Modeling forest aboveground biomass by combining spectrum, textures and topographic features

Abstract

Many textural measures have been developed and used for improving land cover classification accuracy, but they rarely examined the role of textures in improving the performance of forest aboveground biomass estimations. The relationship between texture and biomass is poorly understood. In this paper, SPOT5 HRG datasets were ortho-rectified and atmospherically calibrated. Then the transform of spectral features is introduced, and the extraction of textural measures based on the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix is also implemented in accordance with four different directions (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°) and various moving window sizes, ranging from 3 × 3 to 51 × 51. Thus, a variety of textures were generated. Combined with derived topographic features, the forest aboveground biomass estimation models for five predominant forest types in the scenic spot of the Mausoleum of Sun Yat-Sen, Nanjing, are identified and constructed, and the estimation accuracies exhibited by these models are also validated and evaluated respectively. The results indicate that: 1) Most textures are weakly correlated with forest biomass, but minority textural measures such as ME, CR and VA play a significantly effective and critical role in estimating forest biomass; 2) The textures of coniferous forest appear preferable to those of broad-leaved forest and mixed forest in representing the spatial configurations of forests; and 3) Among the topographic features including slope, aspect and elevation, aspect has the lowest correlation with the biomass of a forest in this study.

References

1. Chica M Abarca F 2000 Computinggeostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification,Comput Geosci26373383
2. Fan J C Mei C L 2002 Data AnalysisBeijingSciencePress94117 (in Chinese)
3. Fang J Y Liu G H Xu S L 1996 Biomass and net primary productivity offorest vegetation in ChinaActa Ecol Sin16(5)497508 (in Chinese)
4. Haralick R 1979 Statistical and structural approaches to textureP IEEE67(5)786804
5. He D C Wang L 1990 Texture unit,textural spectrum and texture analysisIEEET Geosci Remote Sens28509512
6. Huang Y D Li P J Li Z X 2003 The application of geostatistical imagetexture to remote sensing lithological classificationRemote Sens Land Resour(3)4549 (in Chinese)
7. Marceau D Howarth P 1990 Evaluationof the gray-level co-occurrence matrix method for land cover classificationusing SPOT imageryIEEE T Geosci RemoteSens28513519
8. Sakari T Anssi P 2005 Performanceof different spectral and textural aerial photograph features in multi-sourceforest inventoryRemote Sens Environ94256268
9. Wang R S 1994 Image UnderstandingChangshaPress of National University of Defense Technology145183 (in Chinese)
10. Xue C S Wang X 1997 Textural analysisof remotely sensed imagery based on fractal geometry and its applicationGeoll Sci Technol Inform16(Supp.)99105 (in Chinese)
11. Zhao X W Li C G 2001 QuantitativeEstimation of Forest Resources Based on “3S” TechnologiesBeijingChinaScience and Technology Press1841 (in Chinese)