Seasonal response of soil enzyme activity to thinning intensity of aerial seeded stands

Abstract

Aerial seeding is one of the most important vegetation restoration patterns in remote hilly areas, and studies concerning soil quality and its management have practical value. In 2000, a study of the effect of thinning intensities at five different treatments levels, 0 (CK), 30% (slight thinning), 48.75% (medium thinning), 53.75% (intense thinning) and 65.6% (super intense thinning) on soil enzyme activity was carried out on 9-year-old aerial seeded Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.) stands with an initial density of 8000 trees/hm², in the Wangjiapu Aerail Seeding Center, Yanqing County, Beijing. Five years later, the activities of five kinds of soil enzymes, soil urease, alkaline phosphatase, inertase, catalase and polyphenol oxidase in the first 20 cm of soil layer were compared during four seasons. Relationships among soil enzymes and soil physiochemical properties were also analyzed to examine the possibility of using soil enzymes to evaluate thinning intensities. The results showed that the maximum enzyme activities of catalase and polyphenol oxidase occurred in June, those of soil urease and alkaline phosphatase occurred in October, and soil invetase had its maximum in April. In addition, the five soil enzymes were affected differently by thinning intensities. Soil catalase, urease and invertase showed the highest response to a slight thinning, followed by medium thinning, which is the opposite experienced with polyphenol oxidase and alkaline phosphatase. There are statistically significant and positive relationships between soil enzymes and organic matter and available K. It should be noted that soil water was a limiting factor to soil enzyme activity. Compared with soil physicochemical characteristics, soil enzymes were more sensitive to levels of thinning intensities. Among the enzymes, soil alkaline phosphatase and catalase could be regarded as indicators to assess soil quality. It is concluded that a suitable thinning intensity benefits the development of undergrowth and soil enzymes. Generally, when the stand with initial density of 8000 trees/hm² grows up to nine years old, the most suitable thinning intensity should be about 50%.

References

1. Aon M A Colaneri A C 2001 Temporal andspatial evolution of enzyme activities and physio-chemical propertiesin an agricultural soilAppl Soil Ecol18(3)255. doi: 10.1016/S0929‐1393(01)00161‐5
2. Bao S D 2005 Soil and Agricultural Chemistry AnalysisBeijingChinese Agricultural Press34110 (in Chinese)
3. Boyle S I Hart S C Kaye J P Waldrop M P 2005 Restoration and canopy type influence soil microflora in a ponderosapine forestSoil Sci Soc Am J69(5)16271638. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0029
4. Burger J A Kelting D L 1999 Using soilquality indication to assess forest stand managementFor Ecol Manage122(1)155166. doi:10.1016/S0378‐1127(99)00039‐0
5. Chen F Q Lu B 1997 Communitycharacteristic of Pinus tabulaeform sown by plane in Three Gorge Reservoir areaJ Xinyang Teach Coll10(3)4246 (in Chinese)
6. Committee of the FortyYears of the Afforestation Sown by Plane in China. 1998 Forty Years of the Afforestation Sown by Plane in ChinaBeijingChinaForestry Publishing House26 (in Chinese)
7. Criquet S Farnet A M Tagger S 2000 Annual variations of phenoloxidase activitiesin an evergreen oak litter: influence of certain biotic and abioticfactorsSoil Biol Biochem32(11)15051513. doi:10.1016/S0038‐0717(00)00027‐4
8. Dick W A Tabatabai M A 1993 Significanceand potential uses of soil enzymesIn: Blaine M F Soil Microbial Ecology: Applicationin Agricultural and Environmental Management New York Marcel Dekker95127
9. Garcia C Hermandez T 1997 Biologicaland biochemical indications in derelict soils subject to erosionSoil Biol Biochem29(2)171177. doi:10.1016/S0038‐0717(96)00294‐5
10. Guan S Y 1980 Soil enzyme and soil fertilityChin J Soil Sci11(6)4144 (in Chinese)
11. Guan S Y 1986 Soil Enzymology and Its MethodologyBeijingChina Agricultural Press188359 (in Chinese)
12. Guo T L Li S L Bai J Wang X L Zhang L 2004 Study on thinning techniqueof air-seeded forest of Pinus tabulaeformisProtect For Sci Technol56364 (in Chinese)
13. He Y J Zhong Z C Liu J M Liu J C Jin J Li Q Y 2005 Soil enzyme activities of limestone degraded ecosystem at its differentrestoration phasesChin J Appl Ecol16(6)10771081 (in Chinese)
14. Hou X Y 1982 Biogeography and the Dominant Bio-chemical Element of ChinaBeijingSciencePress (in Chinese)
15. Hu B Duan C Q Wang Z H Zhang S B Qi L C 2002 Effect on vegetation rehabilitationmeasures on soil fertility and soil enzymatic activity in degradedecosystemActa Pedolog Sin39(4)604608 (in Chinese)
16. Li C R Xu J W Song H Y Li C Y Zheng L Wang W D Wang Y H 2006c Soil enzymeactivities in different plantations in lowlands of the Yellow Riverdelta, ChinaActa Phytoecol Sin30(5)802809 (in Chinese)
17. Li G L Liu Y Guo B Xu Y Zhang K D Zhao S R 2006b Advances in the research of the aerial-seeding forest inChinaWorld For Res19(6)4548 (in Chinese)
18. Li G L Liu Y Guo B Xu Y Zhang K D Zhao S R 2007 Effect of reserve density on undergrowth development ofaerial seeding Pinus tabulaeformis standsJ Northwestern Coll For22(1)7277 (in Chinese)
19. Li G L Liu Y Xu Y Guo B Zhang K D Zhao S R 2006a Analysis on the flora of seed plants of the communitiesfrom Pinus tabulaeformis sown byplaneJ Shanxi Agric Univ26(4)369372 (in Chinese)
20. Li Z H Qi F H Bai F M Chen X P He Y J 2004 Studies of the soil fertilityof aerially seeded Pinus massoniana standsJ Cent South For Univ24(5)3235 (in Chinese)
21. Liu J J Yang C Wu C R 1991 The spatial pattern of air-seeded forestof Pinus tabulaeformisJ Northwestern Coll For6(2)5154 (in Chinese)
22. Liu X D Wu Q X Hou Q C Shi L M 1983 Ecological distribution of aerial Chinese pine seedlingsBull Soil Water Conserv3(6)7782 (in Chinese)
23. Liu Z C Wang T R Zhang H W Liu X X 2003 Stand density-control map making for Chinese pine forest sowed byairplane in Henan ProvinceFor Resour Manage42427 (in Chinese)
24. Mergel A Schmitz O Mallmann T Bothe H 2000 Relative abundance of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteriain layers of a forest soilFEMS MicrobiolEcol363342
25. Mo Y X Sun B Y Tang K G Han D F 2003 Effect of reserve density on growth of aerial seeding of Pinus tabulaeformisJ Northwest Coll For18(4)5759 (in Chinese)
26. Sun S C Bao W K 2005 RestorationEcologyBeijingChemical Industry Press50 (in Chinese)
27. Wei T L Ye Z F Fan B Y Zhang D H 2001 Influence of thinning on soil fertility in artificial forestChin J Appl Ecol12(5)672676 (in Chinese)
28. Xiong H Z Wang K Y Yang W Y 2004 Seasonal variations of soil enzyme activitiesin fir and birch forests in subalpine area of western SichuanChin J Appl Environ Biol10(4)416420 (in Chinese)
29. Yang C D Jiao R Z Tu X N Xiong Y Q Chen Z L 1995 Effect of undergrowthin Chinese fir plantation on soil properties in the 5–15 cmlayerFor Res8(5)514519 (in Chinese)
30. Yang C 1996 Study on growth rhythems of aerial seeding forest of Pinus tabulaeformis CarrJ Northwest Coll For11(4)2427 (in Chinese)
31. Yang W Q Wang K Y 2002 Advances onsoil enzymologyChin J Appl Environ Biol8(5)564570 (in Chinese)
32. Yang W Q Wang K Y 2004 Advances inforest enzymologySci Silv Sin40(2)152159 (in Chinese)
33. Zhao L S Wang J L 1995 Research onrelations between growth effect and soil enzyme activities and soilnutrient factors in mixed poplar and black locust plantationsJ Beijing For Univ17(4)18 (in Chinese)
34. Zhou D M Chen X P Zhang J X Tian B B Li Z H 2002 Study of soil microorganismsin air-sowing Pinus massoniana standsJ Cent South For Univ22(3)5962 (in Chinese)
35. Zhou L K 1987 Soil EnzymologyBeijingScience Press178 (in Chinese)