The role of disaggregated renewable energy consumption on income and load capacity factor: A novel inclusive sustainable growth approach

Abstract

Stimulating renewable energy consumption is a major focus of the Sustainable Development Goals in combating climate change and global warming. The International Energy Agency estimates that renewable energy consumption should be doubled to achieve the COP21 targets. In this context, the question is whether renewable energy types promote the improvement of ecological quality and economic growth. Most studies have investigated the influence of renewable energy on ecological pollution using carbon dioxide emissions or ecological footprint indicators, which only represent the pollution caused by human consumption patterns, and these indicators neglect the supply side. Motivated by this point, this study uses the LCF (Load Capacity Factor) as an environmental indicator and examines the causality relationship among different types of renewable energy, income, and environmental quality in the USA, while also incorporating employment and capital stock into the analysis. Through using the Fourier causality test with the wavelet-decomposed series, the study explores for the validity of the renewable energy-based growth hypothesis and answers to the question of whether there is a causal effect of renewable energy types on environmental quality. The results demonstrate that there is a bidirectional causality between total renewable energy, wood, biomass, and economic growth as well as between these renewable energy types and the LCF.

Keywords

Load capacity factor / Economic growth / Renewable energy / Fourier approximation / Emvironmental quality

References

[1] Adebayo T. S., Ullah S., Kartal M. T., Ali K., Pata U. K., Ağa M. 2023. Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Sci. Total. Environ. 859, 160181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181.

[2] Andersson F.N. 2016. Identifying and modelling cycles and long waves in economic time series. Structural Analysis and the Process of Economic Development, Routledge, New York, 34-55.

[3] Apergis N., Payne J.E. 2011a. Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from emerging market economies. Appl. Energ. 88(12), 5226-5230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.041.

[4] Apergis N., Payne J.E. 2011b. The renewable energy consumption-growth nexus in Central America. Appl. Energ. 88(1), 343-347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.013.

[5] Aslan A. 2016. The causal relationship between biomass energy use and economic growth in the United States Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 57, 362-366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.109.

[6] Aslan A., Oguz O. 2016. The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: Evidence from asymmetric causality. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 60, 953-959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.123.

[7] Aydın M., Pata U.K. 2020. Are shocks to disaggregated renewable energy consumption permanent or temporary for the USA? Wavelet based unit root test with smooth structural shifts. Energy, 207, 118245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118245.

[8] Azam A., Rafiq M., Shafique M., Zhang H., Ateeq M., Yuan J. 2021. Analyzing the relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources: Fresh evidence from newly industrialized countries. Sustain. Energy Techn. 44, 100991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.100991.

[9] Bang G. 2010. Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energ. Policy. 38(4), 1645-1653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.045.

[10] Becker R., Enders W., Lee J. 2006. A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. j.Time Anal. 27(3), 381-409, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x.

[11] Bowden N., Payne j.E. 2010. Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources B Energy Econ. Plann., 5(4), 400-408, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802534250.

[12] Brassarote G.O.N., Souza E, M., Monico J.F.G. 2018. Non-decimated wavelet transform for a shift-invariant analysis. TEMA (São Carlos), 19, 93-110, https://doi.org/10.5540/tema.2018.019.01.0093.

[13] Chen L., Huang K., Zhou J., Duan H. F., Zhang J., Wang D., Qiu H. 2020. Multiple-risk assessment of water supply, hydropower and environment nexus in the water resources system j.Clean. Prod. 268, 122057, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122057.

[14] Chiu C.L., Chang T. H. 2009. What proportion of renewable energy supplies is needed to initially mitigate CO₂ emissions in OECD member countries? Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13(6-7), 1669-1674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.026.

[15] Dai J., Ahmed Z., Sinha A., Pata U. K., Alvarado R. 2023. Sustainable green electricity, technological innovation, and ecological footprint: Does democratic accountability moderate the nexus? Util. Pol. 82, 101541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101541.

[16] Daubechies I. 1992. Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Volume 61 of CBMS-NFS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics (Philadelphia, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematic).

[17] Destek M.A., Aslan A. 2017. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: Evidence from bootstrap panel causality. Renew. Energ. 111, 757-763, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.008.

[18] Duan H.F., Gao X. 2019. Flooding control and hydro-energy assessment for urban Stormwater drainage systems under climate change: Framework development and case study Water Resour. Manag. 33, 3523-3545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02314-8.

[19] Durusu-Ciftci D., Soytas U., Nazlioglu S. 2020. Financial development and energy consumption in emerging markets: Smooth structural shifts and causal linkages. Energy Econ., 87, 104729, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104729.

[20] EDF. 2018. The Clean Power Plan. Environmental Defense Fund. https://www.edf.org/clean-power-plan-resources, 2018 (Accessed on 1 April 2023).

[21] EIA. 2023. Renewable & alternative fuels, https://www.eia.gov/renewable/data.php, 2022. (Accessed on 11 January 2023).

[22] Emirmahmutoglu F., Denaux Z., Topcu M. 2021. Time-varying causality between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output: Sectoral evidence from the United States. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 149, 111326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111326.

[23] Enders W., Jones P. 2016. Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. E. 20(4), 399-419, https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0101.

[24] Enders W., Lee J. 2012. The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root tests. Econ. Lett., 117(1), 196-199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081.

[25] Fareed Z., Pata U.K. 2022. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and income in top ten renewable energy-consuming countries: Advanced Fourier based panel data approaches. Renew. Energ. 194, 805-821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.156.

[26] FRED. 2023. Economic data, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPCA (Accessed on 11 December 2022).

[27] Gencay R., Gradojevic N., Selcuk F., Whitcher B. 2010. Asymmetry of information flow between volatilities across time scales. Quantit. Fin., 10(8), 895-915, https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680903460143.

[28] GFN. 2021. Compare countries, https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.213014356.193975080.1607636931-1228825067.1607467693#/compareCountries?type=EFCtot&cn=all&yr=2017 (Accessed on 13 February 2023).

[29] GFN. 2023. National footprint accounts, ecological footprint. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/ (Accessed 5 January 2023).

[30] Goffe W.L. 1994. Wavelets in macroeconomics:An introduction. In Computational techniques for econometrics and economic analysis Springer, Dordrecht, 137-149.

[31] Gozgor G. 2018. A new approach to the renewable energy-growth nexus: evidence from the USA. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 25(17), 16590-16600, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1858-9.

[32] Granger C.W. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 37(3), 424-438, https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791.

[33] Ha J., Tan P.P., Goh K.L. 2018. Linear and nonlinear causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in China: New evidence based on wavelet analysis. Plos One. 13(5), e0197785, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197785.

[34] Hill J., Tajibaeva L., Polasky S. 2016. Climate consequences of low-carbon fuels: the United States Renewable Fuel Standard. Energ. Policy. 97, 351-353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.035.

[35] Hsiao C. 1981. Autoregressive modelling and money-income causality detection. j.Monetary Econ., 7(1), 85-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(81)90053-2.

[36] Kartal M. T. 2022. The role of consumption of energy, fossil sources, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on environmental degradation in top-five carbon producing countries. Renew. Energ. 184, 871-880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.022.

[37] Kartal M. T. 2023. Production-based disaggregated analysis of energy consumption and CO₂ emission nexus: Evidence from the USA by novel dynamic ARDL simulation approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 30(3), 6864-6874, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22714-5.

[38] Kartal M. T., Pata U. K., Kılıç Depren S., Depren Ö. 2023. Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO₂ emissions: Evidence from France under Russia’s gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Appl. Energ. 339, 120983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120983.

[39] Koebrich S., Chen E., Bowen T., Forrester S., Tian T. 2017. Renewable energy databook, U.S Department of Energy; 2017 (accessed on 28 February 2022).

[40] Kraft J., Kraft A. 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP j.Energy Dev. 3(2), 401-403.

[41] Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P. C., Schmidt P., Shin Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? j.Econometrics. 54(1), 159-178, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y.

[42] Lee C.C., Ranjbar O., Lee C.C. 2021. Testing the persistence of shocks on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from a quantile unit-root test with smooth breaks. Energy. 215, 119190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119190.

[43] Lumsdaine R.L., Papell D.H. 1997. Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis Rev Econ. Stat., 79(2), 212-218, https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791.

[44] Menyah K., Wolde-Rufael Y. 2010. CO₂ emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US Energ. Policy. 38(6), 2911-2915, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.024.

[45] Mounir E. K., El-houjjaji H. 2022. Economic growth and renewable energy consumption nexus in G 7 countries: Symmetric and asymmetric causality analysis in frequency domain J. Clean. Prod. 342, 130618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130618.

[46] Nazlioglu S., Gormus N. A., Soytas U. 2016. Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energ. Econ. 60, 168-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009.

[47] Nazlioglu S., Gormus A., Soytas U. 2019. Oil prices and monetary policy in emerging markets: structural shifts in causal linkages. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 55(1), 105-117, https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1434072.

[48] Ocal O., Aslan A. 2013. Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 28, 494-499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.036.

[49] Pata U. K., 2021a. Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues. Eur. j.Public Health. 22(9), 1427-1439, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0.

[50] Pata U.K. 2021b. Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO₂ emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renew. Energ. 173, 197-208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125.

[51] Pata U. K., Kartal M. T. 2023. Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 55(2), 587-594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.027.

[52] Pata U. K., Çağlar A. E., Kartal M. T., Kılıç Depren S. 2023a. Evaluation of the role of clean energy technologies, human capital, urbanization, and income on the environmental quality in the United States. j.Clean. Prod. 136802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136802.

[53] Pata U. K., Kartal M. T., Adebayo T. S., Ullah S. 2023b. Enhancing environmental quality in the United States by linking biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor. Geosci. Front. 14(3), 101531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101531.

[54] Pata U. K., Kartal M. T., Dam M. M., Kaya F. 2023c. Navigating the impact of renewable energy, trade openness, income, and globalization on load capacity factor: The case of Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. Int. j.Energ. Res. 6828781, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6828781.

[55] Payne J.E. 2009. On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl. Energ. 86(4), 575-577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.003.

[56] Payne J.E. 2011. On biomass energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources B. Energy Econ. Plann., 6(1), 47-52, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240903160906.

[57] REN21. 2018. Renewables 2018 Global Status Report, accessed on 20 February 2023).

[58] Saidi K., Mbarek M.B. 2016. Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO₂ emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: Evidence from panel Granger causality tests. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 88, 364-374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.01.018.

[59] Schleicher C. 2002. An Introduction to Wavelets for Economists, Staff Working Papers, Bank of Canada, 2002.

[60] Shahbaz M., Sinha A. 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO₂ emissions: A literature survey. j.Econ. Stud. 46(1), 106-168, https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249.

[61] Sharma G. D., Tiwari A. K., Jain M., Yadav A., Erkut B. 2021. Unconditional and conditional analysis between covid-19 cases, temperature, exchange rate and stock markets using wavelet coherence and wavelet partial coherence approaches. Heliyon, 7(2), e06181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06181.

[62] Siche R., Pereira L., Agostinho F., Ortega E., 2010. Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 15(10), 3182-3192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027.

[63] Sims C. A. 1972. Money, income, and causality. Amer. Econ. Rev., 62(4), 540-552.

[64] Sissine F. 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: A summary of major provisions. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service.

[65] Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing B.T. 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 62(3), 482-489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009.

[66] Stern D.I. 1997. Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: a neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 21(3), 197-215, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00103-6.

[67] Stern D.I. 2004. Economic growth and energy. Encycl. Energy. 2(00147), 35-51.

[68] Stern D. I. 2011. The role of energy in economic growth. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 1219(1), 26-51, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05921.x.

[69] Steve Y.S., Murad A. B., Gyamfi B.A., Bekun F.V., Uzuner G. 2022. Renewable energy consumption a panacea for sustainable economic growth: Panel causality analysis for African blocs. Int. j.Green Energy. 19(8), 847-856, https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2021.1966793.

[70] Sulemana I., Bugri Anarfo E., Quartey P. 2019. International remittances and household food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Migrat. Develop. 8(2), 264-280, https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2018.1560926.

[71] Tahseen S., Karney B.W. 2017. Reviewing and critiquing published approaches to the sustainability assessment of hydropower. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.67, 225-234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.031.

[72] Tiba S., Omri A. 2017. Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 69, 1129-1146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.113.

[73] Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. 1995. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. j.Econom. 66(1), 225-250, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8.

[74] Troster V., Shahbaz M., Uddin G.S. 2018. Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: A Granger-causality in quantiles analysis. Energy Econ. 70, 440-452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.029.

[75] Tugcu C.T., Ozturk I., Aslan A. 2012. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: Evidence from G7 countries. Energ. Econ. 34(6), 1942-1950, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.021.

[76] Ullah S., Luo R., Adebayo T. S., Kartal M. T. 2023. Paving the ways toward sustainable development: the asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environ. Dev. Sustain, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03085-4.

[77] Usman O., Akadiri S. S., Adeshola I. 2020a. Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: Implications for environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 27(24), 30681-30693, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9.

[78] Usman O., Alola A. A., Sarkodie S. A. 2020b. Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: Evidence from the US. Renew. Energ. 150, 266-277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.151.

[79] Wackernagel M., Rees W. 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

[80] Wu T.P., Wu H.C. 2019. Causality between European economic policy uncertainty and tourism using wavelet-based approaches. j.Travel Res. 58(8), 1347-1356, https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518803204.

[81] Yildirim E., Sarac S., Aslan A. 2012. Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: Evidence from renewable energy. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16(9), 6770-6774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.004.

[82] Zafar M.W., Sinha A., Ahmed Z., Qin Q., Zaidi S.A.H. 2021. Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 142, 110868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110868.

[83] Zivot E., Andrews D.W.K. 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. j.Bus. Econ. Stat., 10(3), 251-270, https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372.

[84] US EPA. 2019. EPA finalizes Affordable Clean Energy Rule, ensuring reliable, diversified energy resources while protecting our environment. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-finalizes-affordable-clean-energy-rule-ensuring-reliable-diversified-energy (accessed on 1 April 2023).

[85] World Bank. 2023. World Development Indicators, accessed on 13 December 2023).