Evaluating paraben concentrations in skincare products and assessing their potential health risks
Ghofran Al-Qudaihi , Reem Al-Rouqi , Iman Al-Saleh
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 1
There is a lack of specific regulations in Saudi Arabia governing the use of potentially hazardous compounds, such as parabens, in skincare products (SCPs). This study analyzed 111 feminine SCPs used in Saudi Arabia for the presence of selected parabens [namely methylparaben (MeP), ethylparaben (EtP), and propylparaben (PrP)] to assess their health risks. These parabens were highly prevalent in the examined SCPs; MeP was the most common, followed by PrP. However, we noted that ≈14% of the products were paraben-free. Nine products contained MeP, EtP, and PrP in concentrations exceeding the European Union Regulation 1223/2009 limits. The estimated daily paraben intake via dermal exposure was calculated. The combined maximum estimated daily intake (EDI) for MeP and EtP was remarkably lower than the acceptable daily intake (ADI) limit set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); however, PrP levels in 23% of the products exceeded the recommended ADI limit. Although the average hazard index (HI) was below the safety threshold, 26 products had a HI > 1, indicating a potential health risk primarily due to PrP. The margin of exposure (MOE) values calculated for these parabens did not reach the safety benchmark set by the EFSA. In conclusion, MeP and EtP in the tested SCPs pose a relatively low health risk; however, the PrP content of many of these products raises concerns, especially considering the cumulative exposure to multiple parabens. This study underscores the need to monitor and regulate the use of parabens in SCPs to ensure consumer safety.
Parabens / dermal exposure / skincare products / health risk assessment / consumer safety / estimated daily intake
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Final amended report on the safety assessment of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, isopropylparaben, butylparaben, isobutylparaben, and benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.Int J Toxicol2008;27 Suppl 4:1-82 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
SCCS Members. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) - Final Opinion on propylparaben (CAS No 94-13-3, EC No 202-307-7).Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2021;125:105005 |
| [13] |
European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1223. [Last accessed on 27 Dec 2024] |
| [14] |
Market Research Survey. Personal care and cosmetic preservatives market. 2023. Available from: https://www.factmr.com/report/4638/personal-care-and-cosmetic-preservatives-market. [Last accessed on 27 Dec 2024] |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title40-vol24/pdf/CFR-2012-title40-vol24-part136-appB.pdf. [Last accessed on 27 Dec 2024] |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Exposure factors handbook - Chapter 17: consumer products. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/efh-chapter17.pdf. [Last accessed on 27 Dec 2024] |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) related to para hydroxybenzoates (E 214-219).EFSA J2004;2:83 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
SCCP/1183/08. Opinion on parabens. 2008. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_138.pdf. [Last accessed on 27 Dec 2024] |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic.EFSA J2005;3:282 |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |