Can Imagined Contact Improve Intergroup Attitude in the Long Run?

Anqi HU , Jiro TAKAI

Intercultural Communication Studies ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 2

PDF (603KB)
Intercultural Communication Studies ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) :2
Article
research-article
Can Imagined Contact Improve Intergroup Attitude in the Long Run?
Author information +
History +
PDF (603KB)

Abstract

The imagined contact method of cognitively manipulating intergroup relations has been reported to be widely successful in improving attitude toward the outgroup. However, little has been reported on its durability. Study 1 was conducted to test the stimulus scenario, involving 282 students who were given either an imagined contact scenario or a control, featuring Chinese as the outgroup. Pre-post measures of intergroup attitude were obtained. Imagined contact group showed some improvement in attitude. In study 2, the same method was applied to non-student participants (N=134), but this time, measurements were taken before, right after, one week after and one month after administering the imagined contact approach. Results indicated that the effect of imagined contact did not dissipate after one week, and even one month, particularly for the perception of social distance, but not for other measures. We discussed the potential of imagined contact in its application as a viable means of improving intergroup attitude toward Chinese in Japan.

Keywords

Imagined contact / indirect contact / intergroup anxiety / intergroup attitude / longitudinal / outgroup evaluation / social distance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Anqi HU, Jiro TAKAI. Can Imagined Contact Improve Intergroup Attitude in the Long Run?. Intercultural Communication Studies, 2020, 29 (2) : 2 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Allport, Gordon W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

[2]

Bettencourt, Ann B.; Brewer, Marilynn B.; Croak, Marian R. & Miller, Norman. (1992). Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(4), 301-319.

[3]

Cohen, Elizabeth G. & Lotan, Rachel A. (1995). Producing equal status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99-120.

[4]

Crisp, Richard J. & Turner, Rhiannon N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact, American Psychologist, 64(4), 231-240.

[5]

Giacobbe, Michael R.; Stukas, Arthur A. & Farhall, John. (2013). The effects of imagined versus actual contact with a person with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(3), 265-271.

[6]

Gollwitzer, Peter M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 141-185.

[7]

Hoffarth, Mark R. & Hodson, Gordon. (2016). Who needs imagined contact? Replication attempts examining previous contact as potential moderator. Social Psychology, 47(2), 118-124.

[8]

Hu, Anqi & Takai, Jiro. (2018). Effect of imagined contact in reducing explicit prejudice toward outgroups in Japan. Intercutural Communication Studies, 27(2), 59-80.

[9]

Husnu, Shenel & Crisp, Richard J. (2010). Imagined intergroup contact: A new technique for encouraging greater inter—ethnic contact in Cyprus. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16(1), 97-108.

[10]

Japanese Ministry of Justice. (2017). Heisei 29 nen 6 gatsu genzainiokeru zairyuugaikokujin suunitsuite (Kakuteichi) [2017 June, About the current number of foreign residents in Japan]. Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.moj.go.jp/nyuukokukanri/kouhou/nyuukokukanri04_00068.html.

[11]

Jones, Edward E. & George Goethals R. (1987). Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. In Edward E Jones et al. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 27-46). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

[12]

Mifune, Nobuhiro & Yokota, Kuknihiro. (2018). The external validity of the relationship between social dominance orientation and political or discriminatory attitudes toward foreigners using a Japanese sample. Research in Social Psychology, 34(2), 94-101.

[13]

Miles, Eleanor & Crisp, Richard J. (2014). A meta—analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3-26.

[14]

Mozzariotta, Agostino; Mummendey, Am lie & Wright, Stephan C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effect: Applying social—cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relation , 14(2), 255-274.

[15]

Ohtsuki, Shigemi. (2007). Japanese views over the increase in foreigners: using JGSS—2003 data, Shakaigakuronkou, 28, 1-25.

[16]

Pettigrew, Thomas F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory, Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.

[17]

Stathi, Sofia; Cameron, Linsey; Hartley, Bonny & Bradford Shona. (2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice—reduction intervention in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitudes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(8), 536-546.

[18]

Stephan Walter G. & Stephan White C. (1985). Intergroup anxiety, Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157-175.

[19]

Takai, Jiro. (1989). An overview of international student adjustment studies in Japan. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, 36, 139-147.

[20]

Turner, Rhiannon N.; Crisp, Richard J. & Lambert, Emily. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitude. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 427-441.

[21]

Tropp, Linda R. & Pettigrew, Thomas F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. American Psychological Society, 16(12), 951-957.

[22]

Voci, Alberto & Hewstone Miles. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The meditational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Presses & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 37-54.

[23]

Wark, Colin & Galliher, John F. (2007). Emory Bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale. The American Sociologist, 38(4), 383-395.

[24]

White, Fiona A.; Abu—Rayya, Hisham M. & Weitzel, Chela. (2014). Achieving twelve—months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity—electronic contact (DIEC) experiment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 158-163.

[25]

White, Fiona A.; Harvey, Lauren J. & Abu—Rayya Hisham M. (2015). Improving intergroup relations in the internet age: A critical review. Review of General Psychology, 19(2), 1—11.

[26]

Wright, Stephen. C.; Aron, Arthur; Volpe, Tracy M. & Ropp, Stacy A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross—group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90.

PDF (603KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/