Lean Product Development—Faster, Better … Cleaner?

Geert Letens

PDF(117 KB)
PDF(117 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 52-59. DOI: 10.15302/J-FEM-2015007
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES

Lean Product Development—Faster, Better … Cleaner?

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To address this challenge, lean product development has emerged to become the leading improvement methodology for companies toward the creation of a competitive advantage on innovation and technology leadership. While lean product development has its origin in the best practice studies of Japanese car manufacturers such as Toyota, it has been further elaborated in defence and aerospace organizations over the last two decades, and recently empirical evidence has become available for successful introductions in sectors different from the traditionally-studied environments. The primary purpose of this work is to untangle the fuzziness that still surrounds lean product development and to ground the key aspects of lean product development based on insights from six studies published in a special issue of the Engineering Management Journal on this topic. This demonstrates how better and faster product development can be achieved through the integration of lean principles with the best of more traditional new product development (NPD) practices, into a holistic system that can be characterised by value-focused and risk-based decision making, the socio-technical integration of people and process, improved project, pipeline and portfolio management, optimized knowledge management, and the creation of a learning organization. Unfortunately, while the increasing global competition offers the potential to improve the quality of life for many, the spirit of faster, better, and cheaper also threatens to endanger the future of our planet as a whole. As the majority of a product’s social and ecological impacts are committed in the design phase, it, therefore, seems imperative to investigate the integration of lean product development and eco-design principles. As a result, this work also explores the symbiosis of both approaches through the identification of tools and methods that can support the triple bottom-line goals for a sustainable future of life and business.

Keywords

lean product development / sustainability engineering / responsible design

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Geert Letens. Lean Product Development—Faster, Better … Cleaner?. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(1): 52‒59 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2015007

References

[1]
Abraham, M. A., & Nguyen, N.2003. “Green engineering: Defining the principles”—Results from the Sandestin Conference. Environmental Progress, 22(4), 233–236
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B.2003. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(5), 94A–101A
[3]
Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B.2009. Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Baumann, H., Boons, F., & Bragd, A.2002. Mapping the green product development field: Engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 409–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Beauregard, Y., Bhuiyan, N., & Thomson, V.2011. Post-certification engineering taxonomy and task value optimization in the aerospace industry. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 86–100
[6]
Browning, T. R.2002. Process integration using the design structure matrix. Systems Engineering, 5(3), 180–193
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Browning, T. R.2003. On customer value and improvement in product development processes. Systems Engineering, 6(1), 49–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Byggeth, S. H., Ny, H., Wall, J., Broman, G., & Robèrt, K. -H.2007. Introductory procedure for sustainability-driven design optimization. In: J.-C. Bocquet, ed. Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. Paris: The Design Society, DS42_P_534
[9]
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T.1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
[10]
Cooper, R. G.2000. Doing it right: Winning with new products. Ivey Business Journal, 64(6), 54–60
[11]
Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, C. A.2008. New Product Management. New York: McGraw-Hill
[12]
Cusumano, M. A.1994. The limits of “lean”. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 27–32
[13]
Cusumano, M. A., & Nobeoka, K.1998. Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies. New York, NY, US: The Free Press
[14]
Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K.2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367
[15]
Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P., & Gebala, D. A.1994. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design, 6(1), 1–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Griffin, A.1997. PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 429–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Haque, B., & James-Moore, M.2004. Applying lean thinking to new product introduction. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(1), 1–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Hines, P., & Rich, N.1997. The seven value stream mapping tools. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(1), 46–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hoppmann, J., Rebentisch, E., Dombrowski, U., & Zahn, T., 2011. A framework for organizing lean product development. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 3–15
[20]
Hübner, R.2012. Ecodesign: Reach, limits and challenges. 20 years of ecodesign—Time for a critical reflection. Forum Ware International, 25–38
[21]
Industrial Designers Society of America. 1992. 12 facts of ecological design. Innovation Special
[22]
León, H. C. M., & Farris, J. A2011. Lean product development research: Current state and future directions. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 29–51
[23]
Letens, G., Farris, J. A., & Van Aken, E. M.2011. A multilevel framework for lean product development system design. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 69–85
[25]
Liker, J. K., & Morgan, J. M.2006. The Toyota way in services: The case of lean product development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 5–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Liker, J. K., & Morgan, J. M.2011. Lean product development as a system: A case study of body and stamping development at Ford. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 16–28
[26]
Mascitelli, R.2011. Mastering Lean Product Development: A Practical, Event-driven Process for Maximizing Speed, Profits, and Quality. Northridge: Technology Perspectives
[27]
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M.2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. [s.l.]: North Point Press
[28]
Nepal, B., Yadav, O. P., & Solanki, R.2011. Improving the NPD process by applying Lean principles: A case study. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 65–81
[29]
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H.1995. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
[30]
Oosterwal, D. P.2010. The Lean Machine: How Harley-Davidson Drove Top-line Growth and Profitability with Revolutionary Lean Product Development. New York: AMACOM
[31]
Oppenheim, B. W., Murman, E. M., & Secor, D. A.2011. Lean enablers for systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 14(1), 29–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Radeka, K., & Sutton, T.2007. What is “lean” about product development? An overview of lean product development. PDMA Visions, 31(2), 11–15
[33]
Reinertsen, D. G.2009. The Principles of Product Development Flow: Second Generation Lean Product Development. Redondo Beach, CA, US: Celeritas Publishing
[34]
Ro, Y. K., Liker, J. K., & Fixson, S. K.2008. Evolving models of supplier involvement in design: The deterioration of the Japanese model in U.S. auto. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 359–377
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Seuring, S., & Müller, M.2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J., & Sobek, D. K.1995. The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 43–62
[37]
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T.2010. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York: The Free Press
[38]
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D.1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(117 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/