Integrated proteomic analysis reveals interactions between phosphorylation and ubiquitination in rose response to Botrytis infection

Rui Li, Juanni Yao, Yue Ming, Jia Guo, Jingjing Deng, Daofeng Liu, Zhengguo Li, Yulin Cheng

PDF
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 238. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad238
ARTICLES

Integrated proteomic analysis reveals interactions between phosphorylation and ubiquitination in rose response to Botrytis infection

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As two of the most abundant post-translational modifications, phosphorylation and ubiquitination play a significant role in modulating plant-pathogen interactions and increasing evidence indicates their crosstalk in plant immunity. Rose (Rosa sp.) is one of the most important ornamental plants and can be seriously infected by Botrytis cinerea. Here, integrated proteomics analysis was performed to detect global proteome, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination changes in rose upon B. cinerea infection and investigate the possible phosphorylation and ubiquitination crosstalk. A total of 6165 proteins, 11 774 phosphorylation and 10 582 ubiquitination sites, and 77 phosphorylation and 13 ubiquitination motifs were identified. Botrytis cinerea infection resulted in 169 up-regulated and 122 down-regulated proteins, 291 up-regulated and 404 down-regulated phosphorylation sites, and 250 up-regulated and 634 down-regulated ubiquitination sites. There were 12 up-regulated PR10 proteins and half of them also showed reduced ubiquitination. A lot of kinases probably involved in plant pattern-triggered immunity signaling were up-regulated phosphoproteins. Noticeably, numerous kinases and ubiquitination-related proteins also showed a significant change in ubiquitination and phosphorylation, respectively. A cross-comparison of phosphoproteome and ubiquitylome indicated that both of two post-translational modifications of 104 proteins were dynamically regulated, and many putative pattern-triggered immunity signaling components in the plant plasma membrane were co-regulated. Moreover, five selected proteins, including four PR10 proteins and a plasma membrane aquaporin, were proven to be involved in rose resistance to B. cinerea. Our study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying rose resistance to B. cinerea and also increases the database of phosphorylation and ubiquitination sites in plants.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rui Li, Juanni Yao, Yue Ming, Jia Guo, Jingjing Deng, Daofeng Liu, Zhengguo Li, Yulin Cheng. Integrated proteomic analysis reveals interactions between phosphorylation and ubiquitination in rose response to Botrytis infection. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11(1): 238 https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad238

References

[1.]
Zhang Y, Zeng L. Crosstalk between ubiquitination and other post-translational protein modifications in plant immunity. Plant Commun. 2020;1:100041
[2.]
Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L. et al. Global analysis of phospho-rylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat Methods. 2013;10:676-82
[3.]
Mevissen TE, Komander D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase speci-ficity and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:159-92
[4.]
Dai VL, Gevaert K, De Smet I. Protein language: post-translational modifications talking to each other. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:1068-80
[5.]
Tahir J, Rashid M, Afzal AJ. Post-translational modifications in effectors and plant proteins involved in host-pathogen conflicts. Plant Pathol. 2019;68:628-44
[6.]
DeFalco TA, Zipfel C. Molecular mechanisms of early plant pattern-triggered immune signaling. Mol Cell. 2021;81:3449-67
[7.]
Li L, Li M, Yu L. et al. The FLS2-associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:329-38
[8.]
Liu J, Elmore JM, Lin Z-JD. et al. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase phosphorylates the host target RIN4, leading to the activation of a plant innate immune receptor. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9:137-46
[9.]
Wang J, Zhou L, Shi H. et al. A single transcription factor pro-motes both yield and immunity in rice. Science. 2018;361:1026-8
[10.]
Zhou J, Wang X, He Y. et al. Differential phosphorylation of the transcription factor WRKY33 by the protein kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 cooperatively regulates camalexin biosynthe-sis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020;32:2621-38
[11.]
Ma M, Wang W, Fei Y. et al. A surface-receptor-coupled G protein regulates plant immunity through nuclear protein kinases. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30:1602-1614.e5
[12.]
Zhao Y, Zheng X, Zhang X. et al. PIF3 is phosphorylated by MAPK to modulate plant immunity. New Phytol. 2023;240:372-81
[13.]
Zhou B, Zeng L. Conventional and unconventional ubiquitina-tion in plant immunity. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017;18:1313-30
[14.]
Liu X, Song L, Zhang H. et al. Rice ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme OsUBC26 is essential for immunity to the blast fungus Magna-porthe oryzae. Mol Plant Pathol. 2021;22:1613-23
[15.]
Ma X, Zhang C, Kim DY. et al. Ubiquitylome analysis reveals a central role for the ubiquitin-proteasome system in plant innate immunity. Plant Physiol. 2021;185:1943-65
[16.]
Zhou B, Mural RV, Chen X. et al. A subset of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes is essential for plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 2017;173: 1371-90
[17.]
Lee D, Lal NK, Lin ZJD. et al. Regulation of reactive oxygen species during plant immunity through phosphorylation and ubiquitination of RBOHD. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1-16
[18.]
Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA. et al. The top 10 fun-gal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13:414-30
[19.]
Fillinger S, Elad Y (eds). Botrytis - the Fungus, the Pathogen and its Management in Agricultural Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016
[20.]
Liao C-J, Hailemariam S, Sharon A. et al. Pathogenic strategies and immune mechanisms to necrotrophs: differences and sim-ilarities to biotrophs and hemibiotrophs. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2022;69:102291
[21.]
AbuQamar S, Moustafa K, Tran LS. Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against Botrytis cinerea. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37: 262-74
[22.]
Li W, Ahn IP, Ning Y. et al. The U-box/ARM E3 ligase PUB13 regulates cell death, defense, and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012;159:239-50
[23.]
Luo H, Laluk K, Lai Z. et al. The Arabidopsis Botrytis Susceptible1 Interactor defines a subclass of RING E3 ligases that regulate pathogen and stress responses. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1766-82
[24.]
Hibrand Saint-Oyant L, Ruttink T, Hamama L. et al. Ahigh-quality genome sequence of Rosa chinensis to elucidate ornamen-tal traits. Nat Plants. 2018;4:473-84
[25.]
Munoz M, Faust JE, Schnabel G. Characterization of Botrytis cinerea from commercial cut flower roses. Plant Dis. 2019;103: 1577-83
[26.]
LiuX, ZhouX, LiD. et al. Rose WRKY13 promotes disease pro-tection to Botrytis by enhancing cytokinin content and reducing abscisic acid signaling. Plant Physiol. 2023;191:679-93
[27.]
Cao X, Yan H, Liu X. et al. A detached petal disc assay and virus-induced gene silencing facilitate the study of Botrytis cinerea resistance in rose flowers. Hortic Res. 2019;6:136
[28.]
Liu X, Cao X, Shi S. et al. Comparative RNA-Seq analysis reveals a critical role for brassinosteroids in rose (Rosa hybrida)petal defense against Botrytis cinerea infection. BMC Genet. 2018;19: 1-10
[29.]
Liu X, Li D, Zhang S. et al. Genome-wide characterization of the rose (Rosa chinensis) WRKY family and role of RcWRKY41 in gray mold resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:1-12
[30.]
Facette MR, Shen Z, Björnsdóttir FR. et al. Parallel proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of successive stages of maize leaf development. Plant Cell. 2013;25:2798-812
[31.]
Prianichnikov N, Koch H, Koch S. et al. MaxQuant software for ion mobility enhanced shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020;19:1058-69
[32.]
Zhou H, Low TY, Hennrich ML. et al. Enhancing the identifica-tion of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase sub-strates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;12:2673
[33.]
Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Mertins P. et al. Refined preparation and use of anti-diglycine remnant (K-ε-GG) antibody enables routine quantification of 10,000s of ubiquitination sites in single proteomics experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12: 825-31
[34.]
Xu J, Wang XY, Guo WZ. The cytochrome P450 superfamily: key players in plant development and defense. J Integr Agr. 2015;14: 1673-86
[35.]
Gullner G, Komives T, Kiraly L. et al. Glutathione S-transferase enzymes in plant-pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1836
[36.]
Jain D, Khurana JP. Role of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins in plant defense mechanism. In: Singh A, Singh I, eds. Molecu-lar Aspects of Plant-Pathogen Interaction. Springer: Ingapore, 2018, 265-81
[37.]
Yoshida H, Tanimoto E, Hirai T. et al. Evolution and diversi-fication of the plant gibberellin receptor GID1. PNAS Nexus. 2018;115:E7844-53
[38.]
Agarwal P, Agarwal PK. Pathogenesis related-10 proteins are small, structurally similar but with diverse role in stress signal-ing. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:599-611
[39.]
Guo J, Cao P, Yuan L. et al. Revealing the contribution of GbPR10.5D 1 to resistance against Verticillium dahliae and its regulation for structural defense and immune signaling. Plant. Genome. 2022;15:e20271
[40.]
Ye J, Zhang Z, Long H. et al. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses reveal extensive phosphorylation of regulatory pro-teins in developing rice anthers. Plant J. 2015;84:527-44
[41.]
Mayank P, Grossman J, Wuest S. et al. Characterization of the phosphoproteome of mature Arabidopsis pollen. Plant J. 2012;72: 89-101
[42.]
Ren L, Li C, Wang Y. et al. In vivo phosphoproteome analysis reveals kinome reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018;17:1067-83
[43.]
Guo J, Liu J, Wei Q. et al. Proteomes and ubiquitylomes analysis reveals the involvement of ubiquitination in protein degradation in petunias. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:668-87
[44.]
Zhu L, Cheng H, Peng G. et al. Ubiquitinome profiling reveals the landscape of ubiquitination regulation in rice young panicles. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020;18:305-20
[45.]
Cheng Y, Xia X, Lin Y. et al. Ubiquitylome study highlights ubiquitination of primary metabolism related proteins in fruit response to postharvest pathogen infection. Postharvest Biol Tech-nol. 2020;163:111142
[46.]
Albert I, Hua CL, Nurnberger T. et al. Surface sensor systems in plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 2020;182:1582-96
[47.]
Lang JL, Genot B, Bigeard J. et al. MPK3 and MPK6 control salicylic acid signaling by up-regulating NLR receptors during pattern-and effector-triggered immunity. J Exp Bot. 2022;73:2190-205
[48.]
Bredow M, Monaghan J. Regulation of plant immune signaling by calcium-dependent protein kinases. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019;32:6-19
[49.]
Zhao Z, Li M, Zhang H. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins in rice leaves reveals a vesicle trafficking network in plant immunity that is provoked by blast fungi. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:853195
[50.]
Schellenberger R, Touchard M, Clément C. et al. Apoplastic invasion patterns triggering plant immunity: plasma membrane sensing at the frontline. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019;20:1602-16
[51.]
Tian S, Wang X, Li P. et al. Plant aquaporin AtPIP1;4 links apoplas-tic H2O2 induction to disease immunity pathways. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:1635-50
[52.]
Zhang M, Shi H, Li N. et al. Aquaporin OsPIP2;2 links the H2O2 sig-nal and a membrane-anchored transcription factor to promote plant defense. Plant Physiol. 2022;188:2325-41
[53.]
Yan S, Bhawal R, Yin Z. et al. Recent advances in proteomics and metabolomics in plants. Mol Hortic. 2022;2:1-38
[54.]
Zheng T, Li P, Li L. et al. Research advances in and prospects of ornamental plant genomics. Hortic Res. 2021;8:65
[55.]
Heazlewood JL. The green proteome: challenges in plant pro-teomics. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2:6
[56.]
Iesmantavicius V, Weinert BT, Choudhary C. Convergence of ubiquitylation and phosphorylation signaling in rapamycin-treated yeast cells. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13: 1979-92
[57.]
Ma G, Shi X, Zou Q. et al. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals dynamic changes during daylily flower senes-cence. Planta. 2018;248:859-73
[58.]
Yao J, Li R, Cheng Y. et al. A combined transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of chrysanthemum provides new insights into petal senescence. Planta. 2022;255:1-14
[59.]
He D, Li M, Damaris RN. et al. Quantitative ubiquitylomics approach for characterizing the dynamic change and extensive modulation of ubiquitylation in rice seed germination. Plant J. 2020;101:1430-47
[60.]
Mehta D, Ghahremani M, Pérez-Fernández M. et al. Phosphate and phosphite have a differential impact on the proteome and phosphoproteome of Arabidopsis suspension cell cultures. Plant J. 2021;105:924-41
[61.]
Amagai A, Honda Y, Ishikawa S. et al. Phosphoproteomic pro-filing reveals ABA-responsive phosphosignaling pathways in Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2018;94:699-708
[62.]
Jiang C, Jiang T, Deng S. et al. Integrative analysis of transcrip-tome, proteome, and ubiquitome changes during rose petal abscission. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1041141
[63.]
Zhang Q, Xu C, Wei H. et al. Two pathogenesis-related proteins interact with leucine-rich repeat proteins to promote Alternaria leaf spot resistance in apple. Hortic Res. 2021;8:219
[64.]
Ma H, Xiang G, Li Z. et al. Grapevine VpPR10.1 functions in resis-tance to Plasmopara viticola through triggering a cell death-like defence response by interacting with VpVDAC3. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1488-501
[65.]
Liu G-T, Wang BB, Lecourieux D. et al. Proteomic analysis of early-stage incompatible and compatible interactions between grapevine and P. viticola. Hortic Res. 2021;8:21
[66.]
Choi DS, Hwang IS, Hwang BK. Requirement of the cytosolic interaction between PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN10 and LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEIN1 for cell death and defense signaling in pepper. Plant Cell. 2012;24:1675-90
[67.]
Akira S. Regnase-1, a ribonuclease involved in the regulation of immune responses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2013;78: 51-60
[68.]
Guo J, Cheng Y. Advances in fungal elicitor-triggered plant immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12003
[69.]
Liebrand TW, van den Burg HA, Joosten MH. Two for all: receptor-associated kinases SOBIR1 and BAK1. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19: 123-32
[70.]
Cao Y, Liang Y, Tanaka K. et al. The kinase LYK5 is a major chitin receptor in Arabidopsis and forms a chitin-induced complex with related kinase CERK1. eLife. 2014;3:e03766
[71.]
Veronese P, Nakagami H, Bluhm B. et al. The membrane-anchored BOTRYTIS-INDUCED KINASE1 plays distinct roles in Arabidopsis resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. Plant Cell. 2006;18:257-73
[72.]
LinW, Li B, Lu D. et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of protein kinase complex BAK1/BIK1 mediates Arabidopsis innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:3632-7
[73.]
Ma X, Claus LAN, Leslie ME. et al. Ligand-induced monoubiq-uitination of BIK1 regulates plant immunity. Nature. 2020;581: 199-203
[74.]
Wang J, Grubb LE, Wang J. et al. A regulatory module control-ling homeostasis of a plant immune kinase. Mol Cell. 2018;69: 493-504.e6
[75.]
Albrecht C, Boutrot F, Segonzac C. et al. Brassinosteroids inhibit pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune sig-naling independent of the receptor kinase BAK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:303-8
[76.]
Elmore JM, Coaker G. The role of the plasma membrane H+- ATPase in plant-microbe interactions. Mol Plant. 2011;4:416-27
[77.]
Rodrigues O, Reshetnyak G, Grondin A. et al. Aquaporins facili-tate hydrogen peroxide entry into guard cells to mediate ABA-and pathogen-triggered stomatal closure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9200-5
[78.]
Ma Z, Sun Y, Zhu X. et al. Membrane nanodomains modulate formin condensation for actin remodeling in Arabidopsis innate immune responses. Plant Cell. 2022;34:374-94
[79.]
Gouguet P, Gronnier J, Legrand A. et al. Connecting the dots: from nanodomains to physiological functions of REMORINs. Plant Physiol. 2021;185:632-49
[80.]
Wang J, Xi L, Wu XN. et al. PEP7 acts as a peptide ligand for the receptor kinase SIRK1 to regulate aquaporin-mediated water influx and lateral root growth. Mol Plant. 2022;15: 1615-31
[81.]
Lefebvre B, Timmers T, Mbengue M. et al. A remorin protein inter-acts with symbiotic receptors and regulates bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2343-8
[82.]
Pinto E, Ferreira IM. Cation transporters/channels in plants: tools for nutrient biofortification. J Plant Physiol. 2015;179: 64-82
[83.]
He Y, Zhou J, Meng X. Phosphoregulation of Ca2+ influx in plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24:1067-9
[84.]
Cheng YL, Wang X, Yao J. et al. Characterization of protein kinase PsSRPKL, a novel pathogenicity factor in the wheat stripe rust fungus. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17: 2601-17
[85.]
Meier F, Brunner AD, Koch S. et al. Online parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF) with a novel trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018;17: 2534-45
[86.]
Nelson BK, Cai X, Nebenführ A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 2007;51:1126-36
[87.]
Gachon C, Saindrenan P. Real-time PCR monitoring of fun-gal development in Arabidopsis thaliana infected by Alternaria brassicicola and Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42: 367-71
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/