Neutral theory in community ecology

Abstract

One of the central goals of community ecology is to understand the forces that maintain species diversity within communities. The traditional niche-assembly theory asserts that species live together in a community only when they differ from one another in resource uses. But this theory has some difficulties in explaining the diversity often observed in specie-rich communities such as tropical forests. As an alternative to the niche theory, Hubbell and other ecologists introduced a neutral model. Hubbell argues that the number of species in a community is controlled by species extinction and immigration or speciation of new species. Assuming that all individuals of all species in a trophically similar community are ecologically equivalent, Hubbell’s neutral theory predicts two important statistical distributions. One is the asymptotic log-series distribution for the metacommunities under point mutation speciation, and the other is the zero-sum multinomial distribution for both local communities under dispersal limitation and metacommunities under random fission speciation. Unlike the niche-assembly theory, the neutral theory takes similarity in species and individuals as a starting point for investigating species diversity. Based on the fundamental processes of birth, death, dispersal and speciation, the neutral theory provided the first mechanistic explanation of species abundance distribution commonly observed in natural communities. Since the publication of the neutral theory, there has been much discussion about it, pro and con. In this paper, we summarize recent progress in the assumption, prediction and speciation mode of the neutral theory, including progress in the theory itself, tests about the assumption of the theory, prediction and speciation mode at the metacommunity level. We also suggest that the most important task in the future is to bridge the niche-assembly theory and the neutral theory, and to add species differences to the neutral theory and more stochasticity to the niche theory.

References

1. Alonso D McKane A J 2004 Sampling Hubbell'sneutral theory of biodiversityEcology Letters7901910. doi:10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2004.00640.x
2. Armstrong R A 1989 Competition, seed predation, and species coexistenceJournal of Theoretical Biology141191195. doi:10.1016/S0022‐5193(89)80017‐7
3. Bell G 2000 The distribution of abundance in neutral communitiesAmerican Naturalist155606617. doi:10.1086/303345
4. Bell G 2001 Neutral macroecologyScience29324132418. doi:10.1126/science.293.5539.2413
5. Chase J 2005 Towards a really unified theory for metacommunitiesFunction ecology19182186. doi:10.1111/j.0269‐8463.2005.00937.x
6. Chave J 2004 Neutral theory and community ecologyEcology Letters7241253. doi:10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2003.00566.x
7. Chave J Leigh E G 2002 A spatiallyexplicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forestsTheoretical Population Biology62153168. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2002.1597
8. Chave J Muller-Landau H C Levin S A 2002 Comparing classical community models:Theoretical consequences for patterns of diversityAmerican Naturalist159123. doi:10.1086/324112
9. Chesson P 2000 Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics31343366. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343
10. Condit R Hubbell S P Foster R B 1995 Mortality rates of 205 neotropical treeand shrub species and the impact of a severe droughtEcological Monographs65419439. doi:10.2307/2963497
11. Durrett R Levin S A 1996 Spatial modelsfor species area curvesJournal of TheoreticalBiology179119127. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0053
12. Etienne R S 2005 A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversityEcology Letters8253260. doi:10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2004.00717.x
13. Etienne R S Alonso D 2005 A dispersal-limitedsampling theory for species and allelesEcology Letters811471156. doi:10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2005.00817.x
14. Etienne R S Olff H 2004a How dispersallimitation shapes species-body size distributions in local communitiesAmerican Naturalist1636983. doi:10.1086/380582
15. Etienne R S Olff H 2004b A novel genealogicalapproach to neutral biodiversity theoryEcology Letters7170175. doi:10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2004.00572.x
16. Ewens W J 1972 The sampling theory of selectively neutral allelesTheoretical Population Biology387112. doi:10.1016/0040‐5809(72)90035‐4
17. Fisher R A Corbet A S Williams C B 1943 The relation between the number of speciesand the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal populationJournal of Animal Ecology124258. doi:10.2307/1411
18. Harpole W S Tilman D 2006 Non-neutralpatterns of species abundance in grassland communitiesEcology Letters91523
19. Hubbell S P 1979 Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropicaldry forestScience20312991309. doi:10.1126/science.203.4387.1299
20. Hubbell S P 2001 The Unified Neural Theory of Biodiversity and BiogeographyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
21. Hubbell S P 2003 Modes of speciation and the lifespans of species underneutrality: A response to the comment of Robert E. RicklefsOikos100193199. doi:10.1034/j.1600‐0706.2003.12450.x
22. Hubbell S P 2005a Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesisof functional equivalenceFunctional Ecology19166172. doi:10.1111/j.0269‐8463.2005.00965.x
23. Hubbell S P 2005b The neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography andStephen Jay GouldPaleobiology31122132. doi:10.1666/0094‐8373(2005)031[0122:TNTOBA]2.0.CO;2
24. Hubbell S P 2006 Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalenceEcology8713871398. doi:10.1890/0012‐9658(2006)87[1387:NTATEO]2.0.CO;2
25. Hubbell S P Foster R B 1983 Diversityof canopy trees in a neotropical forest and implications for conservationIn: Sutton S LWhitmoreT CChadwick A CTropical Rain Forest: Ecology and ManagementOxfordBlackwell Scientific Publications2541
26. Hubbell S P Foster R B 1986 Biology, chanceand history and the structure of tropical rain forest tree communitiesDiamond J MCase T JCommunity EcologyNew YorkHarper and Row314329
27. Karlin S McGregor J 1967 The numberof mutants maintained in a populationProc.5th Berkeley Symp Math Stat Prob4415438
28. Karlin S McGregor J 1972 Polymorphismsfor genetic and ecdogical systems with weak couplingTheoretical Population Biology3210238. doi:10.1016/0040‐5809(72)90027‐5
29. Levin S A Nathan R Muller-Landau H C Chave J 2003 The ecology and evolution of dispersal: A theoretical perspectiveAnnual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics34575604. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132428
30. MacArthur R H 1957 On the relative abundance of bird speciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America43293295. doi:10.1073/pnas.43.3.293
31. MacArthur R H Wilson E O 1963 An equilibriumtheory of insular zoogeographyEvolution17373387. doi:10.2307/2407089
32. MacArthur R H Wilson E O 1967 The Theoryof Island BiogeographyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press
33. Magurran A E Henderson P A 2003 Explainingthe excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributionsNature422714716. doi:10.1038/nature01547
34. McGill B J 2003 A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversityNature422881885. doi:10.1038/nature01583
35. Mouquet N Loreau M 2003 Coexistencein metacommunities: The regional similarity hypothesisAmerican Naturalist162544557. doi:10.1086/378857
36. Ostling A 2005 Neutral theory tested by birdsNature436635636. doi:10.1038/436635a
37. Pandolfi J M 1996 Limited membership in Pleistocene reef coral assemblagesfrom the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea: constancy during globalchangePaleobiology22152176
38. Pandolfi J M 2002 Coral community dynamics at multiple scalesCoral Reefs211323
39. Poulin R 2004 Parasites and the neutral theory of biodiversityEcography27119123. doi:10.1111/j.0906‐7590.2004.03695.x
40. Preston F W 1948 The commonness and rarity of speciesEcology29254283. doi:10.2307/1930989
41. Purves D W Pacala S W 2005 Ecologicaldrift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not implyneutral processIn: Burslem DPinard MHartley SEiotic Interactions in the TropicsCambridgeCambridgeUniversity Press107138
42. Ricklefs R E 2003 A comment on Hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift modelOikos100185192. doi:10.1034/j.1600‐0706.2003.12018.x
43. Sheil D Jennings S Savill P 2000 Long-term permanent plot observationsof vegetation dynamics in Budongo, a Ugandan rain forestJournal of Tropical Ecology16765800. doi:10.1017/S0266467400001723
44. Sugihara G Bersier L Southwood T R E Pimm S L May R M 2003 Predicted correspondencebetween species abundance and dendrograms of niche similarityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America10052465251. doi:10.1073/pnas.0831096100
45. Tilman D Pacala S 1993 The maintenanceof species richness in plant communitiesIn: Ricklefs R ESchluter DSpecies Diversity in Ecological CommunitiesChicagoChicagoUniversity Press1325
46. Tokeshi M 1990 Niche apportionment or random assortment: Species abundancepatterns revisitedJournal of Animal Ecology5811291146
47. Volkov I Banavar J R Hubbell S P Maritan A 2003 Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecologyNature4241,0351,037. doi:10.1038/nature01883
48. Volkov I Banavar J R He F Hubbell S P Maritan A 2005 Density dependence explainstree species abundance and diversity in tropical forestsNature438658661. doi:10.1038/nature04030
49. Walker S C Cyr H 2007 Testing thestandard neutral model of biodiversity in lake communitiesOikos116143155. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030‐1299.15300.x
50. Wootton J T 2005 Field-parameterization and experimental test of the neutralof biodiversityNature433309312. doi:10.1038/nature03211
51. Yu D W Terborgh J W Potts M D 1998 Can high tree species richness be explainedby Hubbell's null modelEcology Letters1193199. doi:10.1046/j.1461‐0248.1998.00036.x
52. Zhang D Y Lin K 1997 The effectsof competitive asymmetry on the rate of competitive displacement:How robust is Hubbell's community drift modelJournal of Theoretical Biology188361367. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1997.0491
53. Zhang D Y et al. 2000 Researches on Theoretical EcologyBeijingChinaHigher Education Press(in Chinese)
54. Zhou S R Zhang D Y 2007 A nearly neutralmodel of biodiversityEcology(in press)