Internal Charging Evaluation in Jupiter Exploration Mission

Abstract

Jupiter has a similar radiation belt structure as Earth. The proton flux in Jupiter’s magnetosphere is about 10 times of that in the Earth. The electron flux in Jupiter’s magnetosphere is about 2～3 magnitude order higher than that of the Earth，and the maximum energy of electron is about 1 GeV. So，the anti-radiation design is one of the key technologies in Jupiter mission. Three elliptical orbits with different inclinations and two kinds of dielectric are selected，and the internal charging processes in time-varying electron environment are simulated. For Fr4 material，the conductivity is relatively small and the deposited charge will leak off when the spacecraft is far away from the center of radiation belt. The maximum charging field is determined by the maximum electron flux. For Kapton material，the conductivity is relatively large and the deposited charge will be accumulated between different orbits，so the charging field will grow gradually. Large inclinations of orbit will benefit in decreasing charging field. Comparing the internal charging behavior of Jupiter elliptical orbit with that of GEO orbit，it is found that the difference of charging field between Fr4 and Kapton in Jupiter orbits is smaller than that in GEO orbit.

Keywords

Jupiter / radiation belt / internal charging

References

[1] KAYALI S，MCALPINE W，BECKER H，et al. Juno radiation design and implementation[C]//Aerospace Conference. Big Sky，MT，USA：IEEE，2012.
[2] LEUNG P,WHITTLESEY C,GARRETT H B,et al. Environment-induced electrostatic discharges as the cause of voyager 1 power-on resets[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,1986(23):323-330
[3] GARRETT H B. Charged particle distributions in Jupiter’s magnetosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1983,88(A9):6899-6903
[4] GARRETT H B,KATZ I,JUN I,et al. The Jovian charging environment and its effects – a review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science,2012,40(2):144-154
[5] BURRELL M O. The calculation of proton penetration and dose rates，NASA TM X-53063[R]. US：NASA，1964.
[6] TABATA T,ITO R. An algorithm for the energy deposition by fast electrons[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineer,1974(53):226-239
[7] FREDERICKSON A R,BELL J T. Analytic approximation for charge current and deposition by 0.1 to 100 MeV electrons in thick slabs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science,1995,42(6):1910-1921
[8] 王建昭,陈鸿飞,蔡振波. 电阻接地状态下星用电路板深层充电仿真方法[J]. 航天器环境工程,2017,34(3):258-264
WANG J Z,CHEN H F,CAI Z B. A method for simulating internal charging of spacecraft circuit board grounded by electric resistance[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering,2017,34(3):258-264
[9] TABATA T,ANDREO P,ITO R. Energy-deposition distributions in materials irradiated by plane-parallel electron beams with energies between 0.1 and 100 MeV[J]. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables,1994, 56(1):105-131
[10] RODGERS D J，HUNTER K A，WRENN G L. The FLUMIC electron environment model[C]//The 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference. Huntsville，USA：NASA，2004.