Resources, innovation, globalization, and green growth: The BRICS financial development strategy

Abstract

Resources, innovation, globalization, and green growth are interconnected pillars that shape societies and economies. By effectively managing resources, fostering innovation, embracing globalization, and embracing green growth, countries can achieve sustainable development, economic prosperity, and a better future for future generations. In this paper, we examine the nexus of natural resources, innovation, globalization, and green growth in BRICS countries from 1990 to 2021 in light of financial development's role in promoting green growth. We use dynamic system panel data estimations and robust random effect GLS regression for long-run estimates. BRICS countries experience green growth due to natural resources, globalization, financial development, and research and development. There is a negative relationship between globalization and green growth in the BRICS countries. Policymakers need to consider the policy implications discussed in this document to ensure a greener and more sustainable future for the BRICS countries. To mitigate the negative impacts of globalization on green growth, BRICS countries should enhance their environmental regulations. Stricter standards can help control pollution, promote sustainable resource management, and encourage the adoption of clean technologies. The BRICS countries should prioritize sustainable trade practices by integrating environmental considerations into trade agreements and policies. This could include promoting eco-labeling, supporting eco-friendly supply chains, and reducing trade barriers for environmentally friendly products.

Keywords

Natural resources / Globalization / Research and development / Green growth / BRICS countries

Declaration of Competing Interest

The author declares that she has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1] M. Abid. Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? a comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. J. Environ. Manage., 188 (2017), pp. 183-194,

[2] Adebayo, T.S., Ramzan, M., Iqbal, H.A., Awosusi, A.A., Akinsola, G.D., 2021. The environmental sustainability effects of financial development and urbanization in Latin American countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (41) , 57983-57996.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14580-4.

[3] F.F. Adedoyin, M.I. Gumede, F.V. Bekun, M.U. Etokakpan, D. Balsalobre-lorente. Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies?. Sci. Total Environ., 710 (2020), pp. 1-30,

[4] F.F. Adedoyin, A. Zakari. Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: The role of economic policy uncertainty. Sci. Total Environ., 738 (2020), Article 140014,

[5] M. Ahmad, G. Jabeen, M. Irfan, C. Işık, A. Rehman. Do inward foreign direct investment and economic development improve local environmental quality: aggregation bias puzzle. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (26) (2021), pp. 34676-34696,

[6] M. Ahmad, I. Khan, M. Qaiser, S. Khan, G. Jabeen. Households ’ perception-based factors influencing biogas adoption : Innovation diffusion framework. Energy, 263 (2022),

[7] Ahmad, M., 2021. Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies ? A new perspective 30, 1–5.

[8] Z. Ahmed, M. Cary, S. Ali, M. Murshed, H. Ullah, H. Mahmood. Moving toward a green revolution in Japan: Symmetric and asymmetric relationships among clean energy technology development investments, economic growth, and CO2 emissions. Energy Environ., 1–10 (2021),

[9] S. Ali, Q. Yan, A. Razzaq, I. Khan, M. Irfan. Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption : a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. (2022),

[10] O.A. Aluko, A.A. Obalade. Financial development and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa: Is there a technology effect?. Sci. Total Environ., 747 (2020), Article 141515,

[11] M.K. Anser, M. Usman, D.I. Godil, M.S. Shabbir, A. Sharif, M.I. Tabash, L.B. Lopez. Does globalization affect the green economy and environment? The relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021), pp. 51105-51118,

[12] H.M. Arslan, I. Khan, M.I. Latif, B. Komal, S. Chen. Understanding the dynamics of natural resources rents, environmental sustainability, and sustainable economic growth : new insights from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. (2022),

[13] R.M. Auty. How natural resources affect economic development. Dev. Policy Rev., 18 (2000), pp. 347-364,

[14] A. Awan, M. Sadiq, S. Tauseef, I. Khan, N. Hashim. Urban Climate Combined nonlinear effects of urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. An application of QARDL and KRLS. Urban Clim., 46 (2022), Article 101342,

[15] D. Balsalobre-Lorente, O.M. Driha, G. Halkos, S. Mishra. Influence of growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions: The moderating effect of foreign direct investment on energy use in BRICS. Sustain. Dev., 30 (2022), pp. 227-240,

[16] J. Bansard, M. Schröder. The Sustainable Use of Natural Resources: The Governance Challenge |. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2021)

[17] F.V. Bekun, A.A. Alola, B.A. Gyamfi, A.B. Ampomah. The environmental aspects of conventional and clean energy policy in sub-Saharan Africa: is N-shaped hypothesis valid?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021), pp. 66695-66708,

[18] M. Bernier, M. Plouffe. Financial innovation, economic growth, and the consequences of macroprudential policies. Res. Econ., 73 (2019), pp. 162-173,

[19] K.I. Bilal, D. Tan, W. Azam, S. Tauseef Hassan. Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: The impact of inflation dynamics. Gondwana Res., 106 (2022), pp. 51-63,

[20] D. Blandford, J.B. Braden, J.S. Shortle. Economics of natural resources and environment in agriculture. Encycl. Agric. Food Syst., 18–34 (2014),

[21] J. Cai, M. Ahmad, M. Irfan, I. Khan, A. Razzaq, M. Ahmad, M. Irfan. Modeling wind energy development barriers : implications for promoting green energy sector. Energy Sources, Part B Econ Planning, Policy, 17 (2022), pp. 1-31,

[22] L. Charfeddine, K. Ben Khediri. Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: Cointegration with structural breaks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 55 (2016), pp. 1322-1335,

[23] Chen, X., Fu, Q., Chang, C., 2021. What are the shocks of climate change on clean energy investment : A diversified exploration. Energy Econ. 95, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105136.

[24] Y. Chen, C.C. Lee. Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J. Clean. Prod., 263 (2020), pp. 1-23,

[25] Y. Chen, Z. Wang, Z. Zhong. CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renew. Energy, 131 (2019), pp. 208-216,

[26] E.W. Chu, J.R. Karr. Environmental impact: concept, consequences, measurement. Ref. Module Life Sci. (2017),

[27] U.R. Danish. Renewable energy, technological innovation and the environment: A novel dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 150 (2021), Article 111433,

[28] H. Danish, M.A. Baloch, N. Mahmood, J.W. Zhang. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain. Cities Soc., 47 (2019), Article 101516,

[29] G. Estrada, P. Donghyun, A. Ramayandi. Financial development and economic growth in developing Asia. Asian Dev. Bank, 233 (2010), pp. 1-63

[30] F. Fatai Adedoyin, P.O. Agboola, I. Ozturk, F.V. Bekun, M.O. Agboola. Environmental consequences of economic complexities in the EU amidst a booming tourism industry: accounting for the role of brexit and other crisis events. J. Clean. Prod., 305 (2021), pp. 1-25,

[31] J.A. Frankel, D. Romer. Does trade cause growth?. Am. Econ. Rev., 89 (1999), pp. 379-399,

[32] Freedman, B., 2018. Chapter 12: Resources and Sustainable Development. Environ. Sci. a Can. Perspect. 1–37.

[33] F.Y. Fu, M. Alharthi, Z. Bhatti, L. Sun, F. Rasul, I. Hanif, W. Iqbal. The dynamic role of energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability in the dilemma of emission reduction and economic growth. J. Environ. Manage., 280 (2021),

[34] Y. Gao, S.-B. Tsai, X. Xue, T. Ren, X. Du, Q. Chen, J. Wang. An empirical study on green innovation efficiency in the green institutional environment. Sustainability, 10 (2018), p. 724,

[35] A. Gasparatos, T. Gadda. Environmental support, energy security and economic growth in Japan. Energy Policy, 37 (2009), pp. 4038-4048,

[36] L. Georgeson, M. Maslin, M. Poessinouw. The global green economy: a review of concepts, definitions, measurement methodologies and their interactions. Geo Geogr. Environ., 4 (2017), pp. 1-48,

[37] GGKP. Moving towards a common approach on green growth indicators. Green Growth Knowl. Platf. Scoping Pap. (2013), pp. 1-46

[38] D.I. Godil, Z. Yu, A. Sharif, R. Usman, S.A.R. Khan. Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector CO2 emission in China: A path toward sustainable development. Sustain. Dev., 29 (2021), pp. 694-707,

[39] R.W. Goldsmith. Financial structure and development as a subject for international comparative study. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. the Compar (1969), pp. 114-123

[40] J. Guo, Y. Zhou, S. Ali, U. Shahzad, L. Cui. Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. J. Environ. Manage., 292 (2021), pp. 1-3,

[41] B. Gutti, M.M. Aji, G. Magaji. Environmental Impact of Natural Resources Exploitation in Nigeria and the Way Forward. J. Appl. Technol. Environ. Sanit., 2 (2012), pp. 95-102

[42] S. Gygli, F. Haelg, N. Potrafke, J.E. Sturm. The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. Rev. Int. Organ., 14 (2019), pp. 543-574,

[43] S.T. Hassan, P. Wang, I. Khan, B. Zhu. The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Res., 113 (2022), pp. 237-246,

[44] A. Ii. of Economics Capital-Labor substitution. Rev. Lit. Arts Am., 43 (2011), pp. 225-250

[45] Irena Global Renewables Outlook: Energy transformation 2050, International Renewable Energy Agency 2020.

[46] H. Jie, I. Khan, M. Alharthi, M. Wasif, A. Saeed. Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint : The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Util. Policy, 81 (2023), Article 101490,

[47] I. Khan, F. Hou. Does multilateral environmental diplomacy improve environmental quality? The case of the United States. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021), pp. 23310-23322,

[48] I. Khan, B. Khilji, R. Tabassam. Agricultural financing, state bank and economic growth of Pakistan: A case study of allied bank limited, Sargodha region. Aust. J. Commer. Study SCIE Journals, 1 (2014), pp. 26-31

[49] I. Khan, F. Hou, M. Irfan, A. Zakari, H.P. Le. Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 146 (2021), pp. 1-11,

[50] Z. Khan, M.Y. Malik, K. Latif, Z. Jiao. Heterogeneous effect of eco-innovation and human capital on renewable \& non-renewable energy consumption: Disaggregate analysis for G-7 countries. Energy, 209 (2020), Article 118405

[51] R. Kurniawan, Y. Sugiawan, S. Managi. Economic growth – environment nexus: An analysis based on natural capital component of inclusive wealth. Ecol. Indic., 120 (2021), Article 106982,

[52] K.H. Lee, B. Min. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod., 108 (2015), pp. 534-542,

[53] K.-H. Lee, B. Min, K.-H. Yook. The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 167 (2015), pp. 1-11,

[54] W. Li, M. Elheddad, N. Doytch. The impact of innovation on environmental quality: Evidence for the non-linear relationship of patents and CO2 emissions in China. J. Environ. Manage., 292 (2021), Article 112781,

[55] G. Li, W. Wei. Financial development, openness, innovation, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Energy Econ., 97 (2021), Article 105194,

[56] W. Liu, X. Chen. Natural resources commodity prices volatility and economic uncertainty: Evaluating the role of oil and gas rents in COVID-19. Resour. Policy, 76 (2022), pp. 1-24,

[57] H. Liu, I. Khan, A. Zakari, M. Alharthi. Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment. Energy Policy, 170 (2022), pp. 1-9,

[58] H. Liu, M.W. Zafar, A. Sinha, I. Khan. The path to sustainable environment : Do environmental taxes and governance matter ?. Sustain. Dev., 1–13 (2023),

[59] N. Loganathan, M. Shahbaz, R. Taha. The link between green taxation and economic growth on CO2 emissions: Fresh evidence from Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 38 (2014), pp. 1083-1091,

[60] X. Long, X. Ji. Economic growth quality, environmental sustainability, and social welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI). Ecol. Econ., 159 (2019), pp. 157-176,

[61] M. Luqman, N. Ahmad, K. Bakhsh. Nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in Pakistan : Evidence from non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model. Renew. Energy, 139 (2019), pp. 1299-1309,

[62] L. Lyu, I. Khan, A. Zakari, Bilal. A study of energy investment and environmental sustainability nexus in China: a bootstrap replications analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29 (2022), pp. 8464-8472,

[63] E.A. Mohamued, M. Ahmed, P. Pypłacz, K. Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, M.A. Khan. Global oil price and innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending, oil price and oil price volatility on ghg emissions. Energies, 14 (2021),

[64] K. Mughal, I. Khan, F. Usman. The Impacts of Financial Crisis on Pakistan Economy: An Empirical Approach. Int. J. Empir. Financ., 4 (2015), pp. 258-269

[65] S. Nasreen, M.B. Mbarek, M. Atiq-ur-Rehman. Long-run causal relationship between economic growth, transport energy consumption and environmental quality in Asian countries: Evidence from heterogeneous panel methods. Energy, 192 (2020), Article 116628,

[66] P. Pegkas, C. Staikouras, C. Tsamadias. Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. J. Policy Model., 41 (2019), pp. 1005-1025,

[67] C. Pérez, O. Claveria. Natural resources and human development: Evidence from mineral-dependent African countries using exploratory graphical analysis. Resour. Policy, 65 (2020), pp. 11-12,

[68] M.H. Pesaran. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econom., 22 (2007), pp. 265-312,

[69] Pesaran, M.H., 2004. General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. IZA Discuss. Pap. No. 1240 August 2004 1–39.

[70] A. Rauf, X. Liu, W. Amin, I. Ozturk, O.U. Rehman, M. Hafeez. Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25 (2018), pp. 32066-32080,

[71] S.V. Scott, J. Van Reenen, M. Zachariadis. The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Res. Policy, 46 (2017), pp. 984-1004,

[72] A. Shabbir, S. Kousar, F. Kousar. The role of natural resources in economic growth: new evidence from Pakistan. J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci., 25 (2020), pp. 221-238,

[73] M. Shahbaz, K. Ahmed, A.K. Tiwari, Z. Jiao. Resource curse hypothesis and role of oil prices in USA. Resour. Policy, 64 (2019), pp. 2-3,

[74] W. Shittu, F.F. Adedoyin, M.I. Shah, H.O. Musibau. An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: Evidence from Asia. Resour. Policy, 73 (2021), pp. 1-6,

[75] P. Söderholm. The green economy transition: the challenges of technological change for sustainability. Sustain. Earth, 3 (2020), pp. 1-47,

[76] L. Sun, Y. Wang. Global economic performance and natural resources commodity prices volatility: Evidence from pre and post COVID-19 era. Resour. Policy, 74 (2021), pp. 1-9,

[77] F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, A. Zakari, N. Yoshino, I. Khan. Leveraging on energy security to alleviate poverty in Asian economies. Singapore Econ. Rev., 1–28 (2022),

[78] R. Tao, M. Umar, A. Naseer, U. Razi. The dynamic effect of eco-innovation and environmental taxes on carbon neutrality target in emerging seven (E7) economies. J. Environ. Manage., 299 (2021), pp. 1-23,

[79] V. Tawiah, A. Zakari, I. Khan. The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: An analysis of the effect of China – Africa partnership on carbon emissions. Sci. Total Environ. (2021),

[80] D. Töbelmann, T. Wendler. The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. J. Clean. Prod., 244 (2020),

[81] S. Ullah, I. Ozturk, M.T. Majeed, W. Ahmad. Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod., 316 (2021), Article 128239,

[82] UNESCO. Natural resources and pro-poor growth the economics and politics. South African Med. J., 101 (2016), p. 16

[83] United Nations Climate Change Global Innovation Hub, 2021. UN Climate Change Global Innovation Hub.

[84] R. Waheed, S. Sarwar, C. Wei. The survey of economic growth, energy consumption and carbon emission. Energy Rep., 5 (2019), pp. 1103-1115,

[85] Wallace, K.J., Beecham, B.C., Bone, B.H., 2003. Managing natural biodiversity in the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Dep. Conserv. L. Manag. 64.

[86] S.B. Wassie. Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: a review. Environ. Syst. Res., 9 (2020), pp. 1-115,

[87] WDI, 2022. Financial development, https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/gfdr/gfdr-2016/background/financial-development, The World Bank Group, IBRD-IDA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266119970206.

[88] J. Westerlund. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 69 (2007), pp. 709-748,

[89] World Health Organization (WHO), 2020. WHO/Europe | Types of seasonal influenza vaccine, WHO.

[90] Xin, D., Ahmad, M., Lei, H., Khattak, S.I., 2021. Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States ? 9–11.

[91] J. Xu, J. Zhao, S. She, W. Liu. Green growth, natural resources and sustainable development: Evidence from BRICS economies. Resour. Policy, 79 (2022), pp. 1-30,

[92] X. Yang, I. Khan. Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: the role of industry value-added. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29 (2022), pp. 4116-4127,

[93] Y. Yu, Y. Du. Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’ economy in China. Atmos. Pollut. Res., 10 (2019), pp. 152-161,

[94] J. Yu, X. Shi, D. Guo, L. Yang. Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and firm carbon emissions: Evidence using a China provincial EPU index. Energy Econ., 94 (2021), pp. 1-26,

[95] A. Zakari, I. Khan. Boosting economic growth through energy in Africa: the role of Chinese investment and institutional quality. J. Chinese Econ. Bus. Stud., 20 (2022), pp. 1-21,

[96] A. Zakari, I. Khan, V. Tawiah, R. Alvarado. Reviewing the ecological footprints of Africa top carbon consumer: a quantile on quantile analysis. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2022),

[97] A. Zakari, I. Khan, R. Alvarado. The impact of environmental technology innovation and energy credit rebate on carbon emissions : A comparative analysis. J. Int. Dev. WILEY, 1–17 (2023),

[98] D. Zhang, M. Mohsin, A.K. Rasheed, Y. Chang, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary. Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy, 153 (2021), pp. 1-24,

[99] Z. Zheng, Z. Wu, Y. Chen, Z. Yang, F. Marinello. Exploration of eco-environment and urbanization changes in coastal zones : A case study in China over the past 20 years. Ecol. Indic., 119 (2020), Article 106847,