Google-Translate-Combined Emotion Analysis in Translating Literary Works: Comparison of Two Chinese Versions of David Copperfield

Yan LI

Intercultural Communication Studies ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 1

PDF (638KB)
Intercultural Communication Studies ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) :1
Article
research-article
Google-Translate-Combined Emotion Analysis in Translating Literary Works: Comparison of Two Chinese Versions of David Copperfield
Author information +
History +
PDF (638KB)

Abstract

Emotion, the root of literature, can never be ignored as a key factor in literature translation, yet studies on it are still rare till now. Reasons may vary, among which one might be that emotions of different languages seem impossible to compare for the different degrees or standards of measuring them in different cultures. This study intends to investigate the possibility of emotion transfer in translations. Specifically, it examines to what extent and how emotions in the original can be transferred into the translations, combining the machine translation, by comparing two Chinese versions of David Copperfield, as well as the machine translation of the two Chinese versions with the original. The results indicate that emotions can flow from the source to the target language, and their representations are closely related to the translators’ desire to have their versions be adequate to the source or acceptable to the target culture.

Keywords

Emotional analysis / Google Translate / adequacy / acceptability / translational unit

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan LI. Google-Translate-Combined Emotion Analysis in Translating Literary Works: Comparison of Two Chinese Versions of David Copperfield. Intercultural Communication Studies, 2022, 31 (2) : 1 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bowker, Lynne. (2020). Chinese speakers’ use of machine translation as an aid for scholarly writing in English: A review of the literature and a report on a pilot workshop on machine translation literacy. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 7, 288-98.

[2]

Chen, Xiu. (2002). The obtrusion of translators. Chinese Translators Journal, 23, 18-21.

[3]

Dai, Wenjing. (2017). Translator Behavior Criticism on the English translation of Chinese literary theory—A case study of the English translation of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 40, 28-34+159.

[4]

Darwin, Charles. (2009). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[5]

Dickens, Charles. (1980). David Copperfield. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.

[6]

Dixon, Thomas. (2012). “Emotion”: The history of a keyword in crisis. Emotion Review, 4, 338-344.

[7]

Fang, Mengzhi. (2021). The way to construct the Chinese translation discourse system. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies (pp. 29-37).

[8]

Feng, Quangong. (2019). Disputes over faithfulness in translation and further reflections. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 42, 109-19+60.

[9]

Fu, Jingmin, & Hong Zhang. (2020). Towards constructing a viable translation criticism discourse system. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 1—6+94.

[10]

Gao, Yu. (2017). Why would a thousand readers understand Shakespeare in a thousand ways?: The signifying logic of a text from the perspective of hermeneutic openness. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 42, 80-89.

[11]

Holland, Norman N. (2004). The power(?) of literature: A neuropsychological view. New Literary History, 35, 395-410.

[12]

Hu, Gengshen. (2004). From “translator’s subjectivity” to “translator—centeredness”. Chinese Translators Journal, 25, 12-18.

[13]

Huang, Qin, & Qinling Wang. (2018). An exploration into the translation of dialects in Lin Taiyi’s translation of Jing Hua Yuan: Truth—seeking or utility—attaining?. Foreign Language Research, 200, 103—09.

[14]

Izard, Carroll E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2, 363—70.

[15]

Kajzer—Wietrzny, Marta. (2022). An intermodal approach to cohesion in constrained and unconstrained language. Target: International Journal of Translation Studies, 34, 130-62.

[16]

Lei, Lei, & Dilin Liu. (2021). Conducting sentiment analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[17]

Li, Hongman. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu and the theoretical construction of the sociology of translation. Chinese Translators Journal (pp. 6-9).

[18]

Li, Wei, & Haifeng Yan. (2022). Translator Behavior Criticism on the English translation of Chinese martial arts fictions: A case study of Legends of the condor heroes: A hero born. Chinese Cultural Research (pp. 162-171).

[19]

Liu, Yichuan, Elise A. Piazza, Erez Simony, Patricia A. Shewokis, Banu Onaral, Uri Hasson, & Hasan Ayaz. (2017). Measuring speaker—listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7, 43293-93.

[20]

Longo, Mariano. (2020). Emotions through literature: Fictional narratives, society and the emotional self. London and New York: Routledge.

[21]

Luo, Dijiang. (2020). Problem shifts and eco—orientaiton of translator research from the perspective of eco—translatology. Chinese Translators Journal, 41, 13-19+190.

[22]

Ma, Zhijun, & Haixue Jin. (2020). Study on the reported speech and its modern significance in the May 4th novels. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou (pp.151-158).

[23]

Mukhtar, Neelam; Mohammad Abid Khan, & Nadia Chiragh. (2018). Lexicon—based approach outperforms supervised machine learning approach for Urdu sentiment analysis in multiple domains. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 2173-2183.

[24]

Qian, Chunhua, & Fang Liu. (2015). Research on the system of translational actions. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 36, 111-115.

[25]

Radford, Colin. (1977). Tears and fiction. Philosophy, 52, 208-213.

[26]

Rinker, Trinker. (2018). "Sentimentr (Version 2.6.1)."

[27]

Rout, Jitendra Kumar, Kim—Kwang Raymond Choo, Amiya Kumar Dash, Sambit Bakshi, Sanjay Kumar Jena, & Karen L. Williams. (2018). A model for sentiment and emotion analysis of unstructured social media text. Electronic Commerce Research, 18, 181-199.

[28]

Shu, Qizhi, and Hua Yang. (1999). The theory of intertextuality and the subjectivity of translators in translation of literature. Social Science Journal of Xiangtan University, 23, 115-118.

[29]

Stephens, Greg J., Lauren J. Silbert, & Uri Hasson. (2010). Speaker—listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences — PNAS, 107, 14425-14430.

[30]

Tamir, Maya, Shalom H. Schwartz, Jan Cieciuch, Michaela Riediger, Claudio Torres, Christie Scollon, Vivian Dzokoto, Xiaolu Zhou, & Allon Vishkin. (2016). Desired emotions across cultures: A value—based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 67-82.

[31]

Tian, Debei. (2000). On Translator Identity. Chinese Translators Journal (pp. 20-24).

[32]

Tian, Wangsheng. (2003). Appreciation of Tongcheng School’s writings. Beijing: Huawen Press.

[33]

Toury, Gideon. (2012). Descriptive translation studies: And beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

[34]

Wang, Junping. (2020). Distinctions between cultural and social factors in translatorial behavior study. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 3, 53-58+98.

[35]

Wilss, Wolfram. (1996). Knowledge and skills in translator behavior. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub.

[36]

Xing, Jie. (2007). Translators' "habitus": A new perspective on descriptive translation studies. Chinese Translators Journal (pp. 10-15).

[37]

Yin, Guoming. (2013). A study of sentiment: Returning to the root of literature. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (pp. 59-66).

[38]

Zhou, Lingshun. (2010). Translator behavior and the "Truth—seeking—utility—attaining" continuum mode of evaluation: Translator behavior studies (I). Foreign Language Education, 31, 93-97.

[39]

Zhou, Lingshun. (2014a). On the critical perspective of translator behavior and that of texts. Foreign Language Education, 35, 89-93.

[40]

Zhou, Lingshun. (2014b). Translator Behavior Criticism: The theoretical framework. Beijing: Commercial Press.

[41]

Zhou, Lingshun. (2019). Some concepts of the translator behavior criticism. Foreign Language and Literature (bimonthly), 35, 118-123.

[42]

Zhou, Lingshun. (2021). On methodology of Translator Behavior Criticism. Foreign Language Education, 42: 87-93.

[43]

Zhou, Lingshun, & Siyu Zhang. (2018). A review of the translator Fang Zhong from the perspective of the translator’s behavior. Foreign Language and Literature (bimonthly), 34, 103—09.

[44]

Zhou, Lingshun, & Guoyue Zhao. (2015). The strategic significance of Translator Behavior Criticism. Shanghai Journal of Translators (pp. 9—14).

[45]

Zhu, Fen. (2021). Research on the types of translation critics in translator's behavior criticism——with the controversy on the evaluation of the Japanese translation of MO Yan's novels as a case study. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice (pp.153-161).

PDF (638KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/