Gravitational and elastic energies stored in crustal volumes activate normal versus strike-slip and thrust seismogenic faults

Abstract

Shallow crustal faults are passive features mobilized by the dissipation of the potential energy and the shear stress accumulated in the brittle volume surrounding them. However, the stored energy in the volume differs from the tectonic setting, i.e., it is mainly gravitational in extensional tectonic settings, whereas it is elastic in strike-slip and contractional tectonic environments. In extensional settings, below about 1 km, the horizontal tensile stress is overwhelmed by the confining pressure of the lithostatic load, and it becomes positive, i.e. compressive. Therefore, there is no horizontal tension in extensional tectonic settings and the pro-gravity motion of the crustal volume is provided by the lithostatic load, which is the vertical maximum principal stress. The elastic energy is rather accumulated by the maximum horizontal principal stresses, i.e., iso-gravity in transcurrent settings and counter-gravity in contractional tectonic settings. The different relation with the gravitational force in the different tectonic settings generates several relevant differences in the three main tectonic environments. The extensional tectonic settings, both in continental and oceanic rift zones generate normal fault-related earthquakes, i.e., pro-gravity movements, or graviquakes. They differ from the other tectonic setting because are marked by (i) lower energy and lower differential stress to activate faults with respect to strike-slip and contractional tectonics; (ii) lower maximum earthquake magnitude; (iii) a larger number of low magnitude earthquakes in extensional settings because the crust moves downward as soon as it can move, whereas contractional settings require larger accumulation of energy to move counter-gravity; (iv) consequently, the b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter is higher than 1 and the aftershocks are more numerous and last longer in extensional settings; (v) the downward motion of the hangingwall determines more diffuse cataclastic deformation with respect to the other tectonic settings because the lithostatic load works everywhere, whereas in the other tectonic settings is concentrated where the elastic energy accumulates; (vi) in extensional settings the volume dimension is determined by thickness of the brittle layer, and its length is in average three times the seismogenic thickness; in strike-slip and contractional settings dominates the elastic energy (elastoquakes), and the mobilized volume may be ten to thirty times longer in a single seismic sequence, being its size proportional both to the brittle thickness and the relative speed of plates. These differences characterize the seismic cycle of graviquakes with respect to the elastoquakes. The bigger the volume, the wider the seismogenic fault in all tectonic settings. The interplay between the horizontal tectonic forces and the lithostatic load, which is ubiquitous, varies in the three main tectonic settings, generating different seismotectonic styles and an increase of magnitude as the effect of the vertical gravitational force becomes a minority relative to the elastic storage and coseismic rebound.

Keywords

Pro-gravity tectonics / Iso-gravity tectonics / Counter-gravity tectonics / Graviquake / Elastoquake

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ugur Korkut Pata: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Sole author of this article, Ugur Korkut Pata, was an Associate Editor of Geoscience Frontiers. He was not involved in the handling and decision making of this paper.

References

S. Allerton, B.J. Murton, R.C. Searle, M. Jones. Extensional faulting and segmentation of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge north of the Kane Fracture Zone (24°00′N to 24°40′N). Marine Geophys. Res., 17 (1995), pp. 37-61

Bath, M., 2013. Introduction to Seismology (Vol. 27). Birkhäuser.

S. Beanland, G.H. Blick, D.J. Darby. Normal faulting in a back arc basin: geological and geodetic characteristics of the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 95 (B4) (1990), pp. 4693-4707

Y. Ben-Zion, C.G. Sammis. Characterization of fault zones. Pure Appl. Geophys., 160 (3) (2003), pp. 677-715

C. Bignami, E. Valerio, E. Carminati, C. Doglioni, P. Tizzani. Volume unbalance on the 2016 Amatrice-Norcia (central Italy) seismic sequence and insights on normal fault earthquake mechanism. Sci. Rep., 9 (2019), p. 4250,

C. Bignami, E. Valerio, E. Carminati, C. Doglioni, P. Petricca, P. Tizzani, R. Lanari. Are normal fault earthquakes due to elastic rebound or gravitational collapse?. Ann. Geophys., 63 (2) (2020), p. SE213,

P. Bird, X. Kong. Computer simulations of California tectonics confirm very low strength of major faults. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 106 (2) (1994), pp. 159-174

S. Biswas, P. Ray, B.K. Chakrabarti. Statistical Physics of Fracture, Breakdown, and Earthquake: Effects of Disorder and Heterogeneity. John Wiley & Sons (2015)

S.E. Boyer. Sedimentary basin taper as a factor controlling the geometry and advance of thrust belts. Am. J. Sci., 295 (10) (1995), pp. 1220-1254

S.E. Boyer, D. Elliott. Thrust systems. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 66 (9) (1982), pp. 1196-1230

M. Brudy, M. Zoback, K. Fuchs, F. Rummel, J. Baumgärtner. Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: Implications for crustal strength. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 102 (B8) (1997), pp. 18453-18475

E. Carminati, C. Doglioni, S. Barba. Reverse migration of seismicity on thrusts and normal faults. Earth-Sci. Rev., 65 (3–4) (2004), pp. 195-222

W. Chen, G. Rao, D. Kang, Z. Wan, D. Wang. Early report of the source characteristics, ground motions, and casualty estimates of the 2023 Mw 7.8 and 7.5 Turkey earthquakes. J. Earth Sci., 34 (2) (2023), pp. 297-303

C. Chiarabba, P. De Gori, L. Valoroso, M. Petitta, E. Carminati. Large extensional earthquakes push-up terrific amount of fluids. Sci. Rep., 12 (1) (2022), p. 14597,

M. Cocco, A. Rovelli. Evidence for the variation of stress drop between normal and thrust faulting earthquakes in Italy. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 94 (B7) (1989), pp. 9399-9416

C. Doglioni, S. Barba, E. Carminati, F. Riguzzi. Role of the brittle-ductile transition on fault activation. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 184 (2011), pp. 160-171

C. Doglioni, G. Panza. Polarized Plate Tectonics. Advances in Geophysics, vol. 56, Elsevier (2015), pp. 1-167

C. Doglioni, S. Barba, E. Carminati, F. Riguzzi. Fault on–off versus coseismic fluids reaction. Geosci. Front., 5 (6) (2014), pp. 767-780

T. Hatano, C. Narteau, P. Shebalin. Common dependence on stress for the statistics of granular avalanches and earthquakes. Sci. Rep., 5 (2015), p. 12280

M. Holschneider, C. Narteau, P. Shebalin, Z. Peng, D. Schorlemmer. Bayesian analysis of the modified Omori law. J. Geophys. Res., 117 (2012), p. B06317

J.A. Jackson, N.J. White. Normal faulting in the upper continental crust: observations from regions of active extension. J. Struct. Geol., 11 (1–2) (1989), pp. 15-36,

C. Jiménez. Seismic source characteristics of the intraslab 2017 Chiapas-Mexico earthquake (Mw8. 2). Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 280 (2018), pp. 69-75

S.E. Johnson, W.J. Song, S.S. Vel, B.R. Song, C.C. Gerbi. Energy partitioning, dynamic fragmentation, and off-fault damage in the earthquake source volume. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 126 (11) (2021)

Y. Kagan. Fractal dimension of brittle fracture. J. Nonlinear Sci., 1 (1) (1991), pp. 1-16,

H. Kanamori. Mechanics of earthquakes. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 22 (1994), pp. 207-237

Kanamori, H., Rivera, L., 2006. Energy partitioning during an earthquake. In: Abercrombie, R., McGarr, A., Di Toro, G., Kanamori, H. (Eds.), Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting. Am. Geophys. Un., Geophys. Monograph Series 170, 3–13.

H. Kanamori, E.E. Brodsky. The physics of earthquakes. Rep. Prog. Phys., 67 (8) (2004), p. 1429

K. Koketsu, Y. Yokota, N. Nishimura, Y. Yagi, S.I. Miyazaki, K. Satake, Y. Fujii, H. Miyake, S.I. Sakai, Y. Yamanaka, T. Okada. A unified source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 310 (3–4) (2011), pp. 480-487

T. Lay. A review of the rupture characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku-oki Mw 9.1 earthquake. Tectonophysics, 733 (2018), pp. 4-36

T. Lay, H. Kanamori, C.J. Ammon, M. Nettles, S.N. Ward, R.C. Aster, S.L. Beck, S.L. Bilek, M.R. Brudzinski, R. Butler, H.R. DeShon. The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004. Science, 308 (5725) (2005), pp. 1127-1133

J. Li, T. Kim, N. Lapusta, E. Biondi, Z. Zhan. The break of earthquake asperities imaged by distributed acoustic sensing. Nature, 620 (7975) (2023), pp. 800-806

J. McBeck, Y. Ben-Zion, F. Renard. Volumetric and shear strain localization throughout triaxial compression experiments on rocks. Tectonophysics, 822 (2022), Article 229181

C. Morellato, F. Redini, C. Doglioni. On the number and spacing of faults. Terra Nova, 15 (5) (2003), pp. 315-321

C.K. Morley. Variable extension in Lake Tanganyika. Tectonics, 7 (4) (1988), pp. 785-801,

R. Muir Wood. Earthquakes, strain-cycling and the mobilization of fluids. Geol. Soc., London, Special Publications, 78 (1) (1994), pp. 85-98

R. Muir-Wood, G.C.P. King. Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain. J. Geophys. Res., 98 (B12) (1993), pp. 22035-22068

C. Narteau, P. Shebalin, M. Holschneider. Temporal limits of the power law aftershock decay rate. J. Geophys. Res., 107 (2002), p. B122359

C. Narteau, S. Byrdina, P. Shebalin, D. Schorlemmer. Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology. Nature, 462 (2009), pp. 642-645

K. Okubo, H.S. Bhat, E. Rougier, S. Marty, A. Schubnel, Z. Lei, E.E. Knight, Y. Klinger. Dynamics, radiation, and overall energy budget of earthquake rupture with coseismic off-fault damage. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 124 (11) (2019), pp. 11771-11801

C. Pearson, J. Beavan, D. Darby, G. Blick, R. Walcott. Strain distribution across the Australian-Pacific plate boundary in the central South Island, New Zealand, from 1992 GPS and earlier terrestrial observations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 100 (B11) (1995), pp. 22071-22081

P. Petricca, C. Bignami, C. Doglioni. The epicentral fingerprint of earthquakes marks the coseismically activated crustal volume. Earth-Sci. Rev., 218 (2021), Article 103667

P. Petricca, E. Carminati, C. Doglioni. Estimation of the maximum earthquakes magnitude based on potential brittle volume and strain rate: the Italy test case. Tectonophysics (2022),

A. Petruccelli, D. Schorlemmer, T. Tormann, A.P. Rinaldi, S. Wiemer, P. Gasperini, G. Vannucci. The influence of faulting style on the size-distribution of global earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 527 (2019), Article 115791

F. Pollitz, P. Banerjee, K. Grijalva, B. Nagarajan, R. Bürgmann. Effect of 3-D viscoelastic structure on post-seismic relaxation from the 2004 M= 9.2 Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 173 (1) (2008), pp. 189-204

H.F. Reid. The elastic-rebound theory of earthquakes. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bull. Dept. Geol., 6 (19) (1911), pp. 413-444

F. Riguzzi, M. Crespi, R. Devoti, C. Doglioni, G. Pietrantonio, A.R. Pisani. Geodetic strain rate and earthquake size: New clues for seismic hazard studies. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 206–207 (2012), pp. 67-75

C.H. Scholz. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. Cambridge University Press (2019)

D. Schorlemmer, S. Wiemer, M. Wyss. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature, 437 (7058) (2005), pp. 539-542

R.C. Searle, B.J. Murton, K. Achenbach, T. LeBas, M. Tivey, I. Yeo, M.H. Cormier, J. Carlut, P. Ferreira, C. Mallows, K. Morris. Structure and development of an axial volcanic ridge: Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 45°N. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 299 (1–2) (2010), pp. 228-241

P. Shebalin, C. Narteau. Depth dependent stress revealed by aftershocks. Nature Comm., 8 (2017), p. 1317

R.H. Sibson. Frictional constraints on thrust, wrench and normal faults. Nature, 249 (5457) (1974), pp. 542-544

R. Sibson. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. J. Geol. Soc., 133 (3) (1977), pp. 191-213

D. Sornette. Earthquakes: from chemical alteration to mechanical rupture. Phys. Rep., 313 (5) (1999), pp. 237-292

S. Stein, M. Wysession. An Introduction to Seismology, Earthquakes, and Earth Structure. John Wiley & Sons (2009)

M. Taroni, M.M.C. Carafa. Earthquake size distributions are slightly different in compression vs extension. Comm. Earth Environ., 4 (2023), p. 398,

L. Telesca, V. Lapenna. Measuring multifractality in seismic sequences. Tectonophysics, 423 (1–4) (2006), pp. 115-123

G.A. Thompson, T. Parsons. From coseismic offsets to fault-block mountains. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 114 (37) (2017), pp. 9820-9825

R.J. Twiss, E.M. Moores. Structural Geology. Macmillan (1992)

E. Valerio, P. Tizzani, E. Carminati, C. Doglioni. Longer aftershocks duration in extensional tectonic settings. Sci. Rep., 7 (1) (2017), p. 16403,

E. Valerio, P. Tizzani, E. Carminati, C. Doglioni, S. Pepe, P. Petricca, C. De Luca, C. Bignami, G. Solaro, R. Castaldo, V. De Novellis. Ground deformation and source geometry of the 30 October 2016 Mw 6.5 Norcia earthquake (central Italy) investigated through seismological data, DInSAR measurements, and numerical modelling. Remote Sens., 10 (12) (2018), p. 1901

D. Zaccagnino, C. Doglioni. Fault dip vs shear stress gradient. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 2 (4) (2023), Article 100211,

D. Zaccagnino, L. Telesca, C. Doglioni. Scaling properties of seismicity and faulting. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 584 (2022), Article 117511

M.D. Zoback, R. Apel, J. Baumgärtner, M. Brudy, R. Emmermann, B. Engeser, K. Fuchs, W. Kessels, H. Rischmüller, F. Rummel, L. Vernik. Upper-crustal strength inferred from stress measurements to 6 km depth in the KTB borehole. Nature, 365 (6447) (1993), pp. 633-635