Bioleaching of vanadium from stone coal vanadium ore by Bacillus mucilaginosus: Influencing factors and mechanism
Yingbo Dong, Jinyu Zan, Hai Lin
Bioleaching of vanadium from stone coal vanadium ore by Bacillus mucilaginosus: Influencing factors and mechanism
Vanadium and its derivatives are used in various industries, including steel, metallurgy, pharmaceuticals, and aerospace engineering. Although China has massive reserves of stone coal resources, these resources have low grades. Therefore, the effective extraction and recovery of metallic vanadium from stone coal is an important way to realize the efficient resource utilization of stone coal vanadium ore. Herein, Bacillus mucilaginosus was selected as the leaching strain. The vanadium leaching rate reached 35.5% after 20 d of bioleaching under optimal operating conditions. The cumulative vanadium leaching rate in the contact group reached 35.5%, which was higher than that in the noncontact group (9.3%). The metabolites of B. mucilaginosus, such as oxalic, tartaric, citric, and malic acids, dominated in bioleaching, accounting for 73.8% of the vanadium leaching rate. Interestingly, during leaching, the presence of stone coal stimulated the expression of carbonic anhydrase in bacterial cells, and enzyme activity increased by 1.335–1.905 U. Enzyme activity positively promoted the production of metabolite organic acids, and total organic acid content increased by 39.31 mg·L−1, resulting in a reduction of 2.51 in the pH of the leaching system with stone coal. This effect favored the leaching of vanadium from stone coal. Atomic force microscopy illustrated that bacterial leaching exacerbated corrosion on the surface of stone coal beyond 10 nm. Our study provides a clear and promising strategy for exploring the bioleaching mechanism from the perspective of microbial enzyme activity and metabolites.
Bacillus mucilaginosus / stone coal vanadium ore / bioleaching / carbonic anhydrase / organic acids
[1] |
X.X. Guo, S.M. Chen, Y.W. Han, C.B. Hao, X.J. Feng, and B.G. Zhang, Bioleaching performance of vanadium-bearing smelting ash by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans for vanadium recovery, J. Environ. Manage., 336(2023), art. No. 117615.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
Z.L. Wang, B.G. Zhang, C. He, J.X. Shi, M.X. Wu, and J.H. Guo, Sulfur-based mixotrophic vanadium (V) bio-reduction towards lower organic requirement and sulfate accumulation, Water Res., 189(2021), art. No. 116655.
|
[7] |
B. Zhang, Y. Jiang, K. Zuo, C. He, Y. Dai, and Z.J. Ren, Microbial vanadate and nitrate reductions coupled with anaerobic methane oxidation in groundwater, J. Hazard. Mater., 382(2020), art. No. 121228.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
E. Romanovskaia, V. Romanovski, W. Kwapinski, and I. Kurilo, Selective recovery of vanadium pentoxide from spent catalysts of sulfuric acid production: Sustainable approach, Hydrometallurgy, 200(2021), art. No. 105568.
|
[13] |
J.X. Li, B.G. Zhang, M. Yang, and H. Lin, Bioleaching of vanadium by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans from vanadium-bearing resources: Performance and mechanisms, J. Hazard. Mater., 416(2021), art. No. 125843.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
L. Chen, J.R. Liu, W.F. Hu, J. Gao, and J.Y. Yang, Vanadium in soil-plant system: Source, fate, toxicity, and bioremediation, J. Hazard. Mater., 405(2021), art. No. 124200.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
J.R. Ju, Y.L. Feng, H.R. Li, S.L. Liu, and C.L. Xu, Separation and recovery of V, Ti, Fe and Ca from acidic wastewater and vanadium-bearing steel slag based on a collaborative utilization process, Sep. Purif. Technol., 276(2021), art. No. 119335.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
A. Safonov, V. Tregubova, V. Ilin, et al., Comparative study of lanthanum, vanadium, and uranium bioremoval using different types of microorganisms, Water Air Soil Pollut., 229(2018), art. No. 82.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
Y. Wang, Z.L. Cai, Y.M. Zhang, and Q.S. Zheng, Green recovery of vanadium from vanadium-bearing shale under the biological action by Bacillus mucilaginosus and its effect on mineral dissolution, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 10(2022), No. 1, art. No. 107048.
|
[39] |
H.Q. Tian, Z.L. Cai, Y.M. Zhang, and Q.S. Zheng, Chemical mutation of Bacillus mucilaginosus genes to enhance the bioleaching of vanadium-bearing shale, Biochem. Eng. J., 197(2023), art. No. 108962.
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
Z.L. Cai, Y. Wang, Y.M. Zhang, and Q.S. Zheng, Improvement on bioleaching interfacial behavior between Bacillus mucilaginosus and vanadium-bearing shale by surfactant additive, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 10(2022), No. 6, art. No. 108911.
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
S. Chang, Y. He, Y.X. Li, and X.M. Cui, Study on the immobilization of carbonic anhydrases on geopolymer microspheres for CO2 capture, J. Cleaner Prod., 316(2021), art. No. 128163.
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
L. Dusengemungu, G. Kasali, C. Gwanama, and B. Mubemba, Overview of fungal bioleaching of metals, Environ. Adv., 5(2021), art. No. 100083.
|
[49] |
T.H. Nguyen, S. Won, M.G. Ha, D.D. Nguyen, and H.Y. Kang, Bioleaching for environmental remediation of toxic metals and metalloids: A review on soils, sediments, and mine tailings, Chemosphere, 282(2021), art. No. 131108.
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
Y.B. Dong, H. Lin, Y. Liu, and Y. Zhao, Blank roasting and bioleaching of stone coal for vanadium recycling, J. Cleaner Prod., 243(2020), art. No. 118625.
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
Y.Y. Hu, W.T. Liu, W.J. Wang, et al., Biomineralization performance of Bacillus sphaericus under the action of Bacillus mucilaginosus, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020(2020), art. No. 6483803.
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |