Design of low-alloying and high-performance solid solution-strengthened copper alloys with element substitution for sustainable development

Abstract

Solid solution-strengthened copper alloys have the advantages of a simple composition and manufacturing process, high mechanical and electrical comprehensive performances, and low cost; thus, they are widely used in high-speed rail contact wires, electronic component connectors, and other devices. Overcoming the contradiction between low alloying and high performance is an important challenge in the development of solid solution-strengthened copper alloys. Taking the typical solid solution-strengthened alloy Cu–4Zn–1Sn as the research object, we proposed using the element In to replace Zn and Sn to achieve low alloying in this work. Two new alloys, Cu–1.5Zn–1Sn–0.4In and Cu–1.5Zn–0.9Sn–0.6In, were designed and prepared. The total weight percentage content of alloying elements decreased by 43% and 41%, respectively, while the product of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and electrical conductivity (EC) of the annealed state increased by 14% and 15%. After cold rolling with a 90% reduction, the UTS of the two new alloys reached 576 and 627 MPa, respectively, the EC was 44.9%IACS and 42.0%IACS, and the product of UTS and EC (UTS × EC) was 97% and 99% higher than that of the annealed state alloy. The dislocations proliferated greatly in cold-rolled alloys, and the strengthening effects of dislocations reached 332 and 356 MPa, respectively, which is the main reason for the considerable improvement in mechanical properties.

Keywords

element substitution / copper alloy / solid solution strengthening / microstructure and performance

References

[1] Jiang YX, Lou HF, Xie HF, et al. Development status and prospects of advanced copper alloy. Strategic Study of CAE, 2020, 22(5): 84.

[2] C.Z. Huang, Y.B. Jiang, Z.X. Wu, et al., Significantly enhanced high-temperature mechanical properties of Cu–Cr–Zn–Zr–Si alloy with stable second phases and grain boundaries, Mater. Des., 233(2023), art. No. 112292.

[3] Maki K, Ito Y, Matsunaga H, Mori H. Solid-solution copper alloys with high strength and high electrical conductivity. Scripta Mater., 2013, 68(10): 777.

[4] Davis JR. ASM Specialty Handbook: Copper and Copper Alloys, 2001, Ohio, ASM International.

[5] H. Zhang, X.C. Deng, and G.H. Zhang, Preparation and properties of multiphase solid-solution strengthened high-performance W–Cu alloys through alloying with Mo, Fe and Ni, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 871(2023), art. No. 144909.

[6] S.W. Huang, P.F. Zhou, F.X. Luo, et al., Effects of Ni and Mn contents on precipitation and strengthening behavior in Cu–Ni–Mn ternary alloys, Mater. Charact., 199(2023), art. No. 112775.

[7] Wang JY, Lü XQ, Chen SQ, Gao Y, Liu Y. Effect of Ni content on the solid solution strengthening behavior of Cu–Ni–Ag alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. Powder Metall., 2021, 26(3): 263.

[8] Liao RW, Wang LR, Liu XZ, Liu Y. Microstructure and properties of Cu–Zn–Al–Fe alloy. Hot Working Technol., 2019, 48(16): 75.

[9] Yang P, He DY, Shao W, et al. Study of the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu–Sn alloys formed by selective laser melting with different Sn contents. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 24, 5476.

[10] Bruder E, Braun P, Rehman HU, et al. Influence of solute effects on the saturation grain size and rate sensitivity in Cu–X alloys. Scripta Mater., 2018, 144, 5.

[11] Olivetti EA, Cullen JM. Toward a sustainable materials system. Science, 2018, 360(6396): 1396.

[12] Raabe D, Tasan CC, Olivetti EA. Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals. Nature, 2019, 575, 64.

[13] Li XY, Lu K. Playing with defects in metals. Nat. Mater., 2017, 16(7): 700.

[14] Li XY, Lu K. Improving sustainability with simpler alloys. Science, 2019, 364(6442): 733.

[15] Zhang HT, Fu HD, He XQ, et al. Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening. Acta Mater., 2020, 200, 803.

[16] Zhang SS, Zhu HH, Zhang L, Zhang WQ, Yang HQ, Zeng XY. Microstructure and properties in QCr0.8 alloy produced by selective laser melting with different heat treatment. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 800, 286.

[17] Zuo XW, Han K, Zhao CC, Niu RM, Wang EG. Microstructure and properties of nanostructured Cu28wt%Ag microcomposite deformed after solidifying under a high magnetic field. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 619, 319.

[18] Harzer TP, Djaziri S, Raghavan R, Dehm G. Nanostructure and mechanical behavior of metastable Cu–Cr thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Acta Mater., 2015, 83, 318.

[19] Akhtar A, Teghtsoonian E. Substitutional solution hardening of magnesium single crystals. Philos. Mag., 1972, 25(4): 897.

[20] J.Z. Li, H. Ding, B.M. Li, W.L. Gao, J. Bai, and G. Sha, Effect of Cr and Sn additions on microstructure, mechanical-electrical properties and softening resistance of Cu–Cr–Sn alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 802(2021), art. No. 140628.

[21] Friedrich HE, Mordike BL. Magnesium technology, 2006, Berlin, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

[22] Balogh L, Ungár T, Zhao YH, et al. Influence of stacking-fault energy on microstructural characteristics of ultrafine-grain copper and copper–zinc alloys. Acta Mater., 2008, 56(4): 809.

[23] Zhang Y, Tao NR, Lu K. Mechanical properties and rolling behaviors of nano-grained copper with embedded nano-twin bundles. Acta Mater., 2008, 56(11): 2429.

[24] Hansen N. Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scripta Mater., 2004, 51(8): 801.

[25] Liu Y, Li Z, Jiang YX, Zhang Y, Zhou ZY, Lei Q. The microstructure evolution and properties of a Cu–Cr–Ag alloy during thermal-mechanical treatment. J. Mater. Res., 2017, 32(7): 1324.

[26] K. Yamaguchi, T. Ishigaki, Y. Inoue, et al., Comprehensive elemental screening of solid-solution copper alloys, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.: Methods, 3(2023), No. 1, art. No. 2250704.

[27] Abe Y, Semboshi S, Masahashi N, Lim SH, Choi EA, Han SZ. Mechanical strength and electrical conductivity of Cu–In solid solution alloy wires. Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2023, 54(3): 928.