Media optimization for extracellular amylase production by Pseudomonas balearica vitps19 using response surface methodology

Moni Philip Jacob Kizhakedathil , Subathra Devi Chandrasekaran

Front. Biol. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 123 -129.

PDF (666KB)
Front. Biol. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 123 -129. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-018-1485-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Media optimization for extracellular amylase production by Pseudomonas balearica vitps19 using response surface methodology

Author information +
History +
PDF (666KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we optimized the process for enhancing amylase production from Pseudomonas balearica VITPS19 isolated from agricultural lands in Kolathur, India.

METHODS: Process optimization for enhancing amylase production from the isolate was carried out by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with optimized chemical and physical sources using Design expert v.7.0. A central composite design was used to evaluate the interaction between parameters. Interaction between four factors – maltose (C-source), malt extract (N-source), pH, and CaCl2 was studied.

RESULTS: The factors pH and CaCl2 concentration were found to affect amylase production. Validation of the experiment showed a nearly twofold increase in alpha amylase production.

CONCLUSION: Amylase production was thus optimized and increased yield was achieved.

Keywords

Pseudomonas balearica VITPS19 / alpha amylase / optimization / response surface methodology / central composite design / pH

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Moni Philip Jacob Kizhakedathil, Subathra Devi Chandrasekaran. Media optimization for extracellular amylase production by Pseudomonas balearica vitps19 using response surface methodology. Front. Biol., 2018, 13(2): 123-129 DOI:10.1007/s11515-018-1485-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bradford M M (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 72(1-2): 248–254

[2]

Dey G, Mitra A, Banerjee R,Maiti B R (2001). Enhanced production of amylase by optimization of nutritional constituents using response surface methodology. Biochem Eng J, 7(3): 227–231

[3]

Elibol M, Tanyildizi M S, Dursun O (2005). Optimization of α-amylase production by Bacillus sp. using response surface methodology. Process Biochem, 40(7): 2291–2296

[4]

Gangadharan D,Sivaramakrishnan S, Nampoothiri K M, Sukumaran R K, Pandey A (2008). Response surface methodology for the optimization of alpha amylase production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Bioresour Technol, 99(11): 4597–4602

[5]

Kizhakedathil M P J, Chandrasekaran S D (2017). Screening for extracellular enzymes from actinomycetes isolated from agricultural soils of Kolathur, Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Bioact Compd, 13 (In press)

[6]

Kumar R, Mehta A (2013). Isolation, optimization and characterization of α-amylase from Bacillus alcalophilus. Int J Sci Res, 2(7): 171–174

[7]

Liu J, Weng L, Zhang Q, Xu H, Ji L (2003). Optimization of glucose oxidase production by Aspergillus niger in a benchtop bioreactor using response surface methodology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 3(3): 317–323

[8]

Meena B, Rajan L A, Vinithkumar N V, Kirubagaran R (2013). Novel marine actinobacteria from emerald Andaman & Nicobar Islands: a prospective source for industrial and pharmaceutical byproducts. BMC Microbiol, 13(1): 145

[9]

Miller G L (1959). Use of dinitrosalycilic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem, 31(3): 426–428

[10]

Myers R, Montgomery R C (2002). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York, Wiley

[11]

Nigam P, Singh D (1995). Enzyme and microbial systems involved in starch processing. Enzyme Microb Technol, 17(9): 770–778

[12]

Osorio N M (2001). Response Surface Modelling of the Production of v-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids-Enriched Fats by a Commercial Immobilized Lipase. J Mol Catal B Enzym,11: 677–686

[13]

Pujari V, Chandra T S (2000). Statistical optimization of medium components for enhanced riboflavin production by a UV-mutant of Eremothecium ashbyii. Process Biochem, 36: 31–37

[14]

Rameshkumar A, Sivasudha T (2011). Optimization of nutritional constitute for enhanced α-amylase production by solid state fermentation technology. Int J Microbiol Res, 2(2): 148

[15]

Rao K J, Kim C, Rhee S (2000). Statistical optimization of medium for the production of recombinant hirudin from Saccharomyces cereveasiae using response surface methodology. Process Biochem, 35(7): 639–647

[16]

Saha K, Maity S, Roy S, Pahan K, Pathak R, Majumdar S, Gupta S (2014). Optimization of amylase production from B. amyloliquefaciens (MTCC 1270) using solid state fermentation. Int J Microbiol, 2014: 764046

[17]

Stergiou P, Papamichael E (2014). Optimization of the production of extracellular α-amylase by Kluyveromyces marxianus IF0 0288 by response surface methodology. Braz Arch Biol Technol, 57(6): 421–426

[18]

Suganthi V, Mohanasrinivasan V (2014). Optimization studies for enhanced bacteriocin production by Pediococcus pentosaceus KC692718 using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol,

[19]

Sunitha K, Lee J, Oh T(1999). Optimization of medium components for phytase production by E. coli using response surface methodology. Bioprocess Eng, 21: 477–481

[20]

Viswanathan S, Rohini S, Rajesh R, Poomari K (2014). Production and medium optimization of amylase by Bacillus Spp. using submerged fermentation method. W J Chem, 9(1): 1–6

[21]

Vohra A, Satyanarayana T (2002). Statistical optimization of the medium components by response surface methodology to enhance phytase production by Pichia anomala. Proc Biogeosciences, 37: 999–1004

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (666KB)

964

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/