How does the improved DB mode degrade the complex integrity of infrastructure mega-projects? Evidence from the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge project in China

Abstract

Complex integrity is one of the main characteristics of infrastructure mega-projects (IMPs). Cost, technology, risk, duration, environmental impact, and other uncertain complexities are interrelated and constitute a challenging and complex management problem. At present, there is no unified understanding of or solutions to these complex integrity problems. This study analyzes the complex integrity of the island-tunnel subproject of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) project and proposes an improved design-build (DB) mode in which the owner provides a preliminary design and has the right to form and manage consortium. This improved DB mode creatively degrades the special complexities that arise from multiple dimensions. On this basis, it is an efficacious way to grasp the main contradictions, integrate the effective resources, and degrade the complex integrity in multiple dimensions and at multiple levels so as to effectively deal with the complexity management of IMPs.

Keywords

Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge project / island-tunnel subproject / complex integrity / complexity degradation / the general contracting mode of design-build / the design-build consortium

References

[1] Albrecht J C, Spang K (2014). Linking the benefits of project management maturity to project complexity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(2): 285–301

[2] Baccarini D (1996). The concept of project complexity–A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4): 201–204

[3] Bosch-Rekveldt M, Jongkind Y, Mooi H, Bakker H, Verbraeck A (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6): 728–739

[4] Brady T, Davies A (2014). Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4): 21–38

[5] Chan H S (2003). The civil service under one country, two systems Public Administration Review, 63(4): 405–417

[6] Chapman R J (2016). A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6): 937–956

[7] Chen H Q, Su Q K, Zeng S X, Sun D X (2017a). Overcoming the innovation island in mega-infrastructure project. Working Paper

[8] Chen H Q, Zeng S X, Lin H, Ma H Y (2017b). Munificence, dynamism, and complexity: How industry context drives corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2): 125–141

[9] Cheng S P, Qiu Y M, Tong J X (2016). Research on Supply Chain Management of Mega-project. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press (in Chinese)

[10] Davies A, Mackenzie I (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5): 773–790

[11] Fang C, Marle F (2013). Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modelling for project risk analysis. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(4): 239–256

[12] Flyvbjerg B (2006). From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right. Project Management Journal, 37(3): 5-15

[13] Flyvbjerg B (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2): 6–19

[14] Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[15] Geringer J M, Louis H (1989). Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(2): 235–254

[16] Geringer J M, Louis H (1991). Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 249–263

[17] Girmscheid G, Brockmann C (2008). The inherent complexity of large scale engineering projects. Project Perspectives, (29): 22–26

[18] Haynes W (2011). Infrastructure megaproject leadership, management, innovation, and accountability. Public Works Management & Policy, 16(3): 193–198

[19] Hongyun J (2005). Research on technology innovation system based on complexity theory. Studies in Science of Science, 2002 20(4): 437–440

[20] Imbeah W, Guikema S (2009). Managing construction projects using the advanced programmatic risk analysis and management model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8): 772–781

[21] Kodeih F, Greenwood R (2014). Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, 35(1): 7–39

[22] Lessard D, Sakhrani V, Miller R (2014). House of project complexity—Understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 4(4): 170–192

[23] Lu Y B, Luo L, Wang H L, Le Y, Shi Q (2015). Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3): 610–622

[24] Mohr A, Wang C, Fastoso F (2016). The contingent effect of state participation on the dissolution of international joint ventures: A resource dependence approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(4): 408–426

[25] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul M T (2007). Effect of host country and project conditions in international construction joint ventures. International Journal of Project Management, 25(8): 799–806

[26] Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul M T (2008). Implications of culture in the performance of international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(5): 361–370

[27] Pich M T, Loch C H, De Meyer A (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8): 1008–1023

[28] Pitsis T S, Sankaran S, Gudergan S, Clegg S R (2014). Governing projects under complexity: Theory and practice in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8): 1285–1290

[29] Qiu Y M, Chen H Q, Sheng Z H, Cheng S P (2017). How to govern the conflicting institutional logics in mega-infrastructure project : Evidence from the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge in China. Working paper

[30] Qureshi S M, Kang C W (2015). Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1): 165–176

[31] Sheng Z H (2018). Fundamental theories of mega infrastructure Construction Management (Vol. 259). Cham: Springer International Publishing

[32] Tsang E W K (2016). How existing organizational practices affect the transfer of practices to international joint ventures. Management International Review, 56(4): 565–595

[33] Vidal L A, Marle F (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8): 1094–1110

[34] Vidal L A, Marle F, Bocquet J C (2011). Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6): 718–727

[35] Zeng S X, Ma H Y, Lin H, Chen H Q, Shi J J (2017). The societal governance of megaproject social responsibility. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7): 1–13

[36] Zhang J W (2017). The construction management and planning of the main project in the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. China Highway, (1): 73–75 (in Chinese)

[37] Zhang J W, Sheng Z H (2014). Study on the relationship of the “government” principal-agent in the decision-making of the major projects: Based on the practice of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge project. Scientific Decision-Making, (12): 23–34 (in Chinese)

[38] Zhang J W, Zhu Y L (2012). Project management planning for construction of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) main Bridge project. Highway, (3): 143–14 (in Chinese)

[39] Zhang J W, Zhu Y L, Gao X L, Liu G (2012). Design-build contracting model development for islands and tunnel engineering of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge project. Highway, (1): 133–136 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Zhaohan Sheng, Shuping Cheng, Feng Xu, and Huimin Liu for their insightful suggestions on previous versions of this manuscript.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 The Author(s) 2018. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)