REVIEW

Surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury: A review of clinical evidence, animal model studies, and potential future directions of investigation

  • Yiping LI 1 ,
  • Chandler L. WALKER 1 ,
  • Yi Ping ZHANG 2 ,
  • Christopher B. SHIELDS , 2 ,
  • Xiao-Ming XU , 1
Expand
  • 1. Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery and Goodman and Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
  • 2. Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY 40202, USA

Received date: 08 Feb 2014

Accepted date: 01 Mar 2014

Published date: 01 Apr 2014

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

The goal for treatment in acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is to reduce the extent of secondary damage and facilitate neurologic regeneration and functional recovery. Although multiple studies have investigated potential new therapies for the treatment of acute SCI, outcomes and management protocols aimed at ameliorating neurologic injury in patients remain ineffective. More recent clinical and basic science research have shown surgical interventions to be a potentially valuable modality for treatment; however, the role and timing of surgical decompression, in addition to the optimal surgical intervention, remain one of the most controversial topics pertaining to surgical treatment of acute SCI. As an increasing number of potential treatment modalities emerge, animal models are pivotal for investigating its clinical application and translation into human trials. This review critically appraises the available literature for both clinical and basic science studies to highlight the extent of investigation that has occurred, specific therapies considered, and potential areas for future research.

Cite this article

Yiping LI , Chandler L. WALKER , Yi Ping ZHANG , Christopher B. SHIELDS , Xiao-Ming XU . Surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury: A review of clinical evidence, animal model studies, and potential future directions of investigation[J]. Frontiers in Biology, 2014 , 9(2) : 127 -136 . DOI: 10.1007/s11515-014-1297-z

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH/NINDS R01 NS059622, R01 NS050243, R01 NS073636 to XMX, and F31NS 071863 to CLW), the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) Collaboration in Biomedical/Translational Research (CBR/CTR) Pilot Program Grants (Grant #RR025761) from the NIH, the Indiana Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Funds, the Mari Hulman George Endowment Funds. We also appreciate the use of the Core facility of the Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group/Stark Neurosciences Research Institute at Indiana University School of Medicine, and collaboration with Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY.
1
AckeryA, TatorC, KrassioukovA (2004). A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma, 21(10): 1355-1370

DOI PMID

2
AhnJ, ManL X, WandererJ, BernsteinJ, IannottiJ P (2008). The future of the orthopaedic clinician-scientist. Part I: The potential role of MD-PhD students considering orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90(8): 1794-1799

DOI PMID

3
AmarA P, LevyM L (1999). Pathogenesis and pharmacological strategies for mitigating secondary damage in acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery, 44(5): 1027-1039, discussion 1039-1040

DOI PMID

4
BaptisteD C, FehlingsM G (2008). Emerging drugs for spinal cord injury. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs, 13(1): 63-80

DOI PMID

5
BötelU, GläserE, NiedeggenA (1997). The surgical treatment of acute spinal paralysed patients. Spinal Cord, 35(7): 420-428

DOI PMID

6
BrackenM B, ShepardM J, CollinsW F, HolfordT R, YoungW, BaskinD S, EisenbergH M, FlammE, Leo-SummersL, MaroonJ, MarshallL F, PerotP L Jr, PiepmeierJ, SonntagV K H, WagnerF C, WilbergerJ E, WinnH R (1990). A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury.Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med, 322(20): 1405-1411

DOI PMID

7
BrackenM B, ShepardM J, HolfordT R, Leo-SummersL, AldrichE F, FazlM, FehlingsM, HerrD L, HitchonP W, MarshallL F, NockelsR P, PascaleV, PerotP L Jr, PiepmeierJ, SonntagV K, WagnerF, WilbergerJ E, WinnH R, YoungW (1997). Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA, 277(20): 1597-1604

DOI PMID

8
CampagnoloD I, EsquieresR E, KopaczK J (1997). Effect of timing of stabilization on length of stay and medical complications following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 20(3): 331-334

PMID

9
CarlsonG D, GordenC D, OliffH S, PillaiJ J, LaMannaJ C (2003). Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A(1): 86-94

PMID

10
CarlsonG D, MinatoY, OkadaA, GordenC D, WardenK E, BarbeauJ M, BiroC L, BahnuikE, BohlmanH H, LamannaJ C (1997). Early time-dependent decompression for spinal cord injury: vascular mechanisms of recovery. J Neurotrauma, 14(12): 951-962

DOI PMID

11
CengizS L, KalkanE, BayirA, IlikK, BaseferA (2008). Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 128(9): 959-966

DOI PMID

12
DelamarterR B, ShermanJ, CarrJ B (1995). Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Recovery after immediate and delayed decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77(7): 1042-1049

PMID

13
DesaiA, BallP A, BekelisK, LurieJ, MirzaS K, TostesonT D, WeinsteinJ N (2011). SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis? Neurosurgery, 69(1): 38-44, discussion 44

PMID

14
DimarJ R 2nd, GlassmanS D, RaqueG H, ZhangY P, ShieldsC B (1999). The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 24(16): 1623-1633

PMID

15
DuhM S, ShepardM J, WilbergerJ E, BrackenM B (1994). The effectiveness of surgery on the treatment of acute spinal cord injury and its relation to pharmacological treatment. Neurosurgery, 35(2): 240-248, discussion 248-249

DOI PMID

16
FehlingsM G, ArvinB (2009). The timing of surgery in patients with central spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine, 10(1): 1-2

DOI PMID

17
FehlingsM G, VaccaroA, WilsonJ R, SinghA, W CadotteD, HarropJ S, AarabiB, ShaffreyC, DvorakM, FisherC, ArnoldP, MassicotteE M, LewisS, RampersaudR (2012). Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS ONE, 7(2): e32037

DOI PMID

18
GuestJ, ElerakyM A, ApostolidesP J, DickmanC A, SonntagV K (2002). Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management. J Neurosurg, 97(1 Suppl): 25-32

PMID

19
HallE D, BraughlerJ M (1982). Glucocorticoid mechanisms in acute spinal cord injury: a review and therapeutic rationale. Surg Neurol, 18(5): 320-327

DOI PMID

20
HawrylukG W, RowlandJ, KwonB K, FehlingsM G (2008). Protection and repair of the injured spinal cord: a review of completed, ongoing, and planned clinical trials for acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Focus, 25(5): E14

DOI PMID

21
HurlbertR J (2000). Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: an inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurg, 93(1 Suppl): 1-7

PMID

22
IannottiC, ZhangY P, ShieldsL B, HanY, BurkeD A, XuX M, ShieldsC B (2006). Dural repair reduces connective tissue scar invasion and cystic cavity formation after acute spinal cord laceration injury in adult rats. J Neurotrauma, 23(6): 853-865

DOI PMID

23
JonesC F, CriptonP A, KwonB K (2012a). Gross morphological changes of the spinal cord immediately after surgical decompression in a large animal model of traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine, 37(15): E890-E899

DOI PMID

24
JonesC F, NewellR S, LeeJ H, CriptonP A, KwonB K (2012b). The pressure distribution of cerebrospinal fluid responds to residual compression and decompression in an animal model of acute spinal cord injury. Spine, 37(23): E1422-E1431

DOI PMID

25
JuurlinkB H, PatersonP G (1998). Review of oxidative stress in brain and spinal cord injury: suggestions for pharmacological and nutritional management strategies. J Spinal Cord Med, 21(4): 309-334

PMID

26
KirshblumS, CampagnoloD I, DeLisaJ A (2002). Spinal cord medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. x, 655 p. p.

27
KrengelW F 3rd, AndersonP A, HenleyM B (1993). Early stabilization and decompression for incomplete paraplegia due to a thoracic-level spinal cord injury. Spine, 18(14 Supplement): 2080-2087

DOI PMID

28
LeviL, WolfA, RigamontiD, RaghebJ, MirvisS, RobinsonW L (1991). Anterior decompression in cervical spine trauma: does the timing of surgery affect the outcome? Neurosurgery, 29(2): 216-222

DOI PMID

29
LuJ, AshwellK W, WaiteP (2000). Advances in secondary spinal cord injury: role of apoptosis. Spine, 25(14): 1859-1866

DOI PMID

30
NagataS, GolsteinP (1995). The Fas death factor. Science, 267(5203): 1449-1456

DOI PMID

31
NgW P, FehlingsM G, CuddyB, DickmanC, FazlM, GreenB, HitchonP, NorthrupB, SonntagV, WagnerF, TatorC H (1999). Surgical treatment for acute spinal cord injury study pilot study #2: evaluation of protocol for decompressive surgery within 8 hours of injury. Neurosurg Focus, 6(1): e3

DOI PMID

32
PaceM C, PalagianoA, PaceL, PassavantiM B, IannottiM, SorrentinoR, AurilioC (2004). Sedation in gynaecologic oncology day surgery. Anticancer Res, 24(6): 4109-4112

PMID

33
ParkE, VelumianA A, FehlingsM G (2004). The role of excitotoxicity in secondary mechanisms of spinal cord injury: a review with an emphasis on the implications for white matter degeneration. J Neurotrauma, 21(6): 754-774

DOI PMID

34
PerkinsP G, DeaneR H (1988). Long-term follow-up of six patients with acute spinal injury following dural decompression. Injury, 19(6): 397-401

DOI PMID

35
PollardM E, AppleD F (2003). Factors associated with improved neurologic outcomes in patients with incomplete tetraplegia. Spine, 28(1): 33-39

DOI PMID

36
ProfyrisC, CheemaS S, ZangD, AzariM F, BoyleK, PetratosS (2004). Degenerative and regenerative mechanisms governing spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis, 15(3): 415-436

DOI PMID

37
RabinowitzR S, EckJ C, HarperC M Jr, LarsonD R, JimenezM A, ParisiJ E, FriedmanJ A, YaszemskiM J, CurrierB L (2008). Urgent surgical decompression compared to methylprednisolone for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: a randomized prospective study in beagle dogs. Spine, 33(21): 2260-2268

DOI PMID

38
RowlandJ W, HawrylukG W, KwonB, FehlingsM G (2008). Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus, 25(5): E2

DOI PMID

39
SchumacherH W, WassmannH, PodlinskiC (1988). Pseudomeningocele of the lumbar spine. Surg Neurol, 29(1): 77-78

DOI PMID

40
SmithJ S, AndersonR, PhamT, BhatiaN, StewardO, GuptaR (2010). Role of early surgical decompression of the intradural space after cervical spinal cord injury in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92(5): 1206-1214

DOI PMID

41
TatorC H (1991). Review of experimental spinal cord injury with emphasis on the local and systemic circulatory effects. Neurochirurgie, 37(5): 291-302

PMID

42
TatorC H, FehlingsM G (1991). Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg, 75(1): 15-26

DOI PMID

43
TatorC H, FehlingsM G, ThorpeK, TaylorW (1999). Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurosurg, 91(1 Suppl): 12-18

PMID

44
TatorC H, KoyanagiI (1997). Vascular mechanisms in the pathophysiology of human spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg, 86(3): 483-492

DOI PMID

45
VaccaroA R, DaughertyR J, SheehanT P, DanteS J, CotlerJ M, BalderstonR A, HerbisonG J, NorthrupB E (1997). Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine, 22(22): 2609-2613

DOI PMID

46
WilsonJ R, SinghA, CravenC, VerrierM C, DrewB, AhnH, FordM, FehlingsM G (2012). Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian cohort study. Spinal Cord, 50(11): 840-843

DOI PMID

47
ZhuH, FengY P, YoungW, YouS W, ShenX F, LiuY S, JuG (2008). Early neurosurgical intervention of spinal cord contusion: an analysis of 30 cases. Chin Med J (Engl), 121(24): 2473-2478

PMID

Outlines

/