Multiobjective trajectory optimization of intelligent electro-hydraulic shovel

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 50.

PDF(8238 KB)
PDF(8238 KB)
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 50. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-022-0706-2
Mechanisms and Robotics - RESEARCH ARTICLE

作者信息 +

Multiobjective trajectory optimization of intelligent electro-hydraulic shovel

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Multiobjective trajectory planning is still face challenges due to certain practical requirements and multiple contradicting objectives optimized simultaneously. In this paper, a multiobjective trajectory optimization approach that sets energy consumption, execution time, and excavation volume as the objective functions is presented for the electro-hydraulic shovel (EHS). The proposed cubic polynomial S-curve is employed to plan the crowd and hoist speed of EHS. Then, a novel hybrid constrained multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition is proposed to deal with this constrained multiobjective optimization problem. The normalization of objectives is introduced to minimize the unfavorable effect of orders of magnitude. A novel hybrid constraint handling approach based on ε-constraint and the adaptive penalty function method is utilized to discover infeasible solution information and improve population diversity. Finally, the entropy weight technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution method is used to select the most satisfied solution from the Pareto optimal set. The performance of the proposed strategy is validated and analyzed by a series of simulation and experimental studies. Results show that the proposed approach can provide the high-quality Pareto optimal solutions and outperforms other trajectory optimization schemes investigated in this article.

Keywords

trajectory planning / electro-hydraulic shovel / cubic polynomial S-curve / multiobjective optimization / entropy weight technique

引用本文

导出引用
. . Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering. 2022, 17(4): 50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-022-0706-2

参考文献

[1]
Wu J Q, Wang G Q, Bi Q S, Hall R. Digging force and power consumption during robotic excavation of cable shovel: experimental study and DEM simulation. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2020, 35(1): 12–33
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[2]
Patnayak S, Tannant D D, Parsons I, Del Valle V, Wong J. Operator and dipper tooth influence on electric shovel performance during oil sands mining. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2008, 22(2): 120–145
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[3]
Awuah-Offei K, Frimpong S. Cable shovel digging optimization for energy efficiency. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42(8): 995–1006
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[4]
Awuah-OffeiK. Dynamic modeling of electric shovel-formation interactions for efficient oil sands excavation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Rolla: Missouri University of Science & Technology, 2005
[5]
Zhang L, Celik A, Dang S P, Shihada D. Energy-efficient trajectory optimization for UAV-assisted IoT networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2022, 21(12): 4323–4337
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[6]
Chai R Q, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Chai S C, Xia Y Q. Trajectory optimization of space maneuver vehicle using a hybrid optimal control solver. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019, 49(2): 467–480
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[7]
SunW, LiE Y, WangX B, Guo Z G, LiX D, SongX G. Optimal trajectory planning for intelligent excavators. Journal of Dalian University Technology, 2018, 58(3): 246–253 (in Chinese)
[8]
Zhang T, Zhang M H, Zou Y B. Time-optimal and smooth trajectory planning for robot manipulators. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2021, 19(1): 521–531
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[9]
Song X G, Zhang T C, Yuan Y L, Wang X B, Sun W. Multidisciplinary co-design optimization of the structure and control systems for large cable shovel considering cross-disciplinary interaction. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2020, 234(22): 4353–4365
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[10]
Gao H J, Yang X B, Shi P. Multi-objective robust H-infinity control of spacecraft rendezvous. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2009, 17(4): 794–802
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[11]
Chen J, Zou Z H, Pang X P. Digging performance characterization for hydraulic excavator considering uncertainty during digging operation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2018, 232(5): 857–871
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[12]
Li X, Wang G Q, Miao S J, Li X F. Optimal design of a hydraulic excavator working device based on parallel particle swarm optimization. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 3793–3805
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[13]
QiuQ Y, Li B, FengP E. Optimal design of hydraulic excavator working device based on multiple surrogate models. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(5): 1687814016647947
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[14]
Zhou A M, Qu B Y, Li H, Zhao S Z, Suganthan P n, Zhang Q F. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2011, 1(1): 32–49
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[15]
Serralheiro W, Maruyama N, Saggin F. Self-tuning time-energy optimization for the trajectory planning of a wheeled mobile robot. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2019, 95(3): 987–997
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[16]
Li L L, Wang X P. An adaptive multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on grid subspaces. Memetic Computing, 2021, 13(2): 249–269
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[17]
Xu G Y, Ding H F, Feng Z M. Optimal design of hydraulic excavator shovel attachment based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(2): 808–819
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[18]
Chai R Q, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Chai S C. Multi-objective trajectory optimization of space manoeuvre vehicle using adaptive differential evolution and modified game theory. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136: 273–280
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[19]
Chai R Q, Tsourdos A, Savvaris A, Chai S C, Xia Y Q, Philip Chen C L. Multi-objective overtaking maneuver planning for autonomous ground vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021, 51(8): 4035–4049
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[20]
Chai R Q, Tsourdos A, Savvaris A, Chai S C, Xia Y Q. Two-stage trajectory optimization for autonomous ground vehicles parking maneuver. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(7): 3899–3909
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[21]
Chai R Q, Tsourdos A, Savvaris A, Chai S C, Xia Y Q, Philip Chen C L. Multi-objective optimal parking maneuver planning of autonomous wheeled vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(12): 10809–10821
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[22]
Tao J, Sun Q L, Chen Z Q, He Y P. NSGA-II based multi-objective homing trajectory planning of parafoil system. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(12): 3248–3255
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[23]
Sheng W X, Liu K Y, Liu Y, Meng X L, Li Y H. Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation via an improved nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2015, 30(2): 569–578
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[24]
Skrobek D, Cekus D. Optimization of the operation of the anthropomorphic manipulator in a three-dimensional working space. Engineering Optimization, 2019, 51(11): 1997–2010
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[25]
Zhang Q F, Li H. MOEA/D: a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, 11(6): 712–731
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[26]
Trivedi A, Srinivasan D, Sanyal K, Ghosh A. A survey of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2017, 21(3): 440–462
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[27]
Chutima P, Jirachai P. Parallel U-shaped assembly line balancing with adaptive MOEA/D hybridized with BBO. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 2020, 37(2-3): 97–119
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[28]
Fan R J, Li Y H, Yang L M. Trajectory planning based on minimum input energy for the electro-hydraulic cable shovel. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Boston: IEEE, 2020, 397–402
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[29]
Frimpong S, Hu Y. Parametric simulation of shovel-oil sands interactions during excavation. International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2004, 18(3): 205–219
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[30]
Wei B C, Gao F, Chen J, He J, Wu S, Song Q. Mechanics performance of three-degree-of-freedom excavating mechanism of an electric shovel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011, 225(6): 1443–1457
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[31]
Topno S A, Sahoo L K, Umre B S. Energy efficiency assessment of electric shovel operating in opencast mine. Energy, 2021, 230: 120703
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[32]
LiM QYao X. What weights work for you? Adapting weights for any Pareto front shape in decomposition-based evolutionary multi-objective optimisation. Evolutionary Computation, 2020, 28(2): 227–253
[33]
Mallipeddi R, Suganthan P N. Ensemble of constraint handling techniques. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2010, 14(4): 561–579
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[34]
Jan M A, Zhang Q F. MOEA/D for constrained multi-objective optimization: some preliminary experimental results. In: Proceedings of 2010 UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI). Colchester: IEEE, 2010, 1–6
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[35]
Jan M A, Khanum R A. A study of two penalty-parameterless constraint handling techniques in the framework of MOEA/D. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(1): 128–148
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[36]
Takahama T, Sakai S. Constrained optimization by the ε constrained differential evolution with gradient-based mutation and feasible elites. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Vancouver: IEEE, 2006, 1–8
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[37]
Fan Z, Li W J, Cai X Y, Huang H, Fang Y, You Y G, Mo J J, Wei C M, Goodman E. An improved epsilon constraint-handling method in MOEA/D for CMOPs with large infeasible regions. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(23): 12491–12510
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[38]
Chai R Q, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Xia Y Q, Chai S C. Solving multi-objective constrained trajectory optimization problem by an extended evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2020, 50(4): 1630–1643
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[39]
Li K, Fialho A, Kwong S, Zhang Q F. Adaptive operator selection with bandits for a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(1): 114–130
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[40]
While L, Hingston P, Barone L, Huband S. A faster algorithm for calculating hypervolume. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(1): 29–38
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[41]
Zhu S, Zhang H, Jiang Z G, Hon B. A carbon efficiency upgrading method for mechanical machining based on scheduling optimization strategy. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 15(2): 338–350
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[42]
Zhang P Y, Li H S, Ni Y J, Gong F M, Li M N, Wang F Y. Security aware virtual network embedding algorithm using information entropy TOPSIS. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2020, 28(1): 35–57
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[43]
Liu J J, Teo K L, Wang X Y, Wu C Z. An exact penalty function-based differential search algorithm for constrained global optimization. Soft Computing, 2016, 20(4): 1305–1313
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[44]
Duan H B, Li S T. Artificial bee colony-based direct collocation for reentry trajectory optimization of hypersonic vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2015, 51(1): 615–626
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[45]
Kim J J, Lee J J. Trajectory optimization with particle swarm optimization for manipulator motion planning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2015, 11(3): 620–631
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[46]
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197
CrossRef ADS Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1910211).

版权

2022 Higher Education Press
PDF(8238 KB)

专题

Mechanisms and Robotics

2077

Accesses

1

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/