Improvement of BepiColombo’s Radio Science Experiment Through an Innovative Doppler Noise Reduction Technique

Abstract

The Mercury Orbiter Radio science Experiment (MORE), onboard the ESA/JAXA BepiColombo mission to Mercury, is designed to estimate Mercury’s gravity field, its rotational state, and to perform tests of relativistic gravity. The state-of-the-art onboard and ground instrumentations involved in the MORE experiment will enable to establish simultaneous X/X, X/Ka and Ka/Ka-band links, providing a range rate accuracy of 3 μm/s (at 1 000 s integration time) and a range accuracy of 20 cm. The purpose of this work is to show the improvement achieved on MORE’s performance by means of the Time-Delay Mechanical Noise Cancellation (TDMC) technique. The TDMC consists in a combination of Doppler measurements collected (at different times) at the two-way antenna and at an additional, smaller and stiffer, receive-only antenna located in a site with favorable tropospheric conditions. This configuration could reduce the leading noises in a Ka-band two-way link, such as those caused by troposphere and ground antenna mechanical vibrations. The results of end-to-end simulations and estimation of Mercury’s gravity field and rotational state considering the TDMC technique are presented. The results for a two-way link from NASA’s DSS-25 (in Goldstone, CA) or from ESA’s DSA-3 (in Malargue, Argentina) are compared, while the APEX is assumed as the receive-only antenna. It shows that in best-case noise conditions, the TDMC technique allows to obtain a factor-of-two accuracy gain on both global and local parameters, considering DSA-3 as a two-way antenna. Such improvement in the scientific objectives of MORE is of geophysical interest as it could provide a constraint on the interior structure of Mercury.

Keywords

Mercury / BepiColombo / Mercury Orbiter Radio science Experiment / Doppler / Time-Delay Mechanical Noise Cancellation

References

[1] IESS L, BOSCAGLI G. Advanced radio science instrumentation for the mission BepiColombo to Mercury[J]. Planetary and Space Science, 2001, 49(14-15): 1597-1608
[2] IESS L, ASMAR W S, TORTORA P. More: an advanced tracking experiment for the exploration of Mercury with the mission BepiColombo[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65 (5-6): 666-675
[3] IAFOLLA V, FIORENZA E, LEFEVRE C, et al. Italian spring sccelerometer (ISA): a fundamental support to BepiColombo radio science experiments[J]. Planetary and Space Science, 2010, 58(1-2): 300-308
[4] IMPERI L, IESS L, MARIANI J M. An analysis of the geodesy and relativity experiments of BepiColombo[J]. Icarus,2018(301): 9-25
[5] MARIANI J M, IESS L. Determination of Mercury’s gravity and orientation through the BepiColombo’s radio science experiment[C]// European Planetary Science Congress. Riga Latvia: European Planetary Science Congress, 2017.
[6] ARMSTRONG W J, ESTABROOK B F, ASMAR W S, et al. Reducing antenna mechanical noise in precision spacecraft Doppler tracking[J]. Radio Science 43: RS3010, 2008
[7] NOTARO V, MARIANI J M, RUSCIO DI A, et al. Feasibility of an innovative technique for noise reduction in spacecraft doppler tracking[C]//IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2018 （proceeding not yet printed）.
[8] BERTOTTI B, COMORETTO G, IESS L. Doppler tracking of spacecraft with multi-frequency links[J]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 1993(269): 608-616
[9] BERTOTTI B, IESS L, TORTORA P. A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft[J]. Nature, 2003(425): 374-376
[10] ASMAR S W, ARMSTRONG W J, IESS L, et al. Spacecraft Doppler tracking: noise budget and accuracy available in precision radio science observations[J]. Radio Science, 2005, 40(2): 1-9
[11] THORNTON L C, BORDER S J. Radiometric tracking techniques for deep-space navigation[M]. USA: NASA DESCANSO series, 2003.
[12] ARMSTRONG W J. Low frequency gravitational wave searches using spacecraft Doppler tracking[J]. Living Reviews in Relativity, 2006, 9 (1): 1-59
[13] MOYER D T. Formulation for observed and computed values of deep space network data types for navigation[M]. USA: Wiley, 2005.
[14] MAZARICO E, GENOVA A, GOOSSENS S, et al. The gravity field, orientation, and ephemeris of Mercury from MESSENGER observations after three years in orbit[J]. Journal of Geophysics Research, 2014, 119(12): 2417-2436
[15] MARGOT L J. A Mercury orientation model including non-zero obliquity and librations[J]. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2009(4): 329-336
[16] MILANI A, GRONCHI G. Theory of Orbit Determination[M]. England: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[17] MACKENZIE R, FOLKNER M W. Applying appropriate weights to Doppler data, JPL Technical Note 343J-06-034[R]. USA: JPL, 2006.
[18] IESS L, BENEDETTO DI M, JAMES N, et al. Astra: interdisciplinary study on enhancement of the end-to-end accuracy for spacecraft tracking techniques[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014(94): 699-707
[19] KEIHM J S, ROSERNBERGER H. Measurements and calibration of tropospheric delay at Goldstone from the Cassini Media Calibration System, IPN Progress Report 42-158[R]. USA: NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2004.
[20] SAATSAMOINEN J. Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites[J]. The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy (AGU), 1972(15): 247-251
[21] APEX meteo station website （2017）[EB/OL]. [2018-03-31]. http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/eso/meteo_apex/form（last access 6/12/2017.
[22] FLUHR C, GROP S, DUBOIS B, et al. Characterization of the individual short-term frequency stability of Cryogenic Sapphire Oscillators at the 1e-16 level[J]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 2016, 63(6): 915-921
[23] TJOELKER L R, PHAM T T. DSN telecommunications link design handbook [M/OL]. （2007204202） [2007209220], Tech. Rep. 810-006 NASA, 2010.