A Standard for the Commissioning Process

Abstract

The demand for commissioning services for new-building construction projects is experiencing rapid growth. Commissioning (Cx) is touted as being a quality-focused process for ensuring the owner’s project requirements (OPR) are met by design, final construction, and the operations of a building. To an owner this is just what is needed to receive a perfect building at occupancy. However, as many owners have realized, the Cx process does not guarantee the completed building will be what was expected. It should be pointed out that this is typically not caused by the Cx process, but the Cx process should or could have identified, in the early phases of the project, many of the issues that made it through to the completed building. There are a number of reasons why the Cx services received may not be optimal. Often it is poor communication and the transfer of knowledge between project teams. Cx should and can facilitate both communication and the transfer of knowledge from phase to phase. An adaptation of the quality function deployment (QFD) four-phase model can accomplish this by filling the gaps among the major Cx activities and provide a standard approach to the process. The four-phase model effectively links each of the Cx activities to each other and back to the OPR, providing a method for improved communication and knowledge transfer. This paper investigates some potential reasons for inconsistent Cx services, presents an argument for the need of a Cx standard, and proposes a potential standard.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

construction / engineering management / quality / commissioning

References

[1] AABC Commissioning Group. (2005). ACG Commissioning Guideline: For Building Owners, Design Professionals, and Commissioning Service Providers. Washington, DC, US: AABC Commissioning Group

[2] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (2005). ASHRAE Guideline 0-2005, the Commissioning Process. Atlanta, GA, US: ASHRAE, Inc.

[3] Barber, K. (2008). Commissioning documents: Necessary evil. Consulting Specifying Engineer, 43(6), 51–57

[4] Building Commissioning Association. (2011). New construction building commissioning best practice. Beaverton, OR, US: Building Commissioning Association

[5] California Commissioning Collaborative. (2006). California commissioning guide: New buildings. California: California Commissioning Collaborative

[6] Doty, S. (2007a). Quantifying commissioning benefits. Energy Engineering, 104(3), 20–35

[7] Doty, S. (2007b). Simplifying the commissioning process. Energy Engineering, 104(2), 25–45

[8] Doty, S. (2007c). Tips for applying commissioning. Energy Engineering, 104(3), 6–19

[9] Ellis, R. T. (2008). Commissioning: Commissioning is just the start. Engineered Systems, 25(12), 18

[10] Ellis, R. T. (2009a). Commissioning: Some solutions really aren’t. Engineered Systems, 26(11), 20

[11] Ellis, R. T. (2009b). Commissioning: Commissioning & energy conservation. Engineered Systems, 26(10), 20

[12] Ellis, R. T. (2009c). Commissioning and incomplete design documents. Engineered Systems, 26(5), 16

[13] Enck, H. J. (2010). Commissioning high performance building. ASHRAE Journal, 52(1), 12

[14] Mills E., Friedman H., Powell T., Bourassa N., Claridge D., Haasl T., & Piette M. A. (2004). The cost-effectiveness of commercial-buildings commissioning: A meta-analysis of energy and non-energy impacts in existing buildings and new construction in the United States, LBNL-56637. Berkely, CA, US: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

[15] Newsham, G. R., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. J. (2009). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…. Energy and Buildings, 41(8), 897–905

[16] Nicholson, M., & Molenaar, K. (2000). Building commissioning: Ensuring quality and savings. In: K. D. Walsh, ed. Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. Reston, VA, US: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1074–1082

[17] Shakoorian, A. (2006). Performance assessment of building commissioning process as a quality assurance system (Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree). Atlanta, GA, US: Georgia Institute of Technology

[18] Tseng, P. C. (2005). Commissioning sustainable buildings. ASHRAE Journal, 47(9), S20–S24

[19] Turner, C., & Frankel, M. (2008). Energy performance of LEED® for new construction buildings. White Salmon, WA, US: New Building Institute. [2013-02-03].

[20] U.S. General Services Administration. (2005). The building commissioning guide. Washington, DC, US: U.S. General Services Administration

[21] U.S. Green Building Council. (2009). LEED reference guide for green building design and construction. Washington, DC, US: U.S. Green Building Council

[22] U.S. Green Building Council. (2010). One billion square Feet of LEED certified green building projects worldwide. 2010-11-10

[23] Wilkinson, R. (2012). Commissioning provisions of the international green construction code. Heating Plumbing Air Conditioning, 84(4), 26–31

[24] Ye, K.M., & Rahman, H. (2011). Attentiveness of building commissioning in the Malaysian construction industry. World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology, 80, 255–259

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at engineering.cae.cn