Photosynthetic response to variation in CO concentrations and temperature of four broad-leaved trees in Beijing region

Abstract

Responses of the photosynthetic characteristics to variation in CO₂ concentration and temperature of Ginkgo biloba, Eucommia ulmoides, Magnolia denudata and Tilia japonica were measured during the peak growing season. The results show that the ambient CO₂ concentration could not meet the requirements for photosynthesis of these four species. The optimal temperatures for photosynthesis were lower than the average daytime air temperature. Hence, the photosynthesis of these four species was restricted by the low CO₂ concentration and high daytime air temperature at the time of measurement. Marked enhancements in the net photosynthetic rate were found in all four species when the CO₂ concentration was doubled. When the dependency on CO₂ and temperature were examined simultaneously, it was seen that for increased CO₂ concentrations there was a shift in the optimum temperature for M. denudata and T. japonica towards higher temperatures. Due to their independence on CO₂ concentrations, this trend could not be found in the G. biloba and E. ulmoides data sets. The stomatal conductance (G_s) was sensitive to a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) which in turn was sensitive to temperature. An increase in temperature would cause the VPD to increase and plants might be assumed to react by reducing their stomatal apertures. The effect on stomatal resistance would be most significant at high temperatures. The restriction to stomatal conductance for these four species would increase if CO₂ concentrations were elevated at the same temperature.

References

1. Allen L H 1994 Carbon dioxide increase: Direct impacts on crops and indirecteffects mediated through anticipated climatic changesIn: Boote K J, Bennett J M, Sinclair T R. Paulsen G MPhysiology and Determination of CropYieldMadison, WisconsinAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Societyof America, and soil Science Society of America425459
2. Callander B A Harris N Maskell K 1996 Climate Change 1995: The Science of ClimateChangeCambridgeCambridge University Press151160
3. Cure J D Acock B 1986 Crop responseto carbon dioxide doubling: a literature surveyAgric For Meterorol38127145. doi:10.1016/0168‐1923(86)90054‐7
4. Farquhar G D Sharkey T D 1982 Stomatal conductanceand photosynthesisAnn Rev Plant Physiol33317345. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533
5. Franks P J Farquhar G D 1999 A relationshipbetween humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operatingpoint in C₃ plantsPlant Cell Environ22(11)13371349. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐3040.1999.00494.x
6. Gunderson C A Norby R J Wullschleger S D 2000 Acclimation of photosynthesis and respirationto stimulated climatic warming in northern and southern populationsof Acer saccharum: laboratory andfield evidenceTree Physiol208795
7. Idso S B Kimball B A Hendrix D L 1993 Air temperature modifies the size-enhancingeffects of atmospheric CO₂ enrichment on sourorange tree leavesEnviron Exp Bot33(2)293299. doi:10.1016/0098‐8472(93)90075‐Q
8. Joon K Shashi B V 1991 Modeling canopystomatal conductance in a temperature grassland ecosystemAgric For Meteorol55149166. doi:10.1016/0168‐1923(91)90028‐O
9. Lawlor D W 1993 Photosynthesis Molecular Physiological and EnvironmentalProcessesHong KongLongman Scientific and Technical260268
10. Long S P 1991 Modification of response of photosynthetic productivityto rising temperature by atmospheric CO₂ concentration:Has its importance been underestimated?Plant Cell Environ14729739. doi:10.1111/j.1365‐3040.1991.tb01439.x
11. Ma Z B Ma Q Y Han H R Chen X L 2004 Photosynthetic characteristics of six broad-leaved deciduous treesin BeijingJ Beijing For Univ26(3)1318 (in Chinese)
12. Medlyn B E Loustau D Delzon S 2002 Temperature response of parameters ofa biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changesin mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.).Plant Cell Environ25(9)11551165. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐3040.2002.00890.x
13. Poorter H 1993 Interspecific variation in the growth response of plantsto an elevated ambient CO₂ concentrationVegetation104105
14. Rustad L Campbell J Marion G Norby R Mitchell M Hartley A Cornelissen J Gurevitch J 2001 A meta-analysis of the response of soilrespiration of respiration, net N mineralization, and abovegroundplant growth to experimental ecosystem warmingOecologia126(4)543562. doi:10.1007/s004420000544
15. Sheu B H Lin C K 1999 Photosyntheticresponse of seedling of the sub-tropical tree Schima superba with exposure to elevated carbon dioxideand temperatureEnviron Exp Bot41(1)5765. doi:10.1016/S0098‐8472(98)00048‐3
16. von Caemmerer S Farquhar G D 1981 Some relationshipsbetween the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange ofleavesPlanta153(4)376387. doi:10.1007/BF00384257
17. Wand S J E Midgley G F Jones M H Curtis P S 1999 Responses of wild C₄ and C₃ grasses (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptionsGlobal Change Biol5(6)723741. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2486.1999.00265.x
18. Wetherald R T 1991 Changes of temperature and hydrology caused by an increaseof atmospheric carbon dioxide as predicted by General CirculationModelsIn: Wyman R LGlobal Climate Change and Life on Earth, RoutledgeNew York, LondonChapman and Hall117
19. Wong S C 1979 Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO₂ and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosyntheticcapacity in C₃ and C₄ plants.Oecologia44(1)6874. doi:10.1007/BF00346400