The role of EcoCampus in addressing sustainability in UK universities

Abstract

Universities are key drivers of sustainable development and are well-positioned to contribute to the sustainability agenda. Universities in the United Kingdom (UK) are themselves large and influential organisations, and because of their size, can have a significant impact on the environment. Their challenge, however, is to practice what they preach and to manage their own estates and procurement decisions to reduce their impact on the environment and meet carbon reduction targets. In the UK, higher education (HE) sector Scopes 1 and 2 carbon CO₂e emissions have, over recent years, been falling considerably short of the emission reduction targets set by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) in all but a few institutions. Setting sector specific targets, therefore, does not guarantee success in addressing climate change. However, in those institutions adopting the EcoCampus management system approach, Scopes 1 and 2 carbon CO₂e emissions have fallen by up to 5% over the latest reporting period (2013/2014–2014/2015). This contrasts with the increase in emissions from those institutions who currently do not have a certified management system and are currently at the bottom of the People and Planet University League Table. (This is an independent league table of UK universities ranked by environmental and ethical performance).

Environmental management systems (EMSs) are increasingly being used by organisations to improve their environmental performance. EMSs deliver many benefits such as reducing resource use and pollution, complying with relevant environmental legislation, managing risks, improving corporate reputation and saving costs.

The aim of this research was to assess the carbon management performance of universities in the UK and China and relate this to the level of uptake of EMSs in these universities. The results of this research informed the development of the EMS support and awards programme called EcoCampus. EcoCampus addresses the challenges faced by universities in reducing their carbon emissions by developing an EMS in simple stages with support in a variety of different forms. This self-financing programme has now been operating successfully for over ten years. During this time, EcoCampus has worked with over 60 universities and colleges in the UK. Eighteen participants have currently achieved the highest phase of EcoCampus and certification to the international EMS standard ISO14001. There are currently 40 universities, one research institute and three colleges enrolled on the various phases of the EcoCampus programme. There are five universities from the Russell Group including Cambridge University, Imperial College London, Nottingham University, Newcastle University and University College London. The EcoCampus programme is highly successful in the UK and there is growing interest from international universities wishing to join the programme. Seven of the top ten universities in the UK’s People and Planet University League Table are EcoCampus members. All the top ten universities in the League Table have shown a reduction in their carbon emissions. In contrast, the ten institutions at the bottom of the League don’t have a certified EMS and have increased their carbon emissions.

By identifying the benefits of an EMS, particularly in relation to carbon management, it is hoped that this paper will encourage organisations to develop, implement and operate an EMS. This should lead to a more sustainable sector able to lead by example.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

EcoCampus / environmental management / sustainable development / carbon management

References

[1] Arup, CenSA and De Montfort University (2012). Measuring scope 3 carbon emissions: Supply-chain (procurement): Report to HEFCE on sector emissions by Arup, CenSA and De Montfort University. Cheltenham: HESA.

[2] Bryman A, Bell E (2007). Business Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press

[3] BS 8555 (2003). Environmental management systems. Guide to the phased implementation of an environmental management system including the use of environmental performance evaluation.

[4] Burgess T F (2001). Information Systems Services, Guide to the Design of Questionnaires Edition 1.1 University of Leeds

[5] C2E2 (2006). The 2006 Benchmark Survey of the State of the Environmental Management Systems at Colleges and Universities. Report to the Campus Consortium for Environmental Excellence.

[6] Climate Change Act (2008).

[7] Copernicus Charter (1994). The University Charter of Sustainable Development of the Conference of European Rectors (CRE), Genèva

[8] Dahle M, Neumayer E (2001). Overcoming barriers to campus greening: A survey among higher educational institutions in London, UK. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(2): 139–160

[9] Etheridge D M, Steele L P, Langenfelds R L, Francey R J, Barnola J M, Morgan V I (1998). Historical CO₂ records from the Law Dome DE08, DE08-2, and DSS ice cores. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A

[10] EMAS—The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (2016).

[11] Ferreira A J D, Lopes M A R, Morais J P F (2006). Environmental management and audit schemes implementation as an educational tool for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11): 973–982

[12] Fisher R M (2003). Applying ISO 14001 as a business tool for campus sustainability: A case study from New Zealand. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(2): 138–150

[13] GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004). World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

[14] Higher Education Estates Statistics Report (2015).

[15] Higher Education Funding Council for England (2010). Carbon management strategies and plans: A guide to good practice. HEFCE, Bristol.

[16] HMSO (2008).

[17] IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151

[18] ISO 14001 (2015). Environmental management systems. Requirements with guidance for use.

[19] Li X, Tan H, Rackes A (2015). Carbon footprint analysis of student behaviour for a sustainable university campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106: 97–108

[20] Ministry of Education (2016). Bulletin of National Education Statistics

[21] Morrow D, Rondinelli D (2002). Adopting corporate environmental management systems: Motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. European Management Journal, 20(2): 159–171

[22] National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2016).

[23] Ozawa-Meida L, Brockway P, Letten K, Davies J, Fleming P (2013). Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Montfort University case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56: 185–198

[24] People and Planet (2017).

[25] Psomas E L, Fotopoulos C V, Kafetzopoulos D P (2011). Motives, difficulties and benefits in implementing the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 22(4): 502–521

[26] Robinson O, Kemp S, Williams I (2015). Carbon management at universities: A reality check. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106: 109–118

[27] Sammalisto K, Brorson T (2006). Training and communication in the implementation of environmental management systems (ISO 14001). A case study at the University of Gävle, Sweden . Journal of Cleaner Production, 29

[28] Savely S M, Carson A I, Delclos G L (2007). A survey of the implementation status of environmental management systems in U.S. colleges and universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (7): 650–659

[29] Stern N (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[30] Stern N (2008). Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change. London School of Economics and Political Science

[31] The Varkey Foundation (2017).

[32] UNFCCC (2015).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the many individuals and organisations who have given their time and ideas to the development of EcoCampus. The initial EcoCampus pilot was funded by Environmental Campaigns (ENCAMS) and the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and led by Nottingham Trent University in collaboration with 10 Higher Education Institutions and Loreus Ltd.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 The Author(s) 2017. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)