Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and drugs of abuse: current knowledge and therapeutic opportunities

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term exposure to drugs of abuse causes an upregulation of the cAMP-signaling pathway in the nucleus accumbens and other forebrain regions, this common neuroadaptation is thought to underlie aspects of drug tolerance and dependence. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is an enzyme that the selective hydrolyzes intracellular cAMP. It is expressed in several brain regions that regulate the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse.

OBJECTIVE: Here, we review the current knowledge about central nervous system (CNS) distribution of PDE4 isoforms and the effects of systemic and brain-region specific inhibition of PDE4 on behavioral models of drug addiction.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the Pubmed.

RESULTS: Using behavioral sensitization, conditioned place preference and drug self-administration as behavioral models, a large number of studies have shown that local or systemic administration of PDE4 inhibitors reduce drug intake and/or drug seeking for psychostimulants, alcohol, and opioids in rats or mice.

CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical studies suggest that PDE4 could be a therapeutic target for several classes of substance use disorder. We conclude by identifying opportunities for the development of subtype-selective PDE4 inhibitors that may reduce addiction liability and minimize the side effects that limit the clinical potential of non-selective PDE4 inhibitors. Several PDE4 inhibitors have been clinically approved for other diseases. There is a promising possibility to repurpose these PDE4 inhibitors for the treatment of drug addiction as they are safe and well-tolerated in patients.

Keywords

PDE4 / PDE4 inhibitors / VTA / nucleus accumbens / drug addiction

Drug addiction and alcohol dependence take a high medical, social and economic toll on society. However, options for pharmacological intervention of addictive disorders are very limited, and currently no FDA approved medications are clinically available for the treatment of addiction to psychostimulants. In several animal models, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors were found to reduce drug intake and/or drug seeking for psychostimulants, alcohol, and opioids. Here, we review the current knowledge about central nervous system (CNS) distribution of PDE4 isoforms and the effects of systemic and brain-region specific inhibition of PDE4 on behavioral models of drug addiction.

The PDE4 family of phosphodiesterases

PDE4 is a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase expressed in several brain regions that regulates the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse, including the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, and amygdala ( Cherry and Davis, 1999; Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). These brain regions are also targets of drug-associated neuroadaptations in cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling, and these neuroadaptations are thought to underlie aspects of drug tolerance and dependence ( Muschamp and Carlezon, 2013; Nestler, 2015; Wen et al., 2015). In preclinical studies, PDE4 inhibitors reduce drug intake and/or drug seeking for psychostimulants, alcohol, and opioids, suggesting that PDE4 could be a therapeutic target for several classes of substance use disorder. However, the underlying mechanisms for the anti-addictive behavioral effects of PDE4 inhibitors remain poorly understood. cAMP signaling is highly compartmentalized. PDE4 inhibitors can break down such compartmentalization and causes widespread increase in intracellular cAMP levels (Cooper, 2005). PDE4 inhibitors may disrupt or occlude cAMP-related neuroadaptations caused by drugs of abuse. Here, we review the current knowledge about central nervous system (CNS) distribution of PDE4 isoforms and the effects of systemic and brain-region specific inhibition of PDE4 on behavioral models of drug addiction. We conclude by identifying opportunities for the development of subtype-selective PDE4 inhibitors that may reduce addiction liability and minimize the side effects that limit the clinical potential of non-selective PDE4 inhibitors.

Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) provide the sole means of degrading cAMP and cGMP

Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are a family of enzymes that hydrolyze intracellular cAMP and cGMP ( Conti et al., 2003). There are 11 subtypes of PDEs (PDE1-11) that can be classified into three categories based on their substrate specificity. PDE4, PDE7, and PDE8 are specific for cAMP; PDE5, PDE6, and PDE9 are specific for cGMP; and PDE1, PDE2, PDE3, PDE10, and PDE11 hydrolyze both cAMP and cGMP ( Lugnier, 2006; Zhang, 2009). Among these isoforms, PDE4 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of substance abuse and substance use disorders. This review will be focused on PDE4 and PDE4 inhibitors.

Central nervous system distribution of PDE4 isoforms

PDE4 has four isoforms, PDE4A, PDE4B, PDE4C, and PDE4D. Each of these isoforms are encoded by a unique gene product ( MacKenzie and Houslay, 2000; Wang et al., 2015). Further diversity arises from splice variants among each isoform; for example, PDE4D has 11 variants, PDE4D1-11. As a result, PDE4 has over 30 isoforms or splice variants ( MacKenzie and Houslay, 2000; Wang et al., 2015). PDE4A, PDE4B, and PDE4D have widespread but segregated expression in different regions of the brain, while PDE4C is largely absent from the rodent brain and found only in a limited number of regions of the human brain ( Johansson et al., 2012; Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). Below, we summarize findings of PDE4 distribution throughout the central nervous system, with emphasis on brain regions associated with the expression of behaviors by drugs of abuse. For more complete information on central nervous system distribution of the PDE4 isoforms, we refer the reader to ( Johansson et al., 2012; Lakics et al., 2010; Pérez-Torres et al., 2000).

Striatum/Nucleus accumbens

PDE4B mRNA is high in the human and rodent striatum and nucleus accumbens, while PDE4A and PDE4D mRNA levels are present in lower amounts ( Johansson et al., 2012; Lakics et al., 2010; Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). Consistent with this, PDE4B-immunopositive neurons and neuropil are observed in the nucleus accumbens ( Cherry and Davis, 1999; Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). Within the striatum, PDE4B is differentially expressed in two major, functionally distinct subpopulations of medium spiny neurons. Striatal medium spiny neurons are organized into a dopamine D₁ receptor-expressing “direct” (striatonigral) output pathway and a dopamine D₂ receptor-expressing “indirect” (striatopallidal) output pathway, where the direct pathway is behaviorally stimulating, whereas the indirect pathway is behaviorally suppressant ( Graybiel, 1990, 2000). Using transgenic mice with different tags of dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptors, it was found that the expression of PDE4B was higher in D₂ receptor-enriched striatopallidal neurons than that in D1 receptor-enriched striatonigral neurons ( Nishi et al., 2008). PDE4B protein is also abundant in the ventral pallidum, the target region of the striatopallidal pathway, and this region has a similar enrichment of PDE4B relative to the other isoforms that the striatum does ( Cherry and Davis, 1999). In drug naïve selectively bred alcohol preferring rats, PDE4A mRNA was elevated and PDE4B2 mRNA was reduced in the accumbens relative to the non-preferring rats ( Franklin et al., 2015).

Substantia nigra/Ventral tegmental area (VTA)

PDE4A and 4B mRNA are low in the substantia nigra, while PDE4D was not detected in this brain region ( Johansson et al., 2012). Human mRNA analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR demonstrated that PDE4B mRNA was approximately 3 fold higher than PDE4A and PDE4D in the substantia nigra ( Lakics et al., 2010). Protein expression in rodents largely recapitulated this pattern, where PDE4B immunoreactivity in mouse substantia nigra was moderate and light for PDE4D ( Cherry and Davis, 1999). In the rat VTA, presence of mRNA differed somewhat from the substantia nigra, where PDE4A was the most abundant isoform ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). In drug naïve selectively bred high alcohol drinking (HAD1) rats, PDE4B2 mRNA was elevated in the ventral tegmental area relative to the low alcohol drinking (LAD1) rats ( Franklin et al., 2015).

Cerebral cortex

PDE4A, 4B, and 4D are all present in the cortex, although expression is distinct between cortical layers. In layers V/VI of cortex, PDE4A and 4D proteins are expressed in moderate to high amounts, while PDE4B is reported to be present only in layer V and in low amounts ( Cherry and Davis, 1999; Kuroiwa et al., 2012). In layers II/III, PDE4B and 4D are both expressed in moderate amounts, although 4A immunoreactivity is absent in these layers ( Cherry and Davis, 1999). Quantitative analysis of human frontal cortex including all cell layers indicates that PDE4B is the most abundant isoform, followed by 4A, then 4D ( Lakics et al., 2010)

Amygdala

Studies investigating PDE4 in the whole amygdaloid complex of the human and rodent report low to moderate levels of PDE4A and PDE4D, and very low to low levels of PDE4B ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000; Johansson et al., 2012). In amygdalar subregions of the rodent, there is considerable diversity in mRNA abundance of each isoform between the subregions. PDE4A is most abundant in the medial amygdala, amygdalopiriform transition area, and posteromedial cortical amygdaloid nuclei. PDE4B and 4D were enriched in the medial amygdala, and in the basolateral amygdala, PDE4D was the only isoform detected ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). In the drug naïve selectively bred alcohol preferring rats, PDE4B1 mRNA was decreased in the central amygdala relative to the non-preferring rats ( Franklin et al., 2015).

Brainstem nausea and emetic centers

Although rodents do not have an emetic reflex ( Horn et al., 2013), distribution of PDE4 isoforms in brainstem nausea and emetic centers is largely similar between rodents and humans. In the human area postrema, PDE4D mRNA is the highest of the PDE4 isoforms, while PDE4B is present in modest amounts, and PDE4A barely detectable in this region ( Mori et al., 2010). A similar pattern was observed in rat brain ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000), although while PDE4D protein was detected in mouse, PDE4B protein was not ( Cherry and Davis, 1999).

In the nucleus of the solitary tract, patterns of PDE4 mRNA appear to be similar between the to the area postrema. In human brain, PDE4B and 4D are both enriched, while 4A is not detectable ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000; Mori et al., 2010). In the same study, relative abundance of rat isoforms was somewhat different: PDE4A and 4D were present in moderate amounts, while 4B was low ( Pérez-Torres et al., 2000). Despite these differences, protein expression in the rat was similar to that predicted by the human mRNA data: immunoreactivity of PDE4B and 4D were moderate, while PDE4A was undetectable ( Cherry and Davis, 1999).

To date, we are only aware of one study measuring PDE4 isoforms in the dorsal vagal motor nucleus. In this study of human brain, PDE4D mRNA was the highest PDE4 isoform in this region, while 4B was lower, and 4A was not detected ( Mori et al., 2010).

Effects of PDE4 inhibitors on drug-associated behaviors

Effects of systemic administration of PDE4 inhibitors

Cocaine

A series of studies by Cherry’s group has shown that PDE4 inhibition reduces cocaine reward, incentive saliency and seeking in rodents. They have examined the effects of the selective PDE4 inhibitor rolipram on cocaine-induced increase in locomotor activity, behavioral sensitization, conditioned place preference (CPP) and self-administration ( Knapp et al., 1999; Thompson et al., 2004; Janes et al., 2009). Systemic injection of rolipram 30 min before each of 5 days of cocaine injections greatly reduced cocaine-induced hyperlocomotor activity on days 1 and 5. This treatment also reduced the locomotor response to a challenge dose of cocaine 9 days later, indicating that rolipram treatment during the induction phase could reduce expression of behavioral (locomotor) sensitization to cocaine.

Administration of rolipram 30 min after cocaine injection did not affect the cocaine-induced increase in locomotor activity or locomotor sensitization ( Janes et al., 2009). Thus, PDE4 inhibition must take place during the exposure to cocaine to prevent the development of locomotor sensitization. More recent studies have shown that intracerebroventricular injection of isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX), a nonspecific PDE inhibitor that enhances intracellular cAMP levels, does not affect the acute hyperlocomotor response to cocaine, but reduces the development of behavioral sensitization ( Schroeder et al., 2012).

The process of locomotor sensitization has been linked with incentive sensitization. The incentive sensitization theory posits that repeated drug exposure leads to increased drug “wanting” and ultimately, compulsive drug taking ( Robinson and Berridge, 1993, 2008). Although locomotor sensitization is not a direct measure of incentive sensitization, it is thought to reflect analogous processes in similar neural circuitry. Thus, results suggest that PDE inhibitors may be able to reduce drug “wanting” associated with repeated exposure.

Although PDE4 inhibitors are known to enhance cognitive functions such as learning and memory and have been proposed as potential pharmacotherapy of cognitive decline associate with aging and Alzheimer’s disease ( Richter et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015), they appear to dampen the formation of drug-cue associative memories. Systemic injections of the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram before place conditioning attenuate the expression of cocaine CPP, while injection of rolipram only before the CPP test does not alter a previously established place preference conditioned by cocaine ( Thompson et al., 2004). Rolipram itself does not induce CPP or conditioned place aversion, nor does it alter place preference induced by natural reward (food) ( Thompson et al., 2004). These results indicate that rolipram attenuates the acquisition, but not the expression, of CPP to cocaine without producing any place aversion or general impairment of associative memory formation.

PDE inhibition has also been demonstrated to facilitate extinction of cocaine CPP. Extinction of drug seeking behavior is not simply passive loss of established memory, but it requires consolidation and formation of new memory ( Bardo and Bevins, 2000; Todd et al., 2014). It has been shown that when mice were conditioned by escalating doses of cocaine, the CPP could not be extinguished by free exploration over several sessions ( Itzhak and Anderson, 2012). In this escalating dose model, the PDE9 (cGMP specific) inhibitor BAY-73-6691 facilitated extinction and reduced cocaine primed reinstatement of CPP. In the same model, the PDE4 (cAMP specific) inhibitor rolipram did not have a significant effect on the extinction of cocaine CPP ( Liddie et al., 2012). These results indicate that different subtypes of PDEs regulate the acquisition vs. extinction of drug-cue associative memories.

In rats trained to self-administer cocaine on a fixed-ratio 5 schedule (5 active responses required per infusion), systemic administration of either rolipram or Ro 20-1724 caused a significant reduction in cocaine intake ( Knapp et al., 1999). This reduction was largely attributed to an increase in the latency to initiate operant responding, and food self-administration was reduced in a similar pattern following Ro 20-1724 ( Knapp et al., 1999), suggesting that these drugs may have a general effect on inhibiting motivated behavior or reinforcement processes. This finding emphasizes the fact that systemic administration of PDE4 inhibitors can have sedative effects and/or actions in brainstem emetic centers that may non-specifically alter behavioral phenotypes.

Methamphetamine

Beardsley and coworkers have done a series of studies examining the effects of non-selective PDE inhibitor ibudilast and its analogs on methamphetamine abuse. Similar to the aforementioned effects on cocaine-associated hyperlocomotion, they report that ibudilast and its analog AV1013 reduce the methamphetamine-induced increase in locomotor activity and sensitization without significantly affecting locomotor activity by itself ( Snider et al., 2012). In addition, ibudilast and AV1013 are effective in attenuating methamphetamine self-administration and drug seeking behavior. Systemic administration of these compounds reduces methamphetamine self-administration on an FR1 schedule in the rat ( Snider et al., 2013). Systemic ibudilast and AV1013 significantly reduces footshock- and prime-induced reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking in the rat ( Beardsley et al., 2010). Interestingly, the reduction of drug seeking behavior by ibudilast and its analog may be associated with inflammatory processes. Methamphetamine activates glial cells and increases proinflammatory cytokine production in the brain, and glial cell activation and inflammatory responses have been linked to drug abuse-related behavior ( Beardsley and Hauser, 2014). Ibudilast inhibits both PDE and glial proinflammatory activity, while AV1013 shares the anti-inflammatory activity of ibudilast but only negligibly inhibits PDE ( Snider et al., 2012). These results suggest that modulation of glial inflammatory activity also contributes to the attenuation of methamphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization and relapse of drug seeking by ibudilast and AV1013, and targeting glial cells may provide a novel approach to pharmacotherapy for treating methamphetamine abuse.

Methamphetamine and cocaine are psychostimulants that share similar mechanisms of increasing extracellular dopamine levels in the brain ( Anderson and Pierce, 2005), and many of the behavioral measures discussed above are dopamine-dependent. In vivo microdialysis shows that rolipram increases striatal cAMP levels but does not significantly alter methamphetamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine levels ( Iyo et al., 1996), suggesting that rolipram-induced changes in behaviors are not due to direct modulation of striatal dopamine.

Alcohol

Regulation of alcohol drinking by many different subtypes of PDEs and the underlying signaling mechanisms involved have been recently reviewed in great detail ( Logrip, 2015). In this review, we will review recent progress of studying behavioral effects of PDE4 inhibitors on alcohol drinking.

Reduction of alcohol drinking by PDE4 inhibitors was first shown in in C57BL/6J mice with unlimited 2-bottle choice access to alcohol. Rolipram and Ro 20-1724 reduce alcohol intake and preference without altering total fluid intake, intake of sucrose or quinine, alcohol-induced sedation, or alcohol metabolism ( Hu et al., 2011). Subsequently, this observation was extended to Fawn-Hooded rats and other animal models of alcohol drinking. Acute administration of rolipram dose-dependently reduces operant self-administration of alcohol, and chronic rolipram treatment decreases 2-bottle choice alcohol consumption and preference ( Wen et al., 2012).

The non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor ibudilast reduces 2-bottle choice alcohol drinking and relapse in alcohol-preferring P rats, high-alcohol drinking HAD1 rats, and in alcohol-dependent C57BL/6J mice at doses which had no effect on alcohol drinking in non-dependent mice ( Bell et al., 2015). Taken together, these studies indicate that PDE inhibitors reduce alcohol drinking in multiple rodent models, including models of genetic susceptibility and dependence. Given that ibudilast is a non-selective PDE inhibitor, this study raises the question whether inhibitors to other PDE subtypes reduce alcohol drinking and dependence. Using 24-h two-bottle choice and two-bottle choice with limited (3-h) access to alcohol in C56BL/6J male mice, a recent study has compared the effects of nine PDE inhibitors with different subtype selectivity. Interestingly, only the selective PDE4 inhibitors reduce ethanol intake and preference in the 24-h two-bottle choice test and in the limited access test ( Blednov et al., 2014). More recent studies have shown that the PDE10A inhibitor TP-10 reduces alcohol self-administration in conditions predisposing to elevated self-administration. In addition, TP-10 also reduces alcohol self-administration in genetically alcohol-preferring rats, and in alcohol-non-dependent and-dependent rats ( Logrip et al., 2014). Taken together, the above studies suggest that PDE4 and PDE10A are potential therapeutic targets for pharmacotherapy of alcohol dependence.

Opioids

PDE4 inhibitors reduce morphine-induced hyperlocomotor activity and CPP. It has been shown that systemic injections of rolipram suppresses morphine-induced hyperlocomotion ( Mori et al., 2000). In addition, administration of rolipram 30 min prior to conditioning sessions blocks the acquisition of CPP to morphine, while of administration of rolipram 30 min prior to CPP test does not affect the expression of morphine CPP ( Thompson et al., 2004). The PDE inhibitor rolipram also inhibits the discriminative-stimulus effects of morphine in rats ( Yan et al., 2006). Taken together, these results suggest that the cAMP signaling cascade may play a key role in the acquisition of conditioned morphine reward.

The PDE4 inhibitor rolipram does not significantly inhibit heroin self-administration under the fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule, but dose-dependently decreases the reward values under the progressive ratio schedule. Importantly, rolipram also decreases the cue- and heroin priming-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking ( Lai et al., 2014). Rolipram increases the expression of phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus accumbens, which is correlated with its effect on heroin-seeking behavior ( Lai et al., 2014). These results suggest that PDE4 inhibitors may be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of heroin and morphine dependence.

PDE4 inhibitors were shown to attenuate naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal symptoms. In rats treated with single morphine, naloxone challenge induces an increase in PDE4 activity on frontal cortex and hippocampus. In contrast, in rats treated repeatedly with morphine, the naloxone challenge produced no significant effects on PDE4 activity although cyclic AMP was significantly increased by naloxone challenge ( Kimura et al., 2006). These results suggest that the lack of PDE4 activation leads to an increase in levels of cAMP, which may be involved in naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal symptoms ( Kimura et al., 2006). Consistent with this premise, subsequent studies have shown that repeated intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections, but not acute injections, of PDE4 inhibitors rolipram dampen naloxone-precipitated behavioral signs of morphine withdrawal, such as teeth-chattering, tremor, piloerection, lacrimation, rhinorrhea, ptosis, spontaneous jumping and wet-dog shakes, and weight loss ( Hamdy et al., 2001; Mamiya et al., 2001; González-Cuello et al., 2007; Núñez et al., 2009). The attenuation of withdrawal syndrome by the PDE4 inhibitors is likely mediated by the upregulation of the cAMP signaling ( González-Cuello et al., 2007; Núñez et al., 2009). Chronic rolipram treatment in combination with morphine in mice blocked the increase in the expression of c-Fos protein induced by naloxone challenge ( Hamdy et al., 2001).

PDE4 inhibitors reduce opioid-induced respiratory depression. In rats, intravenous injection of rolipram blocked morphine-induced prolongation and flattening of inspiratory discharge in the phrenic nerve but not did not affect morphine-induced suppression of paw withdrawal responses to nociceptive thermal stimulation. These results suggest that inhibition of PDE4 can block morphine-induced ventilatory depression without loss of analgesia ( Kimura et al., 2015).

Site-specific effects of PDE4 inhibitors

Striatum/Nucleus accumbens

When paired with a distinct environment, cocaine robustly increases levels of the transcription factor c-Fos in the several brain regions in the mesocorticolimbic system. c-Fos is part of the AP-1 transcription complex that results in activation of signaling cascades thought to be important in several functions, including synaptic and behavioral plasticity ( Hiroi and Nestler, 1998; Alberini, 2009; Pérez-Cadahia et al., 2011). Within the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens, rolipram has no effect on cocaine-induced expression of c-Fos, although rolipram itself increases levels in the nucleus accumbens shell ( Thompson et al., 2004). These results suggest that either rolipram does not exert effects on induction via altered c-Fos expression, or the site/s of effects on c-Fos lies outside of the striatum.

There is also evidence that PDE activity in the nucleus accumbens can modulate the reinforcing effect of intracranial self-stimulation of the VTA. Infusion of rolipram into the nucleus accumbens decreases the threshold of intracranial self-stimulation and enhances the effects of systemic cocaine on lowering the threshold of intracranial self-stimulation ( Knapp et al., 2001). These results suggest that increasing the activity of cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathways within the nucleus accumbens may enhance general brain reward function.

Incubation of craving is a phenomenon where drug or reward seeking increases with longer periods of abstinence ( Grimm et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2004; Grimm et al., 2005). Incubation of heroin craving after 14 days of abstinence relative to 1 day was associated with decreased phosphorylated CREB (pCREB) in the nucleus accumbens, and intra-accumbens rolipram reduced drug seeking and increased local pCREB levels ( Sun et al., 2015).

Ventral tegmental area

We have shown that intra-VTA injection of rolipram before cocaine and saline conditioning blocked the acquisition of cocaine CPP, whereas intra-VTA injection of rolipram just before the CPP test did not affect the expression of cocaine CPP ( Zhong et al., 2012). Thus, PDE4 inhibition within the VTA is sufficient to reproduce the ability of systemic rolipram to prevent the establishment of CPP.

Long-term synaptic plasticity in reward circuitry is thought to underlie reinforcement learning and the development of addictive behavior ( Kauer, 2004). Our previous studies have implicated endocannabinoid-mediated long-term depression of inhibitory synaptic transmission (I-LTD) in cocaine-induced inhibitory synaptic plasticity and behavioral effects ( Pan et al., 2008a, b; Pan et al., 2011). Cannabinoid receptors (CB₁) are G_i/o protein-coupled receptors whose activation leads to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC), resulting in decreased cAMP/PKA activity ( Howlett, 2005), while PDE4 inhibition is known to enhance cAMP levels. We found that PDE4 inhibitors rolipram and Ro 20-1724 blocked endocannabinoid I-LTD and synaptic depression induced by D₂ dopamine receptor and cannabinoid CB₁ receptor agonists in VTA dopamine neurons [Figure 1, (Zhong et al., 2012)]. These results suggest that blockade of cocaine-induced inhibitory synaptic plasticity within the VTA is a likely cellular mechanism by which PDE4 inhibition impairs CPP to cocaine.

Therapeutic opportunities of PDE4 inhibitors

Clinical studies with PDE4 inhibitors

PDE4 inhibitors have been under clinical trials for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma ( Diamant and Spina, 2011; Page and Spina, 2012), and depression ( Bertolino et al., 1988; Fleischhacker et al., 1992). Roflumilast is the only approved PDE4 inhibitor for the treatment of COPD, and it reduces COPD exacerbations and modestly improves lung function ( Mulhall et al., 2015). More recently, the PDE4 inhibitor MK-0952 has been under a phase II clinical trial for cognition-enhancing effects ( Wang et al., 2015). Apremilast is an orally effective PDE4 inhibitor that was approved by US FDA in 2015 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis ( Gisondi and Girolomoni, 2016). It is safe and well-tolerated, although it causes nausea and vomiting in some patients ( Gisondi and Girolomoni, 2016). As mentioned earlier in this review, preclinical studies with animal models have shown that the non-selective PDE inhibitor ibudilast reduces drug seeking behaviors of methamphetamine ( Beardsley et al., 2010; Snider et al., 2012; Snider et al., 2013) and alcohol-dependence ( Bell et al., 2015). Ibudilast is currently in a Phase I clinical trial for alcohol use disorders as well as in Phase II clinical trials for methamphetamine dependence and oxycodone abuse ( Logrip, 2015). Ibudilast inhibits both PDE and glial proinflammatory activity, which has been linked to its anti-addiction effects ( Beardsley and Hauser, 2014). Thus, PDE inhibitors may represent a promising candidate for developing anti-addiction medications. PDE4 inhibitors have adverse side-effects such as nausea and emesis, which limit their clinical utility ( O’Donnell and Zhang, 2004). Activation of PDE4D, which is highly expressed in the area postrema, an emetic-trigger zone ( Lamontagne et al., 2001), is related to emetic potential of PDE4 inhibitors ( Robichaud et al., 2002). Subtype- or isoform-specific PDE4 inhibitors are expected to be developed in the future to minimize their off-target effects ( Wang et al., 2015). Paradoxically, non-selective, broader acting drugs such as ibudilast may retain the pharmacological efficacy of PDE inhibition with less side effects. Alternatively, targeting PDE4A or 4B, PDE isoforms with expression in mesocorticolimbic circuitry, may prove to be effective in treatment of substance drug and/or alcohol abuse without inducing the degree of nausea that non-selective PDE4 inhibitors do.

Opportunities

There are at least 30 isoforms and splice variants of PDE4 ( MacKenzie and Houslay, 2000; Wang et al., 2015), which presents challenges and opportunities for pharmacological intervention of drug addiction. As mentioned earlier in this review, a number of PDE4 inhibitors have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of COPD and inflammatory diseases ( Mulhall et al., 2015; Gisondi and Girolomoni, 2016). There is a promising possibility to repurpose these PDE4 inhibitors for the treatment of drug addiction as these inhibitors are known to be safe and well-tolerated in patients.

PDE4 inhibitors such as rolipram often cause nausea and emesis, which prevent their clinical utility ( Hansen and Zhang, 2015). The emetic effects are likely mediated by PDE4 expressed in the area postrema, the emetic center of the brain ( Mori et al., 2010). PDE4A is predominantly expressed in the olfactory system, PDE4B is highly expressed in the mesolimbic dopamine system, and PDE4D is expressed in many parts of the brain, but not in the VTA and nucleus accumbens ( Cherry and Davis, 1999). PDE4 inhibition-induced reduction of the effects of drugs of abuse may be mediated primarily by PDE4B. Selective PDE4B inhibitors may represent an effective means to reduce drug seeking behavior while avoiding emetic effects of PDE4 inhibitors that are mediated by activation of the PDE4D. Recently a series of triazine derivatives were found to be PDE4B selective inhibitors, which show>100-fold selectivity over the PDE4D isozyme. These PDE4B inhibitors exhibited potent anti-inflammatory effects in vivo and showed less emesis ( Naganuma et al., 2009; Hagen et al., 2014). PDE4B inhibition may also have effects on generalized anxiety, which could influence drug craving during abstinence. Knockout of a large region of the catalytic domain (exons 8-11) resulted in increased anxiety-like behavior in the several assays ( Zhang et al., 2008), although there was no difference in the elevated plus maze ( Siuciak et al., 2008). In contrast, reduction of cAMP hydrolization via Y358C substitution within the catalytic subregion reduced anxiety-like behavior ( McGirr et al., 2016). These conflicting results make it difficult to predict how a particular PDE4B specific inhibitor may influence generalized anxiety during drug abstinence, however inhibitors with selectivity for the PDE4B are predicted to have a strong potential for alleviating drug craving without the emetic effects associated with non-selective PDE4 inhibition.

References

[1] Alberini C M (2009). Transcription factors in long-term memory and synaptic plasticity. Physiol Rev, 89(1): 121–145

[2] Allain F, Minogianis E A, Roberts D C, Samaha A N (2015). How fast and how often: The pharmacokinetics of drug use are decisive in addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 56: 166–179

[3] Anderson S M, Pierce R C (2005). Cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine receptor signaling: implications for reinforcement and reinstatement. Pharmacol Ther, 106(3): 389–403

[4] Bardo M T, Bevins R A (2000). Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl), 153(1): 31–43

[5] Beardsley P M, Hauser K F (2014). Glial modulators as potential treatments of psychostimulant abuse. Adv Pharmacol, 69: 1–69

[6] Beardsley P M, Shelton K L, Hendrick E, Johnson K W (2010). The glial cell modulator and phosphodiesterase inhibitor, AV411 (ibudilast), attenuates prime- and stress-induced methamphetamine relapse. Eur J Pharmacol, 637(1-3): 102–108

[7] Bell R L, Lopez M F, Cui C, Egli M, Johnson K W, Franklin K M, Becker H C (2015). Ibudilast reduces alcohol drinking in multiple animal models of alcohol dependence. Addict Biol, 20(1): 38–42

[8] Bertolino A, Crippa D, di Dio S, Fichte K, Musmeci G, Porro V, Rapisarda V, Sastre-y-Hernández M, Schratzer M (1988). Rolipram versus imipramine in inpatients with major, “minor” or atypical depressive disorder: a double-blind double-dummy study aimed at testing a novel therapeutic approach. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 3(3): 245–253

[9] Blednov Y A, Benavidez J M, Black M, Harris R A (2014). Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4 reduces ethanol intake and preference in C57BL/6J mice. Front Neurosci, 8: 129

[10] Britt J P, Benaliouad F, McDevitt R A, Stuber G D, Wise R A, Bonci A (2012). Synaptic and behavioral profile of multiple glutamatergic inputs to the nucleus accumbens. Neuron, 76(4): 790–803

[11] Carlezon W A Jr, Chartoff E H (2007). Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rodents to study the neurobiology of motivation. Nat Protoc, 2(11): 2987–2995

[12] Cherry J A, Davis R L (1999). Cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases are localized in regions of the mouse brain associated with reinforcement, movement, and affect. J Comp Neurol, 407(2): 287–301

[13] Conrad K L, Louderback K M, Milano E J, Winder D G (2013). Assessment of the impact of pattern of cocaine dosing schedule during conditioning and reconditioning on magnitude of cocaine CPP, extinction, and reinstatement. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 227(1): 109–116

[14] Conti M, Richter W, Mehats C, Livera G, Park J Y, Jin C (2003). Cyclic AMP-specific PDE4 phosphodiesterases as critical components of cyclic AMP signaling. J Biol Chem, 278(8): 5493–5496

[15] Crabbe J C (2014). Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol. Nebr Symp Motiv, 61: 5–29

[16] Diamant Z, Spina D (2011). PDE4-inhibitors: a novel, targeted therapy for obstructive airways disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 24(4): 353–360

[17] Fleischhacker W W H, Hinterhuber H, Bauer H, Pflug B, Berner P, Simhandl C, Wolf R, Gerlach W, Jaklitsch H, Sastre-y-Hernández M, Schmeding-Wiegel H, Sperner-Unterweger B, Voet B, Schubert H (1992). A multicenter double-blind study of three different doses of the new cAMP-phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychobiology, 26(1-2): 59–64

[18] Franklin K M, Hauser S R, Lasek A W, McClintick J, Ding Z M, McBride W J, Bell R L (2015). Reduction of alcohol drinking of alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol drinking (HAD1) rats by targeting phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4). Psychopharmacology (Berl), 232(13): 2251–2262

[19] Gisondi P, Girolomoni G (2016). Apremilast in the therapy of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Drug Des Devel Ther, 10: 1763–1770

[20] González-Cuello A, Sánchez L, Hernández J, Teresa Castells M, Victoria Milanés M, Laorden M L (2007). Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, rolipram and diazepam block the adaptive changes observed during morphine withdrawal in the heart. Eur J Pharmacol, 570(1-3): 1–9

[21] Graybiel A M (1990). Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the basal ganglia. Trends Neurosci, 13(7): 244–254

[22] Graybiel A M (2000). The basal ganglia. Curr Biol, 10(14): R509–R511

[23] Grimm J W, Fyall A M, Osincup D P (2005). Incubation of sucrose craving: effects of reduced training and sucrose pre-loading. Physiol Behav, 84(1): 73–79

[24] Grimm J W, Hope B T, Wise R A, Shaham Y (2001). Neuroadaptation. Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal. Nature, 412(6843): 141–142

[25] Hagen T J, Mo X, Burgin A B, Fox D 3rd, Zhang Z, Gurney M E (2014). Discovery of triazines as selective PDE4B versus PDE4D inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 24(16): 4031–4034

[26] Hamdy M M, Mamiya T, Noda Y, Sayed M, Assi A A, Gomaa A, Yamada K, Nabeshima T (2001). A selective phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor, rolipram blocks both withdrawal behavioral manifestations, and c-Fos protein expression in morphine dependent mice. Behav Brain Res, 118(1): 85–93

[27] Hansen R T 3rd, Zhang H T (2015). Phosphodiesterase-4 modulation as a potential therapeutic for cognitive loss in pathological and non-pathological aging: possibilities and pitfalls. Curr Pharm Des, 21(3): 291–302

[28] Hiroi N, Nestler E J (1998). Nuclear memory: gene transcription and behavior. Adv Pharmacol, 42: 1037–1041

[29] Horn C C, Kimball B A, Wang H, Kaus J, Dienel S, Nagy A, Gathright G R, Yates B J, Andrews P L (2013). Why can’t rodents vomit? A comparative behavioral, anatomical, and physiological study. PLoS ONE, 8(4): e60537

[30] Howlett, A. C. (2005). “Cannabinoid receptor signaling.” Handb Exp Pharmacol(168): 53–79.

[31] Hu W, Lu T, Chen A, Huang Y, Hansen R, Chandler L J, Zhang H T (2011). Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4 decreases ethanol intake in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 218(2): 331–339

[32] Ikemoto S, Bonci A (2014). Neurocircuitry of drug reward. Neuropharmacology, 76 Pt B: 329–341

[33] Itzhak Y, Anderson K L (2012). Changes in the magnitude of drug-unconditioned stimulus during conditioning modulate cocaine-induced place preference in mice. Addict Biol, 17(4): 706–716

[34] Iyo M, Bi Y, Hashimoto K, Inada T, Fukui S (1996). Prevention of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats by a cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, rolipram. Eur J Pharmacol, 312(2): 163–170

[35] Janes A C, Kantak K M, Cherry J A (2009). The involvement of type IV phosphodiesterases in cocaine-induced sensitization and subsequent pERK expression in the mouse nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 206(2): 177–185

[36] Johansson E M, Reyes-Irisarri E, Mengod G (2012). Comparison of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase mRNAs distribution in mouse and rat brain. Neurosci Lett, 525(1): 1–6

[37] Kauer J A (2004). Learning mechanisms in addiction: synaptic plasticity in the ventral tegmental area as a result of exposure to drugs of abuse. Annu Rev Physiol, 66(1): 447–475

[38] Kimura M, Tokumura M, Itoh T, Inoue O, Abe K (2006). Lack of cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4 activation during naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal in rats. Neurosci Lett, 404(1-2): 107–111

[39] Kimura S, Ohi Y, Haji A (2015). Blockade of phosphodiesterase 4 reverses morphine-induced ventilatory disturbance without loss of analgesia. Life Sci, 127: 32–38

[40] Knapp C M, Foye M M, Ciraulo D A, Kornetsky C (1999). The type IV phosphodiesterase inhibitors, Ro 20-1724 and rolipram, block the initiation of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 62(1): 151–158

[41] Knapp C M, Lee K, Foye M, Ciraulo D A, Kornetsky C (2001). Additive effects of intra-accumbens infusion of the cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, rolipram and cocaine on brain stimulation reward. Life Sci, 69(14): 1673–1682

[42] Kuroiwa M, Snyder G L, Shuto T, Fukuda A, Yanagawa Y, Benavides D R, Nairn A C, Bibb J A, Greengard P, Nishi A (2012). Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition enhances the dopamine D1 receptor/PKA/DARPP-32 signaling cascade in frontal cortex. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 219(4): 1065–1079

[43] Lai M, Zhu H, Sun A, Zhuang D, Fu D, Chen W, Zhang H T, Zhou W (2014). The phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor rolipram attenuates heroin-seeking behavior induced by cues or heroin priming in rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 17(9): 1397–1407

[44] Lakics V, Karran E H, Boess F G (2010). Quantitative comparison of phosphodiesterase mRNA distribution in human brain and peripheral tissues. Neuropharmacology, 59(6): 367–374

[45] Lamontagne S, Meadows E, Luk P, Normandin D, Muise E, Boulet L, Pon D J, Robichaud A, Robertson G S, Metters K M, Nantel F (2001). Localization of phosphodiesterase-4 isoforms in the medulla and nodose ganglion of the squirrel monkey. Brain Res, 920(1-2): 84–96

[46] Liddie S, Anderson K L, Paz A, Itzhak Y (2012). The effect of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on the extinction of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice. J Psychopharmacol, 26(10): 1375–1382

[47] Lim Y W, Meyer N P, Shah A S, Budde M D, Stemper B D, Olsen C M (2015). Voluntary Alcohol Intake following Blast Exposure in a Rat Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. PLoS ONE, 10(4): e0125130

[48] Liu X, Liu Y, Zhong P, Wilkinson B, Qi J, Olsen C M, Bayer K U, Liu Q S (2014). CaMKII activity in the ventral tegmental area gates cocaine-induced synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology, 39(4): 989–999

[49] Logrip M L (2015). Phosphodiesterase regulation of alcohol drinking in rodents. Alcohol, 49(8): 795–802

[50] Logrip M L, Vendruscolo L F, Schlosburg J E, Koob G F, Zorrilla E P (2014). Phosphodiesterase 10A regulates alcohol and saccharin self-administration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 39(7): 1722–1731

[51] Lu L, Grimm J W, Hope B T, Shaham Y (2004). Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal: a review of preclinical data. Neuropharmacology, 47(Suppl 1): 214–226

[52] Lugnier C (2006). Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) superfamily: a new target for the development of specific therapeutic agents. Pharmacol Ther, 109(3): 366–398

[53] MacKenzie S J, Houslay M D (2000). Action of rolipram on specific PDE4 cAMP phosphodiesterase isoforms and on the phosphorylation of cAMP-response-element-binding protein (CREB) and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase in U937 monocytic cells. Biochem J, 347(Pt 2): 571–578

[54] Mamiya T, Noda Y, Ren X, Hamdy M, Furukawa S, Kameyama T, Yamada K, Nabeshima T (2001). Involvement of cyclic AMP systems in morphine physical dependence in mice: prevention of development of morphine dependence by rolipram, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. Br J Pharmacol, 132(5): 1111–1117

[55] Mantsch J R, Baker D A, Funk D, Lê A D, Shaham Y (2016). Stress-Induced Reinstatement of Drug Seeking: 20 Years of Progress. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1): 335–356

[56] McGirr A, Lipina T V, Mun H S, Georgiou J, Al-Amri A H, Ng E, Zhai D, Elliott C, Cameron R T, Mullins J G, Liu F, Baillie G S, Clapcote S J, Roder J C (2016). Specific Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-4B Results in Anxiolysis and Facilitates Memory Acquisition. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(4): 1080–1092

[57] Mori F, Pérez-Torres S, De Caro R, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Beleta J, Gavaldà A, Palacios J M, Mengod G (2010). The human area postrema and other nuclei related to the emetic reflex express cAMP phosphodiesterases 4B and 4D. J Chem Neuroanat, 40(1): 36–42

[58] Mori T, Baba J, Ichimaru Y, Suzuki T (2000). Effects of rolipram, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4, on hyperlocomotion induced by several abused drugs in mice. Jpn J Pharmacol, 83(2): 113–118

[59] Muelbl M J,Nawarawong N N, Clancy P T, Nettesheim C E, Lim Y W,Olsen C M (2016). Responses to drugs of abuse and non-drug rewards in leptin deficient ob/ob mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl),233(14):2799–2811

[60] Mulhall A M, Droege C A, Ernst N E, Panos R J, Zafar M A (2015). Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of current and developing drugs. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 24(12): 1597–1611

[61] Muschamp J W, Carlezon W A Jr (2013). Roles of nucleus accumbens CREB and dynorphin in dysregulation of motivation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 3(2): a012005

[62] Naganuma K, Omura A, Maekawara N, Saitoh M, Ohkawa N, Kubota T, Nagumo H, Kodama T, Takemura M, Ohtsuka Y, Nakamura J, Tsujita R, Kawasaki K, Yokoi H, Kawanishi M (2009). Discovery of selective PDE4B inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 19(12): 3174–3176

[63] Negus S S, Miller L L (2014). Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs. Pharmacol Rev, 66(3): 869–917

[64] Nestler E J (2015). Reflections on: “A general role for adaptations in G-Proteins and the cyclic AMP system in mediating the chronic actions of morphine and cocaine on neuronal function. Brain Res

[65] Nishi A, Kuroiwa M, Miller D B, O’Callaghan J P, Bateup H S, Shuto T, Sotogaku N, Fukuda T, Heintz N, Greengard P, Snyder G L (2008). Distinct roles of PDE4 and PDE10A in the regulation of cAMP/PKA signaling in the striatum. J Neurosci, 28(42): 10460–10471

[66] Núñez C, González-Cuello A, Sánchez L, Vargas M L, Milanés M V, Laorden M L (2009). Effects of rolipram and diazepam on the adaptive changes induced by morphine withdrawal in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Eur J Pharmacol, 620(1-3): 1–8

[67] O’Donnell J M, Zhang H T (2004). Antidepressant effects of inhibitors of cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4). Trends Pharmacol Sci, 25(3): 158–163

[68] Olsen C M, Childs D S, Stanwood G D, Winder D G (2010). Operant sensation seeking requires metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5). PLoS ONE, 5(11): e15085

[69] Olsen C M, Winder D G (2006). A method for single-session cocaine self-administration in the mouse. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 187(1): 13–21

[70] Page C P, Spina D (2012). Selective PDE inhibitors as novel treatments for respiratory diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 12(3): 275–286

[71] Pan B, Hillard C J, Liu Q S (2008). D2 dopamine receptor activation facilitates endocannabinoid-mediated long-term synaptic depression of GABAergic synaptic transmission in midbrain dopamine neurons via cAMP-protein kinase A signaling. J Neurosci, 28(52): 14018–14030

[72] Pan B, Hillard C J, Liu Q S (2008). Endocannabinoid signaling mediates cocaine-induced inhibitory synaptic plasticity in midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci, 28(6): 1385–1397

[73] Pan B, Zhong P, Sun D, Liu Q S (2011). Extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in the ventral tegmental area mediates cocaine-induced synaptic plasticity and rewarding effects. J Neurosci, 31(31): 11244–11255

[74] Pérez-Cadahía B, Drobic B, Davie J R (2011). Activation and function of immediate-early genes in the nervous system. Biochem Cell Biol, 89(1): 61–73

[75] Pérez-Torres S, Miró X, Palacios J M, Cortés R, Puigdoménech P, Mengod G (2000). Phosphodiesterase type 4 isozymes expression in human brain examined by in situ hybridization histochemistry and[3H]rolipram binding autoradiography. Comparison with monkey and rat brain. J Chem Neuroanat, 20(3-4): 349–374

[76] Pierce R C, Kalivas P W (1997). A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 25(2): 192–216

[77] Richter W, Menniti F S, Zhang H T, Conti M (2013). PDE4 as a target for cognition enhancement. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 17(9): 1011–1027

[78] Robichaud A, Stamatiou P B, Jin S L, Lachance N, MacDonald D, Laliberté F, Liu S, Huang Z, Conti M, Chan C C (2002). Deletion of phosphodiesterase 4D in mice shortens alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated anesthesia, a behavioral correlate of emesis. J Clin Invest, 110(7): 1045–1052

[79] Robinson T E, Berridge K C (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 18(3): 247–291

[80] Robinson T E, Berridge K C (2008). Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363(1507): 3137–3146

[81] Rodd Z A, Bell R L, Sable H J, Murphy J M, McBride W J (2004). Recent advances in animal models of alcohol craving and relapse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 79(3): 439–450

[82] Schroeder J A, Ruta J D, Gordon J S, Rodrigues A S, Foote C C (2012). The phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine attenuates behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Behav Pharmacol, 23(3): 310–314

[83] Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 168(1-2): 3–20

[84] Siuciak J A, McCarthy S A, Chapin D S, Martin A N (2008). Behavioral and neurochemical characterization of mice deficient in the phosphodiesterase-4B (PDE4B) enzyme. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 197(1): 115–126

[85] Snider S E, Hendrick E S, Beardsley P M (2013). Glial cell modulators attenuate methamphetamine self-administration in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol, 701(1-3): 124–130

[86] Snider S E, Vunck S A, van den Oord E J, Adkins D E, McClay J L, Beardsley P M (2012). The glial cell modulators, ibudilast and its amino analog, AV1013, attenuate methamphetamine locomotor activity and its sensitization in mice. Eur J Pharmacol, 679(1-3): 75–80

[87] Stolerman I P, Childs E, Ford M M, Grant K A (2011). Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review. Behav Pharmacol, 22(5-6): 415–429

[88] Sun A, Zhuang D, Zhu H, Lai M, Chen W, Liu H, Zhang F, Zhou W (2015). Decrease of phosphorylated CREB and ERK in nucleus accumbens is associated with the incubation of heroin seeking induced by cues after withdrawal. Neurosci Lett, 591: 166–170

[89] Thompson B E, Sachs B D, Kantak K M, Cherry J A (2004). The Type IV phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram interferes with drug-induced conditioned place preference but not immediate early gene induction in mice. Eur J Neurosci, 19(9): 2561–2568

[90] Thomsen M, Caine S B (2005). Chronic intravenous drug self-administration in rats and mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci, 32:9.20:9.20.1–9.20.40

[91] Todd T P, Vurbic D, Bouton M E (2014). Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem, 108: 52–64

[92] Tzschentke T M (2007). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol, 12(3-4): 227–462

[93] Wang Z Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H T, Li Y F (2015). Phosphodiesterase: an interface connecting cognitive deficits to neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Pharm Des, 21(3): 303–316

[94] Wen R T, Feng W Y, Liang J H, Zhang H T (2015). Role of phosphodiesterase 4-mediated cyclic AMP signaling in pharmacotherapy for substance dependence. Curr Pharm Des, 21(3): 355–364

[95] Wen R T, Zhang M, Qin W J, Liu Q, Wang W P, Lawrence A J, Zhang H T, Liang J H (2012). The phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor rolipram decreases ethanol seeking and consumption in alcohol-preferring Fawn-Hooded rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 36(12): 2157–2167

[96] Yan Y, Nitta A, Mizuno T, Nakajima A, Yamada K, Nabeshima T (2006). Discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine and morphine in rats are attenuated by cAMP-related compounds. Behav Brain Res, 173(1): 39–46

[97] Young R (2009). Drug Discrimination. In: Buccafusco J J, editor. Source Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis

[98] Zhang H T (2009). Cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase-4 as a target for the development of antidepressant drugs. Curr Pharm Des, 15(14): 1688–1698

[99] Zhang H T, Huang Y, Masood A, Stolinski L R, Li Y, Zhang L, Dlaboga D, Jin S L, Conti M, O’Donnell J M (2008). Anxiogenic-like behavioral phenotype of mice deficient in phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B). Neuropsychopharmacology, 33(7): 1611–1623

[100] Zhong P, Wang W, Yu F, Nazari M, Liu X, Liu Q S (2012). Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition impairs cocaine-induced inhibitory synaptic plasticity and conditioned place preference. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(11): 2377–2387

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg