Green trading and ecological sustainability under macroeconomic policy framework

Abstract

When confronted with ecological challenges, trading ecologically friendly products involving renewable technologies, green management practices, and effluent treatment methods could alleviate ecological degradation on a global scale while considering the macroeconomic policy framework. Therefore, this study determines the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy instruments in moderating the relationship between green trade openness (i.e., trade in environmentally related products) and ecological sustainability. Applying panel quantile regression on data from 20 OECD members from 2003 to 2016, we found that green trade openness supports ecological sustainability through a gains-from-trade approach. Concerning moderation effects, expenditure-driven fiscal expansion reinforces the favorable influence of green trade openness on ecological sustainability across ecologically less/moderately efficient economies, while it does the reverse for ecologically more efficient members. Taxation-driven fiscal contraction promotes ecological sustainability amelioration impact of green trade openness for economies with below-average ecological quality and remains neutral for those with average/above-average ecological quality. Besides, interest rate-driven monetary contraction proliferates the ecological sustainability enhancement effect of green openness. We suggest that the fiscal and monetary policies demand unambiguous coordination with the OECD’s trade policy structure for optimal environmental outcomes of trading in environmental products. These insights would help OECD’s green trade policies gain momentum to facilitate the attainment of the Climate Action agenda of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

Keywords

Fiscal policy / Monetary policy / Green trade openness / Ecological sustainability / OECD

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yue Hu: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Funding acquisition. Binhui Li: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Resources. Munir Ahmad: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This achievement is funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21BJY226).

References

[] Z. Ahmed, B. Zhang, M. Cary. Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol. Indic., 121 (2021), Article 107060, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060

[] Z. Ahmed, A. Mahmood, M. Murshed, M. Ibrahim Shah, H. Mahmood, S. Abbas. How do green energy technology investments, technological innovation, and trade globalization enhance green energy supply and stimulate environmental sustainability in the G7 countries?. Gondwana Res., 112 (2022), pp. 105-115, 10.1016/j.gr.2022.09.014

[] M.W. Akbar, M.I. Arshad, P. Yuelan. Role of fiscal policy in energy efficiency and CO 2 emission nexus: An investigation of belt and road region. J. Public Aff., e2603 (2021), pp. 1-12, 10.1002/pa.2603

[] A.A. Alola. The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability. Sci. Total Environ., 658 (2019), pp. 260-267, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212

[] A.B. Atkinson, J.E. Stiglitz. Lectures on Public Economics, Updated. (Ed. ed.), Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2015)

[] A. Awan, M. Sadiq, S.T. Hassan, I. Khan, N.H. Khan. Combined nonlinear effects of urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. An application of QARDL and KRLS. Urban Clim., 46 (2022), Article 101342, 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101342

[] B.H. Baltagi, C. Kao, B. Peng. Testing cross-sectional correlation in large panel data models with serial correlation. Econometrics, 4 (2016), pp. 1-24, 10.3390/econometrics4040044

[] R.J. Barro, X. Sala-I-Martin. Public finance in models of economic growth. Rev. Econ. Stud., 59 (1992), pp. 645-661, 10.2307/2297991

[] Bilal, I. Khan, D. Tan, W. Azam, S. Tauseef Hassan. Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: The impact of inflation dynamics. Gondwana Res., 106 (2022), pp. 51-63, 10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.011

[] J.M. Blatt. Classical economics of involuntary unemployment. J. Post Keynes. Econ., 3 (1981), pp. 552-559, 10.1080/01603477.1981.11489246

[] J. Borland, X. Yang. Specialization and a new approach to economic organization and growth. Am. Econ. Rev., 82 (1992), pp. 386-391

[] J. Breitung. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. B.H. Baltagi, T.B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2001), pp. 161-177, 10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

[] B. Can, Z. Ahmed, M. Ahmad, M. Can. Do renewable energy consumption and green trade openness matter for human well-being? Empirical evidence from European Union countries. Soc. Indic. Res., 164 (2022), pp. 1043-1059, 10.1007/s11205-022-02981-y

[] N. Cantore, C.F.C. Cheng. International trade of environmental goods in gravity models. J. Environ. Manage., 223 (2018), pp. 1047-1060, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.036

[] Y.T. Chan. Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies ? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies. Energy Policy, 141 (2020), Article 111454, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111454

[] C. Chen, D. Pan, Z. Huang, R. Bleischwitz. Engaging central banks in climate change? The mix of monetary and climate policy. Energy Econ., 103 (2021), Article 105531, 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105531

[] M.Z. Chishti, M. Ahmad, A. Rehman, M. Kamran. Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: Assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies. J. Clean. Prod., 292 (2021), Article 126035, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126035

[] S. Damrah, E. Satrovic, F.A. Shawtari. How does fi nancial inclusion affect environmental degradation in the six oil exporting countries ? The moderating role of information and communication technology. Front. Environ. Sci., 1–17 (2022), 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1013326

[] J.M. Dean. Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Can. J. Econ., 35 (2002), pp. 819-842

[] F. Di Iorio, S. Fachin. Savings and investments in the OECD: A panel cointegration study with a new bootstrap test. Empir. Econ., 46 (2014), pp. 1271-1300, 10.1007/s00181-013-0722-5

[] E. Dickens. Keynes’s theory of monetary policy: An essay in historical reconstruction. Contrib. Polit. Econ., 30 (2011), pp. 1-11, 10.1093/cpe/bzr001

[] T. Dietz, E.A. Rosa. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology’. Hum. Ecol. Rev., 1 (1994), pp. 277-300

[] T. Dietz, E.A. Rosa. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94 (1997), pp. 175-179

[] J. Ding, Z. Lu, C.H. Yu. Environmental information disclosure and firms’ green innovation: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 81 (2022), pp. 147-159, 10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.007

[] S. Dowrick, J. Golley. Trade openness and growth: Who benefits?. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy, 20 (2004), pp. 38-56, 10.1093/oxrep/grh003

[] E.I. Dumitrescu, C. Hurlin. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model., 29 (2012), pp. 1450-1460, 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014

[] M. Eberhardt. Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata J., 12 (2012), pp. 61-71, 10.1177/1536867x1201200105

[] T.T. Feng, R. Li, H.M. Zhang, X.L. Gong, Y.S. Yang. Induction mechanism and optimization of tradable green certificates and carbon emission trading acting on electricity market in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 169 (2021), Article 105487, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105487

[] J.A. Frankel, A.K. Rose. Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev. Econ. Stat., 87 (2005), pp. 85-91

[] C. Fredrik, S. Lundström. Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Work. Pap. Econ., 29 (2001), pp. 1-19

[] M. Ghobakhloo, M. Iranmanesh, A. Grybauskas, M. Vilkas, M. Petraitė. Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Bus. Strateg. Environ., 1–21 (2021), 10.1002/bse.2867

[] C. Goodhart. The Conduct of Monetary Policy. Econ. J., 99 (1989), pp. 293-346

[] C.J.W. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37 (1969), pp. 424-438

[] Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper #3914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914.

[] B.A. Gyamfi, D.Q. Agozie, M. Musah, S.T. Onifade, S. Prusty. The synergistic roles of green openness and economic complexity in environmental sustainability of Europe’s largest economy: Implications for technology-intensive and environmentally friendly products. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 102 (2023), Article 107220, 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107220

[] G.E. Halkos, E.Α. Paizanos. The effects of fi scal policy on CO2 emissions: Evidence from the U. S. A.. Energy Policy, 88 (2016), pp. 317-328, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.035

[] X. Hao, W. Fu, K. Albitar. Innovation with ecological sustainability: Does corporate environmental responsibility matter in green innovation?. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 21-42, 10.58567/jea02030002

[] S.M. Hashmi, Q.R. Syed, R. Inglesi-Lotz. Monetary and energy policy interlinkages: The case of renewable energy in the US. Renew. Energy, 201 (2022), pp. 141-147, 10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.082

[] S.T. Hassan, S.U.D. Danish Khan, E. Xia, H. Fatima. Role of institutions in correcting environmental pollution: An empirical investigation. Sustain. Cities Soc., 53 (2020), Article 101901, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101901

[] L.-Y. He, G. Huang. Can importing improve the energy efficiency? Theory and evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 83 (2022), pp. 451-469, 10.2139/ssrn.4010452

[] J. Hu, H. Chen, F. Dinis, G. Xiang. Nexus among green finance, technological innovation, green fiscal policy and CO2 emissions: A conditional process analysis. Ecol. Indic., 154 (2023), Article 110706, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110706

[] X. Hu, H. Pollitt, J. Pirie, J.F. Mercure, J. Liu, J. Meng, S. Tao. The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 140 (2020), Article 111173, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111173

[] J. Huang, J. Zhao, J. Cao. Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment—evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 72 (2021), pp. 154-174, 10.1016/j.iref.2020.11.018

[] G.N. Ike, O. Usman, S. Asumadu. Fiscal policy and CO2 emissions from heterogeneous fuel sources in Thailand: Evidence from multiple structural breaks cointegration test. Sci. Total Environ., 702 (2020), Article 134711, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134711

[] Q. Jiang, S. Cheng. How the fiscal and monetary policy uncertainty of China respond to global oil price volatility: A multi-regime-on-scale approach. Resour. Policy, 72 (2021), Article 102121, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102121

[] Q. Jiang, S. Iqbal, M. Ahmad, P. Lin. Mitigation pathways to sustainable production and consumption: Examining the impact of commercial policy on carbon dioxide emissions in Australia. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 25 (2021), pp. 390-403, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.016

[] I. Khan, F. Hou, M. Irfan, A. Zakari, H. Phong. Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth ? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 146 (2021), Article 111157, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111157

[] I. Khan, F. Hou, A. Zakari, M. Irfan, M. Ahmad. Links among energy intensity, non-linear financial development, and environmental sustainability: New evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J. Clean. Prod., 330 (2022), Article 129747, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129747

[] R. Koenker, G. Bassett. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46 (1978), pp. 33-50, 10.2307/1913643

[] R.E. Lucas. On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monet. Econ., 22 (1988), pp. 3-42

[] H. Mahmood. The spatial analyses of consumption-based CO2 emissions, exports, imports, and FDI nexus in GCC countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29 (2022), pp. 48301-48311, 10.1007/s11356-022-19303-x

[] H. Mahmood. Trade, FDI, and CO2 emissions nexus in Latin America: the spatial analysis in testing the pollution haven and the EKC hypotheses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), pp. 14439-14454, 10.1007/s11356-022-23154-x

[] H. Mao, K. Ostaszewski, J. Wang. Critical condition for deposit insurance to partially or fully substitute for raising capital under cyclical economic environment. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 140-153, 10.58567/jea02040008

[] S. Menguy. Fundamental character of the risk premium to influence the sustainability of the public debt. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 115-129, 10.58567/jea02010008

[] L. Mi, X. Gan, Y. Sun, T. Lv, L. Qiao, T. Xu. Effects of monetary and non-monetary interventions on energy conservation: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 149 (2021), Article 111342, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111342

[] M. Mongo, F. Belaïd, B. Ramdani. The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy, 118 (2021), pp. 1-9, 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004

[] R.A. Musgrave. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. McGraw-Hill, New York (1959)

[] N.A. Neequaye, R. Oladi. Environment, growth, and FDI revisited. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., 39 (2015), pp. 47-56, 10.1016/j.iref.2015.06.002

[] OECD.Stat. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Trade Environ. Relat. Goods. (2021)

[] P.K. Ozili. Determinants of FinTech and BigTech lending: the role of financial inclusion and financial development. J. Econ. Anal., 2 (2023), pp. 66-79, 10.58567/jea02030004

[] M. Parkin. Unemployment, inflation, and monetary policy. Can. J. Econ., 31 (1998), pp. 1003-1032

[] P. Pedroni. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. B.H. Baltagi, T.B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2001), pp. 93-130, 10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2

[] M.H. Pesaran. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econom., 22 (2007), pp. 265-312, 10.1002/jae

[] M.H. Pesaran. Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ. Rev., 34 (2015), pp. 1089-1117, 10.1080/07474938.2014.956623

[] H.M. Pesaran, T. Yamagata. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J. Econom., 142 (2008), pp. 50-93, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

[] J. Qingquan, S.I. Khattak, M. Ahmad, L. Ping. A new approach to environmental sustainability: Assessing the impact of monetary policy on CO2 emissions in Asian economies. Sustain. Dev., 28 (2020), pp. 1331-1346, 10.1002/sd.2087

[] F.P. Ramsey. A contribution to the theory of taxation. Econ. J., 37 (1927), pp. 47-61

[] L.P. Rochon, S. Rossi. Inflation targeting, economic performance, and income distribution: A monetary macroeconomics analysis. J. Post Keynes. Econ., 28 (2006), pp. 615-638, 10.2753/PKE0160-3477280405

[] Satrovic, E., Cetindas, A., Akben, I., Damrah, S., 2024. Do natural resource dependence, economic growth and transport energy consumption accelerate ecological footprint in the most innovative countries? The moderating role of technological innovation. Gondwana Res. 127, 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.008.

[] S. Sumrin, S. Gupta, Y. Asaad, Y. Wang, S. Bhattacharya, P. Foroudi. Eco-innovation for environment and waste prevention. J. Bus. Res., 122 (2021), pp. 627-639, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.001

[] V.E. Sweeney. A note on classical economics. Soc. Sci., 52 (1977), pp. 90-93

[] V. Tanzi, H.H. Zee. Fiscal policy and long-run growth. Staff Pap. - Int. Monet. Fund, 44 (1997), pp. 179-209

[] J.B. Taylor. Discretion versus policy rules in practice: two critical points. A comment. Carnegie-Rochester Confer. Ser. Public Policy, 39 (1993), pp. 215-220, 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90010-T

[] R. Wan, M. Nakada, Y. Takarada. Trade liberalization in environmental goods. Resour. Energy Econ., 51 (2018), pp. 44-66, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.11.001

[] J. Westerlund. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull. Econ. Financ., 69 (2007), pp. 709-748, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x

[] WTO, 2022. World Trade Organization. Trade Environ. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_e.htm#:∼:text=The WTO offers a powerful,law in the environment area. (accessed 6 October 2022).

[] J. Xie, Z. Ahmed, P. Zhang, S. Khan, R. Alvarado. Financial expansion and CO2 mitigation in top twenty emitters: Investigating the direct and moderating effects of the digital economy. Gondwana Res., 125 (2024), pp. 1-14, 10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.013

[] D. Zhang, H. Iqbal. Nexus between fiscal imbalance and emissions reduction: New evidence from developing economies. J. Environ. Manage., 297 (2021), Article 113360, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113360