Perspectives in multilevel decision-making in the process industry

Braulio BRUNAUD, Ignacio E. GROSSMANN

Front. Eng ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 256-270.

PDF(803 KB)
Front. Eng All Journals
PDF(803 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 256-270. DOI: 10.15302/J-FEM-2017049
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Perspectives in multilevel decision-making in the process industry

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Decisions in supply chains are hierarchically organized. Strategic decisions involve the long-term planning of the structure of the supply chain network. Tactical decisions are mid-term plans to allocate the production and distribution of materials, while operational decisions are related to the daily planning of the execution of manufacturing operations. These planning processes are conducted independently with minimal exchange of information between them. Achieving a better coordination between these processes allows companies to capture benefits that are currently out of their reach and improve the communication among their functional areas. We propose a network representation for the multilevel decision structure and analyze the components that are involved in finding integrated solutions that maximize the sum of the benefits of all nodes of the decision network. Although such task is very challenging, significant research progress has been made in each component of this structure. An overview of strategic models, mid-term planning models, and scheduling models is presented to address the solution of each node in the decision network. Coordination mechanisms for converging the integrated solutions are also analyzed, including solving large-scale models, multiobjective optimization, bi-level programming, and decomposition. We conclude by summarizing the challenges that hinder the full integration of multilevel decision making in supply chain management.

Keywords

supply chain optimization / enterprise-wide optimization / multilevel optimization / planning / scheduling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Braulio BRUNAUD, Ignacio E. GROSSMANN. Perspectives in multilevel decision-making in the process industry. Front. Eng, 2017, 4(3): 256‒270 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2017049
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Aytug H, Lawley M A, McKay K, Mohan S, Uzsoy R (2005). Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: a review and some future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(1): 86–110
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Balas E (1998). Disjunctive programming: properties of the convex hull of feasible points. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 89(1–3): 3–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Balas E, Jeroslow R (1972). Canonical cuts on the unit hypercube. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 23(1): 61–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Baldea M, Harjunkoski I (2014). Integrated production scheduling and process control: a systematic review. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 71: 377–390
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Barbosa-Póvoa A P (2012). Progresses and challenges in process industry supply chains optimization. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 1(4): 446–452
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Benders J F (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4(1): 238–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bezanzon J, Karpinski S, Shah V B, Edelman A(2012). Julia: a fast dynamic language for technical computing. Computer Science, arXiv: 1209.5145 [cs.PL]
[8]
Birge J R, Louveaux F (2011). Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media
[9]
Bixby R E, Fenelon M, Gu Z, Rothberg E, Wunderling R (2004). Mixed integer programming: a progress report. The Sharpest Cut, 309–324
[10]
Blum C, Roli A (2003). Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3): 268–308
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2005). Bilevel programming: a survey. 4OR: A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research, 3(2): 87–107
[12]
de Weck O L, Suh E S, Chang D (2003). Product family and platform portfolio optimization. In ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 175–185
[13]
Dias L S, Ierapetritou M G (2016). Integration of scheduling and control under uncertainties: review and challenges. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 116: 98–113
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Drouven M G, Grossmann I E (2016). Multi-period planning, design and strategic models for long-term, quality-sensitive shale gas development. AIChE Journal, 62(7): 2296–2323
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Dunning I, Huchette J, Lubin M (2017). JuMP: a modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Review, 59(2): 295–320
[16]
Florensa C, Garcia-Herreros P, Misra P, Arslan E, Mehta S, Grossmann I E (2017). Capacity planning with competitive decision-makers: trilevel MILP formulation, degeneracy, and solution approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2): 449–463
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Floudas C A, Lin X (2004). Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(11): 2109–2129
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Funaki K (2009). State of the art survey of commercial software for supply chain design. Georgia Institute of Technology Report.
[19]
Gade D, Kücükyavuz S, Sen S (2014). Decomposition algorithms with parametric Gomory cuts for two-stage stochastic integer programs. Mathematical Programming, 144(1–2): 39–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Garcia D J, You F (2015). Supply chain design and optimization: challenges and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 81: 153–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Garcia-Herreros P, Zhang L, Misra P, Arslan E, Mehta S, Grossmann I E (2016). Mixed-integer bilevel optimization for capacity planning with rational markets. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 86: 33–47
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Grossmann I E (2005). Enterprise-wide optimization: a new frontier in process systems engineering. AIChE Journal, 51(7): 1846–1857
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Grossmann I E, Trespalacios F (2013). Systematic modeling of discrete-continuous optimization models through generalized disjunctive programming. AIChE Journal, 59(9): 3276–3295
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Guignard M, Kim S (1987). Lagrangean decomposition: a model yielding stronger Lagrangean bounds. Mathematical Programming, 39(2): 215–228
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann I E (2009). Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AIChE Journal, 55(1): 99–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Harjunkoski I, Maravelias C T, Bongers P, Castro P M, Engell S, Grossmann I E, Hooker J, Méndez C, Sand G, Wassick J (2014). Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 62: 161–193
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hooker J N (2002). Logic, optimization, and constraint programming. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 14(4): 295–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Iyer R R, Grossmann I E (1998). A bilevel decomposition algorithm for long-range planning of process networks. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 37(2): 474–481
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Jain V, Grossmann I E (1999). Resource-constrained scheduling of tests in new product development. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(8): 3013–3026
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Jain V, Grossmann I E (2001). Algorithms for hybrid MILP/CP models for a class of optimization problems. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 13(4): 258–276
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Jalving J, Abhyankar S, Kim K, Hereld M, Zavala V M (2017). A graph-based computational framework for simulation and optimization of coupled infrastructure networks. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, in press
[32]
Karimi B, Fatemi Ghomi S M T, Wilson J M (2003). The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms. Omega, 31(5): 365–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Kondili E, Pantelides C, Sargent R (1993). A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations—I. MILP formulation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 17(2): 211–227
[34]
Laporte G, Louveaux F V (1993). The integer L-shaped method for stochastic integer programs with complete recourse. Operations Research Letters, 13(3): 133–142
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Lappas N H, Gounaris C E (2016). Multi-stage adjustable robust optimization for process scheduling under uncertainty. AIChE Journal, 62(5): 1646–1667
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Levis A A, Papageorgiou L G (2004). A hierarchical solution approach for multi-site capacity planning under uncertainty in the pharmaceutical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(5): 707–725
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Li Z, Ierapetritou M (2008). Process scheduling under uncertainty: review and challenges. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(4–5): 715–727
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Linderoth J T, Savelsbergh M W (1999). A computational study of search strategies for mixed integer programming. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 11(2): 173–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Lotero I, Trespalacios F, Grossmann I E, Papageorgiou D J, Cheon M S (2016). An MILP- MINLP decomposition method for the global optimization of a source based model of the multiperiod blending problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 87: 13–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Mansoornejad B, Pistikopoulos E N, Stuart P (2011). Incorporating flexibility design into supply chain design for forest biorefinery. J-FOR Journal of Science & Technology for Forest Products and Processes, 1(2): 54–66
[42]
Maravelias C T, Grossmann I E (2004). A hybrid MILP/CP decomposition approach for the continuous time scheduling of multipurpose batch plants. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(10): 1921–1949
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Maravelias C T, Sung C (2009). Integration of production planning and scheduling: overview, challenges and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(12): 1919–1930
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Martínez-Costa C, Mas-Machuca M, Benedito E, Corominas A (2014). A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 153: 66–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Melo M T, Nickel S, Saldanha-Da-Gama F (2009). Facility location and supply chain management—a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2): 401–412
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Méndez C A, Cerdá J, Grossmann I E, Harjunkoski I, Fahl M (2006). State-of-the-art review of optimization methods for short-term scheduling of batch processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 30(6–7): 913–946
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Mesarovic M D, Macko D, Takahara Y (1970). Theory of Multilevel Hierarchical Systems. New York: Academic Press
[47]
Meyr H, Wagner M, Rohde J (2015). Structure of advanced planning systems. In Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, 99–106. New York: Springer
[48]
Mitra S, Garcia-Herreros P, Grossmann I E (2014). A novel cross-decomposition multi-cut scheme for two-stage stochastic programming. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 33: 241–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Pantelides C C (1994). Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. Proceedings on the Second Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Process Operations, 253–274. New York: CACHE Publications
[50]
Papageorgiou L G (2009). Supply chain optimization for the process industries: advances and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(12): 1931–1938
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Park M, Park S, Mele F D (2006). Modeling of purchase and sales contracts in supply chain optimization. In SICE-ICASE, 2006. International Joint Conference, 5727–5732
[52]
Perea-López E, Grossmann I E, Ydstie B E, Tahmassebi T (2001). Dynamic modeling and decentralized control of supply chains. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(15): 3369–3383
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Pinto-Varela T, Barbosa-Póvoa A P F, Novais A Q (2011). Bi-objective optimization approach to the design and planning of supply chains: economic versus environmental performances. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(8): 1454–1468
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Rastogi A P, Fowler J W, Matthew Carlyle W, Araz O M, Maltz A, Büke B (2011). Supply network capacity planning for semiconductor manufacturing with uncertain demand and correlation in demand considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2): 322–332
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Sahay N, Ierapetritou M (2015). Flexibility assessment and risk management in supply chains. AIChE Journal, 61(12): 4166–4178
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Sargent R (2005). Process systems engineering: a retrospective view with questions for the future. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29(6): 1237–1241
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Shah N (2005). Process industry supply chains: advances and challenges. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29(6): 1225–1235
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Sherali H D, Fraticelli B M (2002). A modification of Benders’ decomposition algorithm for discrete subproblems: an approach for stochastic programs with integer recourse. Journal of Global Optimization, 22(1–4): 319–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Širovnik D, Zore Ž, Čuček L, Kravanja Z (2016). System synthesis by maximizing sustainability net present value. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 52: 1075–1080
[60]
Snyder L V (2006). Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Transactions, 38(7): 547–564
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Swaney R E, Grossmann I E (1985). An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part i: Formulation and theory. AIChE Journal, 31(4): 621–630
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Van Roy T J (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming. Mathematical Programming, 25(1): 46–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Vicente L N, Calamai P H (1994). Bilevel and multilevel programming: a bibliography review. Journal of Global Optimization, 5(3): 291–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Wang H, Mastragostino R, Swartz C L (2016). Flexibility analysis of process supply chain networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 84: 409–421
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Yano C A (1992). Optimizing transportation contracts to support just-in-time deliveries: the case of one contracted truck per shipment. IIE Transactions, 24(2): 177–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
You F, Grossmann I E (2011). Stochastic inventory management for tactical process planning under uncertainties: MINLP models and algorithms. AIChE Journal, 57(5): 1250–1277
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
You F, Grossmann I E, Wassick J M (2011). Multisite capacity, production, and distribution planning with reactor modifications: MILP model, bilevel decomposition algorithm versus Lagrangean decomposition scheme. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(9): 4831–4849
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Zamarripa M A, Aguirre A M, Méndez C A, Espuña A (2013). Mathematical programming and game theory optimization-based tool for supply chain planning in cooperative/competitive environments. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 91(8): 1588–1600
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Zhang Q, Grossmann I E, Lima R M (2016). On the relation between flexibility analysis and robust optimization for linear systems. AIChE Journal, 62(9): 3109–3123
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Zou J, Ahmed S, Sun X A (2017). Stochastic dual dynamic integer programming. Optimization Online. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2016/05/5436.html
[70]
Zyngier D, Kelly J D (2009). Multi-product inventory logistics modeling in the process industries. In Optimization and Logistics Challenges in the Enterprise, 61–95. New York: Springer
[71]
Zyngier D, Kelly J D (2012). UOPSS: a new paradigm for modeling production planning & scheduling systems. In Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 17: 20

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 The Author (s) 2017. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(803 KB)

5567

Accesses

30

Citations

1

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/