Silk Roads for the 21st Century: Engineering Mega-Infrastructure for Development and Sustainability

Abstract

Infrastructure facilitates the movement of people, the production and distribution of goods and services, and underpins development. Infrastructure is expensive and long-lasting, and needs long-term policy, planning and management, in terms of design, construction, operation and maintenance. Infrastructure relates particularly to engineering and technology. All technological change brings economic, social, cultural and environmental change, planned and unpredicted. Mega levels of technology bring mega levels of change, effects and impacts. Mega infrastructure such as the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, the “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, announced by President Xi Jinping in 2013, will require equally mega policy, planning and management. This paper will discuss policy, planning and management issues relating to mega infrastructure and the OBOR initiative, with particular reference to energy, communications, transportation, health, emergency preparedness and response, and less predictable areas of change, for example in disease prevention and control, within the overall need for economic, environmental and ecological sustainability. The paper will discuss associated needs for education, training and capacity building in engineering. The paper will also refer to lessons learnt from the original Silk Road in the context of the development of civilizations and intercultural dialogue through the transfer of goods, services, technologies, ideas, knowledge, customs, cultures and philosophies, less predictable and unwanted transfers, for example of disease, and the need for awareness, policy, planning and management of such wider issues.

Keywords

infrastructure / growth / development / sustainability / change / new Silk Roads

References

[1] Beanland, D., & Hadgraft, R. (2014). Engineering education: Innovation and transformation. Melbourne: RMIT Publications.

[2] De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

[3] Dobbs, R., Pohl, H., Lin, D., Mischke, J., Garemo, N., Hexter, J., Matzinger, S., Palter, R., & Nanavatty, R. (2013). Infrastructure productivity: How to save $1 trillion a year. McKinsey Global Institute.

[4] Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.

[5] Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

[6] IPCC. (2007). Synthesis report, intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.

[7] Lin, J., Wang, S., Yu, S., & Qiao, W. (2015). PETOE: A new multi-sector collaboration mechanism for engineering training in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 4, 234–249.

[8] Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Pub Ltd.

[9] Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

[10] Marjoram, T. (2014a). Engineering education—Innovate and transform, for innovation and development. In Christensen, S. H., Didier, C., & Jamison, A. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education: Engineering Education and Practice in Context. Germany: Springer.

[11] Marjoram, T. (2014b). Identifying engineering: Developing indicators, epistemology and engineering studies. In Christensen, S. H., Didier, C., & Jamison, A. (Eds.), Engineering practice in context: Engineering identities, epistemologies and values: Engineering education and practice in context. Germany: Springer.

[12] Morton, O. (2009). Wanted: Green Engineers. The Economist.

[13] OECD. (2016). Integrity framework for public investment. Paris: OECD.

[14] Pianin, E. (2014, <Date>December 5</Date>). Obama says China’s infrastructure puts the U.S. to shame. The Fiscal Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2014/12/05/Obama-Says-China-s-Infrastructure-Puts-US-Shame

[15] Standard and Poor’s. (2014, <Date>January</Date>). Global Infrastructure: How to fill a $500 billion hole. Ratings Direct.

[16] UNEP. (2016). World Environment Day, background information. New York: UNEP.

[17] Wall, K . (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: UNESCO.

[18] Von Weizsäcker, E. U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M. H., Desha, C., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2009). Factor five: Transforming the global economy through 80% improvements in resource productivity. In Von Weizsäcker, E. U. (Ed.), Eanst Ulrich von Weizsächer. Springer International Publishing.

[19] World Bank. (2016a). Logistics performance index, global rankings, 2016. Washington: World Bank.

[20] World Bank. (2016b). China country overview. Washington DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview#1

[21] Xue, L. (2006). Universities in China’s national innovation system. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, UNESCO, Paris, 29 November-1 December, 2006.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 The Author(s) 2016. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)