A thermodynamic perspective on electrode poisoning in solid oxide fuel cells

Kevin Huang

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6) : 1449 -1455.

PDF
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6) : 1449 -1455. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-023-2783-6
Research Article

A thermodynamic perspective on electrode poisoning in solid oxide fuel cells

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A critical challenge to the commercialization of clean and high-efficiency solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology is the insufficient stack lifespan caused by a variety of degradation mechanisms, which are associated with cell components and chemical feedstocks. Cell components related degradation refers to thermal/chemical/electrochemical deterioration of cell materials under operating conditions, whereas the latter regards impurities in feedstocks of oxidant (air) and reductant (fuel). This article provides a thermodynamic perspective on the understanding of the impurities-induced degradation mechanisms in SOFCs. The discussion focuses on using thermodynamic analysis to elucidate poisoning mechanisms in cathodes by impurity species such as Cr, CO2, H2O, and SO2 and in the anode by species such as S (or H2S), SiO2, and P2 (or PH3). The author hopes the presented fundamental insights can provide a theoretical foundation for searching for better technical solutions to address the critical degradation challenges.

Keywords

impurities / air / fuel / reaction / activity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kevin Huang. A thermodynamic perspective on electrode poisoning in solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2024, 31(6): 1449-1455 DOI:10.1007/s12613-023-2783-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Niakolas DK. Sulfur poisoning of Ni-based anodes for solid oxide fuel cells in H/C-based fuels. Appl. Catal. A, 2014, 486, 123.

[2]

Jiang SP, Chen XB. Chromium deposition and poisoning of cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells–A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(1): 505.

[3]

Yang ZB, Guo MY, Wang N, Ma CY, Wang JL, Han MF. A short review of cathode poisoning and corrosion in solid oxide fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(39): 24948.

[4]

Sun CW, Hui R, Roller J. Cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: A review. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2010, 14(7): 1125.

[5]

Hilpert K, Das D, Miller M, Peck DH, Weiß R. Chromium vapor species over solid oxide fuel cell interconnect materials and their potential for degradation processes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143(11): 3642.

[6]

Jiang SP. Activation, microstructure, and polarization of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2007, 11(1): 93.

[7]

H.G. Desta, D. Tian, Q. Yang, et al., Developing a new Sr and Co-free composite cathode of solid oxide fuel cells with high performance, Chem. Phys. Lett., 806(2022), art. No. 140037.

[8]

Pişkin F, Bliem R, Yildiz B. Effect of crystal orientation on the segregation of aliovalent dopants at the surface of La0.6Sr0.4CoO3. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(29): 14136.

[9]

Wen YT, Yang TR, Lee D, Lee HN, Crumlin EJ, Huang K. Temporal and thermal evolutions of surface Sr-segregation in pristine and atomic layer deposition modified La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ epitaxial films. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(47): 24378.

[10]

F.F. Wang, H. Kishimoto, T. Ishiyama, et al., A review of sulfur poisoning of solid oxide fuel cell cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 478(2020), art. No. 228763.

[11]

J. Hong, M.R. Anisur, S.J. Heo, P.K. Dubey, and P. Singh, Sulfur poisoning and performance recovery of SOFC air electrodes, Front. Energy Res., 9(2021), art. No. 643431.

[12]

Liu RR, Taniguchi S, Shiratori Y, Ito K, Sasaki K. Influence of SO2 on the long-term durability of SOFC cathodes. ECS Trans., 2011, 35(1): 2255.

[13]

Bucher E, Gspan C, Sitte W. Degradation and regeneration of the SOFC cathode material La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ in SO2-containing atmospheres. Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 112.

[14]

Wang F, Yamaji K, Cho DH, et al. Evaluation of sulfur dioxide poisoning for LSCF cathodes. Fuel Cells, 2013, 13(4): 520.

[15]

Daio T, Mitra P, Lyth SM, Sasaki K. Atomic-resolution analysis of degradation phenomena in SOFCS: A case study of SO2 poisoning in LSM cathodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(28): 12214.

[16]

R. Wang, L.R. Parent, S. Gopalan, and Y. Zhong, Experimental and computational investigations on the SO2 poisoning of (La0.8Sr0.2)0.95MnO3 cathode materials, Adv. Powder Mater., 2(2023), No. 1, art. No. 100062.

[17]

Schuler JA, Yokokawa H, Calderone CF, et al. Combined Cr and S poisoning in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J. Power Sources, 2012, 201, 112.

[18]

Bartholomew CH, Agrawal PK, Katzer JR. Sulfur poisoning of metals. Adv. Catal., 1982, 31, 135.

[19]

Zha SW, Cheng Z, Liu ML. Sulfur poisoning and regeneration of Ni-based anodes in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154(2): B201.

[20]

McCarty JG, Wise H. Thermodynamics of sulfur chemisorption on metals. I. Alumina-supported nickel. J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72(12): 6332.

[21]

Yamada M, Hirashima H, Kitada A, Izumi KI, Nakamura J. Three-Ni-atom cluster formed by sulfur adsorption on Ni(111). Surf. Sci., 2008, 602(9): 1659.

[22]

Sargent GA, Freeman GB, Chao JLR. Adsorption of CO on, and S poisoning of, a perfect Ni(111) single crystal and a Ni(111) crystal with small angle boundaries. Surf. Sci., 1980, 100(2): 342.

[23]

Xu CC, Zondlo JW, Finklea HO, Demircan O, Gong MY, Liu XB. The effect of phosphine in syngas on Ni–YSZ anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2009, 193(2): 739.

[24]

Xu CC, Zondlo JW, Gong MY, Liu XB. Effect of PH3 poisoning on a Ni–YSZ anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell under various operating conditions. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196(1): 116.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

165

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/