Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children and accounts for nearly 25% of malignancies diagnosed among children under 15 years of age (Mei et al., 2014). In this leukemia, progenitor lymphoid cells proliferate and replace the normal hematopoietic cells of the bone marrow. This causes reduced production of normal blood cells (
Hagag et al., 2014). Extramedullary manifestations can also be observed in central nervous system (CNS), lymph nodes, gonads, spleen, and liver (
Portell et al., 2013). Studies showed that crucial sequential events (specific chromosomal translocations or fusion genes) can be the first hits to initiate ALL and further genetic or epigenetic events (gene deletions or mutations) are the second hits involved in the outbreak of ALL (
Du et al., 2013). Recently, many studies suggest that microRNAs can play a substantial role in leukemogenesis (
Schotte et al., 2010; Bottoni and Calin, 2013; Yan et al., 2013;
Yin et al., 2014).
MiRNAs are 20-22 nucleotide non-coding RNA molecules playing a vital role in control of critical cellular processes such as proliferation and differentiation through post translational regulation (
Hauptman and Glavac, 2013). Degradation of target mRNA occurs when miRNA and its target mRNA are complementary to each other exactly (perfect match) or nearly exactly (
Faraoni et al., 2009). Some miRNAs are stable in serum or plasma and show unique expression patterns; therefore, they can be used as biomarkers for various diseases (
Xiong et al., 2014). Studies have indicated the likelihood of distinguishing between malignant B cells from normal B cells as well as activated B cells from inactivated ones by miRNA expression profiles (
Li and Wang, 2013). There have been increasing studies on the relationship between adult cancers and miRNAs in recent years but there are still a relatively low number of studies regarding ALL (
Duyu et al., 2014). Particular miRNA signatures such as miR-124-1, let-7a-3, miR-181, miR-29B and their role in pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of myeloid and lymphoid leukemias have been discovered (
Yin et al., 2014).
MiRNA-146a was first noticed for its activity in innate immune system. Then, its role in acquired immunity was described. Loss of miRNA-146a in mice causes hematological disorders (
So et al., 2013). The pattern of miRNA-146a alternation in patients with leukemia has been analyzed and the results were noticeable. Also, the association between this miRNA and some genetic abnormalities in malignancies has been demonstrated (Table 1). However, evaluation of this miRNA in ALL seems to be insufficient and demands more investigations. In view of this evaluation, the prognostic parameters (including age, gender, WBC/Plt counts, Hb, lineages and cytogenetic abnormalities) have been considered in this study. So, we try to focus on this issue and find out the relationship between miR-146a and clinical outcome of ALL patients.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
ALL was diagnosed via BM aspirate displaying at least 30% blast cells based on FAB classification. Following morphologic, cytogenetic and clinical examinations on 48 ALL patients, the subjects were enrolled in this study, including 31 males (64.6%) and 17 females (35.4%) (1-26 years old; median age: 8.05 years). Forty- five cases (93.75%) were B-lineages and 3 cases (6.25%) were T-lineages ALL. Twenty age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects with no morphologic, cytogenetic and clinical disorders were also enrolled in this study. Table 2 shows patients’ information. All human peripheral blood samples were obtained with written informed consent from the subjects. This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS.REC.1393.310).
Cell culture
Jurkat (suspension, lymphoblast-like, obtained from acute lymphoblastic leukemia; ALL) and U937 (suspension, monocyte-like, derived from histiocytic lymphoma lymphocyte and myeloid cells) cell lines were purchased from Pasture Institute of Iran and were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 2 mmol/L glutamine, 25mmol/L HEPES, 1.5g/L sodium bicarbonate, 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 50 U/mL penicillin and 50 g/mL streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2.
MiRNAs extraction, cDNA synthesis, and real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total miRNA was extracted from blood samples using RNX Plus™ solution (Cinnagen, Iran) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The qualification of extracted miRNAs was performed by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. cDNA synthesis was performed as follows: 1.5 µL of specific primer, 3 µL RNA and 15.5 µL distilled water were mixed. Then, the mixture was placed in ABI step one plus PCR instrument for 5 min in 95 ̊C and 10 min in 70 ̊C. After completing this step, 3µL RT buffer, 3µL dNTP, 1µL RT enzyme and 3µL distilled water was added to this mixture for 15 min at 25 ̊C, 15 min at 37 ̊C, 60 min in 42 ̊C and 10 min at 75 ̊C in the instrument, respectively. MiRNA was quantified by realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with 4 µL Fermentas SYBR Green Mastermix (Fermentas Life Sciences, St Leon-Rot, Germany) in a Rotor-Gene 6000 system (Corbett, Concorde, NSW, Australia) according to manufacturer’s instructions. TaqMan® MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used for reverse transcription with 2 µLtarget specific stem loop primers provided in the TaqMan® miRNA assays. Then, 2 µL of template and 12 µLof distilled water were added. The reactions were performed as follows: initial polymerase activation at 95°C for 15min.For miRNA quantification, 40 amplification cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 58°Cfor 20 s, and 72°C for 20 s with fluorescence detection were performed. The following primers were used for real time PCR: mir-146a RT: GTCGTATGCAGAGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCA CTGCATACGACAACCCAT, miR-146a Forward: TCCGTGAGAACTGAATTCC; miR-146a reverse: GAGCAGGGTCCGAGGT. For miRNA, the data were normalized using the small nucleolar RNA, C/D box (snord) endogenous control. Primers for snord 47 RT: GTCGTATGCAGAGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGCATACGACCACCTC, snord 47 F: ATCACTGTAAAACCGTTCA, were prepared based on the sequence derived from the study of Naderi and colleagues (Naderi et al., 2015). After cDNA synthesis, miR-146a RNA was used to provide a standard curve. The first dilution of the standard included 1500000 copies/mL of miR-146a cDNA. 5-fold serial dilution was applied to provide the standard curve.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 13.0). Each experiment was repeated at least three times. REST software (2009, QIAGEN, Valencia, USA) was used to analyze relative gene expression data of real-time PCR. p≤0.01 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
MiR-146a expression
No statistically significant difference was found between miR-146a expression in patients and controls. Total expression of this miRNA was not different in our cell lines compared to controls. Mir-146a expression in U937cell line was 2.2 times higher than Jurkat cell line (Fig. 1).
MiR-146a expression, clinico-hematological and molecular studies
Among 48 patients enrolled in this study, miR-146a expression was high (18.75%), low (27.08%), and not different (54.17%). We compared miR-146a expression and some prognostic characteristics of patients, including age, gender, WBC/Plt counts, Hb, lineages and cytogenetic abnormalities. There was no significant relationship in this regard (Table 2) (Table 3) (p<0.05). Overall, these results indicate that miR-146a is not a suitable independent prognostic factor in ALL patients.
In our study, among 48 patients, 3 patients were BCR-ABL positive, 3 patients were T-ALL, 2 patients were 11q23 positive and one patient showed t(1;14) as a rare chromosomal abnormality. Our finding showed no significant relationship in the expression of miR-146a in these patients. We also investigated other prognostic factors, including WBC and PLT counts, Hb and organomegaly and found no association between the level of miR-146a and these parameters for distinguishing subtypes or predicting the clinical outcome. Following up our patients for 14 months, we had 2 deceased patients, one of whom was T-ALL with no difference in the expression of miR-146a compared to control group. The other had a high expression level of miR-146a. We observed more invasive clinical features in patients with low expression, which was not statistically significant.
Discussion
ALL, the most common malignancy in children, has achieved remarkable treatment improvements by virtue of recent molecular biomarkers (Friedmann and Weinstein, 2000). Experimental works have shed light on the diagnostic and prognostic role of miRNAs in hematologic disorders (Han et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011; de Oliveira et al., 2012). MiR-146a is implicated in the pathology of leukemia in an NF-kB-dependent manner as well as targeting CXCR4 and smad4 (Fig. 2) (
Ferreira et al., 2014;
Jurado-Camino et al., 201).Demonstrating the impact of miR-146a on lymphocyte differentiation, we selected this immune miRNA to figure out its role in the outcome of leukemia patients.
Mavrakis et al. (2011) showed overexpression of miR-146a in T-ALL patients, which was not consistent with our observation, as we had 3 cases of T-ALL, one of which had low miR-146aexpression and the other two were not different with controls. Muhterem Duyu et al. conducted a follow-up study and their results demonstrated a high level of miR-146a at diagnosis, which was reduced after 6 months of treatment (
Duyu et al., 2014). This result can indicate a seemingly oncogenic role of this miRNA. Consistent with this study, a recent report by Hua Zhang et al. indicated the overexpression of miR-146a in 49 children with ALL (
Zhang et al., 2009). Also, another analysis stated that a high level of miR-146a can predict unfavorable outcome in adult ALL patients (
Wang et al., 2010). However, non-clinical-trial studies showed opposite results. Data showed a tumor suppressive role of miR-146a through targeting early growth response 1 (EGR-1) protein (
Contreras et al., 2015). In line with this, P Rosato et al. suggested that EBNA2 induces B cell transformation by reducing the expression of miR-146a, supporting the anti-leukemic role of this miRNA (
Rosato et al., 2012).
Fallah and colleagues showed that miR-146a induces upregulation of Ikaros, CD2, CD4, CD25 in CD133+ cells, causing differentiation into T lymphoid lineage (
Fallah et al., 2013). In contrast, we concluded that this miRNA has no differentiation effect upon T cell lymphoblasts in our previous study by observing upregulation of PU-1 and downregulation of Notch1, ETS2, Ikaros, SOS1, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, and TCRa by MiR-146a (
Saki et al., 2014). It seems that this miRNA has a basic role during differentiation of lymphocytes and its function depends on the expression and repression of other genes, transcription factors and miRNAs. Taken together, our findings reveal that miR-146a cannot be an independent prognostic factor for ALL patients. Some studies have shown the correlation between miR-146a and miR-155 and increased expression of them in inflammatory disease but not with other miRNAs (
Béres et al., 2016). The expression of MiR-146a and miR-150 genes is also regulated by p53 and NFkB p65/RelA in human cervical carcinoma (
Ghose and Bhattacharyya, 2015). In addition, correlation between miR-155 and mir-150 in neoplastic B cell development has been approved in some studies (
Musilova and Mraz, 2015). So, this can suggest a correlation between miR-146a, 155 and 150 in malignancies. In conclusion, simultaneous evaluation of miR-146a, miR-155 and miR-150 for future studies in this field can be suggested for better prognosis.
Acknowledgements
This paper is issued from thesis of Farzaneh Tavakoli, MSc student of hematology and blood banking. This work was financially supported by grantTH93/17 from vice chancellor for research affairs of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors of this paper have a financial or individualized relationship with other people or institutions that could inappropriately influence the content or directions of paper.
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg