Firm Innovation Systems: Perspectives of Researches on State-owned Key Enterprises

Jin Chen , Shu-fang Huang , Qing-rui Xu

Front. Eng ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 64 -70.

PDF (482KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 64 -70. DOI: 10.15302/J-FEM-2015017
Engineering Management Theories and Methodologies
Engineering Management Theories and Methodologies

Firm Innovation Systems: Perspectives of Researches on State-owned Key Enterprises

Author information +
History +
PDF (482KB)

Abstract

Based on the origin of the innovation theory and the technological innovation models of Rothwell, this paper puts forward four-generations of evolutionary models using the firm innovation system: “Internal R&D-Oriented Innovation System”, “Internal and External Collaborative Innovation System”, “Highly Strategic-Oriented Innovation System” and “Ecological Innovation System”. This paper dwells on the characteristics and relationship between each innovation system, and the role in the enterprise innovation especially the State-owned Key Enterprises innovation, so as to provide a theoretical and practical basis for the design and improvement of the State-owned Key Enterprises innovation system.

Keywords

firm innovation system / state-owned key enterprises / ecology / evolution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jin Chen, Shu-fang Huang, Qing-rui Xu. Firm Innovation Systems: Perspectives of Researches on State-owned Key Enterprises. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(1): 64-70 DOI:10.15302/J-FEM-2015017

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chen, J. (1999). System view and framework on the technological innovation. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2, 66–73.

[2]

Chen, J., & Chen, Y. (2007). The measurement of inputs of innovation resources under open innovation environment and policy meanings. Studies in Sciences of Sciences, 25, 352–359.

[3]

Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44, 35–41.

[4]

Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating andprofiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

[5]

Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365–382

[6]

Cooke, P. (2004). Heidenreich, Braczyk HJ, Regional innovation systems. London: Routledge.

[7]

Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 375–390

[8]

Deschamps, J.P., & Nelson, B. (2013). Innovation governance-how top management organizes and mobilizes for innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[9]

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

[10]

Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? Technicalchange and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

[11]

Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.

[12]

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82, 68–78, 126

[13]

Lundvall, B.A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the National Innovation Systems, technology and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

[14]

Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

[15]

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264

[16]

Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8, 102–153

[17]

Nelson, R.R. (1993). National systems of innovations: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[18]

Ohmae K. (1991). The mind of the strategist: the art of Japanese business. McGraw-Hill Education Press.

[19]

Roberts. (2001). Benchmarking global strategic management of technology. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 25–36.

[20]

Schumpeter, J.A. (1912). Economic doctrine and method publication information. New York: Oxford University Press.

[21]

Teece, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305

[22]

Victor, W.H., & Greg, H. (2012). The rainforest—the secret to building the next. California: Regenwald Press, 182–183.

[23]

Xu, Q., Xie, Z., & Zheng, G. (2004). Institutional analysis on total innovation management. Science Research Management, 25, 6–12.

[24]

Zahra, S.A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons, 55, 219–229

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (482KB)

5989

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/