Comparative analysis of CO2 emissions and economic performance in the United States and China: Navigating sustainable development in the climate change era

Khalid Mehmood, Syed Tauseef Hassan, Xuchun Qiu, Shahid Ali

Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 101843.

Geoscience Frontiers All Journals
Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 101843. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101843

Comparative analysis of CO2 emissions and economic performance in the United States and China: Navigating sustainable development in the climate change era

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Economic growth has brought a global climate change into the spotlight, and CO2 emissions demonstrate significant challenges in reducing environmental shifts worldwide. Globally, the United States and China contribute the largest amount of CO2 emissions. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between different types of CO2 emissions and economic growth by using a modeling approach. We analyze total CO2 emissions, coal CO2 emissions, oil CO2 emissions, the global share of coal CO2 emissions, the global share of oil CO2 emissions, and economic growth. This study provides unique insights into how to simultaneously reduce CO2 emissions and sustain economic growth. A bootstrap autoregressive distributed lag (BARDL) simulation method is utilized to examine the long- and short-run effects of predictors on CO2 emissions. Coal CO2 emissions are found to have a significant positive effect on economic growth in the short run but a negative impact on economic growth over the long run in the United States. The United States needs to implement stronger measures to balance coal CO2 emissions with economic growth for sustainable development. In contrast, oil CO2 emissions have positive effect for China in both the long run and short run. Thus, China can continue to reduce CO2 emissions from oil while maintaining positive economic growth. The China's policies promoting cleaner energy alternatives can be adapted and implemented to maintain a balance between economic growth and carbon reduction. The study has valuable insights for policymakers seeking to balance economic growth with carbon reduction strategies. It emphasizes the need to better understand the complex relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth.

Keywords

CO2 emission / Sustainable development / Climate change / United States / China / BARDL

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Khalid Mehmood, Syed Tauseef Hassan, Xuchun Qiu, Shahid Ali. Comparative analysis of CO2 emissions and economic performance in the United States and China: Navigating sustainable development in the climate change era. Geoscience Frontiers, 2024, 15(5): 101843 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101843

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Khalid Mehmood: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Software, Funding acquisition. Syed Tauseef Hassan: Writing – review & editing, Software. Xuchun Qiu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Methodology. Shahid Ali: Visualization, Data curation, Software.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42350410448).

References

S. Abbas, P. Gui, A. Chen, N. Ali. The effect of renewable energy development, market regulation, and environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29 (2022), pp. 59483-59501,
CrossRef Google scholar
K.R. Abbasi, M. Shahbaz, J. Zhang, M. Irfan, R. Alvarado. Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: the role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy. Renew. Energy, 187 (2022), pp. 390-402
M. Ahmad, S.I. Khattak. Impact of innovation in marine energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 159 (2022), Article 112225
Z. Ahmed, M.M. Asghar, M.N. Malik, K. Nawaz. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour. Policy, 67 (2020), Article 101677
M. Ahmed, C. Shuai, M. Ahmed. Analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions trend in China, India, the USA, and Russia. International J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 20 (2023), pp. 2683-2698,
CrossRef Google scholar
Z. Ahmed, B. Zhang, M. Cary. Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol. Indic., 121 (2021), Article 107060
(2023), p. 6184
M. Ali, F. Joof, A. Samour, T. Tursoy, D. Balsalobre-Lorente, M. Radulescu. Testing the impacts of renewable energy, natural resources rent, and technological innovation on the ecological footprint in the USA: evidence from bootstrapping ARDL. Resour. Policy, 86 (2023), Article 104139
N. Apergis, J.E. Payne, K. Menyah, Y. Wolde-Rufael. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol. Econ., 69 (2010), pp. 2255-2260
M.K. Ardakani, S.M. Seyedaliakbar. Impact of energy consumption and economic growth on CO2 emission using multivariate regression. Energy Strategy Rev., 26 (2019), Article 100428
A.A. Awosusi, T.S. Adebayo, M. Altuntaş, E.B. Agyekum, H.M. Zawbaae, S. Kamel. The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: a quantile regression evidence. Energy Reports, 8 (2022), pp. 1979-1994
M. Aydin, U.K. Pata. Are shocks to disaggregated renewable energy consumption permanent or temporary for the USA? Wavelet based unit root test with smooth structural shifts. Energy, 207 (2020), Article 118245
A. Azam, M. Rafiq, M. Shafique, H. Zhang, J. Yuan. Analyzing the effect of natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy on GDP and carbon emissions: a multi-variate panel data analysis. Energy, 219 (2021), Article 119592
B.P., 2016. British Petroleum statistical review of world energy.
A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Saha, D. Ghosh, B. Dam, A.K. Samanta, S. Dutta. Microbial repairing of concrete and its role in CO2 sequestration: a critical review. Beni-Suef Uni. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 12 (2023), pp. 1-13
M.F. Bashir, M. Shahbaz, M.N. Malik, B. Ma, J. Wang. Energy transition, natural resource consumption and environmental degradation: the role of geopolitical risk in sustainable development. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103985
F.V. Bekun, F. Emir, S.A. Sarkodie. Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Sci. Total Environ., 655 (2019), pp. 759-765
M. Bildirici, Y.A. Çırpıcı, Ö.Ö. Ersin. Effects of technology, energy, monetary, and fiscal policies on the relationship between renewable and fossil fuel energies and environmental pollution: novel NBARDL and causality analyses. Sustainability, 1520 (2023), p. 14887,
CrossRef Google scholar
Bp,. Energy data. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html (2022)
U. Bulut. The impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int, 24 (2017), pp. 15416-15426
W. Chen, Y. Lei. The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: new evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renew. Energy, 123 (2018), pp. 1-14
S. Chen, W. Li. Local government debt and regional economic growth in China. China Political Econ., 2 (2019), pp. 330-353
M. Coccia. The relation between length of lockdown, numbers of infected people and deaths of Covid-19, and economic growth of countries: lessons learned to cope with future pandemics similar to Covid-19 and to constrain the deterioration of economic system. Sci. Total Environ., 775 (2021), Article 145801
R.Y. Cui, N. Hultman, D.-Y. Cui, H. McJeon, L. Clarke, J.-H. Yuan, W.-J. Cai. A US-China coal phaseout and the global 1.5 °C pathway. Adv. Climate Change Res. (2021),
CrossRef Google scholar
J. Da Zhu. Cooperative equilibrium of the China-US-EU climate game. Energy Strategy Rev., 39 (2022), Article 100797,
CrossRef Google scholar
M. Danish. Moving toward sustainable development: the relationship between water productivity, natural resource rent, international trade, and carbon dioxide emissions. Sust. Develop., 284 (2020), pp. 540-549
B. Doğan, B. Saboori, M. Can. Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26 (2019), pp. 31900-31912
M. Elkerbout, J. Bryhn. Carbon removals on the road to net zero: exploring EU policy options for negative emissions. Centre for European Policy Studies, No (2022), p. 35831
S. Erdoğan, D.Ç. Yıldırım, A. Yıldırım, Gedikli.. The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. J. Environ. Manag., 267 (2020), Article 110637
L.J. Esso, Y. Keho. Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy, 114 (2016), pp. 492-497,
CrossRef Google scholar
Y. Feng, Y. Xiong, J.M. Hall-Spencer, K.L. Liu, J. Beardall, K. Gao, K.S. Gao, J.K. Ge, J.T. Xu, G. Gao. Shift in algal blooms from micro-to macroalgae around China with increasing eutrophication and climate change. Global Change Biol, 30 (2023), Article e17018
Y.F. Fernández, M.F. López, B.O. Blanco. Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J. Cleaner Prod., 172 (2018), pp. 3459-3467
P. Friedlingstein, M. O’sullivan, M.W. Jones, R.M. Andrew, J. Hauck, A. Olsen, G.P. Peters, W. Peters, J. Pongratz, S. Sitch. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth Sys. Sci. Data, 12 (2020), pp. 3269-3340
S.K. Goh, J.Y. Yong, C.C. Lau, T.C. Tang. Bootstrap ARDL on energy-growth relationship for 22 OECD countries. Appl. Econ. Lett., 24 (2017), pp. 1464-1467
Y. Guo, F. Wang, P. Li. The interplay of Fintech, natural resources, globalization, and environmental sustainability in China: a BARDL investigation. Resour. Policy, 88 (2024), Article 104476
S. Hammoudeh, A. Lahiani, D.K. Nguyen, R.M. Sousa. An empirical analysis of energy cost pass-through to CO2 emission prices. Energy Econ., 49 (2015), pp. 149-156,
CrossRef Google scholar
Y. Hao, J.-H. Liu, Y. Weng, Gao.. Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve for coal consumption in China exist? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Energy, 114 (2016), pp. 1214-1223
S.T. Hassan, K. Danish, S.U.-D. Khan, E.J. Xia, H. Fatima. Role of institutions in correcting environmental pollution: an Empirical Investigation. Sustain. Cities and Society, 53 (2019), Article 101901
S.T. Hassan, B. Batool, B. Zhu, I. Khan. Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: new insights of energy poverty. J. Cleaner Prod., 340 (2022), Article 130735
T.S. Hassan, E. Xia, C.C. Lee. Mitigation pathways impact of climate change and improving sustainable development: the roles of natural resources, income, and CO2 emission. Energy Environ., 322 (2021), pp. 338-363
T. Houser, H. Pitt, H. Hess. Final US Emissions Estimates for 2018. Rhodium. Group. (2019)
N. Iqbal, K.R. Abbasi, R. Shinwari, W. Guangcai, A. Ahmad, K. Tang. Does exports diversification and environmental innovation achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies?. J. Environ. Manag., 291 (2021), Article 112648,
CrossRef Google scholar
S. Işık, D. Ongan, Özdemir.. Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US States: an application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2611 (2019), pp. 10846-10853
S. Jarboui. Operational and environmental efficiency of US oil and gas companies towards energy transition policies: a comparative empirical analysis. Australian Econ. Papers, 612 (2022), pp. 234-257
M.B. Jebli, S.B. Youssef, I. Ozturk. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol. Indic., 60 (2016), pp. 824-831
Z. Jia, B. Lin. How to achieve the first step of the carbon-neutrality 2060 target in China: the coal substitution perspective. Energy, 233 (2021), Article 121179,
CrossRef Google scholar
X. Jiang, Q. Wang, R. Li. Investigating factors affecting carbon emission in China and the USA: a perspective of stratified heterogeneity. J. Cleaner Prod., 199 (2018), pp. 85-92
Y. Kassouri, F. Bilgili, S. Kuşkaya. A wavelet-based model of world oil shocks interaction with CO2 emissions in the US. Environ. Sci. Policy, 127 (2022), pp. 280-292
A. Khan, Y. Chenggang, J. Hussain, S. Bano, A. Nawaz. Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: a simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries. Resour. Policy, 68 (2020), Article 101751
H. Khan, K. Metaxoglou, C.R. Knittel, M. Papineau. Carbon emissions and business cycles. J. Macroeconomics, 60 (2019), pp. 1-19
S.A.R. Khan, P. Ponce, Z. Yu. Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: an empirical study in the context of COP-21. J. Environ. Manag., 298 (2021), Article 113418
R. Khochiani, Y. Nademi. Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in the United States, China, and India: A wavelet coherence approach. Energy Environ., 315 (2020), pp. 886-902,
CrossRef Google scholar
J.S. Kikstra, Z.R. Nicholls, C.J. Smith, J. Lewis, R.D. Lamboll, E. Byers, K. Riahi. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures. Geosci. Model Develop., 1524 (2022), pp. 9075-9109
H.S. Kim, W.W. Koo. Factors affecting the carbon allowance market in the US. Energy Policy, 38 (2010), pp. 1879-1884,
CrossRef Google scholar
Kripfganz, S., Schneider, D.C., 2016. ardl: Stata module to estimate autoregressive distributed lag models, Stata Conference, Chicago.
C.-C. Lee, F. Wang, R. Lou, K. Wang. How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy?. Empirical Evidence from China. Renew. Energy, 204 (2023), pp. 671-684
R. Li, L. Li, Q. Wang. The impact of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: evidence from the transportation sector in Chinese 30 provinces. Sustain. Cities and Soc., 82 (2022), Article 103880
X. Li, Y. Sun, Y. Xie. Exploring the Effect of Policies on Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance in China’s Highly Polluting Industries: Applying Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior. Emerging Markets Finance Trade, 601 (2024), pp. 165-184
R. Li, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, R. Jiang. Per-capita carbon emissions in 147 countries: the effect of economic, energy, social, and trade structural changes. Sustain. Prod. Consumption, 27 (2021), pp. 1149-1164
X. Liguo, M. Ahmad, S.I. Khattak. Impact of innovation in marine energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 159 (2022), Article 112225
L.L. Liu, T.T. Feng, J.J. Kong. Can carbon trading policy and local public expenditures synergize to promote carbon emission reduction in the power industry?. Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 188 (2023), Article 106659
C. Liu, Y. Jiang, R. Xie. Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US?. J. Cleaner Prod., 217 (2019), pp. 380-387
H. Long, W.W. Li, C. Otrakçı. Sustaining environment through natural resource and human development: Revisiting EKC curve in China through BARDL. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103973
N. Ma, W.Y. Shum, T. Han, F. Lai. Can Machine Learning be Applied to Carbon Emissions Analysis: An Application to the CO2 Emissions Analysis Using Gaussian Process Regression. Front. Energy Res., 9 (2021), Article 756311
J.X. Mao. Under the “3060” Carbon reduction goal, how to develop low-carbon coal power in China. China Electric Power News (in Chinese]. (2022)
T. Martins, A.C. Barreto, F.M. Souza, A.M. Souza. Fossil fuels consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in G7 countries: Empirical evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Environ. Pollut., 291 (2021), Article 118093
R. McNown, C.Y. Sam, S.K. Goh. Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Econ., 50 (2018), pp. 1509-1521
P. Mitić, A. Fedajev, M. Radulescu, A. Rehman. The relationship between CO2 emissions, economic growth, available energy, and employment in SEE countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 306 (2023), pp. 16140-16155
M. Murshed. Can regional trade integration facilitate renewable energy transition to ensure energy sustainability in South Asia?. Energy Reports, 7 (2021), pp. 808-821
P.K. Narayan, S. Popp. A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. J. Applied Stat., 37 (2010), pp. 1425-1438
P. Nejat, F. Jomehzadeh, M.M. Taheri, M. Gohari, M.Z.A. Majid. A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 43 (2015), pp. 843-862
D. Normile. China’s bold climate pledge earns praise—but is it feasible?. Science, 3706512 (2020), pp. 17-18,
CrossRef Google scholar
Z. Nurgazina, Q. Guo, U. Ali, M.T. Kartal, A. Ullah, Z.A. Khan. Retesting the influences on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from dynamic ARDL approach. Front. Environ. Sci., 10 (2022), Article 868740
V.O. Olanrewaju, M. Irfan, M. Altuntaş, E.B. Agyekum, S. Kamel, M.F. El-Naggar. Towards sustainable environment in G7 nations: The role of renewable energy consumption, eco-innovation and trade openness. Front. Environ. Sci., 10 (2022), Article 925822
B. Ozcan. The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 62 (2013), pp. 1138-1147
A. Pandey, M. Asif. Assessment of energy and environmental sustainability in South Asia in the perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 165 (2022), Article 112492
U.K. Pata, A.E. Caglar. Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216 (2021), Article 119220
M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, R.J. Smith. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Applied Econ., 16 (2001), pp. 289-326
S. Rafiq, R.A. Salim. Temporal causality between energy consumption and income in six Asian emerging countries. Applied Econ. Quarterly (2009), pp. 335-350
M. Ramzan, K.R. Abbasi, H.A. Iqbal, T.S. Adebayo. What’s at Stake? The empirical importance of government revenue and debt and renewable energy for environmental neutrality in the US economy. Renew. Energy, 205 (2023), pp. 475-489
A. Razzaq, A. Sharif, A. Najmi, M.-L. Tseng, M.K. Lim. Dynamic and causality interrelationships from municipal solid waste recycling to economic growth, carbon emissions and energy efficiency using a novel bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag. Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 166 (2021), Article 105372
H. Regan, C. Dotto. US vs. How the World’s Two Biggest Emitters Stack up on Climate. CNN, China (2021)
M. Salari, R.J. Javid, H. Noghanibehambari. The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the US. Econ. Anal. Policy, 69 (2021), pp. 182-194
R.A. Salim, K. Hassan, S. Shafiei. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic activities: Further evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ., 44 (2014), pp. 350-360
S.A. Sarkodie, S. Adams. Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci. Total Environ., 643 (2018), pp. 1590-1601
W.U.H. Shah, G. Hao, H. Yan, N. Zhu, R. Yasmeen, G. Dincă. Role of renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and carbon emission in energy efficiency and productivity change: Evidence from G20 economies. Geosci. Front., 14 (2023), Article 101631
M. Shahbaz, H.H. Lean. Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy, 40 (2012), pp. 473-479
M. Shahbaz, N. Khraief, M.M.B. Jemaa. On the causal nexus of road transport CO2 emissions and macroeconomic variables in Tunisia: evidence from combined cointegration tests. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 51 (2015), pp. 89-100,
CrossRef Google scholar
M. Shahbaz, C. Raghutla, M. Song, H. Zameer, Z. Jiao. Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ., 86 (2020), Article 104664,
CrossRef Google scholar
M. Shahiduzzaman, A. Layton. Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis. Applied Energy, 150 (2015), pp. 25-35
A. Sharif, S. Saha, N. Loganathan. Does Tourism Sustain Economic Growth? Wavelet-Based Evidence from the United States. Tourism Anal., 224 (2017), pp. 467-482
A. Sharif, S.A. Raza, I. Ozturk, S. Afshan. The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew. Energy, 133 (2019), pp. 685-691
T. Shi, S. Si, J. Chan, L. Zhou. The carbon emission reduction effect of technological innovation on the transportation industry and its spatial heterogeneity: evidence from China. Atmosphere, 12 (2021), p. 1169,
CrossRef Google scholar
W. Shijin, Q. Wenli, L. Qiaoxia. Key pathways to achieve sustainable development goals in three polar regions. Sustainability, 152 (2023), p. 1735
S.A. Solarin, U. Al-Mulali, I. Ozturk. Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25 (2018), pp. 30949-30961
U. Soytas, R. Sari, B. Ewing. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the united states. Ecological Economics, 62 (2007), pp. 482-489
Y. Tan, X. Liu, H. Sun, C.C. Zeng. Population ageing, labour market rigidity and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Res. Policy, 512 (2022), Article 104428
S. Wang, B. Zhao, S. Cai, Z. Klimont, C. Nielsen, T. Morikawa, J. Woo, Y. Kim, X. Fu, J. Xu. Emission trends and mitigation options for air pollutants in East Asia. Atmospheric Chemist. Phys., 14 (2014), pp. 6571-6603
Q. Wang, M. Zhao, R. Li, M. Su. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: A comparative study of China and the United States. J. Cleaner Prod., 197 (2018), pp. 178-184
Q. Wang, X. Wang, R. Li. Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries. Sustain. Cities Society, 76 (2022), Article 103382
WDI, 2017. World development indicators.
WDI, 2022. World development indicators.
X. Wei, Y. Bai. The role of green financing and natural resources towards sustainable environment: A comparative study of US-China. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103922
C. Wiese, A. Larsen, L.-L. Pade. Interaction effects of energy efficiency policies: a review. Energy Efficiency, 11 (2018), pp. 2137-2156
Y. Wolde-Rufael. Coal consumption and economic growth revisited. Applied Energy, 87 (2010), pp. 160-167
J. Xiao, H. Zhang, Y. Tang, Q. Deng, D. Wang, C.S. Poon. Fully utilizing carbonated recycled aggregates in concrete: Strength, drying shrinkage and carbon emissions analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377 (2022), Article 134520
Q. Xie, T.S. Adebayo, M. Irfan, M. Altuntaş. Race to environmental sustainability: Can renewable energy consumption and technological innovation sustain the strides for China? Renew. Energy, 197 (2022), pp. 320-330
D. Xin, M. Ahmad, H. Lei, S.I. Khattak. Do Innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States?. Technology in Society, 67 (2021), Article 101761,
CrossRef Google scholar
G. Xu, P. Schwarz, H. Yang. Adjusting energy consumption structure to achieve China’s CO2 emissions peak. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 122 (2020), Article 109737
C. Xu, G. Su, K. Zhao, X. Xu, Z. Li, Q. Hu, Y. Xue, J. Xu. Current status of greenhouse gas emissions from aquaculture in China. Water Biology Systems, 13 (2022), Article 100041,
CrossRef Google scholar
W. Yamaka, R. Phadkantha, P. Rakpho. Economic and energy impacts on greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of China and the USA. Energy Reports, 7 (2021), pp. 240-247
C. Yin, W. Zhao, J. Ye, M. Muroki, P. Pereira. Ecosystem carbon sequestration service supports the Sustainable Development Goals progress. J. Environ. Manag. 330, 117155.Zhang, X., Zhang, X., 2021. Nexus among economic growth, carbon emissions, and renewable and non-renewable energy in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2023), pp. 39708-39722
J. Zhang, A.K. Patwary, H. Sun, M. Raza, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, R. Iram. Measuring energy and environmental efficiency interactions towards CO2 emissions reduction without slowing economic growth in central and western Europe. J. Environ. Manag., 279 (2021), Article 111704,
CrossRef Google scholar
Zhou, N., Price, L., Dai, Y.D., Creyts, J., Khanna, N., et al. 2019. A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030. Applied Energy 239, 793-819. .
Zhou, H., Awosusi, A. A., Dagar, V., Zhu, G., Abbas, S., 2023. Unleashing the asymmetric effect of natural resources abundance on carbon emissions in regional comprehensive economic partnership: What role do economic globalization and disaggregating energy play? Resour. Policy 85, 103914.

24

Accesses

1

Citations

1

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/