Mechanism design of reverse auction on concession period and generalized quality for PPP projects

Xianjia WANG, Shiwei WU

PDF(210 KB)
PDF(210 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2017, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 156-170. DOI: 10.15302/J-FEM-2017016
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mechanism design of reverse auction on concession period and generalized quality for PPP projects

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Reverse auctions of PPP projects usually require the bid to specify several characteristics of quality and the concession period to be fulfilled. This paper sets up a summary function of generalized quality, which contributes to reducing the dimensions of information. Thus, the multidimensional reverse auction model of a PPP project can be replaced by a two-dimensional direct mechanism based on the concession period and the generalized quality. Based on the theory of the revelation principle, the feasibility conditions, equilibrium solution and generalized quality requirements of such a mechanism, considering the influence of a variable investment structure are described. Moreover, two feasible multidimensional reverse auctions for implementing such a direct mechanism: Adjusting the scoring function and establishing a special reverse auction rule are built. The analysis shows that in these types of reverse auctions, optimal allocation can be achieved, the social benefit under the incomplete information will be maximized, and the private sector with the highest integrated management level wins the bid. In such a direct mechanism, the investment and financial pressure of the public sector can be reduced.

Keywords

PPP project / reverse auction / mechanism design / multidimensional information / scoring function / two-stage bidding

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xianjia WANG, Shiwei WU. Mechanism design of reverse auction on concession period and generalized quality for PPP projects. Front. Eng, 2017, 4(2): 156‒170 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2017016

References

[1]
Bichler M (2000). An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems, 29(3): 249–268
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bichler M (2001). The Furture of E-Markets: Multi-Dimensional Market Mechanisms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[3]
Branco F (1996). Multiple unit auctions of an indivisible good. Economic Theory, 8(1):77–101
[4]
Branco F (1997). The design of multidimensional auctions. Rand Journal of Economics, 28(1): 63–81
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Che I L (1993). Design competition through multidimensional auctions. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(4): 668–680
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Che Y K, Kim J W (2009). Optimal collusion-proof auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(2): 565–603
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chukwuemeka A, Amadi N N, Nyenke C U (2013). Public spending on transport infrastructure and economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2): 438–446 
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
David A S, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S (2006). Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems, 42(2): 527–556
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Dequiedt V (2007). Efficient collusion in optimal auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1): 302–323
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Dong F Y (2013). Study on the system of tender evaluation index in BOT construction project. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree.Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology (in Chinese)
[11]
Hanák T (2016). Electronic reverse auctions in public construction procurement—Empirical evidence from the Czech Republic. Archives of Civil Engineering, 62(3): 47–60 
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hua A P (2014). Research on marketization of public affairs in city management—A case study of the market bidding of Wuxi sanitation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Shanghai: East China University of Political Science and Law (in Chinese)
[13]
Huang H, Chen J (2010). Mechanism design on auctioning procurement contracts and bargainin. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 13(3): 1–7 (in Chinese)
[14]
Ke Y, Wang S Q, Chan A P C, Lam P T I (2010). Preferred risk allocation in China’s public-private partnership (PPP) projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5): 482–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Lengwiler Y, Wolfstetter E (2010). Auctions and corruption: An analysis of bid rigging by a corrupt auctioneer. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(10): 1872–1892
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li L (2016). China’s infrastructure PPP mode selection research from perspective of game theory. Thesis for the Master’s Degree.Nanjing: Nanjing University (in Chinese)
[17]
Myerson R (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47(1): 61–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Nishimura T (2015). Optimal design of scoring auction with multidimensional quality. Review of Economic Design, 19(2): 117–143 
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Settoon R P, Wyld D C (2003). The ski slope to prosperity: An analysis of the potential impact of reverse auctions in government procurement in five southeast Asian nations. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 15(3): 3–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Wang C, Dargahi F, Bhuiyan M F H (2012). On the tradeoff between privacy and efficiency: A bidding mechanism for scheduling non-commercial services. Computers in Industry, 63(6): 610–618 
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wang H, Chen H M, Yang J X (2010). Optimal mechanism and its implementation in multidimensional auctions. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 13(8): 1–14 (in Chinese)
[22]
Wu X L, Zhou J, Wang J N, Chen X G (2012). The effect of two-dimensional tender contract design on investment and concession term for BOT projects. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 3: 191–196 (in Chinese)
[23]
Xu N (2014). Research on critical success factors of PPP mode for quasi-operational urban infrastructure. Thesis for the Master’s Degree.Chongqing: Chongqing University (in Chinese)
[24]
Yin H, Wang X J (2006). Optimal auction mechanism for complements. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 26(9): 60–66 (in Chinese)
[25]
Yin H, Wang X J (2008). Optimal auction mechanism design for government procurement. Journal of Systems & Management, 17(4): 365–370 (in Chinese)
[26]
Zhao D M, Wang Y Y (2012). Model and analysis of collusion between the auction agent and corruptive bidder in multi-dimensional auction. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 42(8): 26–35 (in Chinese)
[27]
Zhou Y X, Wang X J, Liu H F (2011). The bidding mechanism of dedicated capital investment and operations in regional logistics center. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 31(8): 1429–1440

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71231007 and 71373222).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 The Author(s) 2017. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(210 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/