Multifaceted natural resources and green energy transformation for sustainable industrial development

Abstract

Climate change is the most phenomenal challenge to humanity, and its roots are intervened with unsustainable industrialization, exercising overexploitation of natural resources. Therefore, the departure from non-renewable to renewables has become inevitable, though thought-provoking. In this respect, we explore how green energy transformation moderates the impacts of multifaceted natural resources on sustainable industrial development in the presence of other covariates involving technological progress, financial development, and economic progress. We compiled data from Group of Seven (G-7) members over the 1995−2018 period and applied panel quantile regression (PQREG) to capture the effects across varying levels of quantiles of sustainable industrial development. Results revealed a positive role of natural gas rents, while coal, forest, and total natural resource rents contributed adverse implications for sustainable industrial development. However, the green energy transformation proved to be the game changer because it not only directly induced sustainable industrial development improvement but also turned the unfavorable effects of coal, forest, and total natural resources into favorable ones by interacting with those multifaceted natural resources. Technological, financial, and economic progress supported sustainable industrial development in G-7 nations, particularly in members with existing middle and upper scales of sustainable industrial development. These findings are robust enough when subjected to different estimation tools. In light of these outcomes, the interaction between green energy transformation and natural resource policy is inevitably critical to attaining natural resource efficiency for sustainable industrial development. Therefore, it is imperative to establish a close policy coordination between advancing green energy technology and allocating natural resource revenue to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs), with a particular emphasis on SDG-7 and SDG-13.

Keywords

Multifaceted natural resources / Green energy transformation / Sustainable industrial development / Technological progress / G-7 countries

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Desire Wade Atchike: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Munir Ahmad: Writing – review & editing, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Qingyu Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Key Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (21AGL014); Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20210324093208022); Shenzhen University Humanities and Social Sciences High-level Innovation Team Project for Leading Scholars (24LJXZ06). This achievement was also partially funded by the “Research Base on Digital Economy Innovation and Linkage with Hub Free Trade Zones”, a key research base of philosophy and Social Sciences in Ningbo, China.

References

M.M. Aba, N.B. Amado, A.L. Rodrigues, I.L. Sauer, A.A.M. Richardson. Energy transition pathways for the Nigerian Road Transport: Implication for energy carrier, Powertrain technology, and CO2 emission. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 38 (2023), pp. 55-68,

S. Aboagye, P.A. Kwakwa. The role of international tourism, trade openness and renewable energy in the financial development of selected African countries. Res. Glob., 7 (2023), Article 100170,

I. Adeshola, O. Usman, M. Agoyi, A.A. Awosusi, T.S. Adebayo. Digitalization and the environment: The role of information and communication technology and environmental taxes in European countries. Nat. Resour. Forum, 1–21 (2023),

K. Adjei-Mantey, F. Adusah-Poku, P.A. Kwakwa. International tourism, exchange rate, and renewable energy: Do they boost or burden efforts towards a low carbon economy in selected African countries?. Cogent Econ. Financ., 11 (2023),

M. Ahmad, G. Jabeen. Biogas technology adoption and household welfare perspectives for sustainable development. Energ. Policy, 181 (2023), Article 113728,

M. Ahmad, E. Satrovic. Relating fiscal decentralization and financial inclusion to environmental sustainability : Criticality of natural resources. J. Environ. Manage., 325 (2023), Article 116633,

M. Ahmad, E. Satrovic. Modeling natural resources for ecological sustainability. Gondwana Res., 126 (2024), pp. 243-266,

M. Ahmad, Y. Wu. Natural resources, technological progress, and ecological efficiency: Does financial deepening matter for G-20 economies ?. Resour. Policy, 77 (2022), Article 102770,

M. Ahmad, X. Zhu, Y. Wu. The criticality of international tourism and technological innovation for carbon neutrality across regional development levels. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 182 (2022), Article 121848,

M. Alariqi, W. Long, P.R. Singh, A. Al-Barakani, A. Muazu. Modelling dynamic links among energy transition, technological level and economic development from the perspective of economic globalisation: Evidence from MENA economies. Energ. Reports, 9 (2023), pp. 3920-3931,

H.A. AlNemer, B. Hkiri, K. Tissaoui. Dynamic impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Fresh evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Renew. Energ., 209 (2023), pp. 340-356,

S. Ashfaq, S. Liangrong, F. Waqas, S. Gulzar, G. Mujtaba, R.M. Nasir. Renewable energy and green economic growth nexus: Insights from simulated dynamic ARDL. Gondwana Res (2023),

D.W. Atchike, Z. Zhenyu, T. Ali, G. Weishang, G. Jabeen. Towards sustainable energy: Factors affecting solar power system adoption by small and medium-sized businesses. Front. Environ. Sci., 10 (2022), pp. 1-12,

A.A. Awosusi, T.S. Adebayo, D. Kirikkaleli, M. Altuntaş. Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 29 (2022), pp. 593-610,

A.A. Awosusi, H. Ozdeser, M. Seraj, S. Abbas. Can green resource productivity, renewable energy, and economic globalization drive the pursuit of carbon neutrality in the top energy transition economies?. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 30 (2023), pp. 745-759,

L. Battisti. Energy, power, and greenhouse gas emissions for future transition scenarios. Energy Policy, 179 (2023), Article 113626,

C.P. Bosah, S. Li, G.K.M. Ampofo, I. Sangare. A continental and global assessment of the role of energy consumption, total natural resource rent, and economic growth as determinants of carbon emissions. Sci. Total Environ., 892 (2023), Article 164592,

BP. Statistical Review of World Energy [WWW Document]. Stat. Rev, World Energy (2020)

J. Breitung. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. B.H. Baltagi, T.B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2001), pp. 161-177,

P. Chen. Curse or blessing? The relationship between sustainable development plans for resource cities and corporate sustainability - Evidence from China. J. Environ. Manage., 341 (2023), Article 117988,

J. Dai, Z. Ahmed, A. Sinha, U.K. Pata, R. Alvarado. Sustainable green electricity, technological innovation, and ecological footprint: Does democratic accountability moderate the nexus?. Util. Policy, 82 (2023), Article 101541,

O. Damette, S. Kablan, C. Mathonnat. Firms’ access to finance in resource-based countries and the financial resource curse. J. Comp. Econ., 51 (2023), pp. 1031-1047,

S. Damrah, E. Satrovic, M. Atyeh, F.A. Shawtari. Employing the Panel Quantile Regression Approach to Examine the Role of Natural Resources in Achieving Environmental Sustainability: Does Globalization Create Some Difference?. Mathematics, 10 (2022), pp. 1-19,

H. Deng, Z. Song, T. Baležentis, Z. Shen. How energy transition promotes pollution abatement in China’s industrial sector. Comput. Ind. Eng., 182 (2023), Article 109402,

T. Dietz, E.A. Rosa. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94 (1997), pp. 175-179

N. Ding, B.C. Field. Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Land Econ., 81 (2005), pp. 496-502,

J. Ditzen. Estimating dynamic common-correlated effects in stata. Stata J., 18 (2018), pp. 585-617,

E.I. Dumitrescu, C. Hurlin. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model., 29 (2012), pp. 1450-1460,

ESDN, 2011. Resource policies in the context of sustainable development: Current trends and challenges ahead, European Sustainable Development Network.

M. Fan, M. Li, J. Liu, S. Shao. Is high natural resource dependence doomed to low carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 283 cities in China. Energy Econ., 115 (2022), Article 106328,

Z. Fareed, U.K. Pata. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and income in top ten renewable energy-consuming countries: Advanced Fourier based panel data approaches. Renew. Energy, 194 (2022), pp. 805-821,

Z. Fareed, S. Salem, T.S. Adebayo, U.K. Pata, F. Shahzad. Role of Export Diversification and Renewable Energy on the Load Capacity Factor in Indonesia: A Fourier Quantile Causality Approach. Front. Environ. Sci., 9 (2021), pp. 1-9,

C. Gao, H. Chen. Electricity from renewable energy resources: Sustainable energy transition and emissions for developed economies. Util. Policy, 82 (2023), Article 101543,

GFN. Global Footprint Network: Advancing the Science of Sustainability [WWW Document]. Natl. Footpr, Biocapacity Accounts (2022)

G.M. Grossman, A.B. Krueger. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res, Working Pa (1991)

X. Hao, W. Fu, K. Albitar. Innovation with ecological sustainability: Does corporate environmental responsibility matter in green innovation?. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 21-42, 10.58567/jea02030002

R.L. Ibrahim, A.A. Awosusi, K.B. Ajide, H. Ozdeser. Exploring the renewable energy-environmental sustainability pathways: what do the interplay of technological innovation, structural change, and urbanization portends for BRICS?. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2023),

IEA, 2021. International Energy Agency [WWW Document]. Energy intensity per unit GDP. URL https://www.iea.org/ (accessed 8.23.21).

IISD, 2022. Navigating Energy Transitions - Mapping the road to 1.5°C.

IPCC, 2022. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. doi:

IRENA. Renewable Capacity Statistics 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi (2020)

IRP. Material Efficiency Strategies for a Low-Carbon Future Summary for Policymakers. United Nations Environment Programme (2020),

G. Jabeen, D. Wang, C. Işık, R. Alvarado, S. Ongan. Role of energy utilization intensity, technical development, economic openness, and foreign tourism in environmental sustainability. Gondwana Res (2023),

K. Jamil, L. Dunnan, F.H. Awan, G. Jabeen, R.F. Gul, M. Idrees, L. Mingguang. Antecedents of Consumer’s Purchase Intention Towards Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: An Agenda of Energy Efficiency in the Post COVID-19 Era. Front. Energy Res., 10 (2022), pp. 1-13,

C. Kao. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom., 90 (1999)

K. Khan, J. Zhang, F. Gul, T. Li. The “carbon curse”: Understanding the relationship between resource abundance and emissions. Extr. Ind. Soc., 11 (2022), Article 101119,

R. Koenker, G. Bassett. Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46 (1978), pp. 33-50,

Ö. Korkmaz. Do oil, coal, and natural gas consumption and rents impact economic growth? An empirical analysis of the Russian Federation. Resour. Policy, 77 (2022), pp. 1-6,

C.K. Lau, G. Gozgor, M.K. Mahalik, G. Patel, J. Li. Introducing a new measure of energy transition: Green quality of energy mix and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Econ., 122 (2023), Article 106702,

N. Li, D. Wu. Nexus between natural resource and economic development: How green innovation and financial inclusion create sustainable growth in BRICS region?. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103883,

C. Liu, C. Tang, Y. Liu. Does the transformation of energy structure promote green technological innovation? A quasi–natural experiment based on new energy demonstration city construction. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101615,

G.S. Maddala, S. Wu. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull. Econ. Financ., 61 (1999), pp. 631-652

R.G.T. Maia, K.C. Garcia. What they say, what they do and how they do it: An evaluation of the energy transition and GHG emissions of electricity companies. Energy Policy, 174 (2023),

H. Mao, K. Ostaszewski, J. Wang. Critical condition for deposit insurance to partially or fully substitute for raising capital under cyclical economic environment. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 140-153, 10.58567/jea02040008

E.P. Mesagan, A.O. Charles, X.V. Vo. The relevance of resource wealth in output growth and industrial development in Africa. Resour. Policy, 82 (2023), Article 103517,

S.K. Mohammed, K.U. Pata. Linking the utilization of mineral resources and climate change: A novel approach with frequency domain analysis. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101683,

NICR. Natural Resources. Implications for the United States (2013)

OECD. Environment at a Glance Indicators. Environ. a Glance Indic., 1–25 (2019),

B. Ozcan, Danish, M. Temiz. Re-visiting resource curse hypothesis in China through the lens of human capital and globalization. J. Environ. Manage., 338 (2023), Article 117685,

P.K. Ozili. Determinants of FinTech and BigTech lending: the role of financial inclusion and financial development. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 66-79, 10.58567/jea02030004

U.K. Pata, S. Karlilar. The integrated influence of energy security risk and green innovation on the material footprint: An EKC analysis based on fossil material flows. J. Clean. Prod., 435 (2024), Article 140469,

U.K. Pata, L. Madureira, Z. Fareed. Investigating the LCC hypothesis for Portugal: the role of renewable energy and energy related R&D technologies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2024),

P. Pedroni. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. B.H. Baltagi, T.B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2001), pp. 93-130,

P. Pedroni. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom. Theory, 20 (2004), pp. 597-625,

D. Persyn, J. Westerlund. Error-Correction–Based Cointegration Tests for Panel Data. Stata J (2008), pp. 232-241

M.H. Pesaran. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econom., 22 (2007), pp. 265-312,

M.H. Pesaran. Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels. Econom. Rev., 34 (2015), pp. 1089-1117,

H.M. Pesaran, T. Yamagata. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J. Econom., 142 (2008), pp. 50-93,

C.S. Saba. Nexus between CO2 emissions, renewable energy consumption, militarisation, and economic growth in South Africa: Evidence from using novel dynamic ARDL simulations. Renew. Energy, 205 (2023), pp. 349-365,

M. Sadiq, K.Y. Chau, N.T.T. Ha, T.T.H. Phan, T.Q. Ngo, P.Q. Huy. The impact of green finance, eco-innovation, renewable energy and carbon taxes on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: Evidence from CS ARDL estimation. Geosci. Front., 101689 (2023),

N. Saqib, I. Ozturk, M. Usman. Investigating the implications of technological innovations, financial inclusion, and renewable energy in diminishing ecological footprints levels in emerging economies. Geosci. Front., 14 (2023), Article 101667,

Satrovic, E., Cetindas, A., Akben, I., Damrah, S., 2023. Do natural resource dependence, economic growth and transport energy consumption accelerate ecological footprint in the most innovative countries? The moderating role of technological innovation. Gondwana Res. doi:

F. Shahzad, Z. Fareed. Examining the relationship between fiscal decentralization, renewable energy intensity, and carbon footprints in Canada by using the newly constructed bootstrap Fourier Granger causality test in quantile. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), pp. 4617-4626,

J.H. Stock, M.W. Watson. A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica, 61 (1993), pp. 783-820,

C.W. Su, M. Umar, D. Kirikkaleli, A. Ayobamiji Awosusi, M. Altuntaş. Testing the asymmetric effect of financial stability towards carbon neutrality target: The case of Iceland and global comparison. Gondwana Res., 116 (2023), pp. 125-135,

X.Q. Sun, A.A. Awosusi, Z. Han, B. Uzun, E. Öncü. Racing towards environmental sustainability: a synergy between economic complexity, political stability, and energy transition: policy insight from a bootstrap time varying causality approach. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 31 (2024), pp. 206-221,

W. Teng, M.M. Islam, L. Vasa, S. Abbas, U. Shahzad. Impacts of nuclear energy, greener energy, and economic progress on the load capacity factor: What we learn from the leading nuclear power economies?. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101739,

TUED, 2021. Energy Transition or Energy Expansion?

TWG. Towards the achivement of SDG 7 Net-zero emissions. Energy Transition UN Report (2021)

M. Verbič, E. Satrovic, A. Mujtaba. Assessing the Driving Factors of Carbon Dioxide and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Maintain Environmental Sustainability in Southeastern Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res., 16 (2022), pp. 1-14,

J. Wang, W. Azam. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101757,

Q. Wang, J. Sun, R. Li, U. Korkut Pata. Linking trade openness to load capacity factor: The threshold effects of natural resource rent and corruption control. Gondwana Res (2023),

J. Westerlund. Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bull. Econ. Financ., 69 (2007), pp. 709-748,

H. Wu, Y. Hao, C. Geng, W. Sun, Y. Zhou, F. Lu. Ways to improve cross-regional resource allocation: Does the development of digitalization matter?. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 1-30, 10.58567/jea02040001

L. Xu, Y. Wu. Nexus between green finance, renewable energy and carbon emission: Empirical evidence from selected Asian economies. Renew. Energy, 215 (2023), Article 118983,

S. Yi, C. Raghutla, K.R. Chittedi, Z. Fareed. How economic policy uncertainty and financial development contribute to renewable energy consumption? The importance of economic globalization. Renew. Energy, 202 (2023), pp. 1357-1367,

F. Ze, W.K. Wong, T. kamal Alhasan, A. Al Shraah, A. Ali, I. Muda. Economic development, natural resource utilization, GHG emissions and sustainable development: a case study of China. Resour. Policy, 83 (2023),

J. Zhang. Energy access challenge and the role of fossil fuels in meeting electricity demand: Promoting renewable energy capacity for sustainable development. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101873,

H. Zhou, A.A. Awosusi, V. Dagar, G. Zhu, S. Abbas. Unleashing the asymmetric effect of natural resources abundance on carbon emissions in regional comprehensive economic partnership: What role do economic globalization and disaggregating energy play?. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103914,

X. Zhou, F. Xie, H. Li, C. Zheng, X. Zhao. Understanding inter-term fossil energy consumption pathways in China based on sustainable development goals. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101687,

World Bank, 2021. The World Development Indicators. Data Cat. United Nations World Data bank. URL https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.RNEW.ZS (accessed 4.21.22).

OECD, 2020. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Green growth Indic. URL https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GREEN_GROWTH# (accessed 9.30.21).

OECD, 2021. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Gross Domest. Spend. R&D. URL https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm (accessed 9.26.21).

IMF, 2020. International Monetary Fund. Financ. Dev. Index Database. URL https://data.imf.org/?sk=F8032E80-B36C-43B1-AC26-493C5B1CD33B (accessed 10.6.21).