Ethics, Globalization and Intercultural Communication

Abstract

Ethics and intercultural communication are usually discussed in terms of cultural relativity, identity issues and communication and/ or value systems. In response to our ethical responsibility as communication scholars, a model developed by the author over the last 15 years is introduced. This model explains why and how different types of ethical dilemmas arise in today’s complex global information and communication system, which is increasingly dominated by the Internet and social media (Vaagan 2010, 2011, 2015).
The model, while reflecting a mainly Western vantage point, can have wider significance since it challenges and invites also non-Western perspectives, and thereby can contribute to theorizing and fruitful discussion regarding global intercultural communication and dialogue.

Keywords

Ethics / globalization / information and communication technology (ICT) / information systems / intercultural communication / values

References

[1] Carlsson, Ulla. (Ed.) (2016). Freedom of expression and media in transition. Gothenburg: Nordicom.

[2] Castells, Manuel. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[3] Cleveland, Harlan. (2015). Ethical considerations: Changing behavior. In Larry A. Samovar et al. (2015). Intercultural communication. A reader (pp. 398-404). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

[4] European Commission. (2018). Data protection. Accessed 18 September 2018 from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law—topic/data—protection_en

[5] Evanoff, Richard. (2015). A communicative approach to intercultural dialogue and ethics. In Larry A. Samovar et al. (2015). Intercultural communication. A reader (pp. 417-421). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

[6] International Federation of Journalists. (IFJ) (2018). Accessed 17 September 2018 from: http://www.ifj.org/

[7] International Science Council. (ISC) (2018). Accessed 17 September 2018 from: https://council.science/

[8] Jacobs, Brian. (2015). Community Sociology. In James D. Wright (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2^nd Edition (pp. 361-363). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[9] Kale, David W. (2015). Peace as an ethic for intercultural communication. In Larry A. Samovar et al. (2015). Intercultural communication. A reader (pp. 422-426). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

[10] Ploder, Andrea. (2015). History of ethical questions in social and behavioral sciences. In James D. Wright (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2^nd edition. (pp. 53-59). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[11] Samovar, Larry A.; Porter, Richard E.; McDaniel, Edwin R. & Sexton Roy, Carolyn. (2015). Intercultural communication: A reader. (14^th ed.) Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

[12] United Nations. (2018). Universal declaration of human rights. Accessed 17 September 2018 from: http://www.un.org/en/universal—declaration—human—rights/index.html

[13] Vaagan, Robert W. (2015). Kapittel 9: Etikk. [Chapter 9: “Ethics”]. In Robert W. Vaagan (2015). Medieskapt. Medier i Informasjons—og kommunikasjons—samfunnet. [Medieskapt. Medier i Informasjons— og kommunikasjons—samfunnet.] (pp. 197-224). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

[14] Vaagan, Robert W. (2011). Ethics, social media and mass self—communication. Cahiers de la documentation/Bladen voor documentatie, 2011(2), 16-23. Accessed 17 September 2018 from: https://www.abd—bvd.be/wp—content/uploads/2011—2_Vaagan.pdf

[15] Vaagan, Robert W. (2010). Information ethics revisited: New media and freedom of expression. Ibersid — Journal of Information and Documentation Systems, 2010(1), 29-35. Accessed 17 September 2018 from: http://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/ibersid/article/view/3862

[16] Vaagan, Robert W. & Koehler, Wallace. (2005). Intellectual property rights vs. public access rights: Ethical aspects of the DeCSS decryption program. Information research. Vol. 10. Accessed 17 September 2018 from: http://www.informationr.net

[17] Vaagan, Robert W. (2002, 2012). The ethics of librarianship. IFLA Publications 101. First published2002 by K.G. Saur, Munich. Reprint 2012 by De Gruyter.

[18] Vartabedian, Marc. (2018). California Passes Sweeping Data—Privacy Bill. Wall Street Journal, 28 June, 2018.

[19] Young, Yun Kim. (2015). Intercultural personhood: An integration of eastern and western perspectives. In L.A. Samovar et al. Intercultural communication. A reader (pp. 405-416). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.