3C-based methods to detect long-range chromatin interactions

Abstract

Transcriptional regulatory regions are often located several thousand bases from the gene that they control. To function, the chromatin strand forms loops to juxtapose distal regions with the promoter. These long-range chromatin interactions have profound influences on the regulation of gene expression and mapping these interactions is currently a subject of intensive investigation. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology and its derivatives have been widely used to detect chromatin interactions and greatly contributed to understanding of the relationship between genome organization and genome function. Here we review these 3C-based methods for the study of long-range chromatin interactions and recent exciting findings obtained by using these technologies.

Keywords

chromatin interactions / 3C / gene regulation / next-generation sequencing

References

[1] Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K R, Roh T Y, Schones D E, Wang Z B, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K (2007). High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell, 129(4): 823–837

[2] Boyle A P, Davis S, Shulha H P, Meltzer P, Margulies E H, Weng Z, Furey T S, Crawford G E (2008). High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell, 132(2): 311–322

[3] Cai S T, Lee C C, Kohwi-Shigematsu T (2006). SATB1 packages densely looped, transcriptionally active chromatin for coordinated expression of cytokine genes. Nat Genet, 38(11): 1278–1288

[4] Carroll J S, Liu X S, Brodsky A S, Li W, Meyer C A, Szary A J, Eeckhoute J, Shao W L, Hestermann E V, Geistlinger T R, Fox E A, Silver P A, Brown M (2005). Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell, 122(1): 33–43

[5] Carter D, Chakalova L, Osborne C S, Dai Y F, Fraser P (2002). Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo. Nat Genet, 32(4): 623–626

[6] Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002). Capturing chromosome conformation. Science, 295(5558): 1306–1311

[7] Dostie J, Dekker J (2006). Mapping networks of physical interactions between genomic elements using 5C technology. Nat Protoc, 2, 988–1002

[8] Dostie J, Richmond T A, Arnaout R A, Selzer R R, Lee W L, Honan T A, Rubio E D, Krumm A, Lamb J, Nusbaum C, Green R D, Dekker J (2006). Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res, 16(10): 1299–1309

[9] Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, McIlwain S, Kim Y J, Lee C, Shendure J, Fields S, Blau C A, Noble W S (2010). A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature, 465(7296): 363–367

[10] ENCODE project consortium (2004). The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science, 306(5696): 636–640

[11] Fullwood M J, Liu M H, Pan Y F, Liu J, Xu H, Mohamed Y B, Orlov Y L, Velkov S, Ho A, Mei P H, Chew E G, Huang P Y, Welboren W J, Han Y, Ooi H S, Ariyaratne P N, Vega V B, Luo Y, Tan P Y, Choy P Y, Wansa K D, Zhao B, Lim K S, Leow S C, Yow J S, Joseph R, Li H, Desai K V, Thomsen J S, Lee Y K, Karuturi R K, Herve T, Bourque G, Stunnenberg H G, Ruan X, Cacheux-Rataboul V, Sung W K, Liu E T, Wei C L, Cheung E, Ruan Y (2009). An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature, 462(7269): 58–64

[12] Göndör A, Ohlsson R (2009). Chromosome crosstalk in three dimensions. Nature, 461(7261): 212–217

[13] Horike S, Cai S T, Miyano M, Cheng J F, Kohwi-Shigematsu T (2005). Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet, 37(1): 31–40

[14] Johnson D S, Mortazavi A, Myers R M, Wold B (2007). Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science, 316(5830): 1497–1502

[15] Kim S I, Bresnick E H, Bultman S J (2009). BRG1 directly regulates nucleosome structure and chromatin looping of the alpha globin locus to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Res, 37(18): 6019–6027

[16] Lajoie B R, van Berkum N L, Sanyal A, Dekker J (2009). My5C: web tools for chromosome conformation capture studies. Nat Methods, 6(10): 690–691

[17] Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T (2007). Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet, 8(2): 104–115

[18] Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum N L, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie B R, Sabo P J, Dorschner M O, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender M A, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny L A, Lander E S, Dekker J (2009). Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science, 326(5950): 289–293

[19] Misteli T (2007). Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell, 128(4): 787–800

[20] Murrell A, Heeson S, Reik W (2004). Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops. Nat Genet, 36(8): 889–893

[21] Palstra R J, Tolhuis B, Splinter E, Nijmeijer R, Grosveld F, de Laat W (2003). The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat Genet, 35(2): 190–194

[22] Schones D E, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh T Y, Barski A, Wang Z, Wei G, Zhao K (2008). Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell, 132(5): 887–898

[23] Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, de Wit E, van Steensel B, de Laat W (2006). Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet, 38(11): 1348–1354

[24] Spilianakis C G, Flavell R A (2004). Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat Immunol, 5(10): 1017–1027

[25] Spilianakis C G, Lalioti M D, Town T, Lee G R, Flavell R A (2005). Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature, 435(7042): 637–645

[26] Splinter E, Heath H, Kooren J, Palstra R J, Klous P, Grosveld F, Galjart N, de Laat W (2006). CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev, 20(17): 2349–2354

[27] Tiwari V K, Cope L, McGarvey K M, Ohm J E, Baylin S B (2008). A novel 6C assay uncovers Polycomb-mediated higher order chromatin conformations. Genome Res, 18(7): 1171–1179

[28] Tolhuis B, Palstra R J, Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W (2002). Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol Cell, 10(6): 1453–1465

[29] Vakoc C R, Letting D L, Gheldof N, Sawado T, Bender M A, Groudine M, Weiss M J, Dekker J, Blobel G A (2005). Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the beta-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol Cell, 17(3): 453–462

[30] Wang Z, Schones D E, Zhao K (2009). Characterization of human epigenomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 19(2): 127–134

[31] Würtele H, Chartrand P (2006). Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended Chromosome Conformation Capture methodology. Chromosome Res, 14(5): 477–495

[32] Xu N, Tsai C L, Lee J T (2006). Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science, 311(5764): 1149–1152

[33] Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjölinder M, Göndör A, Mariano P, Wang S, Kanduri C, Lezcano M, Sandhu K S, Singh U, Pant V, Tiwari V, Kurukuti S, Ohlsson R (2006). Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet, 38(11): 1341–1347

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Daniel Northrup for critical reading of the manuscript. Research in the authors’ laboratory is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg