Large Scale Infrastructure Projects: The Art of Project or Change Management?

Abstract

Although it is generally understood that change is a fundamental component of managing projects in the construction industry in general and an inevitable challenge for large scale infrastructure project in particular, there has been little to no attention in the literature to understand change in this context from a more holistic perspective. For this purpose, this work looks at change through the eyes of a framework of six batteries of change that seem essential to charge an organization’s capabilities for change. The framework brings together the expertise of four specialists that all have developed their insights over many years of study and practice, and has been validated through an extensive review of the management literature on organization development and change. Reflections on the application of this model in the construction industry and in large scale infrastructure projects demonstrate that energizing organizations to successfully deal with change goes beyond the traditional techniques of managing change from a program or project management perspective. Assessing the six batteries of change in this context can help organizations to develop capabilities for change that build change energy by balancing formal/rational methods with informal/emotional interventions at both a local (department/subproject) and global (business) level.

Keywords

large scale project management / organization development and change / batteries of change model

References

[1] Akintoye, A.S., & MacLeod, M.J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15, 31–38

[2] Barrett, R. (1998). Liberating the corporate soul: building a visionary organization. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

[3] Beckhard, R., & Harris, R.T. (1987). Organizational transitions: managing complex change. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

[4] Beer, M. (2001). How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 233–247doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00030-4.

[5] Biloslavo, R., & Friedl, P. (2009). Influence factors in change methods choice and their impact on change deficiencies: a case study of construction industry in transition economy. Journal for East European Management Studies, 14, 241–264.

[6] Burell, G., & Morgan, G. (1985). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

[7] Butler, C.J. (2005). The relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behavior in construction industry leaders (Doctoral dissertation). Boulder: University of Colorado.

[8] Cacioppe, R., & Edwards, M.G. (2005). Adjusting blurred visions: a typology of integral approaches to organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 230–246

[9] Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7, 191–207

[10] Dubrovski, D. (2009). Management mistakes as causes of corporate crises: managerial implications for countries in transition. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20, 39–59

[11] Edwards, M.G. (2005). The integral holon—a holonomic approach to organizational change and transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 269–288

[12] Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London: Pitman Paperbacks.

[13] French, W.L., & Bell, C.H. (1999). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for improvement. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

[14] Hao, Q., Shen, W., Neelamkavil, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Change management in construction projects. NRC Institute for Research in Construction, NRCC-50325.

[15] Harrington, H.J., Voehl, F., & Wiggin, H. (2012). Applying TQM to the construction industry. TQM Journal, 24, 352–362

[16] Jashapara, A. (2003). Cognition, culture and competition: an empirical test of the learning organization. Learning Organization, 10, 31–50

[17] Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: a leadership fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[18] Love, P.E.D., Holt, G.D., Shen, L.Y., Li, H., & Irani, Z. (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 425–436

[19] Love, P.E., Li, H., Irani, Z., & Faniran, O. (2000). Total quality management and the learning organization: a dialogue for change in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 321–331

[20] Mechanda, P. (2005). A framework for reducing change order processing time in university construction projects (Doctoral dissertation). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

[21] Nesan, L.J., & Holt, G.D. (1999). Empowerment in construction: the way forward for performance improvement. Baldock, Hertfordshire: Research Studies Press.

[22] Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2002). Who says change can be managed? Positions, perspectives and problematics. Strategic Change, 11, 243–251

[23] Rajagopalan, N., & Spreitzer, G.M. (1997). Toward a theory of strategic change: a multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 48–79.

[24] Reed, M. (1997). In Praise of duality and dualism: rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 18, 21–42

[25] Shang, G., & Sui Pheng, L. (2014). Barriers to lean implementation in the construction industry in China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9, 155–173

[26] Sidwell, A.C. (1990). Project management: dynamics and performance. Construction Management and Economics, 8, 159–178

[27] Smith, J., Love, P.E., & Wyatt, R. (2001). To build or not to build? Assessing the strategic needs of construction industry clients and their stakeholders. Structural Survey, 19, 121–132

[28] White, M.C., Marin, D.B., Brazeal, D.V., & Friedman, W.H. (1997). The evolution of organizations: suggestions from complexity theory about the interplay between natural selection and adaptation. Human Relations, 50, 1383–1401

[29] Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston: Shambala Publications.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2016. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)