Journal of Deep Space Exploration >

2018 , Vol. 5 >Issue 5: 483 - 487

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15982/j.issn.2095-7777.2018.05.012

The Shock Response Suppression and Analysis of Mars Probe and Rocket Separation

Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai 201109, China;
    2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Deep Space Exploration Technology, Shanghai 201109, China;
    3. Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 21 Aug 2018

Revised date: 04 Sep 2018

Fold

Abstract

The shock test and analysis of the equipment in the Mars probe for the large shock response generated by separation of the probe and the Long March 5 launch vehicle is discussed. The reliability of the equipment is analysized after shock test. The Strength-Stress model is proposed to judge if the reliability is affected. The half-sine wave impulse shock condition of components offered by the manufacturers is known as Strength, and the half-sine wave converted by the shock response spectrum of the equipment is known as Stress. The two values are compared. This method can be regarded as an assisting methodto judge the reliability of the equipment after shock test, and also can be regarded as the criteria of shock resistance of the equipment.

Key words： Mars exploration; separation of the probe and the rocket; shock response spectrum; half-sine wave impulse

Cite this article

SHEN Zhichun, LIN Xiaoyan, CHENG Kun, WANG Haipeng . The Shock Response Suppression and Analysis of Mars Probe and Rocket Separation[J]. Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2018 , 5(5) : 483 -487 . DOI: 10.15982/j.issn.2095-7777.2018.05.012

References

[1] 祝耀昌. 对MIL-STD-810D/E中冲击与振动等效的说明[J]. 环境技术,2010,28(1):44-48
ZHU Y C. Edward szymkowiak&henry caraso[J]. Environmental Technology,2010,28(1):44-48
[2] 刘洪英, 马爱军, 安梅岩, 等. 冲击响应谱规范试验室模拟述评[J]. 环境技术,2010,10(05):34-37
LIU H Y, MA A J, AN M Y, et al. Review of laboratory simulation about shock response spectrum test[J]. Environmental Technology,2010,10(05):34-37
[3] 高文硕, 朱子宏, 沈志强, 等. 航天器冲击响应谱试验模拟方法概述[J]. 环境技术,2017,8(4):60-64
GAO W S, ZHU Z H, SHEN Z Q, et al. Summarization of simulation test methods for spacecraft shock response spectrum[J]. Environmental Technology,2017,8(4):60-64
[4] 毛勇建, 李玉龙. 爆炸分离冲击环境的模拟试验技术进展[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术,2007,8(4):37-44
MAO Y J, LI Y L. Advances in simulation techniques of pyroshock environments[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles,2007,8(4):37-44
[5] 何文杰, 唐国安. 冲击试验条件的转换方法及其应用[J]. 上海航天,2012,29(6):57-62
HE W J, TANG G A. Conversion method and application of shock test conditions[J]. Aerospace Shanghai,2012,29(6):57-62
[6] 杨博, 陈立伟, 冯伟, 等. 冲击响应谱与经典冲击试验等效计算方法[J]. 环境技术,2016,8(4):11-15
YANG B, CHEN L W, FENG W, et al. Research on equivalence experimentation of SRS test and classical shock test[J]. Environmental Technology,2016,8(4):11-15
[7] TUMA J, KOCI P. Calculation of a shock response spectrum[C]//2011 12th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC). [S.l.]: ICCC, 2011.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉