The transformative power of generative AI for supply chain management: Theoretical framework and agenda

Huamin WU, Guo LI, Dmitry IVANOV

Front. Eng ››

PDF(1932 KB)
Front. Eng All Journals
PDF(1932 KB)
Front. Eng ›› DOI: 10.1007/s42524-025-4240-x
COMMENTS

The transformative power of generative AI for supply chain management: Theoretical framework and agenda

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The increasing complexity of global supply chains has presented critical challenges for businesses in coordinating resources, forecasting demand, and dynamically optimizing processes. Traditional supply chain management (SCM) methods are often inflexible, reactive, and prone to inefficiencies, which can result in missed opportunities and lost revenue. Technological advancements have played a pivotal role in addressing these challenges, with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) emerging as a transformative force that offers numerous advantages for SCM. Despite the abundance of literature on the role of GAI in enhancing supply chain performance, it remains insufficient in providing a comprehensive theoretical framework for the construction of GAI applications and their empowerment mechanisms within SCM. This study first outlines the core GAI capabilities necessary for constructing the SCM framework. We then examine the empowerment mechanisms and challenges of GAI in SCM and propose corresponding solutions. Afterward, we discuss notable gaps and propose a comprehensive research agenda, focusing on the SCM framework empowered by GAI.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

generative artificial intelligence / supply chain management / theoretical framework

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huamin WU, Guo LI, Dmitry IVANOV. The transformative power of generative AI for supply chain management: Theoretical framework and agenda. Front. Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-025-4240-x
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Bednarski L, Roscoe S, Blome C, Schleper M C, (2025). Geopolitical disruptions in global supply chains: A state-of-the-art literature review. Production Planning and Control, 36( 4): 536–562
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Budhwar P, Chowdhury S, Wood G, Aguinis H, Bamber G J, Beltran J R, Boselie P, Cooke F L, Decker S, DeNisi A, Dey P K, Guest D, Knoblich A J, Malik A, Paauwe J, Papagiannidis S, Patel C, Pereira V, Ren S, Rogelberg S, Saunders M N K, Tung R L, Varma A, (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33( 3): 606–659
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
ChenKZhou XBaoZSkibniewskiM JFangW (2024). Artificial intelligence in infrastructure construction: A critical review. Frontiers of Engineering Management, DOI: 10.1007/s42524-024-3128-5
[4]
Dolgui A, Ivanov D, (2025). Internet of behaviors: conceptual model, practical and theoretical implications for supply chain and operations management. International Journal of Production Research, 63( 1): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, (2024). Benchmarking operations and supply chain management practices using Generative AI: Towards a theoretical framework. Transportation Research Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 189: 103689
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Feuerriegel S, Hartmann J, Janiesch C, Zschech P, (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66( 1): 111–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Floridi L, Chiriatti M, (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30( 4): 681–694
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fosso Wamba S, Guthrie C, Queiroz M M, Minner S, (2024). ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study of key benefits and challenges in operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 62( 16): 5676–5696
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Hendriksen C, (2023). Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: Disruptive innovation or innovative disruption. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59( 3): 65–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Jackson I, Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Namdar J, (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: A capability-based framework for analysis and implementation. International Journal of Production Research, 62( 17): 6120–6145
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Li L, Liu Y, Jin Y, Cheng T E, Zhang Q, (2024a). Generative AI-enabled supply chain management: The critical role of coordination and dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 277: 109388
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Li L, Zhu W, Chen L, Liu Y, (2024b). Generative AI usage and sustainable supply chain performance: A practice-based view. Transportation Research Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 192: 103761
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Li M, Li T, (2022). AI automation and retailer regret in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 31( 1): 83–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Modgil S, Gupta S, Kar A K, Tuunanen T, (2025). How could Generative AI support and add value to non-technology companies—A qualitative study. Technovation, 139: 103124
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ning Y, Li L, Xu S X, Yang S, (2023). How do digital technologies improve supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 1): 39–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Sharma R, Shishodia A, Gunasekaran A, Min H, Munim Z H, (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Mapping the territory. International Journal of Production Research, 60( 24): 7527–7550
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wamba S F, Queiroz M M, Jabbour C J C, Shi C V, (2023). Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-century operations and supply chain excellence. International Journal of Production Economics, 265: 109015
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Xue J, Li G, (2023). Balancing resilience and efficiency in supply chains: Roles of disruptive technologies under Industry 4.0. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 1): 171–176
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1932 KB)

135

Accesses

0

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/