Life cycle carbon emission assessment of a multi-purpose university building: A case study of Sri Lanka

Abstract

Buildings are known to significantly affect the global carbon emissions throughout their life cycle. To mitigate carbon emissions, investigation of the current performance of buildings with regard to energy consumption and carbon emissions is necessary. This paper presents a process-based life cycle assessment methodology for assessing carbon emissions of buildings, using a multi-storey reinforced concrete building in a Sri Lankan university as a case study. The entire cradle-to-grave building life cycle was assessed and the life span of the building was assumed as 50 years. The results provide evidence of the significance of operation and material production stages, which contributed to the total carbon emissions by 63.22% and 31.59% respectively. Between them, the main structural materials, concrete and reinforcement steel made up 61.91% of the total carbon emitted at the material production stage. The life cycle carbon emissions of the building were found to be 31.81 kg·m⁻² CO₂ per year, which is comparable with the values obtained in similar studies found in the literature. In minimizing the life cycle carbon emissions, the importance of identifying control measures for both building operation and material production at the early design stage were emphasized. Although the other life cycle stages only contributed to about 5.19% of the life cycle carbon emissions, they should also receive attention when formulating control strategies. Some of the recommended strategies are introducing energy efficiency measures in building design and operation, using renewable energy for building operation and manufacturing of materials, identifying designs that can save mass material quantities, using alternative materials that are locally available in Sri Lanka and implementing material reuse and recycling. This study is one of the first to undertake a life cycle carbon emissions assessment for a building in the Sri Lankan context, with the hope of facilitating environmentally-friendly buildings and promoting sustainable construction practices in the country.

Keywords

carbon emission / life cycle assessment / buildings / sustainable construction / Sri Lanka

References

[1] Abeysundara U G Y, Babel S, Gheewala S H (2009). A matrix in life cycle perspective for selecting sustainable materials for buildings in Sri Lanka. Building and Environment, 44(5): 997–1004

[2] Abeysundra U G Y, Babel S, Gheewala S (2007). A decision making matrix with life cycle perspective of materials for roofs in Sri Lanka. Materials & Design, 28(9): 2478–2487

[3] Asif M, Muneer T, Kelley R (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Building and Environment, 42(3): 1391–1394

[4] Atmaca A, Atmaca N (2015). Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey. Energy and Building, 102: 417–431

[5] Aye L, Ngo T, Crawford R H, Gammampila R, Mendis P (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy and Building, 47: 159–168

[6] Biswas W K (2014). Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of building construction works in Western Australia. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3(2): 179–186

[7] Blengini G A (2009). Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment, 44(2): 319–330

[8] Chau C K, Leung T M, Ng W Y (2015). A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Applied Energy, 143(1): 395–413

[9] Chau C K, Yik F W H, Hui W K, Liu H C, Yu H K (2007). Environmental impacts of building materials and building services components for commercial buildings in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18): 1840–1851

[10] Chiraratananon S, Hien V D (2011). Thermal performance and cost effectiveness of massive walls under thai climate. Energy and Building, 43(7): 1655–1662

[11] Chiraratananon S, Hien V D, Tummu P (2012). Thermal performance and cost effectiveness of wall insulation under Thai climate. Energy and Building, 45: 82–90

[12] Delzendeh E, Wu S, Lee A, Zhou Y (2017). The impact of occupants’ behaviours on building energy analysis: A research review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80: 1061–1071

[13] Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka 2013 (2015). Survey of Construction Industries

[14] Dias W P S, Pooliyadda S P (2004). Quality based energy contents and carbon coefficients for building materials: A systems approach. Energy, 29(4): 561–580

[15] Dimoudi A, Tompa C (2008). Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(1–2): 86–95

[16] González M J, García Navarro J (2006). Assessment of the decrease of CO₂ emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Building and Environment, 41(7): 902–909

[17] Green Building Council Sri Lanka (2015). Green labelling. Sri Lanka website, Accessed September 20, 2017

[18] Gustavsson L, Joelsson A, Sathre R (2010). Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy and Building, 42(2): 230–242

[19] Hong J, Shen G Q, Feng Y, Lau W S, Mao C (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103: 249–59

[20] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Forth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R K and Reisinger, A (eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

[21] International Energy Agency (2015). IEA Statistics: CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion

[22] International Organization for Standardization (1997). ISO 14040-Environmental management- Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework

[23] Jeong Y S, Lee S E, Huh J H (2012). Estimation of CO₂ emission of apartment buildings due to major construction materials in the Republic of Korea. Energy and Building, 49: 437–442

[24] Kim S, Lee S, Na Y J, Kim J T (2013). Conceptual model for LCC-based LCCO2 analysis of apartment buildings. Energy and Building, 64: 285–291

[25] Kofoworola O F, Gheewala S H (2008). Environmental life cycle assessment of a commercial office building in Thailand. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6): 498–511

[26] Kofoworola O F, Gheewala S H (2009). Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand. Energy and Building, 41(10): 1076–1083

[27] Korea LCI DB Information Network (2017). CFP/EPD website, Accessed May 29, 2017

[28] Kua H W, Wong C L (2012). Analysing the life cycle greenhouse gas emission and energy consumption of a multi-storied commercial building in Singapore from an extended system boundary perspective. Energy and Building, 51: 6–14

[29] Li D, Cui P, Lu Y (2016). Development of an automated estimator of life-cycle carbon emissions for residential buildings: A case study in Nanjing, China. Habitat International, 57: 154–163

[30] Li D Z, Chen H X, Hui E C M, Zhang J B, Li Q M (2013). A methodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiency of a residential building. Building and Environment, 59: 448–455

[31] Luo Z, Yang L, Liu J (2015). Embodied carbon emissions of office building: A case study of China’s 78 office buildings. Building and Environment, 95: 365–371

[32] Monahan J, Powell J C (2011). An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy and Building, 43(1): 179–188

[33] Ortiz-Rodríguez O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2010). Life cycle assessment of two dwellings: One in Spain, a developed country, and one in Colombia, a country under development. Science of the Total Environment, 408(12): 2435–2443

[34] Pacheco-Torres R, Jadraque E, Roldán-Fontana J, Ordóñez J (2014). Analysis of CO₂ emissions in the construction phase of single-family detached houses. Sustainable Cities and Society, 12: 63–68

[35] Paulsen J S, Sposto R M (2013). A life cycle energy analysis of social housing in Brazil: Case study for the program “MY HOUSE MY LIFE”. Energy and Building, 57: 95–102

[36] Pinky Devi L, Palaniappan S (2014). A case study on life cycle energy use of residential building in Southern India. Energy and Building, 80: 247–259

[37] Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K K (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Building, 42(10): 1592– 1600

[38] Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K K (2012). Life cycle approach in evaluating energy performance of residential buildings in Indian context. Energy and Building, 54: 259–265

[39] Roh S, Tae S (2016). Building simplified life cycle CO₂ emissions assessment tool (B-SCAT) to support low-carbon building design in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(6): 567

[40] Roh S, Tae S, Shin S (2014a). Development of building materials embodied greenhouse gases assessment criteria and system (BEGAS) in the newly revised Korea Green Building Certification System (G-SEED). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35: 410–421

[41] Roh S, Tae S, Shin S, Woo J (2014b). Development of an optimum design program (SUSB-OPTIMUM) for the life cycle CO₂ assessment of an apartment house in Korea. Building and Environment, 73: 40–54

[42] Roh S, Tae S, Suk S J, Ford G, Shin S (2016). Development of a building life cycle carbon emissions assessment program (BEGAS 2.0) for Korea’s green building index certification system. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 954–965

[43] Rossi B, Marique A F, Reiter S (2012). Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Building and Environment, 51: 402–407

[44] Ruuska A (2013). Role of embodied energy, operational energy and related greenhouse gas emission of buildings in the context of developing tropical countries. In SB13 Singapore-Realising Sustainability in Tropics, 205–11

[45] Scheuer C, Keoleian G A, Reppe P (2003). Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: Modeling challenges and design implications. Energy and Building, 35(10): 1049–1064

[46] Shukla A, Tiwari G N, Sodha M S (2009). Embodied energy analysis of adobe house. Renewable Energy, 34(3): 755–761

[47] Sim J, Sim J, Park C (2016). The air emission assessment of a South Korean apartment building’s life cycle, along with environmental impact. Building and Environment, 95: 104–115

[48] Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority (2015). Sri Lanka Energy Balance 2015—An analysis of energy sector performance

[50] Tae S, Shin S, Woo J, Roh S (2011). The development of apartment house life cycle CO₂ simple assessment system using standard apartment houses of South Korea. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3): 1454–1467

[51] United Nations Environment Programme (2010). Common Carbon Metric: Protocol for Measuring Energy Use and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations

[52] University of Bath UK (2011). Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) Version 2

[53] Varun S A, Sharma A, Shree V, Nautiyal H (2012). Life cycle environmental assessment of an educational building in Northern India: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 4(1): 22–28

[54] Venkatarama Reddy B V, Jagadish K S (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Building, 35(2): 129–137

[55] Wen T J, Siong H C, Noor Z Z (2015). Assessment of embodied energy and global warming potential of building construction using life cycle analysis approach: Case studies of residential buildings in Iskandar Malaysia. Energy and Building, 93: 295–302

[56] Wu H J, Yuan Z W, Zhang L, Bi J (2012). Life cycle energy consumption and CO₂ emission of an office building in China. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(2): 105–118

[57] Zhang X, Wang F (2015). Life-cycle assessment and control measures for carbon emissions of typical buildings in China. Building and Environment, 86: 89–97

[58] Zhang Y, Zheng X, Zhang H, Chen G, Wang X (2016). Carbon emission analysis of a residential building in China through life cycle assessment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(1): 150–158

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the authorities of the General Sir John Kotelawala Defense University, Sri Lanka and the Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau (CECB), Sri Lanka for providing the valuable information needed for this research work.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 The Author(s) 2017. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)