw events on soil features and greenhouse gas fluxes in a temperate forest. Pedosphere, 2015, 25(1): 1-13.

[16] Nael M (2011) Studying lands destruction using soil quality indices and theirs spatial changes in forest and rangelands, Central Iran. M.Sc. Thesis of Forestry, Esfahan University, pp 135 (In Persian)

[17] Nourbakhsh F, Monreal CM, Emtiazy G, Dinel H. L-asparaginase activity in some soils of central Iran. Arid Land Res Manag, 2002, 16(4): 377-384.

[18] Nsabimana D, Haynes RJ, Wallis FM. Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Appl Soil Ecol, 2004, 26(2): 81-92.

[19] Ohlinger R. Schinner F, Ohlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R. Dehydrogenase activity with the substrate TTC. Methods in soil biology, 1996, Berlin: Springer 241 243

[20] Raiesi F, Asadi E. Soil microbial activity and litter turnover in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils, 2006, 43(1): 76-82.

[21] Salehi A, Matinizadeh M, Tamjidi J. Investigation on effect of forest plantation of Alnus ghutinosa L. (Gaertn.) and Pinus taeda L. on soil microbial activity and biomass. Iran For Poplar Res, 2012, 20(2): 334-345.

[22] SheklAbadi M, Khademi H, Karimian M, Nourbakhsh F. Effects of Climate on soil quality some biological indices in Central Zagros. J Nat Resour, 2007, 41(11): 103-116.

[23] Tian J, McCormack L, Wang J, Guo D, Wang Q, Zhang X, Yu G, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. Linkages between the soil organic matter fractions and the microbial metabolic functional diversity within a broad-leaved Korean pine forest. Eur J Soil Biol, 2015, 66: 57-64.

[24] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem, 1987, 19(6): 703-707.

[25] Walkley A, Black TA. An examination of the dehligaroff method for determining organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci, 1934, 37: 29-38.

[26] Webster R, Oliver MA. Geostatis-tics for environmental scientists, 2000, New York: Wiley press.

[27] Zeng DH, Hu YL, Chang SX, Fan ZP. Land cover change effects on soil chemical and biological properties after planting Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in sandy lands in Keerqin, northeastern China. Plant Soil, 2009, 317(1–2): 121-133.