Spatial distribution patterns and environmental interpretation of clonal buds

Abstract

Anthriscus sylvestris, a weed found both in Europe and China, is a kind of representative clustered clonal plant and is a foe on dams and banks. It has been widely investigated in Europe for its powerful progenitive ability and tolerance to severely adverse environments. Our aims were to investigate and quantify its spatial distribution patterns in four types of community habitats, using a clustering method and adjacency lattice established by Greig-Smith. We concluded our environmental interpretation based on canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) appended to a Monte Carlo test with randomized seeding. The results indicate that the buds around the parent roots are in an aggregation distribution pattern in all scales (0.002–5.12 m²), but theoretical distribution fitting, like negative binomial and Poisson distribution, show that some sizes of several sampling locations are out of place. For this, spatial ordination gives a satisfactory answer implying the effect of environmental variables such as depth of humus layer, soil moisture, light condition, disturbance intensity and herb abundance. CCA accounts for 64.7% of the total environmental variation and the remaining variation may be counteracted in those five variances or can be interpreted by other factors like accumulating temperature, annual rainfall and altitude in landscape scale. With the aid of temporal sequencing, the suppressed type II (monodominant) may be the former mode of suppressed type I (stable type), where invasion is done with the help of disturbance from both humans and nature. The abundance of A. sylvestris can add to our cognition in diversity resistance hypothesis and our hypothesis on disturbance before or upon immigration.

References

1. Bell A D (1984). Dynamics morphology: a contribution to plant populationecology. In: Dirzo R, Saruklan J, eds. Perspectives inPlant Population Ecology. Sunderland: Sinauer, 31–37
2. Chao W S (2002). Contemporary methods to investigate seed and bud dormancy. Weed Sci, 50(2): 215–226. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0215:CMTISA]2.0.CO;2
3. Dukes J S (2002). Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibilityand response to invasion. Ecol Appl, 12(2): 602–617. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0602:SCADAG]2.0.CO;2
4. Greig-Smith P (1983). Quantitative Plant Ecology. 3rd ed.Oxford: Blackwell
5. Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Ezcurra E, Gutiérrez J R, Mohren G M J (2001). El Niñoeffects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol, 16(2): 89–94. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02052-8
6. Klinkhamer P G L, de Jong T J, Meelis E (1987). Life-history variation and the controlof flowering in short-lived monocarps. Oikos, 49(3): 309–314. doi:10.2307/3565766
7. Liu S J, Su Z X (2004). T-squarestudy on spatial pattern and regeneration of Betula albo-sinensis Burkill population on west slopeof Jiuding Mountain. Chin J Appl Ecol, 15(1): 1–4 (in Chinese)
8. Parr T W, Way J M (1988). Managementof roadside vegetation: the long-term effects of cutting. J Appl Ecol, 25(3): 1073–1087. doi:10.2307/2403767
9. Reader R J, Jalili A, Grime J P, Spencer R E, Matthews N (1992). A comparativestudy of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in dry soil. J Ecol, 81: 543–550
10. Roberts H A (1979). Periodicity of seedling emergence and seed survivalin some Umbelliferae. J Appl Ecol, 16(1): 195–201. doi:10.2307/2402738
11. Sheng H Y, Chang J, Ying X W (2002). Seed dispersal and seed bank dynamicsof the endangered Changium smyrnioides. Biodiv Sci, 10(3): 269–273 (in Chinese)
12. Sheng H Y, Ge Y, Chang J, Li W C (2004). Influence of environmental factors on seed germination of two speciesin Umbellaceae. Acta Ecol Sin, 24(4): 614–619 (in Chinese)
13. Sher A A, Hyatt L A (1999). The disturbedresource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plantinvasion. Biol Invas, 1(2–3): 107–114. doi:10.1023/A:1010050420466
14. Silvertown J, Tremlett M (1989). Interactiveeffects of disturbance and shade upon colonization of grassland: anexperiment with Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm., Conium maculatum L., Daucus carota L., and Heracleum sphondylium L. Funct Ecol, 3(2): 229–235. doi:10.2307/2389305
15. Thompson K, Baster K (1992). Establishmentfrom seed of selected Umbelliferae in unmanaged grassland. Funct Ecol, 6(3): 346–352. doi:10.2307/2389526
16. van Mierlo J E M, van Groenendael JM (1991). A population dynamic approach to the control of Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm. J Appl Ecol, 28(1): 128–139. doi:10.2307/2404120
17. Yang Y F, Zhang B T, Li J D (2004). Structure and development regulationon dormancy modules of Hordeum brevisubulatum clone on cultivated condition in the Songnen Plains of China. Acta Ecol Sin, 24(2): 268–273 (in Chinese)