Conceptualising the nexus of projects, finance and capacity in construction business

Abstract

This paper addresses a research question on why construction companies fail in their business. Starting with the concept of growth and capacity underinvestment archetype, a new and operational systems thinking model is developed. The conceptual systems thinking model includes a set of causal structure that can explain various modes (including the growth and failure modes) of business performance of small and medium construction companies. Mainly the three components – projects, finance and capacity – and the understanding of their nexus (or causal inter-relationships) are found to be sufficient to reveal different performance modes in construction business. Further, the three operational aspects, namely, the business growth or decline process; the situation of financial and other capacity resource consumption; and the management of projects, finance and other capacity resources have been identified as the inter-related core and integral aspects of construction business. The three inter-related core aspects could actually include and explain different possible range of business situations, policies and practices in a construction company.

Keywords

performance of construction business / projects / finance / capacity / systems thinking

References

[1] Abu Bakar A H (1993). Growth trend for construction companies: A malaysian experience. In: Proceedings of CIB Symposium. 93, 1: 524–543

[2] Alaka H A, Oyedele L O, Owolabi H A, Bilal M, Ajayi S O, Akinade O O (2017). Insolvency of small civil engineering firms: Critical strategic factors. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(3): 04016026

[3] Arditi D, Koksal A, Kale S (2000). Business failures in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 7(2): 120–132

[4] Betts M, Ofori G (1992). Strategic planning for competitive advantage in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 10(6): 511–532

[5] Bianchi C, Cosenz F, Marinković M (2015). Designing dynamic performance management systems to foster SME competitiveness according to a sustainable development perspective: Empirical evidences from a case-study. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 16(1): 84–108

[6] Bisbe J, Malagueño R (2012). Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: Does it work in dynamic environments? Management Accounting Research, 23(4): 296–311

[7] BounJour L (2014). In: Steup M, Turri J, Sosa E, eds. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. London: Wiley Blackwell

[8] Chinowsky P S (2001). Construction management practices are slowly changing. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 1(2): 17–22

[9] Chinowsky P S, Meredith J (2000). Strategic management in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(1): 1–9

[10] CIDB (2006). Malaysia Construction Industry Master Plan. CIDB, Malaysia

[11] Dangerfield B, Green S, Austin S (2010). Understanding construction competitiveness: The contribution of system dynamics. Construction Innovation, 10(4): 408–420

[12] Dikmen I M, Birgonul T, Ozorhon B, Sapci N E (2010). Using analytic network process to assess business failure risks of construction firms. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 17(4): 369–386

[13] Enshassi A, Al-Hallaq K, Mohamed S (2006). Causes of contractor’s business failure in developing countries: The case of Palestine. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 11(2): 1–14

[14] Gary M S, Kunc M, Morecroft J D W, Rockart S F (2008). System dynamics and strategy. System Dynamics Review, 24(4): 407–429

[15] Gilkinson N, Dangerfield B (2013). Some results from a system dynamics model of construction sector competitiveness. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(9-10): 2032–2043

[16] Hillebrandt P M, Cannon J (1990). The Modern Construction Firm. Basingstoke: Macmillan

[17] Kale S, Arditi D (1998). Business failures: Liabilities of newness, adolescence, and smallness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6): 458–464

[18] Kangari R (1988). Business failure in construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(2): 172–190

[19] Kim D H (2000). Growth and underinvestment: The role of relative delay. Systems Archetypes, III: 13–15

[20] Linard K, Flemin C, Dvorsky L (2002). System dynamics as the link between corporate vision and key performance indicators. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International System Dynamics Conference, Palermo

[21] Morecroft J D W (2007). Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach. London: John Wiley & Sons

[22] Ofori G (1990). The Construction Industry: Aspects of its Economics and Management. Singapore: Singapore University Press

[23] Ogunlana S O, Li H, Sukhera F A (2003). System dynamics approach to exploring performance enhancement in a construction organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5): 528–536

[24] Price A D F, Newson E (2003). Strategic management: Consideration of paradoxes, processes, and associated concepts as applied to construction. Journal of Management Engineering, 19(4): 183–192

[25] Russell J S, Casey J Jr (1992). Design engineer/contractor bankruptcy: Considerations for debtor and creditors. Journal of Management Engineering, 8(3): 278–297

[26] Senge P M (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. New York: Currency Double Day

[27] Sterman J D (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: Irwin McGraw Hill

[28] Tang Y H, Ogunlana S O (2003a). Modelling the dynamic performance of a construction organization. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2): 127–136

[29] Tang Y H, Ogunlana S O (2003b). Selecting superior performance improvement policies. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3): 247–256

[30] Wood M (2015). Insolvency Statistics. London: The Insolvency Service

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2018. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)