Aesthetics of urban commercial streets from the perspective of cognitive memory and user behavior in urban environments

Abstract

Streets are one of the major elements that make-up the urban environment. Urban commercial and mixed-use street types occur as public spaces in every town and city all around the world. With the paucity of such spaces, streets have taken up to solve the problem. Hence, this study assesses the key physical, visual, and aesthetical characteristics and examines the influence of aesthetical attributes over the activity pattern, user behavioral responses, and the color palette observed. Moreover, this research has been carried out in Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India. Four significant commercial streets were identified and featured in the main study. The research method comprehends a structured questionnaire and multiple interviews to amass data, photo elicitation, and video corroboration to identify the key visual characteristics to study and scrutinize the aesthetical responses to various attributes that make good-looking urban commercial and mixed-use street types. The results of the study indicate that the diversity and perceived pleasantness of the environment, which includes elements such as facades, colors, aspect ratios, maintenance, and vegetation, has a very close association with walking preferences. The outcome of the study would also help architects, urban designers and planners, and policy makers to create positive spaces to foster urban commercial street types as place-making and aesthetically pleasing streets.

Keywords

User behavior / Urban commercial streets / Mixed-use / Aesthetical characteristics / Place making / Facade characteristics

References

[1] Ashihara, Y., 1981. Exterior Design in Architecture, Revised Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, Cincinnati, Toronto, London, Melbourne.

[2] Barton, H., 2009. Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Pol. 26, S115–S123.

[3] Buchanan, P., 1988. What city? A plea for place in the public realm. Architect. Rev. 184, 31–41.

[4] Carmona, M., 2015. London’s local high streets: the problems, potential and complexities of mixed street corridors. Prog. Plann. 100, 1–84.

[5] Dang, P.N., 2008. Challenges for sustainable environment in urbanization in Vietnam. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop Council Subscription: Natural Resources. Environment and Sustainable Development, Hanoi, Vietnam.

[6] Donald, A., Gerson, M.S., Lintell, M., 1981. Livable Streets. University of California Press, Berkely, CA, USA.

[7] Drummond, L.B.W., 2000. Street scenes: practices of public and private space in urban Vietnam. Urban Stud. 37, 2377–2391.

[8] Francis, M., 1987. Urbanopenspaces. Adv. Environ. Behav. Design 1, 71.

[9] Gehl, J., Gemzoe, L., 2004. Public Space. The Danish Architectural Press, Public Life, Copenhagen.

[10] Gehl, J., 2006. Close encounters with buildings. Urban Des. Int. 1.

[11] Gehl, J., 2011. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, Washington, DC.

[12] Hassen, N., Kaufman, P., 2016. Examining the role of urban street design in enhancing community engagement: a literature review. Health Place 41, 119–132.

[13] Herzog, T.R., Flynn-Smith, J.A., 2001. Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length and width of urban alleys. Environ. Behav. 33, 653–666.

[14] Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of American Cities. Random House, New York, NY, USA.

[15] Jiang, B., Chang, C.Y., Sullivan, W.C., 2014. A dose of nature: tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landsc. Urban Plann. 132, 26–36.

[16] Lynch, K., 1960. The Image of the City. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

[17] Middleton, J., 2018. The socialities of everyday urban walking and the ‘right to the city. Urban Stud. 55 (2), 296–315.

[18] Marušić, B.G., 2011. Analysis of patterns of spatial occupancy in urban open space using behaviour maps and GIS. Urban Des. Int. 16 (1), 36–50.

[19] Mehta, V., 2009. Look closely and you will see, Listen carefully and you will hear: urban design and social interaction on streets. J. Urban Des. 14, 20–64.

[20] Montgomery, J., 1998. Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. J. Urban Des. 3, 93–116.

[21] Mounir, G.M., Attia, M.S., Tayel, K.Y., 2016. Street children in Alexandria: profile and psychological disorders. J. High Inst. Public Health 37 (1), 56–77.

[22] Nasar, J.L., 1994. Urban design aesthetics: the evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environ. Behav. 26, 377–401.

[23] Stamps, A.E., 2005a. Elongation and enclosure. Percept. Mot. Skills 101, 303–308.

[24] Stamps, A.E., 2005b. Enclosure and safety in urbanscapes. Environ. Behav. 37, 102–133.

[25] Stamps, A.E., 2005c. Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure. Environ. Behav. 37, 587–619.

[26] Sullivan, W.C., Kuo, F.E., De Pooter, S., 2004. The fruit of urban nature: vital neighborhood spaces. Environ. Behav. 36 (5), 678–700.

[27] Whyte, W.H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 2022 Higher Education Press Limited Company. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).