Differential effects of recombinant fusion proteins TAT-OCT4 and TAT-NANOG on adult human fibroblasts

Jiani CAO, Zhifeng XIAO, Bing CHEN, Yuan GAO, Chunying SHI, Jinhuan WANG, Jianwu DAI

PDF(290 KB)
PDF(290 KB)
Front. Biol. ›› 2010, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (5) : 424-430. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-010-0800-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differential effects of recombinant fusion proteins TAT-OCT4 and TAT-NANOG on adult human fibroblasts

Author information +
History +

Abstract

OCT4 and NANOG are two important transcription factors for maintaining the pluripotency and self-renewal abilities of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Meanwhile they play key roles in the induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. In this study, recombinant transcript factors TAT-NANOG and TAT-OCT4, which contained a fused powerful protein transduction domain (PTD) TAT from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), were produced. Each fusion protein could be transported into human adult fibroblasts (HAF) successfully and activated the endogenous transcription of both nanog and oct4. Our study revealed the inter-regulation and autoregulation abilities of solo oct4 or nanog in the process of iPS cell reprogramming. Meanwhile the transduction of TAT-NANOG could accelerate the growth rate of HAF cells, and the key cell cycle regulator cdc25a was up-regulated. Thus cdc25a may be involved in the regulation of cell growth by NANOG. In addition, the TAT fusion protein technology provided a novel way to improve cell growth that is more controllable and safer.

Keywords

induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) / OCT4 / NANOG / protein transduction domain / TAT / cell proliferation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiani CAO, Zhifeng XIAO, Bing CHEN, Yuan GAO, Chunying SHI, Jinhuan WANG, Jianwu DAI. Differential effects of recombinant fusion proteins TAT-OCT4 and TAT-NANOG on adult human fibroblasts. Front Biol, 2010, 5(5): 424‒430 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-010-0800-4

References

[1]
Boyer L A, Lee T I, Cole M F, Johnstone S E, Levine S S, Zucker J P, Guenther M G, Kumar R M, Murray H L, Jenner R G, Gifford D K, Melton D A, Jaenisch R, Young R A (2005). Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell, 122(6): 947–956
[2]
Bradford M M (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 72: 248–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, Smith A (2003). Functional expression cloning of nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 113(5): 643–655
[4]
Go M J, Takenaka C, Ohgushi H (2008). Forced expression of Sox2 or nanog in human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells maintains their expansion and differentiation capabilities. Exp Cell Res, 314(5): 1147–1154
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Green M, Loewenstein P M (1988). Autonomous functional domains of chemically synthesized human immunodeficiency virus tat trans-activator protein. Cell, 55(6): 1179–1188
[6]
Hay D C, Sutherland L, Clark J, Burdon T (2004). Oct-4 knockdown induces similar patterns of endoderm and trophoblast differentiation markers in human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 22(2): 225–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Hough S R, Clements I, Welch P J, Wiederholt K A (2006). Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells after RNA interference-mediated silencing of OCT4 and nanog. Stem Cells, 24(6): 1467–1475
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Hyslop L, Stojkovic M, Armstrong L, Walter T, Stojkovic P, Przyborski S, Herbert M, Murdoch A, Strachan T, Lako M (2005). Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages. Stem Cells, 23(8): 1035–1043
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Kim D, Kim C H, Moon J I, Chung Y G, Chang M Y, Han B S, Ko S, Yang E, Cha K Y, Lanza R, Kim K S (2009). Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell, 4(6): 472–476
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Loh Y H, Wu Q, Chew J L, Vega V B, Zhang W, Chen X, Bourque G, George J, Leong B, Liu J, Wong K Y, Sung K W, Lee C W, Zhao X D, Chiu K P, Lipovich L, Kuznetsov V A, Robson P, Stanton L W, Wei C L, Ruan Y, Lim B, Ng H H (2006). The oct4 and nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet, 38(4): 431–440
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Matin M M, Walsh J R, Gokhale P J, Draper J S, Bahrami A R, Morton I, Moore H D, Andrews P W (2004). Specific knockdown of oct4 and beta2-microglobulin expression by RNA interference in human embryonic stem cells and embryonic carcinoma cells. Stem Cells, 22(5): 659–668
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Maruyama M, Maeda M, Yamanaka S (2003). The homeoprotein nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell, 113(5): 631–642
[13]
Nagahara H, Vocero-Akbani A M, Snyder E L, Ho A, Latham D G, Lissy N A, Becker-Hapak M, Ezhevsky S A, Dowdy S F (1998). Transduction of full-length TAT fusion proteins into mammalian cells: TAT-p27Kip1 induces cell migration. Nat Med, 4(12): 1449–1452
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, Schöler H, Smith A (1998). Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor oct4. Cell, 95(3): 379–391
[15]
Niwa H (2001). Molecular mechanism to maintain stem cell renewal of ES cells. Cell Struct Funct, 26(3): 137–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith A G (2000). Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet, 24(4): 372–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Pesce M, Schöler H R (2001). Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells, 19(4): 271–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Piestun D, Kochupurakkal B S, Jacob-Hirsch J, Zeligson S, Koudritsky M, Domany E, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Givol D (2006). nanog transforms NIH3T3 cells and targets cell-type restricted genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 343(1): 279–285
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Schwarze S R, Ho A, Vocero-Akbani A, Dowdy S F (1999). In vivo protein transduction: delivery of a biologically active protein into the mouse. Science, 285(5433): 1569–1572
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen T W, Guo G, van Oosten A L, Barrandon O, Wray J, Yamanaka S, Chambers I, Smith A (2009). nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell, 138(4): 722–737
[21]
Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5): 861–872
[22]
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126(4): 663–676
[23]
Wang J, Rao S, Chu J, Shen X, Levasseur D N, Theunissen T W, Orkin S H (2006). A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature, 444(7117): 364–368
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Yu J, Hu K, Smuga-Otto K, Tian S, Stewart R, Slukvin I I, Thomson J A (2009). Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences. Science, 324(5928): 797–801
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Yu J, Vodyanik M A, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane J L, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir G A, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson J A (2007). Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 318, 1917–1920
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Zaehres H, Lensch M W, Daheron L, Stewart S A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Daley G Q (2005). High-efficiency RNA interference in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 23(3): 299–305
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zhang J, Wang X, Chen B, Suo G, Zhao Y, Duan Z, Dai J (2005). Expression of nanog gene promotes NIH3T3 cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 338(2): 1098–1102
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhang X, Neganova I, Przyborski S, Yang C, Cooke M, Atkinson S P, Anyfantis G, Fenyk S, Keith W N, Hoare S F, Hughes O, Strachan T, Stojkovic M, Hinds P W, Armstrong L, Lako M (2009). A role for NANOG in G1 to S transition in human embryonic stem cells through direct binding of CDK6 and cdc25a. J Cell Biol, 184(1): 67–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Zhou H, Wu S, Joo J Y, Zhu S, Han D W, Lin T, Trauger S, Bien G, Yao S, Zhu Y, Siuzdak G, Schöler H R, Duan L, Ding S (2009). Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell, 4(5): 381–384
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2006CB943601) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 90919042).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(290 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/